Evaluation of the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of Fournier gangrene

2021 ◽  
pp. 1
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Vacuum Assisted Closure ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Vac Therapy ◽  
Fournier Gangrene ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Closure Method

Background and objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in the treatment of Fournier gangrene (FG). Material and methods: Forty-eight male patients treated for Fournier gangrene were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups (Group I: conventional dressing, Group II: VAC therapy). Characteristics of the patients, laboratory parameters, number of debridement procedures, daily number of dressings, visual analogue scale (VAS) during dressing, analgesic requirement, colostomy requirement, time from the first debridement to wound closure, wound closure method, length of hospital stay, and mortality rates were compared. Results: Group I comprised 33 patients and Group II comprised 15 patients. The number of dressings, VAS score and daily analgesic requirement were statistically significantly lower in Group II (p < 0.05) than in Group I. The number of debridement procedures, colostomy requirement, orchiectomy rate, time from first debridement to wound closure, length of hospital stay, wound closure method and mortality rate were similar between these two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The clinical results of conventional dressing and VAC therapy were similar for treating FG. VAC therapy is an effective postoperative wound care method that offers less requirement for dressing changes, less pain, less analgesic requirement and more patient satisfaction compared to conventional dressing.

scholarly journals Comparative Efficacy of Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline versus 0.9% Normal Saline in Children with Acute Bronchiolitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khandaker Tarequl Islam ◽  
Abid Hossan Mollah ◽  
Abdul Matin ◽  
Mahmuda Begum
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hypertonic Saline ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Acute bronchiolitis is leading cause of hospitalization in infants below 2 years of age. Bronchiolitis being a viral disease, there is no effective treatment. 3% nebulized hypertonic saline and 0.9% nebulized normal saline are often used, although there is disagreement over their efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3% hypertonic saline in children with acute bronchiolitis in reducing clinical severity and length of hospital stay. Methodology: A randomized control trial carried out in the Department of Pediatrics, Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January 2013 to December 2013.Ninty children from 1 month to 2 years of age hospitalized with clinical bronchiolitis were randomized to receive 3% nebulized hypertonic saline(Group-I) or 0.9% nebulized normal saline (Group-II). Nebulization was done 8 hourly until discharge. Outcome variable were clinical severity score, duration of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay. Results: Baseline clinical severity score and O2 saturation were in group-I 9.0±1.0 and 94.9±1.7 and in group- II 9.3±1.8 and 94.6±2.6 respectively (p>0.05). At 72 hours, the mean severity score for the group-I was 1.64±0.99 and that for the group-II was 3.0 ± 1.48 (95% CI -2.17 to - 0.53, p=0.002). The cases of group-I required a shorter duration of oxygen therapy compared to those of group-II (15.0±6.0 hours vs 26.4±5.37 hours, 95% CI -20.35 to -2.44, p<0.05). Forty two (93.3%) of the group-I children recovered by the end of72 hours and discharged whereas 26 (57.8%) of the group-II children recovered during the same period (p<0.05). Length of hospital stay was shorter in group-I compared to group-II (58.1±22.0 hours vs 74.7±27.2 hours, 95% CI -26.89 to- 6.17, p=0.002). None of the cases encountered any side-effects. Conclusion: Nebulization with 3% hypertonic saline significantly reduced clinical severity, length of hospital stay and duration of oxygen therapy in case of acute bronchiolitis in comparison to 0.9% normal saline and was safe. Bangladesh J Child Health 2018; VOL 42 (3) :130-137

scholarly journals Degloving injuries of trunk and limbs: comparison of outcomes of early versus delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Francisco Mello ◽  
José Cesar Assef ◽  
Sílvia Cristine Soldá ◽  
Américo Helene Jr
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Skin Flap ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Degloving Injuries

<sec><title>OBJECTIVE:</title><p> to analyze cases of degloving of the trunk and limbs, comparing outcomes of early versus delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team.</p></sec><sec><title>METHODS:</title><p> we conducted a retrospective analysis of medical charts. Patients comprised two groups: Group I - early assessment, performed within 12 hours post trauma; and Group II - delayed assessment, performed more than 12 hours post trauma. We defined primary grafting as the use of skin from the traumatized skin flap. We excluded cases involving hands, feet or genitalia.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS:</title><p> there were 47 patients treated with degloving injuries between 2002 and 2010. The mean body surface area affected was 8.2%. Lower limbs were the most frequently affected site (95.7%), whether alone or in association with lesions to other sites. Delayed assessment by the plastic surgery team occurred in 25 cases. Mean hospital stay was 36.1 days for Group I and 57.1 days for Group II (p=0.026). Regarding the number of surgical operations (skin grafts), Group I received a mean of 1.3, while Group II underwent 1.6 (p=0.034).</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION:</title><p> based on length of hospital stay and number of operations in trauma patients with degloving of the trunk and limbs, plastic surgery assessment should be carried out early.</p></sec>

