scholarly journals The decision on joint properties in Bengkulu High Religious Court Jurisdiction

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-118
Author(s):  
Jayusman Jayusman
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Joint Properties ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Joint Property

Joint property disputes after divorce at the Religious Courts (PA) under the Bengkulu High Religious Court (PTA) jurisdiction are always equally settled by giving half for each ex-spouse, regardless of the domination in working to earn the properties. The decisions refer to the article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The decisions do not fulfill sense of justice regarding the ex-wife participating in earning the living. This library research would like to descriptively analyze the progressive law reviews of the decision related to joint properties with working wives set at some Religious Courts under the Bengkulu High Religious Court jurisdiction in 2016-2019 periods, in the context of reforming the Marriage Law in Indonesia. In drawing conclusions, the data are analyzed by applying progressive law theory. The study shows that Religious Courts’ decisions are not regulated in traditional Islamic law, but they are found in contemporary Islamic law by analogizing them as Shirkah with the division based on the agreement between the parties. In positive law perspective, the joint property division has been determined with each equally get half. In the meantime, from the progressive law perspective in the context of reforming the Indonesian Marriage Law, ex-wives participating in earning living should get a larger portion of joint properties than their ex-husbands, to fulfill the sense of justice. Their portions are decided amicably on the agreements of the parties

scholarly journals Understanding the Rights of Wife in The Law Number 1 of 1974 About Marriage Among the Terrorist Wives in Central Java

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosdiana Rosdiana ◽  
Hotnidah Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Religious Doctrine ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law

AbstractThe terrorist or ex-terrorist wives in Solo have experienced diverse conditions after their husband officially becomes a terrorist prisoner who has been lived in jail. The Rights of Wife in Law No. 1 of 1974 about Marriage among terrorist wives in Solo have sharpened the analysis on how their level of perception of the wife’s rights that regulated by Law No. 10 of 1974. This study aims to reveal the reality of cases that took place with terrorist wives related to the fulfillment of their rights as a wife regulated by law, and to categorize their marital status related to the validity in a positive law (whether the marriage is registered or not in The Office of Religious Affairs (KUA)). Besides, this paper also wants to explore the terrorist wives' understanding who are legally married in KUA regarding their rights which are highly protected by the law. This research uses a qualitative method which aimed to find concepts and theories, and library research by applying the empirical or sociological legal approach. Data sources used are Primary Data, namely the terrorist prisoner’s wives in Solo, and secondary data from the Marriage Law (Law No. 1 of 1974), Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), books, journals, articles, views of legal experts, and the results of other paper and writings related to the problems that become the subject in this research discussion. The descriptive data analysis method aims to figure out systematically, factually and accurately the facts about the understanding of terrorist wives related to their rights in the Marriage Law (Law No. 1 of 1974). After analyzing and interpreting the existing data, it can be concluded that the terrorist prisoner wives in Central Java have a fairly good understanding of their rights as wives regulated in Law No. 1 of 1974. If only there are rights that undermanned by them for the unfulfilled obligations by the husband, then it is caused by their sincerity attitude towards the husband status who becomes a prisoner. The religious doctrine that is strong enough makes the prisoner’s wife do not ask many of her rights, both physical and mental rights that are not well fulfilled. For them, the status of a husband to become a terrorist prisoner is a Shari reason which consequences must be accepted sincerely.Keywords: Understanding, wife's rights, Terrorist Prisoner’s Wives

scholarly journals The Settlement of Joint Property in Religious Courts of Indonesia (A Case in the Religious Court of South Jakarta)

AL- ADALAH ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 234
Author(s):  
Isnawati Rais
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Crucial Issue ◽  
Peaceful Settlement ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Joint Property

The settlement of joint property, after husbands and wives divorced, is a crucial issue in the Religious Courts of Indonesia. According to the provisions of the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI) and Marriage Law No. 1/1974, a joint property should be divided equally if done peacefully. This research analyzes the joint property settlement after divorce in the Religious Court of South Jakarta and compares it with a number of cases in other similar institutions. This study finds out that the rules as stipulated both in the KHI and Marriage Law No. 1/1974, was not rigidly applied by the judges. Instead, the judges at the Religious Court of South Jakarta took a flexible and casuistic solution for the disputes over the sharing of joint property between divorced couples. The settlement methods used by the judges vary, depending on the case that occurs empirically. The peaceful settlement was also pursued by the Religious Court of South Jakarta, although in general, it was unsuccessful.

