scholarly journals Juridical Review on Grants of Treasure Together Of Child Due Divorce In Religious/ Islamic Courts of Kendal

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 741
Author(s):  
Bagus Malik Hakim ◽  
Akhmad Khisni ◽  
Munsharif Abdul Chalim

Divorce in the event, then the entire joint property, the property acquired during the marriage is divided into two parts, namely the upper half of the husband and half to the wife. Kendal Religious Court in deciding the division of joint property, there are in accordance with the provisions of Islamic Law Compilation, is half portion for half of the husband and wife to. But there is also, Kendal Religious Courts decide part of the joint property of the wife is greater, which is part of the joint property to the wife more than in the joint property of the husband. There is also, the Religious Courts Kendal cut off all joint property is granted (given) to his son.The purpose of this research are: 1) To know and understand the implementation of joint property grants to children of divorce in the Religious Kendal. 2) To know and understand the considerations related decision Religious Court judges Kendal in community property donated to the children of divorce. 3) To know and understand the barriers and solutions implementation of joint property grants to children of divorce in the Religious Kendal. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analytical method.Kendal Religious Court Decision on the Implementation of the Joint Grant Treasure Kids Due To Divorce Court Kendal Religion is a decision that truly reflects the sense of justice, reflect expediency and legal certainty. Therefore, when the divorced husband and wife agreed to grant the joint property willed to his son, accompanied by a deed of peace. Therefore, the verdict ideal is when it contains elements of Gerechtigekeit (justice), Zweckmassigkeit (benefit), and Rechtssicherheit (rule of law) in proportion.Keywords: Overview of Juridical; Grant; Treasure Together; Divorce.

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesraini Mesraini

Abstract: The Concept of  Joint Assets and its Implementation in the  Religious Court. Legislation in Indonesia stipulates that any property acquired during marriage becomes joint property of husband and wife, without distinguishing who works and who registered the property. If the marriage come to an ends, either through death or divorce, the property must be divided equally. In general, this study found that a panel of judges in the religious court division decided a case of the distribution of joint property is not outside of the statutory rules. Since no agreement or reconciliation had been made   by the husband and wife in dispute about the portion of the division of their property, the judge decided that the joint property be divided in the same amount. However, if there is an agreement between husband and wife, the division of the joint property will be based on that agreement.Keywords: community property, Compilation of Islamic Law, judgment, Court of Religion.Abstrak: Konsep Harta Bersama dan Implementasinya di Pengadilan Agama. Perundang-undangan di Indonesia mengatur bahwa setiap harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan dijadikan sebagai harta bersama suami isteri, tanpa membedakan siapa yang bekerja dan harta itu terdaftar atas nama siapa. Apabila perkawinan itu berakhir, baik karena kematian maupun karena perceraian, maka harta tersebut harus dibagi dua sama banyak nilainya. Penelitian ini menemukan data bahwa secara umum majelis hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam memutuskan perkara pembagian harta bersama tidak keluar dari aturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Selama tidak ada kesepakatan atau perdamaian yang dibuat oleh suami dan isteri yang bersengketa tentang porsi pembagian harta bersama, majelis hakim memutuskan harta bersama tersebut dibagi sama banyak. Namun, apabila terdapat kesepakatan antara suami dan isteri, pembagian harta bersama didasarkan atas kesepakatan yang mereka buat.Kata Kunci: harta bersama, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, putusan hakim, Pengadilan AgamaDOI: 10.15408/ajis.v12i1.980


Author(s):  
Lani Regina Yulanda

The existence of legal events in the form of death results in inheritance regulated by certain inheritance laws. In Indonesia, there is still inheritance legal pluralism, including civil inheritance law, Islamic inheritance law and customary inheritance law. In Melayu Siak community, where Islamic law and customary law are their living laws, there are differences in those two laws regarding the inheritance which then raises the question of which law will apply. This study utilizes a qualitative descriptive method with an empirical juridical legal research approach. Research data are collected through field studies by conducting interviews with the respondents to obtain primary data and literature studies to obtain secondary data. The focus of this research is to find out and analyze inheritance over the community property in Melayu Siak community. The results of the study show that 1) there is a relationship between the kinship system and the existence of the community property. 2) the inheritance in Melayu Siak community is based on the Islamic inheritance law and its implementation is carried out based on the results of the deliberation.


