scholarly journals Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kebijakan Hutang Sebagai Variabel Intervening

MANAJERIAL ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Novia Dian Indri Agustini ◽  
Enggar Nursasi
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Company Performance ◽  
Company Value ◽  
Manager Behavior ◽  
Equity Ratio ◽  
Debt Policy

Background - Increasing company value one of the determining factors is ownership structure. Managerial ownership will tend to improve management performance for the benefit of themselves and shareholders. Institutional ownership can control manager behavior and enhance optimal supervision of managers. The high ownership structure within a company will make managers feel monitored and act more cautiously in the use of debt. Thus, companies must be able to create debt at a certain level so that the company's goals to increase company value can be achieved. Objectives - This study aims to examine the effect of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on firm value with debt policy as an intervening variable. Design / methodology / approach - The type of research used is comparative causal used to explain causal relationships between variables. The population in this study are companies that fall into the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) index listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2016 - 2018. Samples of 11 companies were selected using the purposive sampling method. This research uses path analysis. The value of the company is measured by Tobin's Q. Managerial and Institutional Ownership is measured by the percentage of share ownership. Debt policy is measured by Debt to Equity Ratio (DER). Findings - Based on the results of the analysis show that (1) managerial ownership affects the value of the company, (2) institutional ownership affects the value of the company, (3) debt policy affects the value of the company, (4) institutional ownership affects the debt policy, (5) Managerial ownership affects the debt policy, (6) Managerial ownership affects the value of the company through debt policy as an intervening variable, (7) institutional ownership affects the value of the company through the debt policy as an intervening variable. Research Implications - This research has implications that can provide an overview and reference for companies related to matters that can affect the value of the company, and can be used as an evaluation material for companies related to company performance during the observation year. Research limitations - The research sample consisted of only 11 companies listed in the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII), with an observation span of only 3 years, and the data used were not yet normal, there was heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation. So the square root transformation is done to improve the data.  

STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN DAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN: (STUDI PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG LISTING DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA)

Jurnal Varian ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-49
Author(s):  
Restu Fahdiansyah ◽  
Jihadil Qudsi ◽  
Adam Bachtiar
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Agency Problems ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Shareholder Wealth ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Company Value

The purpose of company management in general is to generate profit, but furthermore the management of the company is required to improve the welfare of the owners of the company or in this case the shareholders. To achieve these objectives, it is necessary to have ownership structures that can provide maximum supervision to managers in order to carry out their duties to improve the welfare of the owners of the company through increasing the value of the company. This is in accordance with the agency theory developed by Jensen Meckling stating that the manager as an agent delegated by the owner of the company to manage the company. In the process of managing the company, according to Jensen Meckling there is possible occurrence of agency problems, which arise because of the tendency of managers to not always make decisions that aim to meet the interests of principals or owners of the company to the fullest. To align the interests of managers and owners of the company so as to reduce agency problems, it is necessary to have a good ownership structure, capable of monitoring the performance of management in meeting the interests of the owner of the company. Therefore, this study would like to examine how ownership structures proxied with institutional ownership and managerial ownership can influence the value of firms that can ultimately have an impact on increasing shareholder wealth. This study tested 71 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2016 using multiple regression analysis techniques. The test results show the significant influence of variables with institutional ownership and managerial ownership of firm value, which shows that the ownership structure that allows the owner of the company to supervise the performance of the company's management can have an impact on the increase of company value.

scholarly journals The Effect of Ownership Structure and Financial Performance on Firm Value with Dividend Policy as Moderating Variable at Property and Real Estate Companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 638-645
Author(s):  
Witya Shalini ◽  
Erlina . ◽  
Prihatin Lumban Raja
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Company Value

This study aims to determine managerial ownership, institutional ownership, liquidity, leverage, and profitability on firm value with dividend policy as a moderating variable. This type of research is explanatory research with a quantitative approach. The population used in this study are property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2018. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling so that the selected sample is 16 companies. This study uses descriptive statistical data analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that 1). Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, and Liquidity do no effect on Company Value. 2). Leverage has a negative and significant impact on Company Value. 3). Profitability has a positive and significant impact on Company Value. 4). Dividend Policy cannot moderate the effect of the Managerial Ownership relationship on Company Value. 5). Dividend policy can partially influence the relationship of Institutional Ownership, Liquidity, Leverage, and Profitability to Company Value.

PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, INSTITUSIONAL, DAN PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUTANG

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Umi Murtini
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Regression ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Profit Margin ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Equity Ratio ◽  
Debt Policy ◽  
Positive Effect

This research aimed to examine the effect of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and profitability on debt policy. Samples are used by non-bank companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013-20017. Managerial ownership is measured using the percentage of shares held by managers. Institutional ownership is measured by the percentage of shares held by the institution. Company profitability is measured using Profit Margin, while debt policy is measured using the debt to equity ratio (DER). Testing used multiple regression. The results of this study indicate that managerial and institutional ownership negatively affects debt policy. Profitability has a positive effect on debt policy Keyword: managerial ownership, institutional ownership, profit margin, debt to equity ratio (DER) ABSTRAK  Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, instistusional, dan profitabilitas terhadap kebijakan utang. Sampel digunakan perusahaan non bank yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2013-20017. Kepemilikan manajerial diukur menggunakan prosentase saham yang dimiliki oleh manajer. Kepemilikan institusional diukur dengan prosentase saham yang dimiliki oleh institusi. Profitabilitas perusahaan diukur dengan menggunakan Profit Margin, sedang kebijakan hutang diukur dengan menggunakan rasio hutang terhadap ekuitas (DER). Pengujian digunakan regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan manajerial dan institusional berpengaruh negatif terhadap kebijakan hutang. Profitabilitas berpengaruh positif terhadap kebijakan hutang. Kata kunci: Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, Profit Margin, Debt to Equity

scholarly journals The Effect of Ownership Structure, Profitability, Firm Size and Tangibility on Capital Structure

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-505
Author(s):  
Tika Iswarini ◽  
Anindya Ardiansari
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Financial Management ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Company Value ◽  
Optimal Value

The important decision faced by financial management which relates to the continuity of company operations is funding decision which is capital structure. Capital structure achieves optimal value if the composition of debt and capital are able to increase company value. The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of ownership structure, profitability, firm size, and tangibility against capital structure (research on manufacturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2012-2016). The population in this research were all manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2012-2016. This research used purposive sampling method with certain criteria to determine the sample. The sample used was 38 companies with the research period 2012-2016 at manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Multiple regression analysis using Eviews 8 was used to analyze the data. The result of multiple linear regression test showed that there were three independent variables that affect capital structure they were managerial ownership, firm size and tangibility. Whereas institutional ownership and profitability did not affect the capital structure of manufacturing companies in 2012-2016. The conclusion of this research is managerial ownership, firm size and tangibility have positive and significant effect on capital structure, while institutional ownership and profitability have negative and insignificant effect on capital structure.

scholarly journals Ownership Structure and Firm Value of Quoted Consumers Goods Firms in Nigeria

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-228
Author(s):  
Godwin Emmanuel Oyedokun ◽  
Shehu Isah ◽  
Niyi Solomon Awotomilusi
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Consumer Goods ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Managerial Ownership

This study examined the ownership structure's effect on the firms' value of quoted manufacturing firms (consumer goods) in Nigeria for 2010-2018. The total numbers of quoted consumer goods firms in the Nigeria stock exchange as of 31st December 2018 were twenty-one (21). A judgmental sampling technique was used to sample nineteen (19) consumer goods firms for the study. The study sought to examine whether ownership structure proxy by managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, foreign Ownership, and ownership concentration affect firms' values of quoted consumer goods in Nigeria. Data were collected from secondary sources through the annual reports and accounts of sampled consumer goods firms in Nigeria. The study adopted a panel regression technique as a tool of analysis. The result showed a negative effect of managerial ownership on firm value. While institutional Ownership, foreign Ownership, and Ownership concentration all positively affect the firm value of consumer goods firms in Nigeria. Therefore, the study recommends that the numbers of shares held by management should be reduced to increase the firm value of the listed consumer goods companies in Nigeria. 

scholarly journals The Influence of Ownership Structure, Asset Structure, and Earning Volatility on Debt Policy in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-106
Author(s):  
Saiful Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Stepwise Regression ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Pharmaceutical Companies ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Debt Policy

