scholarly journals Problem of Iterativity and Cyclicity of Historical Process: Socio-Philosophical Analysis

Manuscript ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 168-174
Author(s):  
Andrey Vladimirovich Povilaitis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-425
Author(s):  
Mario Wimmer

Abstract In this article, I portray both the “thinking historian” Heinz-Dieter Kittsteiner and his philosophical analysis of the unavailability of the historical process. In his book Out of Control (2004), Kittsteiner builds on Immanuel Kant’s concept of the historical sign to demonstrate how history is out of joint due to the contingent character of the historical process. This understanding demands a new theory of historical time and of historiographical practice, which I reconstruct through a close reading of a chapter of Kittsteiner’s book.


Author(s):  
Andrei Vladimirovich Povilaitis

The present study considers the problem of the method of historical parallels in the framework of the philosophy of history, taking into account its comparison with the concepts of iterativity and cy-clism. At the beginning of study, the author notes the relevance and analyzes the philosophical and historical aspect of the topic. The greater focus is placed on current research in this area. The work by T.S. Kondratieva “Bolsheviks-Jacobins and the Phantom of Thermidor”, which uses the method of historical parallels at the scientific level, is examined more carefully compared with other works. The au-thor not only analyzes this research, but also pro-vides his own comparisons related to it. The re-search methodology is based on socio-philosophical analysis, historical and comparative method. The method of historical parallels also plays a significant role. For the first time there is suggested the following chain of key concepts of the topic under consideration: cycle, iteration, laws of history. It is concluded that there are certain prob-lems of using the concept of historical cyclism, as well as there are advantages and limitations of the method of historical parallels.


1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 422-423
Author(s):  
Robert B. Cialdini

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (29) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Figley

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 40-48
Author(s):  
Galina V. Talina

The article analyzes V.V. Rozanov’s conceptions of antiquity, Middle Ages and new history. Rozanov singles out three periods of Russian history – Kiev, Vladimir-Moscow and Petersburg ones. The essence of each of those periods the philosopher consecutively correlates with adoption of Christianity, political organization formation and the beginning of individual creative work dominance. While interpreting his contemporary events as a public person and a journalist, Rozanov regards earlier epochs from the position of a myth-creator. The diverse historical process gives way to the literary and static image of the epoch. The author of the article pays special attention to how Rozanov characterizes historical personalities, to his views on the role of religion, state, bureaucracy and parliamentarism.


Author(s):  
Tatyana B. Markova

The article discusses the social and cultural functions of reading. Philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of reading reveals its transformation into knowledge society. The types of modern reading are analyzed and a new role of libraries in society is showed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document