Improving Admission of Low-SES Students at Selective Colleges

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael N. Bastedo ◽  
Nicholas A. Bowman
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
School Context ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
School Contexts ◽  
Admissions Officers ◽  
Selective Colleges

Low-socioeconomic status (SES) students are underrepresented at selective colleges, but the role that admissions offices play is poorly understood. Because admissions offices often have inconsistent information on high school contexts, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether providing detailed information on high school contexts increases the likelihood that admissions officers ( n = 311) would recommend admitting low-SES applicants. Admissions officers in the detailed-information condition were 13 to 14 percentage points (i.e., 26%–28%) more likely to recommend admitting a low-SES applicant from an underserved high school than those in the limited-information condition, although the limited-information condition provided significant details about family SES and high school context. These findings were consistent regardless of the selectivity of the college, admissions office practices, and participant demographics.

Low-socioeconomic Status Students Organizing around Class on Campus

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 512-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Social Movement ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequality ◽  
Student Activism ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Selective Colleges ◽  
Low Ses Students

While scholars have developed stronger understandings of challenges facing low-socioeconomic status (SES) students, there has been very little examination of students’ advocacy on their own behalves. The last 10 years have seen a substantial and rapid increase in low-SES students organizing campus groups to provide safe space, activism, and/or education around class inequality at selective and highly selective colleges and universities. By utilizing literature on other student activist movements, I make two contributions. First, I extend the existing work on student activism to include a contemporary and growing movement around socioeconomic inequality that is—unlike many previous campus movements—largely operating independently of a broader, noncampus social movement. Second, I detail the challenges students face in seeking changes on their own campuses, which I argue are both specific to their roles as activists and also exacerbated, in many cases, by their positions as low-SES students. These findings, therefore, help to further illuminate the ways that socioeconomic inequality is maintained on college campuses over time and also to highlight a growing campus-based social movement.

Intertemporal impulsivity can also arise from persistent failure of long-term plans

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nisheeth Srivastava ◽  
Narayanan Srinivasan
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Social Utility ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Planning And Control ◽  
Intertemporal Discounting ◽  
And Control ◽  
Control Failures

AbstractWe suggest that steep intertemporal discounting in individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES) may arise as a rational metacognitive adaptation to experiencing planning and control failures in long-term plans. Low SES individuals' plans fail more frequently because they operate close to budgetary boundaries, in turn because they consistently operate with limited budgets of money, status, trust, or other forms of social utility.

scholarly journals COVID-19 infections in day care centres in Germany: social and organisational determinants of infections in children and staff in the second and third wave of the pandemic

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Neuberger ◽  
Mariana Grgic ◽  
Svenja Diefenbacher ◽  
Florian Spensberger ◽  
Ann-Sophie Lehfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Third Wave ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Hygiene Measures ◽  
Education And Care

Abstract Background During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, German early childhood education and care (ECEC) centres organised children’s attendance in different ways, they reduced opening hours, provided emergency support for a few children, or closed completely. Further, protection and hygiene measures like fixed children-staff groups, ventilation and surface disinfection were introduced in ECEC centres. To inform or modify public health measures in ECEC, we investigate the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infections among children and staff in ECEC centres in light of social determinants (i.e. the socioeconomic status of the children) and recommended structural and hygiene measures. We focus on the question if the relevant factors differ between the 2nd (when no variant of concern (VOC) circulated) and the 3rd wave (when VOC B.1.1.7 (Alpha) predominated). Methods Based on panel data from a weekly online survey of ECEC centre managers (calendar week 36/2020 to 22/2021, ongoing) including approx. 8500 centres, we estimate the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children and staff using random-effect-within-between (REWB) panel models for count data in the 2nd and 3rd wave. Results ECEC centres with a high proportion of children with low socioeconomic status (SES) have a higher risk of infections in staff and children. Strict contact restrictions between groups like fixed group assignments for children and fixed staff assignments to groups prevent infections. Both effects tend to be stronger in the 3rd wave. Conclusion ECEC centres with a large proportion of children with a low SES background and lack of using fixed child/staff cohorts experience higher COVID-19 rates. Over the long run, centres should be supported in maintaining recommended measures. Preventive measures such as the vaccination of staff should be prioritised in centres with large proportions of low SES children.

