Long-term results of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group PALG-CLL2 phase III randomized study comparing cladribine-based combinations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 606-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Jerzy Z. Blonski ◽  
Joanna Gora-Tybor ◽  
Malgorzata Calbecka ◽  
Jadwiga Dwilewicz-Trojaczek ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 4059-4066 ◽  
Author(s):  
BARTOSZ PULA ◽  
ELZBIETA ISKIERKA-JAZDZEWSKA ◽  
MONIKA DLUGOSZ-DANECKA ◽  
AGNIESZKA SZYMCZYK ◽  
MAREK HUS ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. E35
Author(s):  
Xavier Badoux ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Susan Lerner ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (13) ◽  
pp. 3184-3185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Foon ◽  
Dhaval Mehta ◽  
Suzanne Lentzsch ◽  
Patricia Kropf ◽  
Stanley Marks ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1299-1299
Author(s):  
Siyang Peng ◽  
Feng Pan ◽  
Sonja Sorensen ◽  
Emily Dorman ◽  
Yingxin Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Treatment options for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who received prior therapy are limited, especially for patients in high risk categories, such as del 17p; new therapies are urgently needed. In the Phase III RESONATE (Byrd, 2014), single agent ibrutinib, an oral, once-a-day, first-in-class covalent Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS, HR=0.215), overall survival (OS, HR=0.387) and overall response rate (ORR, 63% vs. 4%) compared with ofatumumab alone. Here we assessed the availability and comparability of clinical data for key therapies used in pre-treated CLL patients with ibrutinib and project long-term outcomes of ibrutinib for comparable studies using a simulation model. Methods A systematic literature review (SLR) identified relapsed or refractory CLL clinical trials on the following regimens: bendamustine ± rituximab (BR), fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR), ofatumumab, idelalisib + rituximab (IR), and rituximab. Patient populations and outcomes (ORR, PFS, and OS) were compared. A health state model was then developed to simulate long-term PFS and OS, comparing other therapies with ibrutinib. The model simulated treatment of a cohort of patients with pre-treated CLL until death or until disease progression, at which point they were simulated to receive subsequent treatment or best supportive care. Available Kaplan-Meier data were used to estimate longer-term projections of PFS and OS of comparable trials. Results The SLR identified few (n=36) relevant trials, only 4 of which were RCTs; comparison to ibrutinib through a common comparator was not possible. Pivotal trials was identified for each therapy based on the comparability to the RESONATE population, largest sample size and greatest amount of data reported. Selected trials (Table) showed significant heterogeneity between study populations, including variations in adverse cytogenetics (e.g. del 17p, del 11q), treatment line, and other characteristics (e.g. bulky disease) which have important ramifications on health outcomes. Three trials were excluded from simulation modeling: Robak (FCR) and LeBlond (BR) consisted of less heavily pre-treated patients than RESONATE; Furman et al. 2014 (rituximab and idelalisib+rituximab), enrolled a similar population to RESONATE aside from 17 p del, however, long-term safety and efficacy outcomes are limited due to the short follow-up in the idelalisib trial. Simulation over a 10 year horizon resulted in prolonged estimated mean OS for ibrutinib compared to ofatumumab (66 months versus 39 months). Despite the ibrutinib patients consisting of more heavily pre-treated, worse adverse cytogenetics and high risk features than those included in the BR and FCR studies, naïve comparison of long-term OS was projected to be 26 months and 8 months longer with ibrutinib respectively. Conclusion Comparisons of outcomes across trials are inherently limited by differences in populations, trial designs, and measurements. In this limited, naïve comparison of high risk CLL patients, ibrutinib is reasonably expected to provide incremental OS over BR and FCR in the pre-treated CLL setting, even when considering the RESONATE patient population included more heavily pre-treated patients and those with worse cytogenetics. The most rigorous comparison, using comparative data from a head-to-head trial, indicated that ibrutinib significantly prolonged PFS and OS compared to ofatumumab, which has established activity in hard-to-treat patients. Table. Patient Characteristics Patient Characteristics RESONATE RESONATE Fischer Badoux Furman Furman Robak FCR LeBlond BR Ibrutinib Ofatumumab BR FCR Rituximab + placebo Rituximab + idelalisib Sample Size 195 196 78 284 110 110 276 58 Median age (range) 67(30- 88) 67 (37- 88) 66.5 (42-86) 60 (NA) 71 (47-92) 71 (48- 90) 63 (35-83) 75 (49-87) Del 17p, (%) 32.30% 32.70% 19.20% 7% 28.20% 23.60% 7% 12% Median # of prior therapies (range) 3 (1-12) 2 (1-13) 2 (1-5)* 2 (1-10) 3 (1-9) 3 (1-12) 1 (1-1) 1 (1-2) % ≥3 prior therapies 52.80% 45.90% 43% 31% NA NA 0% 0% % Purine analog refractory 44.60% 44.90% 28.2%~ 19%~ NA NA NA NA Disclosures Peng: Janssen: Consultancy; Evidera: Employment. Pan:Janssen: Consultancy; Evidera: Employment. Sorensen:Evidera: Employment; Janssen: Consultancy. Dorman:Janssen: Consultancy; Evidera: Employment. Xu:Janssen: Consultancy; Evidera: Employment. Sallum:Evidera: Employment; Janssen: Consultancy. Gaudig:Janssen: Employment. Sengupta:Janssen: Employment. Wildgust:Janssen Global Services: Employment. Sun:Janssen: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2103-2103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Jerzy Z Blonski ◽  
Krzysztof Jamroziak ◽  
Joanna Gora-Tybor ◽  
Beata Stella-Holowiecka ◽  
...  

