Legal Consequences of the Marriage Agreement Made by Notaries, Then Not Registered

Authentica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-120
Author(s):  
Meisha Poetri Perdana

The marriage agreement is based on Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage, a marriage agreement is a means of protecting the assets of a husband and wife, this agreement the parties can determine their respective inheritance. Is there a separation of assets in the marriage from the beginning or is there a shared asset, but the method of division is divided if a divorce occurs. The inheritance of each husband and wife and property obtained as a gift or inheritance, respectively, is under the control of each other as long as the parties do not specify otherwise. The method used in this research is the normative juridical approach. The data used in this paper are secondary data and primary data as a complement to secondary data. The results of research and discussion, namely the marriage agreement that is not recorded or registered, is invalid according to the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974. The legal consequences of marital property if the marriage agreement is not registered is that the property becomes joint property and assets default. Legal protection for a disadvantaged third party is by means of preventive legal protection in which a third party has the right to assume that the marriage agreement does not exist, whereas the refractive legal protection that is the third party has the right to file a lawsuit in court. Suggestions that the notary provides guidance to register the marriage agreement deed to the Population and Civil Registry Office in order to obtain validity and publicity. And the marriage agreement must be registered so as not to harm a third party. Keywords: Registration of Marriage Agreement, Marriage Property, Legal Protection of Third Party

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 204
Author(s):  
Dinaselina Chintya Kosasih ◽  
Ambar Budhisulistyawati

<p>Abstract<br />This articles aims to  find out about the mechanism of transactions and profit sharing at PT Sukses  Integritas Perkasa  and legal protection towards Multi-Level Marketing business members in case  settlement during the Multi-Level Marketing business activities in the case study of PT Sukses  Integritas Perkasa. This research is categorized as a descriptive empirical study. It is using a qualitative approach and primary data support and secondary data. According to the research finding, the legal protection of PT Sukses Integritas Perkasa members in case if a dispute occurs has been stated in the company code of ethics based on applicable regulations in Indonesia. The company code of ethics has elaborated the dispute resolution if a dispute occurs, whereby deliberation and consensus are prioritized prior to other resolution alternatives. In case of the deliberation and consensus failure, dispute resolution alternatives would refer to attend the third party that is arbitration based on Indonesia National Arbitrage Organization (BANI).<br />Keywords : Multi-Level Marketing; Legal Protection; Dispute Resolution.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mekanisme transaksi beserta pembagian reward dalam  PT Sukses Integritas Perkasa dan perlindungan hukum bagi para anggota Multi Level Marketing tersebut beserta cara penyelesaiannya khususnya pada perusahaan MLM PT Sukses Integritas Perkasa. Penulisan hukum ini merupakan jenis penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deksriptif. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan pendekatan data kualitatif dan jenis data berupa data primer serta data sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat diketahui, bahwa perlindungan Hukum terhadap anggota PT Sukses Integritas Perkasa apabila terjadi perselisihan sudah tertuang dalam kode etik perusahaan yang berpedoman pada peraturan-peraturan yang sudah ada terlebih dahulu dan berlaku di Indonesia. Kode etik perusahaan juga telah menguraikan mengenai penyelesaian sengketa apabila terjadi perselisihan dimana diselesaikan secara damai terleboh dahulu yaitu dengan musyawarah dan mufakat. Pelaksanaan musyawarah dan mufakat apabila tidak menemui titik temu maka akan penyelesaian akan menggunakan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dengan cara menghadirkan pihak ke tiga yaitu arbitrase yang berpedoman pada peraturan yang ada di  Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia (BANI).<br />Kata Kunci: Multi Level Marketing; Perlindungan Hukum; Penyelesaian Sengketa.</p>


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 871
Author(s):  
Pulung Jati Kusuma ◽  
Akhmad Khisni

