scholarly journals Surgical Orthodontics: A Case Report

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Mohamed ◽  
Rozita Hassan ◽  
Shaifulizan Ab. Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Chain Complete ◽  
Anchorage Loss ◽  
Short Time ◽  
New Surgical Technique

Introduction: Duration of treatment is one of the things orthodontic patients complaint about most and challenging orthodontist to shorten treatment time. A new surgical technique was introduced to accelerate tooth movement during orthodontic treatment through combining surgical and orthodontic treatment by doing surgical reduction of the bone mass in the path of desired tooth movement prior to start orthodontic alignment of the teeth. This case report showed treatment of 21 years old male patient complaint of teeth malalignment and he requested to finish treatment in short time. Upper right first premolar and lower left second premolar were extracted, all the bones in the desired path of tooth movement was removed and the dentoalveolar distraction procedure was performed using Nickel Titanium closing coil spring and power chain. Complete teeth alignment was achieved in two months period and the anchorage teeth were able to withstand the retraction forces with minimal anchorage loss.

scholarly journals A Accelerating tooth movement with modified surgical and dentoalveolar distraction technique- a case report

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Ahmed Bayomy Mohamed ◽  
Rozita Hassan ◽  
Shaifulizan Abdul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Anchorage Loss ◽  
New Surgical Technique

The duration of treatment is the most concern among orthodontic patients. It is of a challenge for an orthodontist to shorten the treatment time. A new surgical technique was introduced to accelerate tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. This new technique is the surgical reduction of bone mass in the pathway of desired tooth movement before orthodontic treatment. This case report explained the treatment of a 21-year-old male patient with severe-to-moderate crowded dentition and he requested to get the treatment done in a short period of time. Upper right first premolar and lower left second premolar were extracted, the bone in the desired pathway of all teeth movement was reduced and the dentoalveolar distraction procedure performed using nickel-titanium closing coil spring and rubber power chain. Full teeth alignment was achieved in 3 months period and the anchorage teeth were able to withstand the retraction forces with minimal anchorage loss.

An Innovative Approach for Accelerated Orthodontic Tooth Movement Stimulated by Corticotomy and Alveolar Grafting withAutogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft of Extracted Premolar- A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gupta V
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
External Root Resorption ◽  
Tissue Healing ◽  
Demineralized Dentin

In today's era, there is an increased demand for orthodontic treatment, especially among young patients. The greatest concern amongst the patients undergoing orthodontic treatment is the increased treatment time. The fixed orthodontic treatment lasts up to 2 to 3 years which further increases the risk of complications associated with the treatment such as external root resorption, periodontal problems, and patient compliance [1]. Clinicians are constantly striving towards developing strategies to enhance the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and decreasing the treatment time. Numerous surgical modalities found to be highly effective in reducing the treatment time for orthodontic therapy include corticotomy, corticision, peizocision, periodontal distraction, dentoalveolar distraction etc. [2]. Wilcko et al. [3] introduced the combined approach corticotomy surgery with alveolar grafting in a technique referred to as Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (AOO) and recently known as Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO). Many studies dictated that PAOO is an extremely predictable, safe, effective technique. The risk of root resorption and the duration of treatment time is considerably reduced [3-5]. The present article focuses on accelerating the orthodontic tooth movement using a Demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) graft, alloplast and PRF membranes to reduce the treatment time and improves soft and hard tissue healing outcomes.

scholarly journals Attitude and perception of orthodontic patients to orthodontic treatment time and accelerated orthodontics.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
O.D Umeh ◽  
I.G Isiekwe ◽  
O.O DaCosta ◽  
O.O Sanu ◽  
I.L Utomi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Treatment Procedures ◽  
Accelerated Orthodontics