scholarly journals Impact of Spleen Size on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cetin Ali Karadag ◽  
Basak Erginel ◽  
Ozgur Kuzdan ◽  
Nihat Sever ◽  
Melih Akın ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Splenectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Time Rate ◽  
Open Procedure ◽  
Group I ◽  
Longitudinal Length ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Background. The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) between enlarged spleens and normal sized spleens.Methods. From June 2006 to September 2012, 50 patients underwent LS. The patients consisted of 24 girls and 26 boys with the mean age of 8.64 years (1–18). The patients are divided into two groups according to spleen’s longitudinal length on the ultrasonography. Group I consisted of the normal sized spleens; Group II consisted of spleens that are exceeding the upper limit. Groups are compared in terms of number of ports, operative time, rate of conversion to open procedure, and length of hospital stay.Results. The mean number of ports was 3.27 and 3.46, the mean length of the operation was 116.36 min and 132.17 min, rate of conversion to open procedure was 9.09% and 10.25%, and the mean length of hospital stay was 3.36 days and 3.23 days, respectively, in Group I and Group II. Although there is an increase in the number of the ports, the operative time, rate of conversion to open procedure, and the length of hospital stay, the difference was not significant between groups (P>0.05).Conclusion. LS is safe and effective in enlarged spleens as well as normal sized spleens.

scholarly journals Ep.Th.654Home Based Pre-Rehabilitation in Hepatic & Pancreatic Oncological Surgery- A Way Forward for Improved Patient Outcome

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nauman Ahmed ◽  
Rami Obeidallah ◽  
Daren Subar
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
P Value ◽  
Oncological Surgery ◽  
Operative Outcomes ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Group I ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Aims To ascertain the impact of ‘’Cost effective home-based pre-rehabilitation’’ on post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing major hepatic and pancreatic oncological surgery. Methods In this non-randomized comparative study (2019-2021), we included 36 patients having pancreatic or hepatic malignancy. In group I, patients were signed up for home-based pre-rehabilitation program and dietary modification. Group II; included patients who did not have rehabilitation. The two groups were compared for post-operative outcomes (post-operative complications, length of ITU and hospital stay) Results Mean age was 69.05±9.68 years in group I and 67.50±8.75 years in group II (p-value 0.61). Open approach was used in 02 (11.0%) patients in group I and in 09 (50%) patients in group II (p-value 0.01). More patients in group II needed admission in intensive care unit (ICU); 18 (100%) versus 11 (61.1%) in group II (p-value 0.0003). The group I had shorter length of hospital stay as compared to Group II (p-value 0.0001). There was no significant difference in post-operative complications between the groups. Conclusion Home based pre-rehabilitation, has shown beneficial outcomes in terms of less requirement for ITU admission post operatively, shorter length of hospital stay and cost effective method of pre rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Managing bilateral inguinal hernia laparoscopically: is it gold standard?

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 296
Author(s):  
Kalpesh H. Patel ◽  
Jayesh B. Gohel ◽  
Bhumika J. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Bilateral Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Background:Even after many studies done in recent years, no consensus has been achieved on the surgical technique of inguinal hernia repair. It was believed that in bilateral inguinal hernia cases laparoscopic surgery is very much advantageous as it can be done through same incisions as unilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (no additional incision required), whereas in open surgery for bilateral case separate groin incision for each side required. Aim of this study is to evaluate and compare results of bilateral inguinal hernia patients operated by laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) or open (lichenstein) repair.Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital over the period of two years. 60 patients with bilateral inguinal hernia were taken up and randomly divided into two groups. Group I (study group) includes patients operated by bilateral laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) and Group II (control group) includes patients operated by open hernia repair (lichenstein tension free hernioplasty). All patients were followed up for 18 months post-operatively. All patients of both groups were monitored for operative time, conversion rate, length hospital stay, post-operative complications and recurrence, time to return to work.Results:Statistically there was significant difference between both groups in terms of length of hospital stay and time to return to work. Group I patients where TAPP surgery performed, 22 patients (73.33%) were discharged within 36 hours of surgery, whereas in Group II patients - control group where open surgery performed, only 4 patients (13.33%) discharged within 36 hours. All 30 patients (100%) in group I had joined their routine work within 10 days of surgery; whereas in Group II patients only 4 cases (13.33%) joined duties on or before 10 days and most of the patients 26 (86.67%) had taken more than 10 days to resume their duties. But there was no significant difference between operative time, complication rates and recurrence rates. All cases in group I were completed laparoscopically (no conversion to open repair).Conclusions:Simultaneous bilateral inguinal hernia repair laparoscopically does not increase the risk for the patient and has an equal morbidity compared with unilateral repair, length of hospital stay, and return to normal work and over all recovery after laparoscopic repair is faster than after open bilateral simultaneous repair. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair of bilateral hernias should be recommended as the gold standard.

