Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

scholarly journals Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank Aceh Setelah Konversi Periode 2016-2018 Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 8/POJK.03/2014

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Hanifa Assofia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Bank Capital ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

<p>This research aims to find out how Bank Aceh's financial performance after conversion in terms of earnings and capital. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. The data collection method used is the documentation method based on the data in the form of quarterly financial statements for the 2016-2018 period published. The method of data analysis in this study is by using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital). The results of the study show that Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of profitability ranks 2, with the definition that profitability is adequate, profit exceeds the target and supports the growth of bank capital. Bank Aceh's decision to convert to sharia as a whole was a very appropriate decision because it was able to show good performance, besides that it also supported the Aceh Government in carrying out its programs to enforce Islamic law. Bank Aceh's financial performance in terms of capital also ranks 2, with the definition that banks have adequate capital quality and adequacy relative to their risk profile, which is accompanied by strong capital management in accordance with the characteristics, scale of business and the complexity of the bank's business.</p>

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Rgec Pada PT. Bank Tabungan Negara, Tbk. Periode 2015-2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Fina Priskila Kawengian ◽  
Frendy A. O. Pelleng ◽  
Wilfried S. Manoppo
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
A Value ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Composite Rating ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This study aimed to analyze the health of a bank, at PT. Bank Tabungan Negara, Tbk. by using the Rgec method. The Rgec method consists of several components, namely Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital. of these components also have indicators. which will later rank a bank which is ranked in what category, based on calculations through the company's financial statement data. This research uses quantitative descriptive research. The data source used is secondary data with documentation data collection techniques. Based on the results of data analysis, it was concluded that during the 2015-2017 period, (1) Bank BTN risk profile was in a healthy condition with NPL of 1,60%, 1,40% and 1,30% respectively, and LDR of 109,54%, 103,63%, and 104,19%. (2) GCG for the period 2015-2017 is 2 with healthy criteria. (3) Earnings in the 2015-2017 period are in a healthy condition with ROA of 1,47%, 1,55%, and 1,47%, NIM of 3,96%, 3,81%, and 3,57% , BOPO was 78,67%, 77,96% and 77,12%. (4) Capital is in a very healthy condition with a CAR value of 16,96%, 20,33% and 18,86%. (5) Rgec as a whole is in Composite Rating 1 which is very healthy with a value of 85,71%.

scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan RGEC (Studi pada PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk dan PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk Periode 2014-2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Marissa Putriana ◽  
Susi Artati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Risk Indicators ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Value Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This research aims to analyse how the health level comparison of PT Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk with PT Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero), Tbk using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) approach In 2014-2018. The type of research used is quantitative descriptive research. Research results show the health level of Bank Mandiri and BNI in 2014-2018 overall healthy. Risk Profile Bank Mandiri and BNI bank with the credit risk indicator gained a healthy predicate and with the risk indicators of the liquidity of both banks earned a fairly healthy predicate. Assessment of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) based on Self Assessment showed that Bank Mandiri obtained very good predicate while BNI Bank obtained good predicate. The Earnings assessment of the ROA and NIM ratio analysis and Capital valuation based on the CAR value analysis showed that Bank Mandiri and BNI Bank gained a very healthy predicate.

Analisis Kinerja Keuangan untuk Menilai Tingkat Kesehatan pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam dan Pembiayaan BMT Projo Artha Sejahtera (PAS) di Bantul

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mujino Mujino ◽  
Ratih Kusumawardhani ◽  
Diah Cahyani
Keyword(s):  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Collection Method ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Savings And Loan ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Management Aspect ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
Medium Enterprises

This study aims to investigate the health level of the savings and loan cooperatives and financing of BMT PAS in terms of: 1) Capital aspect; 2) Management aspect; 3) Liquidity aspect; 4) Aspect of compliance with syariah. This research is a type of quantitative descriptive research. The subject of this research is the savings and loan cooperatives and financing of BMT PAS in Bantul. The object of this research is the financial statements of 2015 to 2019. The data collection method were used documentation and questionnaire. The calculation use PAP technique was based on Deputy Regulation for the Supervision of the Ministry of Cooperatives and Small and medium Enterprises of Republic Indonesia Number 07/Per/Dep.6/IV/2016. The result of this research shows that health level of the savings and loan cooperatives and financing of BMT PAS 2015 to 2019 seen from; 1) Capital aspects of BMT PAS Bantul in 2015 to 2019 criteria are quite healthy; 2) Aspects management of BMT PAS Bantul in 2015 to 2019 criteria are quite healthy; 3) Aspects of liquidity of BMT PAS Bantul in 2015 to 2019 are healthy criteria; 4) Aspects of compliance with syariah principles BMT PAS Bantul from 2015 to 2019 healthy criteria. Keywords : Financial performance, health level, savings and loan cooperatives and syariah financing.

scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Mandiri Syariah Dengan Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governace, Earnings and Capital

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 724
Author(s):  
Anik Anik ◽  
Suhesti Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Production Factors ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
Health Rating

The purpose of this research is to see the soundness level of Bank Syariah Mandiri with the method of Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital. The research method uses quantitative methods. Production factors in the RGEC method are the risk profile using credit risk (NPF), liquidity risk (FDR), income (ROA, ROE and BOPO) and capital (CAR). On the results of Good Corporate Governance using data processed and obtained from PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The object of this research is PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri. The sampling technique in this study using purposive sampling. This research period is 2013-2017. The data analysis technique used in this research is quantitative descriptive and using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Car), as for the benchmarks to determine the soundness level of a bank after each examination, namely by determining the results of the study classified into the bank's health rating. The results showed that the health of PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri which uses the Risk Profile approach, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital as a whole can be said that Bank Syariah Mandiri is a fairly healthy bank.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF RISK PROFILE, GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, EARNINGS, AND CAPITAL (RGEC) IN SYARIAH COMMERCIAL BANKS AND CONVENTIONAL COMMERCIAL BANKS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oyong Lisa
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
T Test ◽  
Public Funds ◽  
Analytical Technique ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Net Profit ◽  
Lower Ability

Banks play a role in collecting public funds because banks are institutions that are trusted by the community from various parties in placing funds safely. This study aims to analyze the differences in financial performance by using RGEC consisting of risk profile, good corporate governance, earnings, and capitals between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. The analytical technique uses independent sample t-test. The result of the analysis shows that there is a difference of NPL between syariah bank and conventional bank. This shows that conventional commercial banks are better at covering the risk of default of credit repayment by debtors than syariah commercial banks. There is an LDR difference between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that conventional commercial banks have a slightly better liquidity level compared to syariah commercial banks. The LDR ratio is too large to indicate the lower ability of  the bank's liquidity. There is no GCG difference between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that both groups of banks have implemented good corporate governance so that internal management goes according to what is planned. There is a difference of ROA between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that the ability of conventional commercial banks has better ability in obtaining net profit with the use of all assets owned by the bank compared to syariah commercial banks. There is no CAR difference between syariah commercial banks and conventional commercial banks. This shows that both groups of banks have met Bank Indonesia's requirements as a sound bank.

scholarly journals RGEC, Sustainability Reporting, and Financial Performance: A Study in Listed Banks in IDX 2013-2017

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Gunarsih ◽  
Setiyono . ◽  
Fran Sayekti ◽  
Tamas Novak
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Correlation And Regression Analysis ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
And Performance

This study aims to analyze Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, and Capital (RGEC), Sustainability Reporting (SR) and financial performance (ROE and TQ) of the listed banks in the IDX. This research implements correlation and regression analysis. Base on data samples of 12 banks in 2013-2017, the results of this study show that GCG and RGEC positively correlated to performance (ROE and TQ), but there is no correlation between SR and performance. The regression analysis shows that risk profile (LDR), GCG, and Earning / rentability (ROA) are statistically significant influence ROE but only NPL and GCG that influence TQ while SR is not significant, both to ROE and TQ. These findings support the arguments that the better the RGEC, the higher the financial performance. Subject to data limitation of SR, this study could not give empirical evidence that the better the SR, the higher the firm performance.

scholarly journals christiano VOL7 ED.1

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiano Lombogia
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Tobin’S Q ◽  
Corporate Value ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Tobin's Q ◽  
Good Corporate Governance