scholarly journals Juridical Review on Grants of Treasure Together Of Child Due Divorce In Religious/ Islamic Courts of Kendal

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 741
Author(s):  
Bagus Malik Hakim ◽  
Akhmad Khisni ◽  
Munsharif Abdul Chalim
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Children Of Divorce ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Community Property ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife

Divorce in the event, then the entire joint property, the property acquired during the marriage is divided into two parts, namely the upper half of the husband and half to the wife. Kendal Religious Court in deciding the division of joint property, there are in accordance with the provisions of Islamic Law Compilation, is half portion for half of the husband and wife to. But there is also, Kendal Religious Courts decide part of the joint property of the wife is greater, which is part of the joint property to the wife more than in the joint property of the husband. There is also, the Religious Courts Kendal cut off all joint property is granted (given) to his son.The purpose of this research are: 1) To know and understand the implementation of joint property grants to children of divorce in the Religious Kendal. 2) To know and understand the considerations related decision Religious Court judges Kendal in community property donated to the children of divorce. 3) To know and understand the barriers and solutions implementation of joint property grants to children of divorce in the Religious Kendal. The data used in this study are primary data, secondary data and data that can support tertiary study, which was then analyzed by descriptive analytical method.Kendal Religious Court Decision on the Implementation of the Joint Grant Treasure Kids Due To Divorce Court Kendal Religion is a decision that truly reflects the sense of justice, reflect expediency and legal certainty. Therefore, when the divorced husband and wife agreed to grant the joint property willed to his son, accompanied by a deed of peace. Therefore, the verdict ideal is when it contains elements of Gerechtigekeit (justice), Zweckmassigkeit (benefit), and Rechtssicherheit (rule of law) in proportion.Keywords: Overview of Juridical; Grant; Treasure Together; Divorce.

EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN PENCATATAN PERCERAIAN DI KANTOR URUSAN AGAMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Juriyana Megawati Hasibuan Dan Fatahuddin Aziz Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Shipping Costs ◽  
The Status ◽  
Happy Marriage ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Marriage is a sacred bond which is ideally only held once in a lifetime. Both Islamic law and positive law require an eternal happy marriage. To support this the Koran proclaims marriage as mitsaqan galiza. The marriage is then registered in the state administration. In line with this, the laws and regulations are formulated in such a way as to make divorce more difficult. However, when there are acceptable reasons and due to coercive conditions, divorce can be done through a judicial process. The divorce must then be registered by taking certain procedures. The court delivered the notice and sent a copy of the decision to the marriage registrar to file the divorce properly. The implementation of this divorce record was not effective. The separation of the Religious Courts Institution from the Ministry of Religion has become a factor that causes the registration task not to be carried out. The loss of the obligation to submit a copy of the decision on the judge's ruling caused the recording to be constrained. The unavailability of shipping costs also contributed to the failure to register divorce. Even though there is a threat to the Registrar who neglects to deliver a copy of the verdict, unclear sanctions make this ineffective. As a result of the lack of recording of divorce, the status of husband and wife becomes unclear and opens opportunities for abuse of that status.

scholarly journals Konstruksi Nalar Rechtvinding Hakim dalam Pemberian Izin Poligami yang Berkeadilan Gender dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jombang No. 0899/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Jbg

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 496-517
Author(s):  
Abdullah Taufik ◽  
Ilham Tohari
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Gender Justice ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The One ◽  
Legal Discovery ◽  
Religious Courts

The practice of polygamy in Indonesia until now has drawn criticism from some feminists who did not agree. But on the one hand, both Islamic law and positive law permit various conditions. In this case, the Religious Court (PA) becomes the last fence which becomes the determining point for a man to be able to polygamy. For this reason, researchers conducted a study of PA decisions on polygamy, namely Jombang PA Decision No. No. 0899 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PA.Jbg . The focus of the problem is (1) the value of gender justice in the decision and (2) reasoning rechtvinding(legal discovery) judge. The method used in this study is a normative-qualitative legal research method with content analysis techniques from Charles Purse. The results showed that the practice of polygamy licensing in the Religious Courts had actually gone through processes that reflected gender justice. This is reflected in the obligation of the Religious Court to summon the longest wife of the applicant for polygamy to be asked for willingness and information. The results of subsequent studies show that PA Jombang judges used hermeneutic techniques in making legal discovery efforts. Because, they not only focus on aspects of legality, but also consider the contextualization.

scholarly journals POLIGAMI DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HUKUM ISLAM (KRITIK TERHADAP HUKUM PERKAWINAN DI INDONESIA)

