scholarly journals STRUKTUR BAHASA PEMROGRAMAN PASCAL ATAU BAHASA C

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronal Watrianthos
Keyword(s):  
Functional Programming ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Middle Level ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Low Level ◽  
High Level

Bahasa pemrograman procedural merupakan bahasa pemerograman yang melibatkan fungsi-fungsi atau prosedur-prosedur sebagai sub program untuk membentuk solusi dari suatu permasalahan. Ada yang mengelompokanya menjadi 3 level bahasa yaitu: high level (Seperti pascaldan basic), middle Level (Seperti Bahasa C), dan low level (Seperti Bahasa Assembly). Ada juga yang mengelompokannya menjadi procedural/ functional programming, Object oriented programming, dansebagainya.Berbeda halnya dengan bahasa pemerograman yang berorientasi obyek, yang menggunakanpendekatan obyek dalam menyelesaikan suatu persoalan. Dengan memahami element-elementbahasa, kita dapat dengan cepat dan muda untuk memepelajari berbagai macam bahasapemrograman

scholarly journals STRUKTUR BAHASA PEMROGRAMAN PASCAL ATAU BAHASA C

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronal Watrianthos
Keyword(s):  
Functional Programming ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Middle Level ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Low Level ◽  
High Level

Bahasa pemrograman procedural merupakan bahasa pemerograman yang melibatkan fungsi-fungsi atau prosedur-prosedur sebagai sub program untuk membentuk solusi dari suatu permasalahan. Ada yang mengelompokanya menjadi 3 level bahasa yaitu: high level (Seperti pascaldan basic), middle Level (Seperti Bahasa C), dan low level (Seperti Bahasa Assembly). Ada juga yang mengelompokannya menjadi procedural/ functional programming, Object oriented programming, dansebagainya.Berbeda halnya dengan bahasa pemerograman yang berorientasi obyek, yang menggunakanpendekatan obyek dalam menyelesaikan suatu persoalan. Dengan memahami element-elementbahasa, kita dapat dengan cepat dan muda untuk memepelajari berbagai macam bahasapemrograman

scholarly journals STRUKTUR BAHASA PEMROGRAMAN PASCAL ATAU BAHASA C

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronal Watrianthos
Keyword(s):  
Functional Programming ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Middle Level ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Low Level ◽  
High Level

Bahasa pemrograman procedural merupakan bahasa pemerograman yang melibatkan fungsifungsi atau proseedure-prosedur sebagai sub program untuk membentuk solusi dari suatupermasalahan. . Ada yang mengelompokanya menjadi 3 level bahasa yaitu: high level (Seperti pascaldan basic), middle Level (Seperti Bahasa C), dan low level (Seperti Bahasa Assembly). Ada juga yangmengelompokannya menjadi procedural/ functional programming, Object oriented programming, dansebagainya.Berbeda halnya dengan bahasa pemerograman yang berorientasi obyek, yang menggunakanpendekatan obyek dalam menyelesaikan suatu persoalan. Dengan memahami element-elementbahasa, kita dapat dengan cepat dan muda untuk memepelajari berbagai macam bahasapemrograman

Object-Oriented Programming in Computer Science

2018 ◽  
pp. 7470-7480
Author(s):  
Rahime Yilmaz ◽  
Anil Sezgin ◽  
Sefer Kurnaz ◽  
Yunus Ziya Arslan
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Electronic Circuit ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Human Mind ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Computer Hardware ◽  
Programming System ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Application Programming

A program is composed of commands, which runs within a computer or an electronic circuit. Programming is a mathematical methodology to write a program and to encode the algorithm into a notation. It can be classified into two groups such as system and application programming. System programming is a branch of the general programming that is composed of low level instructions which are used to operate and handle computer hardware. Application programming is considered as the improved version of the computer programs which can perform specific tasks. One of the application programming types is the object-oriented programming (OOP) which is about how information is represented in human mind. OOP is useful to provide easy modeling in design and developing real entities. This approach is aimed to model the entities and the relationships existing between them. OOP enables to define the required classes to create the objects and to apply modifications on them. The inherent properties of OOP are modularity, extensibility and reusability. This chapter provides a substantial survey of OOP.