scholarly journals Early-Life Adversities and Recalcitrant Smoking in Midlife: An Examination of Gender and Life-Course Pathways

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 867-879
Author(s):  
Chioun Lee ◽  
Lexi Harari ◽  
Soojin Park
Keyword(s):  
Life Course ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Early Life ◽  
Financial Strain ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Family Instability ◽  
Family Problems ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Logistic Regression Models

Abstract Background Little is known about life-course factors that explain why some individuals continue smoking despite having smoking-related diseases. Purpose We examined (a) the extent to which early-life adversities are associated with the risk of recalcitrant smoking, (b) psychosocial factors that mediate the association, and (c) gender differences in the associations. Methods Data were from 4,932 respondents (53% women) who participated in the first and follow-up waves of the Midlife Development in the U.S. National Survey. Early-life adversities include low socioeconomic status (SES), abuse, and family instability. Potential mediators include education, financial strain, purpose in life, mood disorder, family problems/support, and marital status. We used sequential logistic regression models to estimate the effect of early-life adversities on the risk of each of the three stages on the path to recalcitrant smoking (ever-smoking, smoking-related illness, and recalcitrant smoking). Results For women, low SES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29; 1.06–1.55) and family instability (OR = 1.73; 1.14–2.62) are associated with an elevated risk of recalcitrant smoking. Education significantly reduces the effect of childhood SES, yet the effect of family instability remains significant even after accounting for life-course mediators. For men, the effect of low SES on recalcitrant smoking is robust (OR = 1.48; 1.10–2.00) even after controlling for potential mediators. There are noteworthy life-course factors that independently affect recalcitrant smoking: for both genders, not living with a partner; for women, education; and for men, family problems. Conclusions The findings can help shape intervention programs that address the underlying factors of recalcitrant smoking.

scholarly journals Less human, more to blame: Animalizing poor people increases blame and decreases support for wealth redistribution

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 546-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Sainz ◽  
Rocío Martínez ◽  
Robbie M. Sutton ◽  
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón ◽  
Miguel Moya
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Human Nature ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Poor People ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Mediation Analyses ◽  
Wealth Redistribution ◽  
Human Uniqueness

Increasing economic inequality adversely affects groups with low socioeconomic status (low-SES). However, many people are opposed to wealth redistribution policies. In this context, we examined whether dehumanization of low-SES groups has a role in this opposition. In the first study ( N = 303), opposition to wealth redistribution was related to denying human uniqueness (e.g., intelligence and rationality) and having negative attitudes toward low-SES groups, more than denying human nature (e.g., emotionality and capacity to suffer) to low-SES groups. Mediation analyses indicated that this effect occurred via blaming low-SES groups for their plight, after controlling for participants’ SES and negative attitudes towards low-SES groups. In the second study ( N = 220), manipulating the human uniqueness of a fictitious low-SES group affected support for wealth redistribution measures through blame. These results indicate that animalizing low-SES groups reduces support for wealth redistribution via blaming low-SES groups for their situation.

scholarly journals Impact of cardiorespiratory fitness on survival in men with low socioeconomic status

2020 ◽  
pp. 204748731990105
Author(s):  
Sae Young Jae ◽  
Sudhir Kurl ◽  
Kanokwan Bunsawat ◽  
Barry A Franklin ◽  
Jina Choo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Mortality ◽  
Mortality Hazard ◽  
Disease Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Mortality Hazard Ratio

