scholarly journals Upstreaming advance care planning: application of health behavior change theory to understand barriers and facilitators to talking about death and dying in the community

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Graham-Wisener ◽  
Annmarie Nelson ◽  
Anthony Byrne ◽  
Ishrat Islam ◽  
Craig Harrison ◽  
...  

ObjectivesAdvance care planning is a key preparatory step in ensuring high-quality palliative and end of life care, and should be considered as a process, beginning with community-level conversations among lay persons. There is, however, indication that death talk among community-dwelling adults is not occurring, and there is a dearth of research examining why this is the case. This study aims to provide the first examination of barriers and facilitators to talking about death and dying among community-dwelling adults in a UK region (Northern Ireland), and to provide a novel application of health behaviour change theory towards developing a theoretical understanding of the sources of this behaviour.MethodsQualitative analysis of responses (n=381 participants) to two open-ended questions within a cross-sectional mixed-methods online survey, with recruitment via social media of adults currently living in Northern Ireland. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on open text responses per question, with the barriers and facilitators mapped on to health behaviour change models.ResultsThe findings evidence a myriad of barriers and facilitators to engaging in death talk, with themes aligning to areas such as lack of acceptance of death in social contexts and fear of upsetting self or others, and a need to improve interpersonal communication skills for facilitating conversations and improve knowledge of the death system. A theoretical understanding of the determinants of death talk is presented with findings mapped across the majority of components of the COM-B Behaviour Change Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. ConclusionsThis study contributes to a small but emergent research area examining barriers and facilitators to talking about death and dying. Findings from this study can be used to inform new public health programmes towards empowering adults to have these conversations with others in their community.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael Thorneloe ◽  
Tracy Epton ◽  
Wendy Fynn ◽  
Michael Daly ◽  
Natalia Stanulewicz ◽  
...  

BACKGROUNDDigital contact tracing apps have been proposed as a method of controlling the spread of Covid-19. The effectiveness of this tool depends largely on adequate levels of uptake (e.g. whether the user downloads and registers on the application) and engagement (e.g. the extent of usage of the application or its components over time). It has been estimated that approximately 60% of the population would need to use the NHSX application in order for it to be effective in reducing the spread of COVID-19. It is therefore crucial that we understand the level of, and factors influencing, uptake and engagement with digital tracing applications in order to put appropriate measures in place to mitigate those issues.AIMS1.To quantify the current data on COVID-19 digital contact tracing applicationsa.Uptake and engagement of COVID-19 digital contact tracing applicationsb.Examine whether uptake differs between countries c.Identify any predictors or correlates of uptake and engagement2.To conduct two scoping reviews to identify key barriers and facilitators influencing engagement and uptake of a.COVID-19 digital contact tracing applications b.Health behaviour change applications, including government approved applications, from academic literature and behaviour change guidelinesCONCLUSIONS•There is no evidence on the level of uptake and engagement with COVID-19 digital contact tracing applications.•There is a dearth of evidence regarding the barriers and facilitators to uptake and engagement with COVID-19 digital contact tracing applications.•The health behaviour change literature suggests a number of barriers and facilitators associated with uptake and engagement with applications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 336-345
Author(s):  
Rabia Ruby Patel ◽  
Tanya Monique Graham

This article examines the South African government’s response to COVID-19 by exploring the strong emphasis that has been placed on South Africans taking personal responsibility for good health outcomes. This emphasis is based on the principles of the traditional Health Belief Model which is a commonly used model in global health systems. More recently, there has been a drive towards other health behaviour change models, like the COM-B model and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW); nonetheless, these remain entrenched within the principles of individual health responsibility. However, the South African experience with the HIV epidemic serves as a backdrop to demonstrate that holding people personally accountable for health behaviour changes has major pitfalls; health risk is never objective and does not take place outside of subjective experience. This article makes the argument that risk-taking health behaviour change in the South African context has to consider community empowerment and capacity building.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ersen B Colkesen ◽  
Maurice AJ Niessen ◽  
Niels Peek ◽  
Sandra Vosbergen ◽  
Roderik A Kraaijenhagen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document