scholarly journals The Influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on Financial Distress

Author(s):  
Werner Ria Murhadi ◽  
Felicia Tanugara ◽  
Bertha Silvia Sutejo
Author(s):  
Arifin Syofyan ◽  
Vinola Herawaty

<p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisisis hubungankepemilikan institusi, kepemilikan manajerial, proporsi dewan komisaris, ukuran dewan direksi, dan ukuran komite audit terhadap <em>financial distress</em> dengan kualitas audit sebagai variabel moderasinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yaitu laporan tahunan dan laporan keuangan. Sampel yang digunakan adalah perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada rentang waktu 2014 - 2018. Total sampel yang terpilih adalah 160. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah <em>purposive sampling.</em> Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis regresi logistik.Hasil analisis penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel kepemilikan manajerial dan ukuran dewan direksiberpengaruh negatifterhadap kemungkinan suatu perusahaan terjadinya <em>financial distress, </em>dan variabel kualitas audit dapat meperkuat pengaruh dari kepemilikan manajerial terhadap terjadinya <em>financial distress </em>pada perusahaan perbankan.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teti Rahmawati ◽  
Yana Hendriyana

This study aims to determine the influence of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Company Size, Liquidity, and Rentability on Financial Distress of companies listed on Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI) partially and simultaneously. �The population of this research is companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) and Corporate Governance Perception ranks starting from 2013 to 2016. Based on the criteria above, 59 companies are selected. The sampling of this research is taken by using purposive sampling method from the population with a target of several considerations. The result shows that Good Corporate Governance does not significantly influence Financial Distress, Company Size negatively affects Financial Distress, Liquidity positively affects Financial Distress, and Rentability positively affects Financial Distress.� Good Corporate Governance, Company Size, Liquidity, and Rentability partially influence Financial Distress with coefficient determination is 92,25% while 2,75% is explained by other unobserved variables in outside the model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratieh Widhiastuti ◽  
Ahmad Nurkhin ◽  
Nurdian Susilowati

AbstractThis research aims to study the effect of good corporate governance on financial distress directly and mediated by financial performance. The study population was a manufacturing company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2016. The study sample was determined using the purposive sampling method, which produced 137 companies that met the requirements. The research data uses secondary data in the form of financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained through the Indonesia Stock Exchange website. The analytical tool to test the research hypothesis is Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS). The results of the study show that there is no direct and indirect impact on corporate governance to financial difficulties; while financial performance has a negative impact on financial difficulties. Keywords: Financial Performance, Good Corporate Governance, Financial DistressPeran Financial Performance dalam Memediasi Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Financial DistressAbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap financial distress baik secara langsung maupun dengan dimediasi oleh financial performance. Populasi penelitian adalah perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) pada tahun 2016. Sampel penelitian ditentukan dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling, yang menghasilkan 137 perusahaan yang memenuhi syarat. Data penelitian menggunakan data sekunder berupa laporan keuangan dan annual report perusahaan manufaktur yang diperoleh melalui website Indonesia Stock Exchange. Alat analisis untuk menguji hipotesis penelitian yaitu Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan good corporate governance tidak berpengaruh baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung terhadap financial distress; sedangkan financial performance berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap financial distress. Kata kunci: Financial Performance, Good Corporate Governance, Financial Distress 


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Endriz Devianti Fahlevi ◽  
Hasan Mukhibad

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh rasio keuangan dan penerapan good corporate governance untuk memprediksi financial distress. Populasi penelitian ini adalah koperasi simpan pinjam yang terdaftar di Dinas Koperasi Kabupaten Semarang pada tahun 2014 – 2016 yaitu 42 koperasi. Pemilihan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling dengan kriteria tertentu sehingga diperoleh 26 koperasi (78 unit analisis selama tiga tahun penelitian). Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis regresi logistik yang diolah dengan SPSS 20. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa likuiditas tidak berpengaruh terhadap financial distress, profitabilitas tidak berpengaruh terhadap financial distress, dan leverage tidak berpengaruh terhadap financial distress. Peran anggota tidak berpengaruh terhadap financial distress dan kehadiran pengurus dalam RAT tidak berpengaruh terhadap financial distress, sedangkan kehadiran pengawas dalam RAT berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap financial distress. Hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa prediksi financial distress dapat dipengaruhi oleh kehadiran pengawas dalam RAT dalam koperasi.