Aims Although both low socioeconomic status (SES) and poor cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are associated with increased chronic disease and heightened mortality, it remains unclear whether moderate-to-high levels of CRF are associated with survival benefits in low SES populations. This study evaluated the hypothesis that SES and CRF predict all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease mortality and that moderate-to-high levels of CRF may attenuate the association between low SES and increased mortality. Methods This study included 2368 men, who were followed in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Study cohort. CRF was directly measured by peak oxygen uptake during progressive exercise testing. SES was characterized using self-reported questionnaires. Results During a 25-year median follow-up, 1116 all-cause mortality and 512 cardiovascular disease mortality events occurred. After adjusting for potential confounders, men with low SES were at increased risks for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.30–1.71) and cardiovascular disease mortality (hazard ratio1.38, 1.13–1.69). Higher levels of CRF were associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.54, 0.45–0.64) and cardiovascular disease mortality (hazard ratio 0.53, 0.40–0.69). In joint associations of SES and CRF with mortality, low SES-unfit had significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 2.15, 1.78–2.59) and cardiovascular disease mortality (hazard ratio 1.95, 1.48-2.57), but low SES-fit was not associated with a heightened risk of cardiovascular disease mortality (hazard ratio 1.09, 0.80-1.48) as compared with their high SES-fit counterparts. Conclusion Both SES and CRF were independently associated with subsequent mortality; however, moderate-to-high levels of CRF were not associated with an excess risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in men with low SES.

scholarly journals Association between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening among populations with low socioeconomic status (SES) in Singapore

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka Keat Lim ◽  
Charmaine Lim ◽  
Yu Heng Kwan ◽  
Sui Yung Chan ◽  
Warren Fong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Participation Rates ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Risk Screening ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Access To Health ◽  
Health Promoting

Abstract Background: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a barrier for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening and a determinant of poor CVD outcomes. This study examined the associations between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in a CVD risk screening program among populations with low SES residing in public rental flats in Singapore. Methods: Data from Health Mapping Exercises conducted from 2013 to 2015 were obtained, and screening participation rates of 66 blocks were calculated. Negative binomial regression was used to test for associations between distances to four nearest facilities (i.e., subsidized private clinics, healthy eateries, public polyclinics, and parks) and block participation rate in CVD screening. We also investigated potential heterogeneity in the association across regions with an interaction term between distance to each facility and region. Results: The analysis consisted of 2069 participants. The associations were only evident in the North/North-East region for subsidized private clinic and park. Specifically, increasing distance to the nearest subsidized private clinic and park was significantly associated with lower [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–0.98] and higher (IRR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.15–3.25) screening participation rates respectively. Conclusions: Our findings could potentially inform the planning of future door-to-door screenings in urban settings for optimal prioritization of resources. To increase participation rates in low SES populations, accessibility to subsidized private clinics and parks in a high population density region should be considered.

scholarly journals An Insight Into the Involvement of Mothers of Low Socioeconomic Status in Scottish Primary School Health Education Activities

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-122
Author(s):  
Samantha Donnelly ◽  
Duncan S. Buchan ◽  
Ann-Marie Gibson ◽  
Gillian Mclellan ◽  
Rosie Arthur
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
School Health ◽  
Family Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
School Based ◽  
School Health Education ◽  
Parent Component

School-based health activities that involve parents are more likely to be effective for child health and well-being than activities without a parent component. However, such school-based interventions tend to recruit the most motivated parents, and limited evidence exists surrounding the involvement of hard-to-reach parents with low socioeconomic status (SES). Mothers remain responsible for the majority of family care; therefore, this study investigated mothers with low SES to establish the reasons and barriers to their involvement in school-based health activities and to propose strategies to increase their involvement in those activities. Interviews were conducted with mothers with low SES, who were typically not involved in school-based health activities ( n = 16). An inductive–deductive approach to hierarchical analysis revealed that there are several barriers resulting in mothers being less involved, particularly due to issues surrounding the schools’ Parent Councils and the exclusivity of school-based events. Efforts made by the school to promote health activities and involve parents in such activities were revealed, alongside recommendations to improve on these practices. The findings offer multiple ways in which future school-based health interventions can recruit and involve mothers with low SES.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics, Management Strategies, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Low Socioeconomic Status Cohort: An Observational Study From Urban India