Premarital agreements on joint property made before or during the marriage took place, the parties may determine the contents of the agreement, especially respect the innate property of each party in a premarital agreement. In Act No. 1 of 1974 About the Marriage of Article 29 paragraph (1) confirms that at the time or before the marriage took place two parties by mutual consent may submit a written agreement authorized by the employee registrar of marriage, after which it shall also apply to third parties lodged. Having made premarital agreement then the next must be registered in the district court clerk's office in legal marriages were held, the purpose of such registration in order to satisfy the principle of publicity. Background of the problem, authors conducted a study entitled "Juridical Study Of Premarital On Joint Property Which Made By Notary And Legal Consequences In The District Of Kudus". This study raises the issue of implementation of joint property on premarital agreement made by the notary in Kudus and the legal consequences of the implementation of a premarital agreement. The purpose of this study is to investigate the implementation of the agreement For Premarital of joint property made by a notary in Kudus and to know the legal consequences of a premarital agreement made by the notary. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analysis method. Based on the results of data analysis concluded that Premarital agreements about the estate property that is made before a notary in the Kudus District by husband and wife time before or after the course of the marriage as provided for in Article 29 of Act No. 1 of 1974 About Marriage asserts that the agreement must not violate limits of the law, religion and morality. Agreement it means the contents can be related to any of any one of them the separation of joint property during the agreement was detrimental to the parties and does not conflict with the nature and purpose of marriage. The legal consequences premarital agreement made by a notary it is binding and valid as the Law for the parties. If the premarital agreement that has been made by the husband and wife there was a violation.Keywords: Juridical Study; Premarital Agreements; Joint Property.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Mardianto

The right of a trademark is an exclusive right granted by government. A registered trademark can be cancelled from the General List of Trademark. Cancellation of registration of a trademark can be claimed by a third party through a dispute to a Commercial Court based on article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001. This research is aimed at studying the use of article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001 as the base of dispute for cancelation of the registration of a trademark by a third party, and studying the legal consequences of a trademark cancelation. A qualitative juridicial normative method with descriptive analyses approaches was used to analyze secondary data derived from documents of decisions of Commercial Court of Central Jakarta Number 06/Merek/205/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST and documents of decisions of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 031K/N/HaKI2005. The result of the research showed that the application of article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001 for the base of decision of the judges of Commercial Court of Central Jakarta was inappropritate. In judging at the use of a trademark, the judges only looked at the inconsistency of writtting styles or fonts or colours, but not taking into considerations of the purpose and intention of the parties that claimed the dispute. Cancelation of regitration of a trademark based on the dispute of a third party automatically resulted in the termination of legal protection of the related trademark.Keywords: trademark, cancelation of a trademark, third party, good intention, Commercial Court


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
James Ridwan Efferin

<p class="Default">A Partnership Firm (“Firma”) and a Limited Partnership/Commanditaire Vennootschap (“CV”) in Indonesia are regulated in the First Book of the Commercial Code of Indonesia, chapter the Third (Regarding the various Companies), in the First and Second section.</p><p class="Default">Both partnerships are considered to be the special form of the civil partnership/Maatschap, which is regulated in the Civil Code of Indonesia (Article 1618 – 1652).</p><p class="Default">According to Rudhi Prasetya, “In practice, it is not uncommon for us to see a Firma or CV that has only 2 partners, of which they are husband [and] wife.”</p><p class="Default">Therefore the main issue will be the legitimacy of the said partnership if it has only a husband and wife as the founders/partners, especially if the said husband and wife do not make any separate marital property agreement.</p><p class="Default">What will be the legal consequences if the said condition happens, especially the external liability to the third party.</p><p class="Default">The main objective of this writing is to give an argumentation and the legal standing that a married couple can actually establish and be the sole founders/partners in a partnership with all of its consequences, even though they did not make any separate marital property agreement.</p>


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  
Magmun Migfar ◽  
Amin Purnawan