2019 ◽  
pp. 2010
Author(s):  
Arl Jonathan Paulalengan ◽  
Ni Made Dwi Ratnadi

The purpose of this study examines the effect of financial distress, company age, and good corporate governance on the speed of publication of annual financial statements. This research was focused in the food and beverage companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Samples are determined by non-probability sampling, purposive sampling technique. Sample criteria, the company reports its annual financial statements in a row from 2014 to 2017. The samples were 12 companies with four years of observation. Methods of collecting data with non-participant observation, accessing annual financial reports. The data analysis technique is multiple linear regression. Based on the results, found that financial distress had a negative effect on the speed of publication of annual financial statements. The age of the company does not affect the speed of publication of annual financial statements. Good corporate governance has a positive effect on the speed of publication of annual financial statements. Keywords: Publication, distress, good corporate governance, age


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.28) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Syed Muhammad Hassan Gillani Ahmad ◽  
Suresh Ramakrishnan ◽  
Hamad Raza ◽  
Humara Ahmad

Good corporate governance practices play an import role in increasing the firm value. Based on the agency theory related to corporate governance, if an agent (management) does not protect interest of principal (shareholders) then, agency cost is occurred and this creates a bad impact on the corporate performance. Therefore, it is necessary to address weak corporate governance practices in early stages otherwise firms can go in financial distress and eventually become bankrupt. The objective of this current study is to conduct a nonsystematic review of literature on theories and models related to corporate governance and financial distress. In the light of thorough review of literature, it is found that corporate governance variables (i.e. ownership concentration, board size, board composition, CEO duality, level of independence of board from management and managerial ownership) are good predictors for predicting financial distress. Moreover, it is also found that these corporate governance variables were not only used separately for predicting financial distress but also used along with others variables (firm level and country level) for the purpose of enhancing quality of financial distress models.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 46-55
Author(s):  
Sri Marti Pramudena

Objective - Financial distress is referred to as a condition in which a company's operations result in insufficient funds to meet its obligations (insolvency). The success or failure of a company greatly depends on the corporate governance of the company. This study aims to identify the relationship between the existence of good corporate governance and the probability of financial distress. Methodology/Technique - This study used secondary data obtained from annual reports from 2009 to 2014. The data is gathered from consumer goods manufacturing companies, that are listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI). The sample includes 10 companies. The method of analysis used is multiple linear regressions. Findings - The results of the study show that institutional ownership and managerial ownership adversely affect the possibility of financial distress. On the other hand, the proportion of commissioners and the number of board of directors have a positive effect on the probability of financial distress. Novelty - This study found that institutional ownership (IO) has an inverse effect on the financial distress of a company. Type of Paper - Empirical Keywords: Good Corporate Governance; Financial Distress; Corporate Performance. JEL Classification: G30, G34, G39.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-105
Author(s):  
Elysa Lisitiana Putri

The research aims to predict financial distress at the Foreign Exchange National Private Commercial Bank by using analysis of risk, good corporate governance, earnings, capital and size. Using  sample 17 national foreign exchange private banks, and data analysis techniques using Multiple Linear Regression for four conditions, namely all conditions, financial distress conditions, gray area conditions, and non financial distress conditions. The results of this study indicate that the NPL and the proportion of independent commissioners do not have a significant effect on all conditions, financial distress conditions, gray area conditions, and non financial distress conditions. ROA has a significant effect only for all conditions, gray area, and non financial distress conditions. CAR has a significant effect on all conditions, and financial distress conditions, size only has a significant effect on all conditions and conditions in the gray area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document