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Danu Aris Setiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Main Requirement ◽  
The Poor

This paper will focus on polygamy with a philosophical approach to Islamic law and directly associated with the marriage law in Indonesia. Polygamy is an issue in family law of Islam in the discussion of fiqih both classic and contemporary. Even polygamy is a discussion that is always debated theologically and anthropocentrically. In the positive law in Indonesia, polygamy is allowed with certain conditions which are strict and in it famous with the principle of monogamy. The main requirement of polygamy both in fiqih and in Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage is fair, both physically and spiritually. Polygamy is a right that can only be owned by the husband and not owned by the wife. In the philosophy of Islamic law, polygamy is certainly not due only to the satisfaction of mere biological. But more than that, polygamy is interpreted as a solution to resolve a number of social issues such as the poor orphans, protection of the poor widow, and others. Polygamy in philosophy also has the meaning of protection, to avoid lewdness, and justice for feminists. However, in practice in Indonesia, philosophy of polygamy in the Marriage Law considered  by some of parties, can not be realized effectively. This is due to the absence of strict sanctions, weak administration, and the lack of public awareness in obeying the rules of religion and the Marriage Law in Indonesia. [Tulisan ini akan difokuskan tentang poligami dengan pendekatan filosofis hukum Islam dan dikaitkan langsung dengan hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. Poligami merupakan isu dalam hukum keluarga Islam baik dalam pembahasan fikih klasik maupun fikih kontemporer. Bahkan poligami adalah pembahasan yang selalu diperdebatkan secara teologis maupun antroposentris. Dalam hukum positif di Indonesia, poligami diperbolehkan dengan syarat-syarat tertentu yang ketat dan di dalamnya terkenal dengan asas monogami. Syarat utama poligami baik dalam  fikih maupun dalam Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan adalah adil, baik secara lahir maupun secara batin. Poligami merupakan hak yang hanya dimiliki oleh suami dan tidak dimiliki oleh istri. Secara filosofi hukum Islam, poligami tentu saja bukan karena hanya untuk kepuasan biologis semata. Namun lebih dari itu, poligami dimaknai sebagai solusi untuk menyelesaikan sejumlah persoalan sosial seperti adanya anak yatim yang kurang mampu, perlindungan janda yang lemah dan lain-lain. Poligami secara filosofi juga memiliki makna perlindungan, menghindari perbuatan keji, dan keadilan bagi kaum feminis. Namun dalam praktinya di Indonesia, makna filosofi poligami dalam UU Perkawinan dianggap sejumlah pihak tidak dapat diwujudkan efektif. Hal ini disebabkan karena tidak adanya sanksi yang tegas, lemahnya administrasi, dan lemahnya kesadaran masyarakat dalam menaati aturan agama dan UU Perkawinan di Indonesia.]

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR I TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN AGAMA BANDUNG KELAS I.A

1970 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Kun Budianto
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Regulatory Policy ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Policy Rules ◽  
Litigation Process ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Sense Of Justice ◽  
Religious Courts

This article discussed regulatory policy on mediation in religious courts way dispute resolution through mediation according to Islamic law and implementation of mediation in settlement court cases in Religious Courts Bandung Class I A. This research base on the policy rules by mediation in the  Religious Courts;  (a)  the  benefits to  be  gained if mediation used as a means in the  settlement  of  disputes,  namely  the  mediation process  could overcome  the  problem  of  accumulation of  matter,  the  mediation process is viewed as a means of dispute resolution that is faster and cheaper than the litigation process, enforcement of mediation can expand access for all parties to gain a sense  of  justice,  (b)  provision their peace  efforts in legislation.  (c) Indonesian society is a society that likes peace. The Implementation of the mediation process done with two ways, namely mediation initial litigation, and over litigation.

scholarly journals THE LEGALITY OF INTERRELIGIOUS MARRIAGE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF ISLAMIC LAW AND INDONESIAN POSITIVE LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Muchammad Ichsan
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Negative Outcomes ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Descriptive Method