ABSTRAKDalam memberikan kredit, Perusahaan Pembiayaan wajib mempunyai keyakinan didasarkan pada unsur perinsip kehati-hatian biasa di kenal dengan 5C, yaitu terdiri dari character (watak), capacity (kemampuan), capital (modal), collateral (jaminan), dan condition of economic (kondisi ekonomi).Di dalam penelitian penulis membuat rumusan masalahanuntuk mengetahui tanggung jawab para pihak dalam pembutan akta jaminan fidusia pada Notaris dan penyelesaian sengketanya apabila debitur mengalihkan objek jaminan fidusia tanpa persetujuan tertulis oleh pihak PT. Bussan auto Finance (BAF) Rembang.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang bersifat diskriptif dan apabila dilihat dari tujuannya teremasuk penelitian hukum empiris. Lokasi penelitian di PT. BAF Rembang. Jenis data yang digunakan meliputi data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang dipergunakan yaitu melalui penelitian kepustakaan dan wawancara. Analisis data menggunakan kualitatif analitis.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat diketahui dalam perjanjian pembiayaan antara kreditur dan debitur saling mengikatkan diri, debitur harus membaca dan memahami surat perjanjian pembiayaan, sebelum melakukan kesepakatan sengan Leasing, setelah menandatangi perjanjian pembiayaan, debitur harus memenuhi kewajiban membayar angsuran secara tepat waktu sesuai dengan besaran dan tanggal yang telah disepakati, kemudian timbulah hak dan kewajiban supaya jangan sampai ada konflik atau kesalah pahaman yang bias merugikan debitur dikemudian hari.Dalam hal benda jaminan yang menjadi objek jaminan fidusia dialihkan kepada pihak ketiga berlaku asas drot de suite, kreditur tetap dapat mengeksekusi benda jaminan tersebut di tangan siapaun benda tersebut berada. Pengalihan benda yang menjadi objek jaminan fidusia pada pihak ketiga dan seterusnya tidak menghalangi hak kreditur untuk tetap mengeksekusi benda jaminan fidusia tersebut. Memang dalam peneyelesain sengketa benda jamian fidusia di PT BAF Rembang masih mengedepankan cara musyawarah dahulu akan tetapi jika PT BAF Rembang berpedoman pada POJK No.29/POJK.05/2014 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Usaha Perusahaan Pembiayaan dan perlu adanya pendampingan dai pihak kepolisian maka akan sangat mudah dan mungkin untuk mengatasi debitur yang nakal.Kata kunci : Debitur, Kreditur, Eksekusi Benda Jaminan Fidusia.           ABSTRACTIn granting credit, a Financing Company must have confidence based on the usual principle of prudence known as 5C, which consists of character, capability, capital, collateral and condition of economic ( economic conditions). In the study the authors make the formulation of the problem to know the responsibility of the parties in the fiduciary guarantee certificate pembutan notary and settlement of disputes if the debtor divert the fiduciary guarantee object without written approval by the PT. Bussan auto Finance (BAF) Rembang.Penelitian is a descriptive study and when viewed from its purpose including research empirical law. Research location at PT. BAF Rembang. Types of data used include primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used are through literature research and interviews. Analytical data use qualitative analytical.Based on the results of the research can be known in the financing agreement between the creditor and the debtor bind each other, the debtor must read and understand the letter of financing agreement, before making leasing agreement, after signing the financing agreement, the debtor must meet the obligation to pay installments in a timely manner in accordance with the amount and date which has been agreed, then arise rights and obligations so that there will be no conflicts or misunderstandings that bias detrimental to the debtor in the future. In the event that the collateral object becomes the object of fiduciary guarantee transferred to a third party applies the principle of drot de suite, the lender can still execute the guarantee object in the hands of whoever the object is located. The transfer of objects which become the object of fiduciary collateral to a third party and so on shall not preclude the right of the creditor to keep executing the fiduciary assurance object. Indeed, in peneyelesain dispute fiduciary jamian objects in PT BAF Rembang still put forward the first musyawarah way but if PT BAF Rembang based on POJK No.29 / POJK.05 / 2014 About the Implementation of Financing Company Business and the need for assistance from the police then it will be very easy and possibly to deal with naughty debtors.Keywords: Debtor, Creditors, Execution of Fiduciary Guarantee Items.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 485
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hilmi Akhsin ◽  
Anis Mashdurohatun