The higher the proportion of debt, the higher the stock price, but at a certain point, the increase in debt will reduce the value of the company because the benefits obtained from the use of debt are smaller than the costs incurred. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of ownership structure – managerial ownership and institutional ownership, asset structure, and earning volatility on debt policy. The data used in this study are secondary data in the form of managerial ownership data, institutional ownership, asset structure, earning volatility and debt policy in pharmaceutical companies that go public on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2013-2017. The statistical method used is the Stepwise Regression, because there is high multicollinearity in managerial ownership variables, institutional ownership, assets structure, earning volatility. Based on the results of the Stepwise Regression shows that the variables entered into the regression model are earning volatility. Other variables such as managerial ownership, institutional ownership, asset structures are not included in the Stepwise Regression so that conclusion is only earning volatility variable that influences the debt policy earning volatility variables that affect debt policy.

scholarly journals FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI NILAI PERUSAHAAN NON KEUANGAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
ANWAR HARSONO
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Capital Expenditure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Final Sample ◽  
Debt Policy

The objective of the research is to obtain empirical evidence on the effect of independent variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, debt policy, return on asset, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership to firm value.The population used in this study are non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013-2016. Intake of data in this research using purposive sampling method. There are 54 non-financial companies that fit the criteria and were selected as the final sample. This study uses multiple regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The value of firms in this study was measured using Tobins'Q.The empirical results of this study indicate that the variables independent debt policy and return on assets have an influence on firm value, while the variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership have no effect on firm value.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN, PROFITABILITAS DAN KEBIJAKAN KEUANGAN TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN (STUDI PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2015-2019)

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Nadya Shafira Ramadhani ◽  
Ahmad Subaki ◽  
Ahmad Sonjaya
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sample Selection ◽  
Investment Policy ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Policy Variable ◽  
Debt Policy

ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine how the influence of ownership structure, profitability, dividend policy, debt policy and investment policy on company value in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. In this research, the method of explanation is used. The variables in this study are managerial ownership structure (X1), profitability (X2), dividend policy (X3), debt policy (X4), investment policy (X5) and firm value (Y). The population of this research is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sample selection technique used was purposive sampling. The results of this study indicate that partially managerial ownership has no effect on firm value. Profitability variable partially affects firm value. Dividend policy variable partially has no effect on firm value. The debt policy variable partially affects firm value. The investment policy variable partially affects firm value.  

scholarly journals The Influence of the Fundamental Factors on Plantation Companies’ Firm Value on the Indonesia Stock Exchange

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siska Gita Pratiwi ◽  
Robiyanto Robiyanto ◽  
Harijono Harijono
Keyword(s):  
Firm Value ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Company Value ◽  
Equity Ratio

Objective: Indonesia’s economic growth is mostly supported by the agricultural sector in which the plantation sub-sector has a significant contribution to the primary sector in the sectoral index of Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Plantation companies have a long-term goal of maximizing shareholder prosperity by increasing company values. This study aimed to determine the influence of fundamental factors on company values of plantation companies listed on the IDX during 2015-2019. Research Design & Methods: This study used secondary data involving 8 samples of plantation companies listed on the IDX using a purposive sampling method and panel regression analysis techniques. Research data was taken from the annual reports on the IDX. Findings: The results showed that Managerial Ownership (MO), Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), Earnings per Share (EPS), and Company Age (AGE) have a positive correlation to Firm Value (FV). However, the probability of MO, EPS, AGE is not significant and only DER has a significant effect on FV. Recommendations: There is a blemish in research for further research that is expanding the scope of research, and future studies is suggested to analyze the fundamental influence on FV before and during the Covid-19 period. This cannot be done in this study because the data is still limited. Contribution & Value Added: This result contributes to the financial literature and can be a consideration for investors in investment based on company value.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL, STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL, SET KESEMPATAN INVESTASI, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Purwo Adi Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Investment Opportunity ◽  
Investment Opportunity Set ◽  
Real Estate Company ◽  
Observation Period

The main purpose of this study was to determine the effect of managerial ownership structure, institutional ownership structure, investment opportunity set and firm size on firm value. The population of this study is a real estate company that listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange with the observation period 2008 to 2012. Data obtained by the method of purposive sampling and the 42 companies sampled each year. The method of analysis used is multiple linear regression by using SPSS 20.0. The results of this study indicate that: (1) managerial ownership structure has no effect on firm value, (2) institutional ownership structure has significant effect on firm value, (3) investment opportunity set has significant effect on firm value, and (4) firm size has significant effect on firm value. Key words: managerial ownership structure, institutional ownership structure, investment opportunity set, firm size and firm value

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document