A Comparison of the Greek ACE-III, M-ACE, ACE-R, MMSE, and ECAS in the Assessment and Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease
Objective:This study aimed to adapt the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) and Mini-Addenbrooke’s CognitiveExamination (M-ACE) into Greek and then to examine the convergent validity against their predecessorsAddenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in a Greekpopulation. Moreover, a primary aim was to appraise the utility of each screen by conducting a comparison of thepsychometric properties of ACE-III, M-ACE, ACE-R, MMSE, and the Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural AmyotrophicLateral Sclerosis (ALS) Screen (ECAS) in detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD).Methods:Forty patients with AD were recruited and matched with 38 controls. Bayesian Pearson’s correlation analysis wasconducted to examine the convergent validity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was implemented toappraise the sensitivity and specificity of the tests in detecting AD.Results:The ACE-III, M-ACE, and the ECAS scores robustly correlated with ACE-R and MMSE. The ACE-III and the ECAS-ALSNon-Specific score were the most sensitive and specific tools in detecting AD, closely followed by ECAS Total scoreand M-ACE. Only ECAS Total score correlated with the duration of disease. The ECAS scores were more resilient toceiling effects than the other screens. M-ACE produced fewer ceiling effects than MMSE.Conclusion:The Greek ACE-III and M-ACE were successfully adapted and showed good convergent validity against theirpredecessors. They showed very good psychometric properties in detecting AD and may be considered in hecticclinical settings. ECAS Total score and ECAS-ALS Non-Specific showed comparable psychometric properties in thedetection of AD and may be considered in polypathological clinics where motor impairments are common.