ABSTRACTFiduciary agreements by notarial deed are not sufficient, but should be continued with fiduciary registrants. Fiduciary agreements set forth in notarial deeds without registration do not grant preferential rights to fiduciary recipients. Whereas the objective of Law Number 42 Year 1999 is basically to provide legal protection for creditors from losses caused by default from debtor. From this, the authors in this thesis take the title "Consequences of Fiduciary Guaranty Laws Not Registered According to Law Number 42 Year 1999." With the scope of the issues covered include: (1) How the procedure or implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia; (2) What are the constraints and solutions in the implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia, and (3) What are the consequences of fiduciary guarantee law enlisted under Law No. 42 of 1999.To obtain the results of research from these problems, the authors use the scientific method with an approach that is juridical empirical and normatiif. Empirically that is researching secondary data first and then continued by conducting research of primary data in field. The jurisdiction is to study the rules that exist with the problem in the perusal.Furthermore, from the results of the research can obtain the understanding that the first, that the credit agreement made by debtors and creditors is the principal agreement that refers to the general principles of the agreement, while the imposition of fiduciary collateral meruapakan follow-up agreement or accesoir, which registers it has been regulated by Law No. 42 of 1999 , And set further through Government Regulation No. 21 of 2015; Second, the registration of fiduciary security is a creditor's obligation, but sometimes the creditor does not register it, for cost reasons or because the treaty deed is made under the hand. Therefore, the right of the fiduciary guarantee certificate is categorized as a treaty under the hand. Therefore, the solution taken by the creditors can make the settlement by deliberation or applying through the judiciary. Third, Fiduciary Guarantees must be made by the Deed of Natariil (Notarial Deed) and registered to the Office of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, in order to have executorial power, in addition, the creditor will obtain the preferred right. If fiduciary warranties are not made under the hands and are not registered in accordance with legislative provisions, they have no executorial force, and the right of preference and may become void (vernitigbarheid).Whereas to further realize the main principle of Fiduciary Guarantee provides legal protection for the parties, it is necessary to revise the regulation of fiduciary guarantee in legislation in order to give more legal certainty.Keywords: Fiduciary Security, Registration Procedures, and Legal EffectsABSTRACT Fiduciary agreements by notarial deed are not sufficient, but should be continued with fiduciary registrants. Fiduciary agreements set forth in notarial deeds without registration do not grant preferential rights to fiduciary recipients. Whereas the objective of Law Number 42 Year 1999 is basically to provide legal protection for creditors from losses caused by default from debtor. From this, the authors in this thesis take the title "Consequences of Fiduciary Guaranty Laws Not Registered According to Law Number 42 Year 1999." With the scope of the issues covered include: (1) How the procedure or implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia; (2) What are the constraints and solutions in the implementation of credit with fiduciary guarantee in Indonesia, and (3) What are the consequences of fiduciary guarantee law enlisted under Law No. 42 of 1999.To obtain the results of research from these problems, the authors use the scientific method with an approach that is juridical empirical and normatiif. Empirically that is researching secondary data first and then continued by conducting research of primary data in field. The jurisdiction is to study the rules that exist with the problem in the perusal.Furthermore, from the results of the research can obtain the understanding that the first, that the credit agreement made by debtors and creditors is the principal agreement that refers to the general principles of the agreement, while the imposition of fiduciary collateral meruapakan follow-up agreement or accesoir, which registers it has been regulated by Law No. 42 of 1999 , And set further through Government Regulation No. 21 of 2015; Second, the registration of fiduciary security is a creditor's obligation, but sometimes the creditor does not register it, for cost reasons or because the treaty deed is made under the hand. Therefore, the right of the fiduciary guarantee certificate is categorized as a treaty under the hand. Therefore, the solution taken by the creditors can make the settlement by deliberation or applying through the judiciary. Third, Fiduciary Guarantees must be made by the Deed of Natariil (Notarial Deed) and registered to the Office of the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, in order to have executorial power, in addition, the creditor will obtain the preferred right. If fiduciary warranties are not made under the hands and are not registered in accordance with legislative provisions, they have no executorial force, and the right of preference and may become void (vernitigbarheid).Whereas to further realize the main principle of Fiduciary Guarantee provides legal protection for the parties, it is necessary to revise the regulation of fiduciary guarantee in legislation in order to give more legal certainty.Keywords: Fiduciary Security, Registration Procedures, and Legal Effects


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32
Author(s):  
Ananta Budhi Danurdara

Apprenticeship program is one part of the laborrs force in Indonesia, apprentices basically get the same protection with other labors, but in Indonesia there are many industries that do not provide rights that should be given to participants of the internship program. The purpose of this study was to determine, assess, examine and analyze how the legal protection for participants in apprenticeship programs and practices to determine, assess, examine and analyze an obstacle in the implementation of the apprenticeship program. Study used is descriptive nature Analytical. Secondary data was obtained from the research literature and reinforced with Primary Data obtained from interviews daan questionnaire. Stages of the research literature research and field research. Techniques of data collection are through literature study and interviews. Methods of data analysis using Likert method. The results showed that the occurrence of violations of rights protection for participants in the company's apprenticeship program in terms of three main components, namely Statutory Rights, Contractual Rights and Other Rights on the Protection of Rights Internship Program participants have not been frilly implemented in practice yet. This is because there are some companies who do not exercise rights apprenticeship program participants in the form of the right to obtain employment injury insurance and the right to earn pocket money and or transport money and not doing the apprenticeship agreement in writing between the parties with the company's apprenticeship program participants in a company. Other authors propose recommendations for the educational institutions and industry especially Hotel XYZ at Bandung management to address the existing problems. The purpose of these recommendations is to provide input to the hotel in order to provide protection Rights Internship Program Participants in accordance with the rules of government.