This research is done to know effect of financial performance toward corporate value by using of Good Corporate Governance as a moderating variable. ROA,ROE, And Leverage as an indicator of financial performance is known as the dependent variable. Good Corporate Governance (GCG )is a moderating variable.The companies that are in the research are manufacturing companies which are listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX), published financial statements ending December 31, and had complete data of Good Corporate Governance. The data is then processed by using statistical appliance that was called regression with interaction.According to the research financial performance (ROA, ROE and Leverage) by simultan show has an effect on corporate value (Tobin’s Q). Good Corporate Governance (GCG) hasn’t an effect the financial performance (ROA, ROE Leverage) toward the value of the company (Tobin’s Q). The result of coefficient of determination test indicate that all independent variables (ROA, ROE Leverage) can explain the variation of dependent variable (Corporate Value) amount to 44,8%. The result of coefficient of beta test indicate that ROE is most dominant influence to corporate value.

Determinan Kinerja Keuangan Yang Ditinjau Dari Good Corporate Governance, Leverage dan Ukuran Perusahaan (Sub. Sector Perusahaan BUMN yang Terdaftar Di BEI tahun 2013-2018)

Owner ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
Lola Dwi Antikasari ◽  
Rosa Nikmatul Fajri ◽  
Riana R Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Linear Regression Method ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Effect

Financial performance as a benchmark for the success of the company's work in a certain period. Financial performance is also used as a basis for determining the company's strategy in the future. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of good corporate governance (board size), leverage (DER) and company size on financial performance (ROA). This study uses a population of 120 data from SOE companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2018. And produced a sample of 78 company data. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling. The research instrument in the form of documentation (taking company financial statements). Data analysis method used is multiple linear regression method. The results showed that the size of the board of directors had a positive effect on financial performance. The leverage variable has a negative effect on financial performance. While the size of the company has no effect on financial performance. The benefits of this study are as a reference for further research. Besides that, it can be used as a management guideline in analyzing the company's financial performance.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TINGKAT KESEHATAN PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (BRI) SYARIAH BERDASARKAN METODE RGEC

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Muhamad Manarul Hidayat ◽  
Usep Deden Suherman ◽  
Hendra Syafri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Health Level ◽  
Rank One ◽  
Bank Soundness ◽  
Quantitative Approaches

AbstractEvery bank must have a bank soundness level from all aspects with very healthy criteria, as well as PT. BRI Syariah. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the factors that affect the health level of PT. BRI Syariah uses Bank Indonesia regulations, namely PBI No.13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 and criteria guidelines for using SE. No.13 / 24 / DPNP. In accordance with these provisions, the soundness of a bank is measured by the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). This article uses descriptive methods and quantitative approaches to determine the health level of PT. BRI Syariah is also compared to two state-owned sharia banks, namely PT. BNI Syariah and BSM. The results showed that using the RGEC method the assessment factors used were NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, and ROE. It appears that PT. The health level of BRI Syariah is still below BNI Syariah and BSM. This indicates that BRI Syariah still has to improve its financial performance to have a healthy rating at rank one, which is very healthy.   Keywords: Health Level, RGEC Method, BRI Syariah AbstrakSetiap bank harus memiliki tingkat kesehatan bank dari segala aspek dengan kriteria sangat sehat, begitupula dengan PT. BRI Syariah. Maka dari itu, artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah menggunakan ketentuan Bank Indonesia yaitu PBI No.13/1/PBI/2011 dan pedoman kriteria menggunakan SE. No.13/24/DPNP. Sesuai ketentuan tersebut, tingkat kesehatan bank diukur dengan metode RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). Artikel ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk mengetahui tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah yang mana juga dibandingkan dengan dua bank syariah milik BUMN yaitu PT. BNI Syariah dan BSM.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dengan menggunakan metode RGEC faktor penilaian yang digunakan adalah NPF, FDR, ROA, BOPO, CAR, dan ROE. Terlihat bahwa Tingkat kesehatan PT. BRI Syariah masih berada di bawah BNI Syariah dan BSM. Hal ini menandakan bahwa BRI Syariah masih harus meningkatkan kinerja keuangannya untuk memiliki peringkat yang sehat pada peringkat satu yaitu sangat sehat. Kata kunci: Tingkat Kesehatan, Metode RGEC, BRI Syariah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document