Author(s):  
Rizki Yudha Bramantyo ◽  
Irham Rahman

The purpose of this research is to find out how the application of children's behavior and its influence on the customary law system of the Dayak Ngaju Tribe. The research method used is qualitative. Primary data comes from observations and interviews. Meanwhile, secondary data from previous studies were collected to support the findings. The findings reveal that there are differences in the rule of law between Islamic law and positive law and customary law of the Dayak Ngaju tribe. Islamic law regulates inheritance and inheritance rights according to lineage, positive law regulates the return of cases of adoption to civil law, and customary Dayak Ngaju law recognizes adoption.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 871
Author(s):  
Pulung Jati Kusuma ◽  
Akhmad Khisni

Premarital agreements on joint property made before or during the marriage took place, the parties may determine the contents of the agreement, especially respect the innate property of each party in a premarital agreement. In Act No. 1 of 1974 About the Marriage of Article 29 paragraph (1) confirms that at the time or before the marriage took place two parties by mutual consent may submit a written agreement authorized by the employee registrar of marriage, after which it shall also apply to third parties lodged. Having made premarital agreement then the next must be registered in the district court clerk's office in legal marriages were held, the purpose of such registration in order to satisfy the principle of publicity. Background of the problem, authors conducted a study entitled "Juridical Study Of Premarital On Joint Property Which Made By Notary And Legal Consequences In The District Of Kudus". This study raises the issue of implementation of joint property on premarital agreement made by the notary in Kudus and the legal consequences of the implementation of a premarital agreement. The purpose of this study is to investigate the implementation of the agreement For Premarital of joint property made by a notary in Kudus and to know the legal consequences of a premarital agreement made by the notary. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analysis method. Based on the results of data analysis concluded that Premarital agreements about the estate property that is made before a notary in the Kudus District by husband and wife time before or after the course of the marriage as provided for in Article 29 of Act No. 1 of 1974 About Marriage asserts that the agreement must not violate limits of the law, religion and morality. Agreement it means the contents can be related to any of any one of them the separation of joint property during the agreement was detrimental to the parties and does not conflict with the nature and purpose of marriage. The legal consequences premarital agreement made by a notary it is binding and valid as the Law for the parties. If the premarital agreement that has been made by the husband and wife there was a violation.Keywords: Juridical Study; Premarital Agreements; Joint Property.


Authentica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-120
Author(s):  
Meisha Poetri Perdana

The marriage agreement is based on Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage, a marriage agreement is a means of protecting the assets of a husband and wife, this agreement the parties can determine their respective inheritance. Is there a separation of assets in the marriage from the beginning or is there a shared asset, but the method of division is divided if a divorce occurs. The inheritance of each husband and wife and property obtained as a gift or inheritance, respectively, is under the control of each other as long as the parties do not specify otherwise. The method used in this research is the normative juridical approach. The data used in this paper are secondary data and primary data as a complement to secondary data. The results of research and discussion, namely the marriage agreement that is not recorded or registered, is invalid according to the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974. The legal consequences of marital property if the marriage agreement is not registered is that the property becomes joint property and assets default. Legal protection for a disadvantaged third party is by means of preventive legal protection in which a third party has the right to assume that the marriage agreement does not exist, whereas the refractive legal protection that is the third party has the right to file a lawsuit in court. Suggestions that the notary provides guidance to register the marriage agreement deed to the Population and Civil Registry Office in order to obtain validity and publicity. And the marriage agreement must be registered so as not to harm a third party. Keywords: Registration of Marriage Agreement, Marriage Property, Legal Protection of Third Party


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-118
Author(s):  
Jayusman Jayusman