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117954682091889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navdeep Singh Sidhu ◽  
Sunil Kumar Kondethimmannahally Rangaiah ◽  
Dwarikaprasad Ramesh ◽  
Kumaraswamy Veerappa ◽  
Cholenahally Nanjappa Manjunath
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
St Elevation

Background: Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of mortality in India. There is scarcity of data on demographic profile and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in low socioeconomic status (SES) population of India. Objectives: This study was undertaken to determine the clinical presentation, management strategies, and in-hospital outcomes of ACS in low SES population. Methods: We conducted 1-year prospective observational cohort study of ACS patients admitted at Employees State Insurance Corporation unit of our tertiary care cardiac center. Clinical parameters, management strategies, and in-hospital outcomes of 621 patients enrolled during the study period from February 2015 to January 2016 were studied. Results: Mean age of patients was 56.06 ± 11.29 years. Majority (62%) of the patients had ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), whereas Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) was seen in 38% of the patients. Median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 285 min with wide range from 105 to 1765 min. Coronary angiography was performed in 81% of patient population. Single-vessel disease (SVD) was the most common pattern (seen in 43.3%) of coronary artery involvement with left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) being the most frequently involved vessel (62.8%). Pharmaco-invasive approach was the preferred strategy. Overall percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates were 59.1% (62.1% in STEMI and 54.2% in NSTE-ACS). Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.2%, being significantly higher in STEMI (4.2%) as compared with NSTE-ACS (1.7%). Conclusions: With implementation of evidence-based pharmacotherapy and interventions, outcomes comparable with developed countries can be achieved even in low SES populations of developing world.

scholarly journals Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Return to Work after Acute Ankle Fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0020
Author(s):  
Alessandra L. Falk ◽  
Regina Hanstein ◽  
Chaiyaporn Kulsakdinun
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Ankle Fracture ◽  
Low Ses ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Zip Code

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Socioeconomic status has been recognized throughout the medical literature, both within orthopedics and beyond, as a factor that influences outcomes after surgery, and can result in substandard care. Within the foot and ankle subspecialty, there is limited data regarding socioeconomic status and post-operative outcomes, with the current literature focusing on outcomes for diabetic feet. However, ankle fractures are among the most common fractures encountered by orthopedic surgeons. While a few studies have explored the impact of ankle fractures on employment and disability status, the effect of socioeconomic status on return to work post operatively has not yet been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of low socioeconomic status on return to work. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 592 medical charts of patients with CPT code 27766, 27792, 27814, 27822, 27823, 27827, 27829, 27826, 27828 from 2015-2018. Included were patients >18 yrs of age who sustained an acute ankle fracture, were employed prior to the injury, and with information on return to work after ankle surgery, zip code, race, ethnicity and insurance status. Excluded were patients who were not employed prior to their injury. Socioeconomic status was either defined by insurance status - Medicaid/Medicare, commercial, or workman’s compensation -, or by assessing socioeconomic status (SES) using medial household per capita income by zip code as generated and reported by the US National Census Bureau’s 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. The national dataset was divided into quartiles with the lowest quartile defined as low SES. Patients who had income that fell within this income category were classified as low SES. Results: 174 patients were included with an average follow-up of 10.2months. 22/174 (12.6%) patients didn’t return to work post-operatively. Univariate analysis identified non-sedentary work to decrease the likelihood of return to work (HR:0.637; p=0.03). Patients with a low SES were more prevalent in the no return group compared to the return to work group (86% vs 60%; p=0.028). 95% of patients with low SES were a minority compared to 56% with average/high SES (p<0.005). Patients with low SES had a higher BMI (p=0.026), a longer hospitalization (p=0.04) and more wound complications (p=0.032). Insurance type didn’t affect return to work (p=0.158). Patients with workman’s compensation had a longer follow-up time and a longer time to return to work compared to other insurances (p<0.005 for each comparison). Conclusion: Low socioeconomic status based on income, not insurance type, affected return to work after an ankle fracture ORIF. Patients with workman’s compensation took a longer time to return to work compared to other insurance types. These findings warrants the need to consider socioeconomic status when allocating resources to treat these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document