This study aims at examining the legality of interreligious marriage according to Islamic law and Indonesian positive law. To reach the goal set by this research, a descriptive method is used in the writing while an analytical method is employed to scrutinize the relevant problems. This study finds that interreligious marriage has spread widely among Indonesians that it has now become a phenomenon. However, Islam does not recognize a Muslim woman's marriage unless she is married by a man belonging to the same religion, i.e. a Muslim. A Muslim man is not permitted to marry a mushrik (polytheist) woman. It is lawful for him to marry a woman from the Ahlul Kitaab (Jews and Christians), but Indonesian ulemas prohibit such a marriage as well because of the negative outcomes. Meanwhile, the 1974 Indonesian Marriage Law fails to address the issue of interreligious marriage in a clear manner. This brings forth at least three interpretations: firstly, the law does not regulate interreligious marriage at all; secondly, the law allows it; and thirdly, the law denies it. Through an analysis, the last interpretation is found to have stronger reasons than the others.  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji legalitas pernikahan antaragama menurut hukum Islam dan hukum positif Indonesia. Agar tercapai tujuan yang diinginkan, maka penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif untuk menganalisis masalah yang sedang diteliti. Studi ini menemukan bahwa pernikahan antaragama telah menyebar luas di kalangan masyarakat Indonesia yang kini telah menjadi fenomena. Namun, Islam tidak mengenali pernikahan wanita Muslim kecuali jika dia menikah dengan pria yang memiliki agama yang sama, yaitu seorang Muslim. Seorang pria Muslim tidak diizinkan untuk menikahi wanita musyrik (politeis). Dan halal baginya untuk menikahi wanita dari Ahlul Kitaab (Yahudi dan Kristen), namun sebagian ulama Indonesia tetap melarang pernikahan semacam ini, karena beberapa alasan. Sementara itu, Undang-Undang Perkawinan Indonesia 1974 gagal menangani masalah pernikahan antaragama dengan cara yang jelas. Ini setidaknya menghasilkan tiga interpretasi: pertama, hukum sama sekali tidak mengatur pernikahan antaragama; Kedua, hukum mengizinkannya; Ketiga, undang-undang tersebut menolaknya. Melalui sebuah analisis tersebut di atas, disimpulkan bahwa jenis interpretasi yang terakhir ditemukan memiliki alasan yang lebih kuat daripada alasan yang lainnya.

scholarly journals Problems of Islamic Law Compilation In Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Arip Purkon
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Religious Courts

Abstract.Islamic Law Compilation is one of the efforts to implement Islamic law in Indonesia constitutionally. Islamic Law Compilation covers three legal fields, namely marriage, inheritance and benefiction. The Islamic Law Compilation contributes positively in providing legal certainty, especially for judges in religious courts. In addition, there are still a number of problems related to the Islamic Law Compilation, namely the issue of socialization, equality of perception and the fear of reducing Islamic law.Keywords: Islamic Law Compilation, Marriage Law, Inheritance Law, Benefaction   Abstrak.Kompilasi Hukum Islam merupakan salah satu upaya untuk mengimplementasikan hukum Islam di Indonesia secara konstitusional. Kompilasi Hukum Islam mencakup tiga bidang hukum, yaitu perkawinan, waris dan wakaf. Kompilasi Hukum Islam memberikan kontribusi yang positif dalam memberikan kepastian hukum, khususnya untuk para hakim di pengadilan agama. Selain itu, masih ada beberapa masalah terkait Kompilasi Hukum Islam, yaitu masalah sosialisasi, persamaan persepsi dan adanya kekhawatiran tereduksinya hukum Islam.Kata Kunci: Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Hukum Perkawinan, Hukum Waris, Wakaf

scholarly journals Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Perkara Harta Bersama di Pengadilan Agama Tembilahan

Al-Qadha ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-174
Author(s):  
Azmil Fauzi Fariska
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Secondary Material ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Primary Reference ◽  
Shared Property ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Research Decision ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Laws And Regulations

This research was motivated by the decision of the Tembilahan Religious Court judges who decided the joint property case in which the judge decided the Plaintiff (husband) got 1/4 while the Defendant (wife) got 3/4 of the shared property. However, Article 97 in the Compilation of Islamic Law states that: "Widows or widowers are each entitled to half of the joint property as long as it is not stipulated otherwise in the marriage agreement." This research is in the form of library research using case No.0233/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbh, as the primary reference, while the secondary material in this paper consists of laws and regulations related to the object of the research decision No. 0233/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbh as well as books, journals, scientific works related to the object of research. The author's data collection technique uses interview techniques and study documents or library materials. The results of the verdict research are in accordance with the judge in deciding the case based on Legal Certainty (legal certainty) and Legal Justice (legal justice), legal certainty is what has been outlined by the laws and regulations, Compilation of Islamic Law, like this case according to legal certainty then the distribution it is the wife gets 1/2 and the husband also gets 1/2 then if only this which is applied rigidly in the case will reduce the values of justice itself, thus the judge in determining the joint property case uses Legal Justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document