Joint property disputes after divorce at the Religious Courts (PA) under the Bengkulu High Religious Court (PTA) jurisdiction are always equally settled by giving half for each ex-spouse, regardless of the domination in working to earn the properties. The decisions refer to the article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The decisions do not fulfill sense of justice regarding the ex-wife participating in earning the living. This library research would like to descriptively analyze the progressive law reviews of the decision related to joint properties with working wives set at some Religious Courts under the Bengkulu High Religious Court jurisdiction in 2016-2019 periods, in the context of reforming the Marriage Law in Indonesia. In drawing conclusions, the data are analyzed by applying progressive law theory. The study shows that Religious Courts’ decisions are not regulated in traditional Islamic law, but they are found in contemporary Islamic law by analogizing them as Shirkah with the division based on the agreement between the parties. In positive law perspective, the joint property division has been determined with each equally get half. In the meantime, from the progressive law perspective in the context of reforming the Indonesian Marriage Law, ex-wives participating in earning living should get a larger portion of joint properties than their ex-husbands, to fulfill the sense of justice. Their portions are decided amicably on the agreements of the parties


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 488
Author(s):  
Tetty Hariyati ◽  
Wahyuni Retnowulandari

The division of community property is a very essential issue in domestic life. Regarding the positive law taking in force in Indonesia, the division of community property for Islam is regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) where the Compilation of Islamic Law regulates the division of community property for both widowed (widowed and not remarried) and divorced (divorced and not remarried). The widowed is regulated in article 96 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and the divorced is regulated in article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. If examined from these two articles, both equally regulates  if the marriage relationship broke up, the community property is divided for husband and wife, each will get a 50:50 part. However, this is different based upon  Decision Number 197K / AG / 2015 The division is greater for the wife of 60% and 40% for husband. In this case the problem raised here is how the regulation makes an arrangement for division of community property in dead condition without father and children (mati kalalah) under the law of inheritance in Indonesia and how the judge's consideration related to the division of community property in dead condition without father and children (case study: Decision number 197K / AG / 2015)? The author here used normative legal research method that is descriptive and primary and secondary data and also supported by interviews in this study.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Abdul Syukur ◽  
Lathifah Hanim

The purpose of this study was to: 1) To Know and analyze the Legal Certainty Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land and Building conducted by husband and wife after divorce based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration. 2) To Know and analyze weaknesses Sale and Purchase Agreements Law of Land and Buildings performed by husband and wife after divorce based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration. 3) To Menegetahui and analyze how solutions address the legal shortcomings Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land and Building conducted by husband and wife after divorce based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data tertiary that can support assessment,Based on the results of data analysis concluded that: 1) Rule of Law Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land and Building conducted by husband and wife after divorce based on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 on Land Registration declared legally valid if in accordance with the terms of buying and selling land and buildings in accordance with article 37 paragraph 1 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 and proving that the right to land and building will be transferred transitioning right evidenced by a deed made by and before PPAT that the deed of sale which will then be used as the basis of registration of changes in land registration data. 2) deficiencies, legal certainty deed of sale of land and building is done by husband and wife after divorce are on how the process of making the PPAT deed, the signatories of the deed of sale both parties must be on the terms of buying and selling is done in the presence of public officials who authorized and paid in cash. 3) to overcome the solution weakness against legal certainty deed of sale of land and buildings before registering the land to the National Land Agency (BPN) requirements in the execution of the sale and purchase must be taken by both sides in this case the former husband and wife so that in the future no one one side of those demanding the validity of the deed of sale.Keywords: Rule of Law, Sale and Purchase Agreements, Land Registry


