Control and Well-being Across Cultures: The Moderation of Individualism on the Relationship between Primary & Secondary Control and Affective & Cognitive SWB
Perceived control is essential to our subjective well-being (SWB). However, people from individualist and collectivist cultures may prefer different types of perceived control. We examined cultural variations in agency-oriented primary control and adjustment-oriented secondary control, their relationship to affective and cognitive SWB, and the moderation of Individualism of this relationship. We used an IPIP-based personality questionnaire that sampled 40, 000 participants from over across 42 countries. Using multilevel analyses, we found that the correlations between the two types of perceived control and the two aspects of SWB were different at the country level versus the individual level: primary control was more strongly related to cognitive SWB than affective SWB at the individual level, but the pattern was flipped at the country level. Contrary to previous results, we found stronger associations between individualism and secondary control and between collectivism and primary control; and primary control better predicted general SWB in collectivist cultures while secondary control better predicted general SWB in individualist cultures. We explored methodological (e.g., high influence items), philosophical (e.g., Hobbesian social contract), and sociopolitical (e.g., globalization) explanations of our results. Given the high generalizability and the high statistical power of our results that contradict previous findings, our study potentially calls for more nuanced and more generalizable revision of the current understanding of cultural differences in perceived control and its relation to SWB.