An Object-Oriented Class Library for Medical Software Development

1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (04/05) ◽  
pp. 343-347
Author(s):  
E. E. McColligan ◽  
K. C. O’Kane
Keyword(s):  
Medical Record ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Message Processing ◽  
Class Library ◽  
File Access ◽  
Medical Software ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract:The objective of this research is the development of a Medical Object Library (MOL) consisting of reusable, inheritable, portable, extendable C++ classes that facilitate rapid development of medical software at reduced cost and increased functionality. The result of this research is a library of class objects that range in function from string and hierarchical file handling entities to high level, procedural agents that perform increasingly complex, integrated tasks. A system built upon these classes is compatible with any other system similarly constructed with respect to data definitions, semantics, data organization and storage. As new objects are built, they can be added to the class library for subsequent use. The MOL is a toolkit of software objects intended to support a common file access methodology, a unified medical record structure, consistent message processing, standard graphical display facilities and uniform data collection procedures. This work emphasizes the relationship that potentially exists between the structure of a hierarchical medical record and procedural language components by means of a hierarchical class library and tree structured file access facility. In doing so, it attempts to establish interest in and demonstrate the practicality of the hierarchical medical record model in the modern context of object oriented programming.

Robust Bipedal Locomotion Based on a Hierarchical Control Structure

Robotica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1750-1767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianwen Luo ◽  
Yao Su ◽  
Lecheng Ruan ◽  
Ye Zhao ◽  
Donghyun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Pressure ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Hierarchical Control ◽  
Middle Level ◽  
Smooth Transition ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Joint Torques ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Hybrid Controller ◽  
High Level

SummaryTo improve biped locomotion’s robustness to internal and external disturbances, this study proposes a hierarchical structure with three control levels. At the high level, a foothold sequence is generated so that the Center of Mass (CoM) trajectory tracks a planned path. The planning procedure is simplified by selecting the midpoint between two consecutive Center of Pressure (CoP) points as the feature point. At the middle level, a novel robust hybrid controller is devised to drive perturbed system states back to the nominal trajectory within finite cycles without chattering. The novelty lies in that the hybrid controller is not subject to linear CoM dynamic constraints. The hybrid controller consists of two sub-controllers: an oscillation controller and a smoothing controller. For the oscillation controller, the desired CoM height is specified as a sine-shaped function, avoiding a new attractive limit cycle. However, this controller results in the inevitable chattering because of discontinuities. A smoothing controller provides continuous properties and thus can inhibit the chattering problem, but has a smaller region of attraction compared with the oscillation controller. A hybrid controller merges the two controllers for a smooth transition. At the low level, the desired CoM motion is defined as tasks and embedded in a whole body operational space (WBOS) controller to compute the joint torques analytically. The novelty of the low-level controller lies in that within the WBOS framework, CoM motion is not subject to fixed CoM dynamics and thus can be generalized.

scholarly journals Programación multiparadigma como estrategia de aprendizaje de los lenguajes de programación en ingeniería de sistemas [Multiparadigm programming as a strategy for learning programming languages in Systems Engineering]

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Timarán Pereira ◽  
Javier Jiménez Toledo ◽  
Anivar Chaves Torres
Keyword(s):  
Software Development ◽  
Programming Languages ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Functional Programming ◽  
Programming Model ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Development Environment ◽  
Learning Programming ◽  
Programming Paradigms