SEEU Review ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93
Author(s):  
Emine Zendeli

Abstract This research article analyzes the right of disposal of marital property in relation to the undertaking of those legal actions that imply the highest authorizations that legal subjects can have over things. Having in consideration the fact that according to the legislation in the Republic of Macedonia, marital property is joint as are the authorizations of spouses over their joint items, it is important to determine the extent of the disposal, i.e. who disposes of the items of the joint property and to what extent. Referring to the normative framework, which regulates disposal relations of spouses, the article emphasizes the concept and importance of the authorization of disposal of things (alienation or assignment of things from joint ownership), through legal activities (sale, donation, exchange, etc.). In this context, the article tends to draw a divisive line between the administration with the joint item, referring to continuative actions and measures and the disposal of the thing, which is not continuative but, due to legal consequences it causes, has great importance in practice, and as a result, enjoys greater attention in legislators in terms of its limitation compared to the acts of administration with joint items in marriage.


LITIGASI ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mulyanto Mulyanto ◽  
Sutapa Mulja Widada

  The purpose of this study was to describe the root causes of conflict and the palace of King Twins conflict resolution patterns Keraton Surakarta Sultanate . The method used is descriptive method sosiolegal . This study is located in the Keraton Surakarta using primary data and secondary data. Techniques of qualitative data analysis by using the theoretical interpretation. The results showed that the root of the problem is basically this conflict began Keraton Surakarta since the death of Paku Buwana XII on June 11, 2004. The conflict between the heir to the throne of Kanjeng Gusti Pangeran Harya (KGPH) Hangabehi and KGPH Tedjowulan born of different mothers. Patterns of conflict resolution involving a third party (mediation) mechanisms beyond traditional law paugeran palace. Lastly, Mediation of legal protection based Surakarta Mayor Letter No. 181.1/6619/SJ Minister mentioned that the mayor coordinate with Deliberation forums Regional Head (Muspida) and family Keraton Solo Kasunanan, to resolve conflicts and protect the palace as a cultural heritage. Keywords : Mediation; Conflict; Local Wisdom.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Triana Widati ◽  
Hudi Asrori ◽  
Pujiyono ,

<p>Abstract<br />This article examines the legal protection of BPJS emergency patients with diagnoses beyond the emergency diagnostic list and factors that may inhibit the emergency services for BPJS user patients at the Sukoharjo District Hospital. This type of research is empirical. Form of research is deskriptif. The dara used are primary data, secondary data and tertiery data collection methode of documentation and interviews. Analysis of data using qualitative analysis. Based on the description of the results of research and discussion in connection with the considered promblems with the teory of the working of the legal system and the legal protection teory, it can be concluded that the legal protection of BPJS participants and the right to submit a complaint related to the health service in the National Health Insurance (JKN). Based on Article 25 letter b of Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2013, services that are not guaranteed are services performed in health facilities that are not cooperated with BPJS Health, except in emergency conditions, but the emergency condition condition has also been determined, if the people who have emergency discharge. Factors that can inhibit the emergency services for patients using BPJS in RSUD Sukoharjo District, among others, the legal factor which limits the emergency conditions.<br />Key Word: Legal Protection; Patients; Emergency Diagnosis</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perlindungan hukum bagi pasien kegawatdaruratan BPJS dengan diagnosa di luar daftar diagnosa gawat darurat dan faktor-faktor yang dapat menghambat <br />dalam  pelayanan  kegawatdaruratan  bagi  pasien  pengguna  BPJS    di    RSUD  Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jenis penelitian ini adalah empiris. Bentuk penelitian deskriptif analitis. Data yang digunakan adalah data primer, sekunder dan tersier dengan pengumpulan data dokumentasi dan wawancara. Analisis data menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Berdasarkan deskripsi hasil penelitian dan pembahasan sehubungan dengan masalah yang dikaji dengan teori bekerjanya hukum dan teori perlindungan hukum dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlindungan hukum peserta BPJS didasari oleh perlindungan hak memperoleh pelayanan kesehatan sebagai peserta BPJS dan hak menyampaikan keluhan terkait dengan pelayanan kesehatan dalam Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN). Berdasarkan Pasal 25 huruf b Perpres Nomor 12 tahun 2013 pelayanan yang tidak dijamin adalah pelayanan yang dilakukan di fasilitas kesehatan yang tidak bekerjasama dengan BPJS Kesehatan, kecuali dalam kondisi gawat darurat, namun demikian kondisi kegawat daruratannya juga telah ditentukan, apabila orang-orang yang mengalami kegawatdaruratan yang tidak tertulis maka tidak ditanggung oleh BPJS. Faktor-faktor yang dapat menghambat dalam pelayanan kegawatdaruratan bagi pasien pengguna BPJS  di  RSUD Kabupaten Sukoharjo antara lain faktor hukum yang membatasi kondisi kegawatdaruratan. <br />Kata kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Pasien; Kegawatdaruratan.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document