Rebutting Pedro J. Silva’s article in Biophysical Chemistry supporting Mitchell-Boyer’s ideas on bioenergetics and advocating murburn concept as a viable explanation for aerobic respiration and oxygenic photosynthesis
Over the last three years, I had pointed out the untenable nature of the proton-centric ‘chemiosmosis driven rotary ATP-synthesis (CRAS)’ explanation for Oxidative Phosphorylation (OxPhos). Recently, Pedro J. Silva (PJS) [Chemiosmotic misunderstandings (2020). Biophys. Chem. 264, 106424] afforded a part of our work his critical attention, but overlooked the large volume of evidence against CRAS and supporting the oxygen-centric murburn mechanism of OxPhos. In his article, PJS also posed some queries on our bioenergetics model. When I offered my rebuttal, the Editor of Biophysical Chemistry refused to publish it. Therefore, I have no other option than to publish the rebuttal as a preprint. Herein, I demonstrate the flaws and lacunae in PJS’s defense of CRAS hypothesis and answer his specific queries and defend the murburn explanation of mOxPhos. The current scientific discourse is crucial for correcting major historical errors in mitochondrial physiology and understanding oxygen’s crucial role in the powering chemistry of life.