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Kurnia Muhajarah

<p class="IIABSTRAK333">This research is motivated by a thought that domestic violence is every act against a person, especially a woman, resulting in physical, sexual, psychological, and / or neglect of the suffering or suffering of the household. Seeing the fact, should not be much more domestic violence, but the reality of proving domestic violence is increasing. The purpose of the study: first, to know and analyze the violence in the household that the reason for the occurrence of divorce. Second, to know and analyze the authority of the Religious Courts in handling divorce cases caused by domestic violence. Thirdly, to know and analyze the legal conse­quences of the decision of the Religious Courts in divorce cases caused by domestic violence. Researchers use normative juridical approach method. The research specification used qualitative analytical descriptive research. Sources of data in this study are some judges of the Religious Courts. As the primary data are Law Number 1 Year 1974 About Marriage, KHI and interview guidelines in a structured manner. Against secondary data, the data collection method is done by library research. The results show that domestic violence is the reason for divorce. The reasons for divorce caused by cruelty or severe maltreatment have been set forth in the following provisions: a) provided for in Article 39 paragraph (2) of the explanation of Law Number 1 Year 1974 con­cerning Marriage; b) is regulated in Article 19 point (d) of Government Regulation Number 9 Year 1975 concerning the imple­mentation of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage; c) is regulated in Article 116 point (d) KHI (Compilation of Islamic Law). These reasons are included in the category of domestic violence. In other words, domestic violence is part of cruelty or severe abuse. The authority of the Religious Courts to handle divorce cases caused by domestic violence has been regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The legal consequences of the decision of the Religious Courts in divorce cases caused by domestic violence are stipulated in Article 156 of KHI.</p><p class="IIABSTRAK333">_________________________________________________________</p>Penelitian ini didorong oleh pemikiran bahwa kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah setiap tindakan terhadap seseorang, ter­utama wanita, yang mengakibatkan fisik, seksual, psikologis, dan/atau pengabaian penderitaan atau penderitaan rumah tangga. Melihat kenyataan, seharusnya tidak lebih banyak kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, namun kenyataan membuktikan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga semakin meningkat. Tujuan penelitian ini: pertama, untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa kekerasan di rumah tangga yang menjadi alasan terjadinya perceraian. Kedua, untuk menge­tahui dan menganalisis kewenangan Pengadilan Agama dalam menangani kasus perceraian akibat kekerasan dalam rumah tan­g­ga. Ketiga, untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa konsekuensi hukum dari keputusan Pengadilan Agama dalam kasus perceraian yang disebabkan oleh kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Penelitian meng­gunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi pe­nelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif analitik kualitatif. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah beberapa hakim Peng­adilan Agama. Sebagai data utama adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, KHI dan pedoman wawancara secara terstruktur. Terhadap data sekunder, metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan penelitian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah alasan perceraian. Alasan perceraian yang disebabkan oleh kekejaman atau penganiayaan berat telah diatur dalam ketentuan berikut: a) yang diatur dalam Pasal 39 ayat (2) penjelasan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan; b) diatur dalam Pasal 19 huruf (d) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pe­laksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Per­kawin­an; c) diatur dalam Pasal 116 huruf d (d) KHI (Kompilasi Hukum Islam). Alasan ini termasuk dalam kategori kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Dengan kata lain, kekerasan dalam rumah tangga adalah bagian dari kekejaman atau penganiayaan berat. Kewenangan Peng­adilan Agama untuk menangani kasus perceraian akibat ke­kerasan dalam rumah tangga telah diatur dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Konsekuensi hukum dari keputusan Pengadilan Agama dalam kasus perceraian yang disebabkan oleh kekerasan dalam rumah tangga diatur dalam Pasal 156 KHI.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Tinuk Dwi Cahyani

Case Number: 0701 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Mlg is the product of the Malang Religious Court which has permanent legal force. In fact, after the ruling gets permanent legal force, it is known that the parties have a joint debt which causes problems for the parties who are responsible for paying off the joint debt if the decision only regulates the share of each of these assets. The problems in this study are: 1) The judge's decision regarding the division of joint assets in terms of legal certainty and justice in the decision Number: 0701 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Mlg. 2) The implementation of sharing the shared assets 3) The implementation of shared debt division if there is no decision by the judge, in fact there is a joint debt. The author uses an empirical juridical research method located in the Malang Religious Court. Primary data is obtained by interviewing the Head and the Registrar of the Malang Religious Court and the Judge who handled the case Number: 0701 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PA.Mlg and the secondary data is obtained from research and literature review which consisted of laws and other legal materials which are relevant. Regarding the opinion of the Panel of Judges on the decision of 0701 / Pdt.G /2014 / PA.Mlg it can be learned from legal considerations in the a quo decision. In general, the principles of justice and legal certainty must be upheld. Justice must be upheld in accordance with the provisions of Article 35 to 37 of Act Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 85 up to Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document