A Positive Future for Futures and Foresight Science Needs Fierce Competition in the Marketplace of Ideas: Commentary on Fergnami and Chermack 2021
Keyword(s):
This is a commentary on a target article by Fergnami and Chermack. It addresses the issue of how the study of futures and foresight can ensure a scientific future. I comment on two aspects of the authors' essay: first, their emphasis on theory development, which I believe is overemphasized (at the cost of an emphasis on method) and, second, their aspiration for reconciliation among scientists, consultants and ideologies. I propose that consensus-seeking is overrated and scientists should focus on competing in the marketplace of ideas.