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the a􀄴itude and perception of orthodontic patients to the duration of orthodontic treatment and the procedures for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. The study population was made up of patients undergoing fixed appliance orthodontic treatment at the Orthodontic Unit of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. A convenience sampling technique was used and data collection was via selfadministered questionnaires and an information sheet. The questionnaires assessed patients' knowledge of accelerated orthodontic procedures as well as their perception of orthodontic treatment time and willingness to undergo some accelerated orthodontic treatment procedures. The procedures evaluated included corticotomy, piezocision, micro-osteoperforation, laser therapy, local administration of injections and use of vibrations.Results: One hundred orthodontic patients (n=100, adolescents, 46%; adults, 54%) were surveyed comprising 36 males and 64 females. Most of the participants (88%) had never heard of accelerated orthodontics. A majority of respondents (75%) believed that orthodontic treatment time was too long, and were willing to undergo additional procedures to reduce treatment time (81%). Subjects' willingness to undergo the procedures were inversely proportional to the degree of its invasiveness for all groups, with at least a third of the patients willing to accept a 10% increase in treatment fees for a reduction in treatment time across all techniques surveyed.Conclusion: The orthodontic patients surveyed considered treatment time protracted and were interested in undergoing adjunctive orthodontic procedures to accelerate tooth movement, with a consequent increase in treatment cost. They, however, had a limited knowledge of the different methods of accelerating orthodontic treatment. Key words: Accelerated orthodontics, orthodontic treatment time

scholarly journals CORTICOTOMY-PERIODONTALLY ACCELERATED OSTEOGENIC ORTHODONTICS - A SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND CASE REPORT

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 112-114
Author(s):  
Sheehan R. Dsouza ◽  
Amitha Ramesh ◽  
Sharath K. S. ◽  
Biju Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Tissue Turnover

AbstractCorticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment involves selective alveolar decortication in the form of decortication lines and dots performed around the teeth that are to be moved. It is done to induce a state of increased tissue turnover and a transient osteopenia, which is followed by a faster rate of orthodontic tooth movement.This technique has several advantages, including faster tooth movement, shorter treatment time, safer expansion of constricted arches, enhanced post-orthodontic treatment stability and extended envelope of tooth movement.This case report describes a surgical technique and case report involving periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics.

“ADMINISTRATION OF PLATELET RICH PLASMA- A SHIFT IN ACCELERATED ORTHODONTICS– A REVIEW “

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Saraa Angel .L ◽  
Abhijeet Jaiswal
Keyword(s):  
Human Population ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Invasive Procedures ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Accelerated Orthodontics ◽  
Economical Alternative

Increasing awareness towards self-appearance and aesthetics has led to increase in overall patients willing to undergo orthodontic treatment. Various surgical and non surgical methods have been tried to reduce the overall orthodontic treatment time. Painless, non invasive procedures are preferred over the traumatic methods. Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injection has recently gained popularity due to its safe , relatively painless and economical alternative in accelerating the tooth movement. This article briefs on the researches done in animal and human population so far using PRPand their cumulative effects on tooth movement.

scholarly journals Root Resorption in Orthodontic Treatment: Scoping Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Neeta Aryal ◽  
Mao Jing
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Orthodontic Tooth Movement ◽  
Conventional Radiography ◽  
Promising Tool ◽  
External Root Resorption ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Introduction: Root resorption is the loss of apical root tissue leading to the shortness of root which is often evident in orthodontic tooth movement. Proper management during orthodontic treatment however can minimize this undesirable outcome. The present article attempts to review the etiology of root resorption, methods of diagnosis, and strategies for prevention.Materials & Method: A scoping review was done with the purpose to carry out the narrative integration of the relevant evidences on root resorption and orthodontic treatment from the published literatures. The resulting papers were studied and reviewed thoroughly for the key explanation of root resorption in orthodontic patients. A total of 41 published research articles were reviewed.Discussion: According to the literatures root resorption is common iatrogenic outcome in orthodontic treatment. Biological, mechanical, and combined biological and mechanical factors result in external root resorption. Though most clinicians diagnose root resorption by conventional radiography, researches have clearly shown that CBCT is the promising tool. The clinicians need to counsel orthodontic patients and their parents that the root resorption might be a potential consequence of the treatment lasting for long time. In case of severity; it is essential to reassess the patient and minimize the underlying cause. It is necessary to understand the role of orthodontist in preventing root resorption

scholarly journals Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinand M. Machibya ◽  
Xingfu Bao ◽  
Lihua Zhao ◽  
Min Hu
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Steel Wire ◽  
Skeletal Changes ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Conventional Brackets ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Anchorage Loss ◽  
Mandibular Incisors