scholarly journals Comparison of conventional dressings and vacuum-assisted closure in the wound therapy of Fournier’s gangrene

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Yanaral ◽  
Can Balci ◽  
Faruk Ozgor ◽  
Abdulmuttalip Simsek ◽  
Ozkan Onuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fournier’S Gangrene ◽  
Vacuum Assisted Closure ◽  
Fournier's Gangrene ◽  
Narcotic Analgesics ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Vac Therapy ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Fg Materials

Objective: The purpose of our study was to compare Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) and conventional dressings in the wound therapy of Fournier’s gangrene (FG). Materials and methods: The study evaluated 54 patients, retrospectively. Following initial removal of necrotic and devitalized tissue, in Group I patients the wounds were covered with conventional antiseptic dressings and patients continued to be treated with conventional dressings. In Group II patients VAC therapy was initiated. The collected data were compared between groups. Results: The difference between two groups were statistically significant in terms of number of daily dressing (group I: 2, group II: 0,5), VAS (group I: 8, group II: 5), number of daily analgesics (group I: 4, group II: 2), number of daily narcotic analgesics (group I: 1, group II: 0), duration of mobilization per day (group I: 40, group II: 73 minutes) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study does not determine that a VAC therapy is better than conventional dressings in terms of clinical outcome. However, vacuum dressing appears an effective and successful method, which offers fewer dressing changes, less pain, and greater mobility comparing to conventional dressings in the management of FG patients.

scholarly journals ACUTE APPENDICITIS: DELAYED SURGERY DOES NOT INCREASE THE NUMBER OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Romualdas Riauka ◽  
Povilas Ignatavičius ◽  
Žygimantas Tverskis ◽  
Žilvinas Dambrauskas
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
Perforation Rate ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Introduction. Historically appendicitis is tending to be operated as soon as possible to prevent future complications. Recent discussions show, that urgent operation does not always reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Immediate appendectomy can be delayed in some cases. Methods. Retrospective, non-randomized, single center, cohort study was performed. During one-year period 167 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included in the study. The study population was divided into two groups according to the time from the onset of the symptoms to the operation. Group I (≤ 24 hours) - 74 patients and Group II (≥ 24 hours) – 93 patients. Primary (postoperative complications) and secondary (operating time, length of hospital stay and perforation rate at the final pathology report) endpoints were evaluated and compared. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications when comparing both groups. In Group I – 21.9% patients (87.5% Grade I) and in Group II – 25.8% patients (83% Grade I) had postoperative complications. Operating time was similar between the groups (72.97±29.1 (Group I) vs 79.95±35.4 minutes (Group II)). Length of hospital stay was longer in Group II, but no statistically significant difference was found (2.85±2.3 vs 3.34±4.88 days accordingly). Perforation rate at the final pathology report was twice higher in Group II (8 (10.8%) vs 17 (18.3%)), but no statistically significant difference was found. Conclusions. This study findings support earlier reports showing that delayed appendectomy is safe surgical procedure without higher rate of postoperative complications and may be applied in certain cases.

scholarly journals Bilateral Nephrectomy in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Chronic Renal Failure

Nephron ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Lubennikov ◽  
Nicolay V. Petrovskii ◽  
German E. Krupinov ◽  
Evgeniy M. Shilov ◽  
Roman N. Trushkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Large Bowel ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bowel Injury ◽  
Polycystic Kidney ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney ◽  
End Stage

