EFEITO AGUDO DE DIFERENTES PERÍODOS DE FOAM ROLLING SOBRE O SALTO VERTICAL CONTRAMOVIMENTO

Haroldo Santana; Gabriel Andrade Paz; Humberto Lameira Miranda

doi:10.31501/rbcm.v28i2.10597

EFEITO AGUDO DE DIFERENTES PERÍODOS DE FOAM ROLLING SOBRE O SALTO VERTICAL CONTRAMOVIMENTO

Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento ◽

10.31501/rbcm.v28i2.10597 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 28 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Haroldo Santana ◽

Gabriel Andrade Paz ◽

Humberto Lameira Miranda

Keyword(s):

Foam Rolling

Vários métodos de aquecimento têm sido empregados no campo do treinamento esportivo. O foam rolling (FR) é uma das técnicas mais populares. No entanto, permanece o esclarecimento sobre os períodos ótimos de FR para melhorar ou manter o desempenho. Portanto, o objetivo do presente estudo foi explorar o efeito agudo de diferentes períodos do FR no desempenho do salto vertical contramovimento (SV). Doze indivíduos recreacionalmente ativos (23,92 ± 4,08 anos, 70 ± 12 kg, 171 ± 8cm) foram voluntários para o estudo. Os participantes realizaram seis visitas separadas por 48 horas. A primeira sessão incluiu a coleta de dados antropométricos, familiarização com o FR e a técnica do SV. Em seguida, cinco protocolos experimentais foram executados em ordem aleatória: Protocolo controle (CP) - salto vertical sem FR; P30 – uma série de 30 segundos de FR antes do salto vertical; P60 - duas séries de 30 segundos de FR; P90: três séries de 30 segundos de FR; P120 – quatro séries de 30 segundos de FR. O FR foi implementado para quadríceps, isquiotibiais, glúteo e gastrocnêmio. Diferenças significativas no desempenho do salto vertical (p

Download Full-text

Acute foam rolling on quadriceps performance and short-term recovery from fatigue

Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche ◽

10.23736/s0393-3660.18.03753-1 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 178 (4) ◽

Author(s):

Govindasamy Balasekaran ◽

Jolene Lim ◽

Visvasuresh V. Govindaswamy ◽

Wayne Foo ◽

Yew C. Ng

Keyword(s):

Short Term ◽

Foam Rolling

Download Full-text

FOAM ROLLING AND INDICES OF AUTONOMIC RECOVERY FOLLOWING EXERCISE-INDUCED MUSCLE DAMAGE

International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy ◽

10.26603/ijspt20200429 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (3) ◽

pp. 429-440

Author(s):

Anthony D’Amico ◽

Jason Gillis ◽

Kelley McCarthy ◽

Jessica Leftin ◽

Melissa Molloy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Muscle Damage ◽

Foam Rolling ◽

Exercise Induced

Download Full-text

Acute Comparative Effect of Foam Rolling and Static Stretching on Range of Motion in Rowers

Sustainability ◽

10.3390/su13073631 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (7) ◽

pp. 3631

Author(s):

Alfonso Penichet-Tomas ◽

Basilio Pueo ◽

Marta Abad-Lopez ◽

Jose M. Jimenez-Olmedo

Keyword(s):

Range Of Motion ◽

Repeated Measures ◽

Static Stretching ◽

Foam Rolling ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Post Test ◽

Alternating Treatment Design ◽

Stroke Amplitude ◽

Treatment Design ◽

Over Time

Rowers’ anthropometric characteristics and flexibility are fundamental to increase stroke amplitude and optimize power transfer. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of foam rolling and static stretching on the range of motion over time. Eight university rowers (24.8 ± 3.4 yrs., height 182.3 ± 6.5 cm, body mass 79.3 ± 4.6 kg) participated in an alternating treatment design study with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The sit and reach test was used to measure the range of motion. Both in the foam rolling and in the static stretching method, a pre-test (T0), a post-test (T1), and a post-15-min test (T2) were performed. A significant effect was observed on the range of motion over time (p < 0.001), but not for time x method interaction (p = 0.680). Significant differences were found between T0 and T1 with foam rolling and static stretching (p < 0.001, d = 0.4); p < 0.001, d = 0.6). The differences between T0 and T2 were also significant with both methods (p = 0.001, d = 0.4; p < 0.001, d = 0.4). However, no significant difference was observed between T1 and T2 (p = 1.000, d = 0.1; p = 0.089, d = 0.2). Foam roller and static stretching seem to be effective methods to improve the range of motion but there seems to be no differences between them.

