Investigating the factors behind differences in ‘lay’ and ‘expert’ medical knowledge in the context of fever treatment in Yangon, Myanmar.
How is treatment seeking behaviour influenced by contrasting medical discourses? This paper uses the context of fever patients in Yangon, Myanmar to investigate the factors behind differences between ‘lay’ and ‘expert’ medical knowledge, which consequently guide the treatment seeking behaviour of hospital and clinic patients in Myanmar’s second largest city. By conducting the deductive thematic analysis of secondary qualitative data from both patients and medical doctors using an adapted form of Amartya Sen’s capability approach framework, this cross-sectional study uncovers how: education, socially rooted collective knowledge and unregulated pharmacies drive differences between ‘lay’ and ‘expert’ medical knowledge and therefore dictate treatment seeking behaviour. The results of this paper highlight the interdisciplinary nature of health, meaning health systems should be considered within their sociological, political and economic contexts. The current omission of traditional health discourse within the prevailing Burmese health system may limit the successfulness of biomedical treatment. Appreciating the complexity of how health is understood by populations, specifically how traditional medicine and biomedicine coexist within the Burmese context can allow policymakers to form a stronger health system by creating contextualised policies and health interventions for the general public that cater to the diversity of narratives within health.