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss among orthodontic patients treated by self-ligating brackets (SLBs) and conventional brackets (CBs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study compared 34 patients (SLB group) treated by SmartClip brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) to 35 patients (CB group) treated by conventional preadjusted Victory series brackets (3M Unitek) and ligated by stainless steel wire ligatures. Pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) lateral cephalograms were traced and analyzed using Pancherz sagittal-occlusion analysis to obtain skeletal and dental changes in the maxilla and the mandible. The dental cast models were assessed by the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index for the treatment outcomes. Results: The mean treatment time for SLBs (19.19 months) did not show a statistically significant difference from 21.25 months of CBs; the treatment time and pretreatment PAR scores were strongly correlated. There was no difference in anchorage loss between the SLB and CB groups. There were significant dental and skeletal changes among adolescent orthodontic patients regardless of the bracket used. The lingual inclination of the mandibular incisors in the CB group was 3.62° more than in the SLB group (P < .01). Conclusions: The treatment time and anchorage loss are not influenced by the type of bracket used. There are significant dental and skeletal changes among adolescent orthodontic patients regardless of the bracket used. There is significantly greater lingual inclination of mandibular incisors in the CB group than in the SLB group.

scholarly journals Bimaxillary Protrusion - A Case Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-73
Author(s):  
Hemant Kumar Halwa ◽  
Sumit Kumar Yadav ◽  
Kishor Dutta ◽  
Sandeep Kumar Gupta ◽  
Raju Shrestha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Facial Appearance ◽  
Total Treatment Time ◽  
Total Treatment ◽  
Bimaxillary Protrusion ◽  
Maximum Anchorage

Correction of a severe bimaxillary protrusion with maximum anchorage can be challenging. This case report describes the treatment of a girl with a bimaxillary protrusion. Orthodontic treatment included extraction of her 4 first premolars. The total treatment time was 18 months. Her dental proclination and facial appearance was significantly improved.

scholarly journals Comparison of Rate of Canine Retraction and Secondary Outcomes Associated With Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Treatment and Minimally Invasive Techniques (MOPs): A Randomized Control Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 030157422096350
Author(s):  
Ajit Vikram Parihar ◽  
Shivam Verma ◽  
TP Chaturvedi ◽  
Naresh Kumar ◽  
A Kavin Prasanth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Pain Level ◽  
Canine Retraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Anchorage Loss

Introduction: The objective of the study was to assess the rate of canine retraction and secondary outcomes associated with conventional fixed orthodontic treatment (CFO) and CFO with micro-osteoperforation (CFO + MOP), that is, anchorage loss, root resorption, vitality of tooth, pain and discomfort level during the procedure. Methods: A total of 16 patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion who required upper first premolar extraction with lower non-extraction/single incisor extraction were divided into the test group (MOP) and positive control group (CFO + MOP) for a split-mouth study. Both maxillary canines were retracted with nickel–titanium (NiTi) closed coil springs. Patients were reviewed after 24 hours, 7 days, 28 days, and 4, 8, and 16 weeks to assess the rate of tooth movement, anchorage loss, root resorption, vitality of tooth, pain and discomfort level. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of tooth movement between the CFO and CFO + MOP groups after the first 4 weeks ( P-value = .026), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed at 8, 12, and 16 weeks ( P-value = .33, .99, and .08, respectively). In the CFO group, there was no statistically significant difference in tooth movement between different time intervals ( P-value > .05). There was no significant difference in root resorption between the groups. The pain level was higher in the MOP group in the first 24 hours ( P-value < .05) after the procedure. Later on, the difference in pain level between the groups was not significant ( P-value > .05). The vitality of retracted canines in both groups was healthy. Conclusion: The study recommends that the CFO + MOP procedure has substantial potential to be used as an adjunct to the routine mechanotherapy for faster tooth movement, as it may reduce the treatment time by half in the first 4 weeks after the MOP procedure. There are no potential differences in anchorage loss, tipping, vitality, and apical and lateral root resorption between the CFO and CFO + MOP groups. This trial was registered at Clinical Trial Registry, India.

scholarly journals Orthodontic treatment time: can it be shortened?

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 90-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Moresca
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Determining Factors ◽  
Major Factors

Abstract Introduction: In the literature, no consensus has been reached about orthodontic treatment time. Similarly, the determining factors of the latter have not yet been completely elucidated. Objective: The aim of the present article was to deepen the discussion on the major factors influencing orthodontic treatment time, as well as to present some strategies that have proven effective in controlling and shortening it. Method: Based on evidences found in the literature, the method focussed in providing the basis for clinical decision-making. Conclusions: Treatment time varies according to the type of malocclusion and treatment options. Orthodontist’s influence, patient’s characteristics and compliance are all decisive in determining treatment time, while the effects provided by orthodontic appliances and methods used to speed tooth movement up seem little effective.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document