Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé, and Werner Winter (eds.). Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill. The Hague: Mouton, 1978-79Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé, and Werner Winter (eds.). Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill. The Hague: Mouton, 1978-79. Vol. 1 : General and Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 412; vol. 2: Descriptive Linguistics, pp. 363; vol. 3: Historical and Comparative Linguistics, pp. 374; vol. 4: Linguistics and Literature. Sociolinguistics and Applied Linguistics, pp. 392.

Author(s):  
Marcel Danesi
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-111
Author(s):  
यादवराज उपाध्याय [Yadav Raj Upadhyay]

यस शोधन आलेखमा भाषा, भाषा विज्ञानको परिचय तथा शाखाहरूबारे चिनारी प्रस्तुत गर्दै पारिभाषिक शब्दावली र कोशीय प्रारूपबारे खोज विश्लेषण गरिएको छ । भावाभिव्यक्तिको संस्कृति विचार विनिमयको आधार भाषाका बारेमा वैज्ञानिक ढङ्गले अध्ययन गर्ने ज्ञानको शाखा नै भाषा विज्ञान हो । व्याकरण, भाषाशास्त्र हुँदै विकसित भाषा विज्ञानको संरचक पक्षका आधारमा ध्वनि विज्ञान, वणर् विज्ञान, व्याकरण (रूप, रूप सन्धि र वाक्य)  र अर्थ विज्ञान प्रमुख शाखाहरू हुन् । अध्ययन विश्लेषणको पद्धतिका आधारमा भाषा विज्ञानका ऐतिहासिक, तुलनात्मक र वणर्नात्मक प्रमुख तिन शाखाहरू छन् । सिद्धान्तकेन्द्री र प्रयोगकेन्द्री आधारमा भाषा विज्ञान सैद्धान्तिक र प्रायोगिक दुई प्रकारका हुन्छन् । भाषा शिक्षण, कोश विज्ञान, शैली विज्ञान, सामाजिक भाषा विज्ञान, मनोभाषा विज्ञान, अनुवाद विज्ञान, कम्प्युटर विज्ञान, व्यतिरेकी भाषा विज्ञान, सङ्कथन विश्लेषण आदि प्रायोगिक भाषा विज्ञानका प्रकारहरू हुन् । भाषाविज्ञानका यी शाखाहरूमा प्रयुक्त परिभाषाका माध्यमबाट बुझ्नु पर्ने सयांै पारिभाषिक तथा प्राविधिक शब्दावलीहरू छन् । यस्ता शब्दावलीहरूलाई शब्दकोशीय ढाँचामा पेस गर्न सकिने कोशीय प्रारूपको सीमित नमुना समेत यहाँ प्रस्तुत गरिएको छ । [Linguistic semantics and lexical structures have been discussed in this paper, introducing language, linguistics and its forms. Linguistics is the scientific study of language and its structure that is associated with the knowledge systems while communicating across cultures. It is a developed form of grammar, including other aspects of language such as sound system, letters, words, sentences and meanings. It has three main branches such as historical linguistics, comparative linguistics and descriptive linguistics. It can also be categorized into two types: theoretical linguistics and applied linguistics. There are other types of linguistics as well that include language teaching, lexicology, stylistics, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, translation studies, computational linguistics and narratology are some examples of applied linguistics. Based on these branches of linguistics, there are hundreds of linguistic semantics to be leant in the study of language and its structure. In this paper, they are exemplified as lexical structures of language and linguistic semantics.]


Author(s):  
Miguel Fuster Márquez ◽  
Begoña Clavel Arroitia

The aim of this paper is to review and analyse relevant factors related to the implementation of corpus linguistics (CL) in higher education. First we set out to describe underlying principles of CL and its developments in relation to theoretical linguistics and its applications in modern teaching practices. Then we attempt to establish how different types of corpora have contributed to the development of direct and indirect approaches in language teaching. We single out Data Driven Learning (DDL) due to its relevance in applied linguistics literature, and examine in detail advantages and drawbacks. Finally, we outline problems concerning the implementation of CL in the classroom since awareness of the limitations of CL is vital for its future success.


Language ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 755
Author(s):  
William Bright ◽  
Mohammad Ali Jazayery ◽  
Edgar C. Polome ◽  
Werner Winter

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-386
Author(s):  
Probal Dasgupta

Abstract This article explores some topics at the boundary between linguistics theory and the applied linguistic foundations of the practice of translation. Section 1, The irrelevance of the avant-garde , considers the relation between such academic adventures as semiotics and poststructuralism on the one hand and the theory of language and the practice of translation on the other, and argues that radical antiscientism does not bear on the foundations of translation. Section 2, The irrelevance of the technical , looks at formal syntax and semantics in relation to the concepts of applied linguistics and shows that careful contemporary linguistics cannot underpin an applied enterprise that includes translation studies. Section 3, The substantive hase of translation , indicates (in some detail for translation and at a general level for other applied linguistic activities) the direction that the contemporary integration of various lines of linguistic research is taking vis-à-vis the needs of such applied enterprises as translation, literary studies, language planning, lexicography, and language teaching. Section 3 invokes a concept of substance as opposed to form and thus sets the scene for the concluding section 4, Pragmatics, applied studies, and scientific progress , which argues that it is necessary to take help from linguistics in order to construct the field of translation studies in such a way that practitioners can truly benefit freely from all relevant branches of knowledge, in view of the fact that chaos is an obstacle to genuine freedom.


1984 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald A. Carter

An essentially interdisciplinary activity, like many areas of applied linguistics, the most immediately contingent area to stylistics remains that of literary studies, although recent years have witnessed extension into other domains such as lexicography and teaching English as a Foreign Language. This survey is divided into five main sections but, given the interrelatedness of the areas, there will be inevitable overlaps as well as potential cases for sub-categorization. The sections are: 1) Linguistic stylistics 2) Literary stylistics 3) Style and discourse A) Pedagogical stylistics 5) Stylistics and the foreign language learner.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 849
Author(s):  
Xinya Zuo

As a burgeoning branch of applied linguistics, ecolinguistics mainly studies the influence of language on the sustainable relationships between human themselves, human and other organisms and even the natural environment. One of the most important approaches of ecolinguistic studies is ecological discourse analysis. For instance, the ecological analysis of natural poetry is bound to involve the hidden ideology and potential significance behind the discourse. Emily Dickinson, a famous poet in the United States, has written 1775 touching poems in her life, more than 500 of which are directly or indirectly related to nature and ecology. It has been discussed from different perspectives in the field of literary studies, but discussion from the linguistics perspective is still rare. Working within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics by M.A.K. Halliday, this paper tries to explore how the poem language expresses the writer’s attitude and thought towards the nature through an ecological and linguistic analysis of Emily Dickinson’s representative nature poetry—The Grass. The study shows that the poet’s choice of language serves the meaning of the poem appropriately and that linguistic analysis of the poem can give implications for literary studies.


LingVaria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (spec) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Maciej Grochowski

The paper describes Witold Mańczak’s contribution to the development of general and theoretical linguistics in the last fifty years. Against the background of his monistic notion of language as a material entity, this author presents Mańczak’s critical evaluation of the methodological apparatus of paradigms which came after the inductive historical-comparative linguistics. The analysis focuses primarily on Mańczak’s criticism of Ferdinand de Saussure’s notion of language.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document