Resumen Para el desarrollo de software se cuenta con varios paradigmas de programación, cada uno provisto de sus metodologías, técnicas y herramientas y orientado a un determinado campo o a un conjunto de problemas, y por ende, ninguno es suficiente por sí mismo para solucionar todos los problemas que se puedan suscitar. En este artículo se presentan los resultados del proyecto de investigación que tiene como objetivo la apropiación y aplicación del modelo de programación multiparadigma con el entorno Mozart-Oz para el desarrollo de software en el programa Ingeniería de Sistemas de la Universidad de Nariño. Esta investigación se realizó en tres fases en las que se estudian y evalúan la programación estructurada y orientada a objetos, la programación funcional y la programación por restricciones, con el fin de desarrollar en los estudiantes las competencias específicas en la solución de problemas utilizando estos modelos y entorno. Palabras ClaveProgramación Multiparadigma, Entorno de Desarrollo Mozart-Oz, Aprendizaje de Lenguajes de Programación.  Abstract For software development has several programming paradigms, each equipped with their methodologies, techniques and tools aimed at a particular field or set of problems, and therefore, none is sufficient by itself to solve all problems that can inspire. This paper presents the results of the research project that aims at the appropriation and application of multiparadigm programming model with the Mozart-Oz environment for software development in the Systems Engineer program at the Universidad of Nariño. This research was conducted in three phases in which structured and object-oriented programming, functional programming and constraints programming was studied and evaluated, in order to develop in students the specific skills to solve problems using these models and environment.KeywordsMultiparadigm Programming, the Mozart-Oz Development Environment, Learning Programming Languages 

scholarly journals EL FUTURO DE APPLE: SWIFT VERSUS OBJECTIVE-C

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Cristian González García ◽  
Jordán Pascual Espada B. ◽  
Cristina Pelayo G-Bustelo ◽  
Juan Manuel Cueva Lovelle
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Programming Language ◽  
Quantitative Evaluation ◽  
Functional Programming ◽  
Computer Programming ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Computer Languages ◽  
Programming Software

Hace unos meses Apple presentó un nuevo lenguaje de programación para sus plataformas: Swift. Con Swift, Apple pretende atraer a los programadores de los lenguajes de programación basados en la sintaxis de C++ y darles una mayor abstracción, que con Objective-C, para que sea más fácil programar para las plataformas de Apple. Por estas razones, se hace necesario contrastar lo pretendido por Apple y realizar un estudio del lenguaje de programación a fin de contrastar su objetivo. Para ello, se hicieron dos evaluaciones, una cualitativa y otra cuantitativa, con el propósito de verificar en qué medida Swift es un avance respecto a Objective-C.DThe Future of Apple: Swift Versus Objective-CABSTRACTFew months ago, Apple presented a new programming language: Swift. With Swift, Apple pretends to attract the programmers of the programming languages based on C++ syntax and gives them a higher abstraction than with Objective-C for being easier to programme to Apple’s platforms. For these reasons, it is necessary to contrast what is intended by Apple and do a study of the programming language to ascertain their goal. For this purpose, we did two evaluations, firstly a qualitative evaluation and after, a quantitative evaluation to verify in how much Swift is an advance with respect to Objective-C.Keywords: computer languages, computer programming, functional programming, object oriented programming, programming, software.

scholarly journals Representing Harmony in Computational Music Cognition

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. C. Harrison ◽  
Marcus Thomas Pearce
Keyword(s):  
Music Theory ◽  
Cognitive Modeling ◽  
Music Cognition ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Formal Models ◽  
Roman Numeral ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Cognitive Theories ◽  
High Level ◽  
Lead Sheet

Cognitive theories of harmony require unambiguous formal models of how listeners internally represent chords and chord progressions. Previous modeling work often uses representation schemes heavily reliant on Western music theory, such as Roman-numeral and lead-sheet notation; however, we argue that such work should be complemented by models using representations that are closer to psychoacoustics and rely less on Western-specific assumptions. In support of this goal, we compile a network of 13 low-level harmonic representations relevant for cognitive modeling, organised into three symbolic, acoustic, and sensory categories. We implement this collection of representations in an easy-to-use object-oriented framework written for the programming language R and distributed in an open-source package called hrep (http://hrep.pmcharrison.com). We also discuss computational methods for deriving higher-level representations from these low-level representations. This work should ultimately help researchers to construct high-level models of harmony cognition that are nonetheless rooted in low-level auditory principles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document