Download Full-text

Foam Rolling Elicits Neuronal Relaxation Patterns Distinct from Manual Massage: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Brain Sciences ◽

10.3390/brainsci11060818 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. 818

Author(s):

Yann Kerautret ◽

Aymeric Guillot ◽

Sébastien Daligault ◽

Franck Di Rienzo

Keyword(s):

Skin Conductance ◽

Muscle Pain ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Muscle Relaxation ◽

Well Being ◽

Self Report ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Control Group ◽

Foam Rolling ◽

Randomized Controlled

The present double-blinded, randomized controlled study sought to compare the effects of a full-body manual massage (MM) and a foam rolling (FR) intervention on subjective and objective indexes of performance and well-being. A total of 65 healthy individuals were randomly allocated to an FR, MM, or a control group who received a cognitively oriented relaxation routine. Self-report ratings of perceived anxiety, muscle relaxation, and muscle pain were used to index changes in affect and physical sensations. The sit-and-reach and toe-touch tests, as well as a mental calculation task, were used to index motor and cognitive performances, respectively. We also conducted resting-state electroencephalography and continuous skin conductance recordings before and after the experimental intervention. Both FR and MM groups exhibited neural synchronization of alpha and beta oscillations during the posttest. Skin conductance increased from the pretest to the posttest in the relaxation group, but decreased in the FR group. All interventions improved range of motion, although only the MM group outperformed the relaxation group for the toe-touch performance. MM was associated with reduced muscle pain and increased muscle relaxation. Reduced perceived anxiety after the intervention was observed in the FR group only. Overall, MM and FR both improved objective and subjective indexes of performance and well-being. Differences between the two massage interventions are discussed in relation to the effects of pressure stimulation on autonomic regulations and the proactive vs. retroactive nature of FR, compared to MM.

Download Full-text

Comparison between Neurodynamic therapy and foam rolling in cool-down sessions for delayed onset muscle soreness in healthy individuals.

Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies ◽

10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.018 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Dr. Vedang Vaidya ◽

Dr. Anand Gangwal ◽

Dr. Rachana Dabadghav ◽

Dr. Ashok Shyam ◽

Dr. Parag Sancheti

Keyword(s):

Muscle Soreness ◽

Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness ◽

Healthy Individuals ◽

Foam Rolling ◽

Delayed Onset

Download Full-text

Influence of foam rolling on the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system in healthy women

Biomedical Human Kinetics ◽

10.1515/bhk-2017-0012 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 75-81 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Dariusz Boguszewski ◽

Magdalena Falkowska ◽

Jakub Grzegorz Adamczyk ◽

Dariusz Białoszewski

Keyword(s):

Muscle Strength ◽

Musculoskeletal System ◽

Lower Limb ◽

Functional Limitations ◽

Core Stability ◽

Stability Test ◽

Physical Effort ◽

Foam Rolling ◽

The Core ◽

Group 1

Summary Study aim: To determine the effect of foam rolling on the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system.Material and methods: The study encompassed 37 healthy and physically active women divided into two groups. Group 1 comprised women who performed self-massage with a foam roller after physical effort twice a week, for two months. Group 2 (control) comprised women who did not undergo any exercises or treatment after physical effort. The study used the following research tools: the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) test, the Core Muscle Strength and Stability Test (CMS&ST), and the Sit and Reach Test.Results: The study revealed that foam rolling minimized functional limitations (as measured with the FMS test). The differences between the first and second measurement in Group 1 were statistically significant (p=0.014). In the control group, the results of both measurements were similar. In the CMS&ST, the maximal result of three minutes was not achieved. Moreover, no improvement of results was observed. In the Sit and Reach Test, a statistically significant improvement in the flexibility of the posterior muscles of the thigh was noted in Group 1 (right lower limb p=0.009, left lower limb p = 0.007).Conclusions: 1. Foam rolling may minimize the functional limitations of the musculoskeletal system. It is recommended to incorporate self-myofascial release techniques after physical effort into training. 2. Using foam rolling helped maintain the results obtained in the Core Muscle Strength and Stability Test. Therefore, foam rolling may help maintain the achieved core stability.

Download Full-text