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and end-stage kidney disease, bilateral nephrectomy (BN) is currently performed predominantly via the laparoscopic approach. We analysed the results of BN depending on the approach and preoperative and perioperative factors. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> This was a single-centre retrospective study carried out from April 2010 to March 2020, including a total of 142 patients presenting with ADPKD who were treated by BN. Of these, 108 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were selected to analyse the results. We compared therapeutic outcomes depending on the surgical approach (laparotomy or laparoscopy) and the type of the operation (emergent or elective). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 108 eligible patients, 36 (group I) underwent laparoscopic BN and the remaining 72 patients (group II) were subjected to midline laparotomy. Sixty-nine patients underwent elective surgery and 39 endured emergent operations. The most frequent indications (87 patients, 80.6%) for surgical treatment were urinary tract infection and infected cysts. The median length of hospital stay for group I and group II patients amounted to 8 days (IQR: 7.5–9) and 12.5 days (IQR: 9–16.5), respectively (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). However, comparing the patients operated on electively, the actual difference in the length of hospital stay was inconsiderable: median 8 days (IQR: 7–9) in group I and 9 days (IQR: 9–11.5) in group II. The median duration of the operation was significantly (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) longer in group I amounting to 217.5 min (IQR: 197.5–305) than in group II equalling 115 min (IQR: 107.5–145). The frequency of postoperative complications, lethal outcomes, and blood loss volume did not statistically significantly differ depending on the surgical approach. Only patients operated on emergency underwent releparotomy due to intraoperative large bowel injury. Lethal outcomes (<i>n</i> = 18, 16.7%) after surgery were observed only in emergent patients. Sepsis prior to surgery, systemic inflammation response syndrome (SIRS) with the CRP level above 173 mg/mL, prolonged preoperative antibacterial therapy, and undiagnosed large bowel injury were associated with a lethal outcome after BN. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The results of open and laparoscopic BN in elective surgery were comparable. Emergency operations for infected renal cysts and SIRS were associated with increased incidence of large bowel injury and lethal outcomes.

scholarly journals Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Arnous ◽  
H Elgendy ◽  
W Thabet ◽  
SH Emile ◽  
SA Elbaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Cosmetic Results ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

BackgroundAlthough several surgical techniques for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (SPND) have been described, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical procedure. In this study we compared excision with primary closure and Limberg flap in the treatment of SPND.MethodsThis was a prospective randomised clinical trial in patients with SPND who were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group I (excision and primary closure) and group II (Limberg flap technique). The primary outcome of the trial was recurrence of SPND whereas postoperative complications, return to work and cosmetic results were the secondary outcomes.ResultsSixty patients were included, with a mean age of 24.1 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.8 kg/m2. Group 1 had significantly shorter operation time than group II. Both groups had similar hospital stay and comparable complication rates (43.3% vs 30%; P = 0.4). Group I had significantly higher recurrence rate (20% vs 0; P < 0.02) and significantly better cosmetic satisfaction score than group II. Being hairy (P = 0.04), positive family history (P = 0.03), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.005) and history of previous surgery for SPND (P = 0.01) were the significant predictors for recurrence.ConclusionsThe Limberg flap is an effective technique for the treatment of SPND with very low recurrence rate and comparable complication rate and hospital stay to excision and primary closure. Excision and primary closure offered the advantages of quicker healing time, earlier resumption of daily activities, better cosmetic results, which may render it more suitable for patients with low risk for recurrence.

scholarly journals Short term versus conventional Catheterisation after Genital Prolapse Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khurshida Tahmin ◽  
Shamsun Nahar Begum
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Genital Prolapse ◽  
Prolapse Surgery ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Group I ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Catheter Urine ◽  
Randomised Controlled

This Randomised controlled clinical trial was undertaken to determine the suitable time of catheter removal after urogenital prolapse surgery in order to reduce the catheter related UTI and its long term sequel. Method: Total 80 patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor repair were enrolled and randomised into two equal groups by lottery method. Trans-urethral catheter was removed on 2nd & 5th post operative day in group I (n=40) and in group II (n=40) respectively. Post   voidal residual urine volume before operation and after removal of catheter was measured in   all patients by ultrasound scanning. Re-catheterisation was done for three more days if residual volume > 200ml after removal of catheter. Urine samples were taken before removal of catheter and send for routine microscopic examination and culture & sensitivity test to detect UTI.Results: Removal of catheter on 2nd post-operative day lead to significant reduction of rate of UTI. The rate of UTI following removal of catheter was 7.5% versus 42.5% in group I and in group II (p<0.001). But need for recatheterisation was significantly higher in group I (15%) than in group II (2.5%). The mean duration of catheterisation was 47.63 (±0.628) and 119.35 (±0.864) hours in group I and group II respectively. Majority of the patients in group I did not  require prolongation of catheterisation. Mean duration of hospital stay after operation was 5 days in group I and 7.95 days in group II (p<0.001). Conclusion: Short period catheterisation is associated with lower rate of UTI and shorter hospital stay. Disadvantages of prolonged catheterisation outweigh the advantages. Therefore removal of the catheter on the 2nd post-operative day after genital prolapse surgery is preferable than 5 days catheterization DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjog.v26i2.13782 Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011; Vol. 26(2) : 68-71

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document