Abstract Purine nucleoside analogues, cladribine(2-CdA) and fludarabine (FA), especially combined with cyclophosphamide (CY) are potent cytotoxic drugs for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this randomized study we aimed to establish whether combination of 2-CdA plus CY (CC) with FA plus (FC) provide similar benefit to previously untreated patients with CLL. The trial was started in January 2004 and the recruitment was ended in May 2007. The study primary endpoints were overall response (OR) and complete response (CR). The secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), minimal residual disease negativity (MRD/-/) and treatment related toxicity. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive 6 courses of either 2-CdA 0.12 mg/kg/d i.v. + CY 250 mg/m2/d i.v. or FA 25 mg/m2/d i.v. + CY 250 mg/m2/d, both combinations for 3 consecutive days. The treatment response and toxicity were evaluated according to NCI-WG guidelines. MRD was evaluated in patients with CR using four-color flow cytometry assay. There were no significant difference in the rates of OR, CR, MRD negativity, grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and infections. PFS and OS were also similar in both groups. In conclusion, CC and FC regimens are similarly active and toxic in previously untreated CLL, however trend of longer OS in CC group is observed. Characteristic CC arm FC arm P value Pts enrolled 212 211 - Pts evaluated 184 187 - No of courses (median, range) 6 (2–6) 5 (2–6) 0.56 OR (%) 163 (88.6) 159 (85.0) 0.31 CR (%) 86 (46.7) 91 (48.7) 0.43 MRD/–/ (%) 33 (68.8) 44 (72.1) 0.70 PFS (median, years) 2.195 2.361 0.86 Thrombocytopania gr 3/4 (%) 23 (12.6) 22 (11.6) 0.77 Neutropenia gr 3/4 (%) 39 (21.4) 43 (22.8) 0.76 Infection gr 3/4 (%) 53 (29.1) 54 (28.6) 0.91 OS (median, years) 4.066 2.531 0.10 Death (%) 37 (20.2) 53 (27.9) -


1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
Jeane P. Hester ◽  
Kenneth B. McCredie ◽  
Michael A. Burgess ◽  
William K. Murphy ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (16) ◽  
pp. 1391-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff P. Sharman ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Bruce D. Cheson ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
...  

PURPOSE A randomized, double-blind, phase III study of idelalisib (IDELA) plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was terminated early because of superior efficacy of the IDELA-plus-rituximab (IDELA/R) arm. Patients in either arm could then enroll in an extension study to receive IDELA monotherapy. Here, we report the long-term efficacy and safety data for IDELA-treated patients across the primary and extension studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive rituximab in combination with either IDELA 150 mg twice daily (IDELA/R; n = 110) or placebo (placebo/R; n = 110). Key end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS The long-term efficacy and safety of treatment with IDELA was assessed in 110 patients who received at least one dose of IDELA in the primary study, 75 of whom enrolled in the extension study. The IDELA/R-to-IDELA group had a median PFS of 20.3 months (95% CI, 17.3 to 26.3 months) after a median follow-up time of 18 months (range, 0.3 to 67.6 months). The ORR was 85.5% (94 of 110 patients; n = 1 complete response). The median OS was 40.6 months (95% CI, 28.5 to 57.3 months) and 34.6 months (95% CI, 16.0 months to not reached) for patients randomly assigned to the IDELA/R and placebo/R groups, respectively. Prolonged exposure to IDELA increased the incidence of all-grade, grade 2, and grade 3 or greater diarrhea (46.4%, 17.3%, and 16.4%, respectively), all-grade and grade 3 or greater colitis (10.9% and 8.2%, respectively) and all-grade and grade 3 or greater pneumonitis (10.0% and 6.4%, respectively) but did not increase the incidence of elevated hepatic aminotransferases. CONCLUSION IDELA improved PFS and OS compared with rituximab alone in patients with relapsed CLL. Long-term IDELA was effective and had an expected safety profile. No new IDELA-related adverse events were identified with longer exposure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document