Non-operative vs Surgical Treatment of Isolated Non-Thumb Metacarpal Shaft Fractures

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Metacarpal Shaft

scholarly journals Protocol for surgical and non-surgical treatment for metacarpal shaft fractures in adults: an observational feasibility study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e046913
Author(s):  
Rowa Taha ◽  
Paul Leighton ◽  
Chris Bainbridge ◽  
Alan Montgomery ◽  
Tim Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Text Messages ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Metacarpal Shaft ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

IntroductionMetacarpal shaft fractures (MSF) are common traumatic hand injuries that usually affect young people of working age. They place a significant burden on healthcare resources and society; however, there is a lack of evidence to guide their treatment. Identifying the most beneficial and cost-efficient treatment will ensure optimisation of care and provide economic value for the National Health Service. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment for MSF in adults.Methods and analysisThis is a multicentre prospective cohort study, with a nested qualitative study consisting of patient interviews and focus groups, and an embedded factorial randomised substudy evaluating the use of text messages to maximise data collection and participant retention. The outcomes of interest include eligibility, recruitment and retention rates, completion of follow-up, evaluation of primary outcome measures, calculation of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for selected outcome measures and establishing the feasibility of data collection methods and appropriate time-points for use in a future trial. Data will be captured using a secure online data management system. Data analyses will be descriptive and a thematic inductive analysis will be used for qualitative data. Minimum clinically important effects for each patient-reported outcome measure will be estimated using anchor-based responsiveness statistics and distribution-based methods.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethical approval from the Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority (REC reference 20/EE/0124). Results will be made available to patients, clinicians, researchers and the funder via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Social media platforms, local media and feedback from the Patient Advisory Group will be used to maximise circulation of findings to patients and the public.Trial registration numberISRCTN13922779.

scholarly journals Metacarpal shaft fixation: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plating, lag screws, and headless compression screws

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix G. E. Dyrna ◽  
Daniel M. Avery ◽  
Ryu Yoshida ◽  
David Lam ◽  
Simon Oeckenpöhler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peak Load ◽  
Rigid Fixation ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Metacarpal Shaft ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Headless Compression Screws ◽  
Diaphyseal Fractures ◽  
Dorsal Plating

Abstract Background Metacarpal shaft fractures are common and can be treated nonoperatively. Shortening, angulation, and rotational deformity are indications for surgical treatment. Various forms of treatment with advantages and disadvantages have been documented. The purpose of the study was to determine the stability of fracture fixation with intramedullary headless compression screws in two types of metacarpal shaft fractures and compare them to other common forms of rigid fixation: dorsal plating and lag screw fixation. It was hypothesized that headless compression screws would demonstrate a biomechanical stronger construct. Methods Five matched paired hands (age 60.9 ± 4.6 years), utilizing non-thumb metacarpals, were used for comparative fixation in two fracture types created by an osteotomy. In transverse diaphyseal fractures, fixation by headless compression screws (n = 7) and plating (n = 8) were compared. In long oblique diaphyseal fractures, headless compression screws (n = 8) were compared with plating (n = 8) and lag screws (n = 7). Testing was performed using an MTS frame producing an apex dorsal, three point bending force. Peak load to failure and stiffness were calculated from the load-displacement curve generated. Results For transverse fractures, headless compression screws had a significantly higher stiffness and peak load to failure, means 249.4 N/mm and 584.8 N, than plates, means 129.02 N/mm and 303.9 N (both p < 0.001). For long oblique fractures, stiffness and peak load to failure for headless compression screws were means 209 N/mm and 758.4 N, for plates 258.7 N/mm and 518.5 N, and for lag screws 172.18 N/mm and 234.11 N. There was significance in peak load to failure for headless compression screws vs plates (p = 0.023), headless compression screws vs lag screws (p < 0.001), and plates vs lag screws (p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in stiffness between groups. Conclusion Intramedullary fixation of diaphyseal metacarpal fractures with a headless compression screw provides excellent biomechanical stability. Coupled with lower risks for adverse effects, headless compression screws may be a preferable option for those requiring rapid return to sport or work. Level of evidence Basic Science Study, Biomechanics.

scholarly journals Bone plate fixation ability on the dorsal and lateral sides of a metacarpal shaft transverse fracture

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Cheng Chiu ◽  
Cheng-En Hsu ◽  
Tsung-Yu Ho ◽  
Yen-Nien Ting ◽  
Ming-Tzu Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Strength ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Shaft Fracture ◽  
Bone Plate ◽  
Lateral Side ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Fracture Force ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Metacarpal Shaft

Abstract Background Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common hand trauma. The current surgical fixation options for such fractures include percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning and nonlocking and locking plate fixation. Although bone plate fixation, compared with Kirschner wire pinning, has superior fixation ability, a consensus has not been reached on whether the bone plate is better placed on the dorsal or lateral side. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fixation of locking and regular bone plates on the dorsal and lateral sides of a metacarpal shaft fracture. Materials and methods Thirty-five artificial metacarpal bones were used in the experiment. Metacarpal shaft fractures were created using a saw blade, which were then treated with four types of fixation as follows: (1) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the dorsal side (LP_D); (2) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the lateral side (LP_L); (3) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the dorsal side (RP_D); (4) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the lateral side (RP_D); and (5) two K-wires (KWs). All specimens were tested through cantilever bending tests on a material testing system. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the five fixation types were determined based on the force–displacement data. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the specimens with metacarpal shaft fractures were first analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test. Results The maximum fracture force results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (230.1 ± 22.8 N, mean ± SD) ≅ RP_D group (228.2 ± 13.4 N) > KW group (94.0 ± 17.4 N) > LP_L group (59.0 ± 7.9 N) ≅ RP_L group (44.5 ± 3.4 N). In addition, the stiffness results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (68.7 ± 14.0 N/mm) > RP_D group (54.9 ± 3.2 N/mm) > KW group (20.7 ± 5.8 N/mm) ≅ LP_L group (10.6 ± 1.7 N/mm) ≅ RP_L group (9.4 ± 1.2 N/mm). Conclusion According to our results, the mechanical strength offered by lateral plate fixation of a metacarpal shaft fracture is so low that even KW fixation can offer relatively superior mechanical strength; this is regardless of whether a locking or nonlocking plate is used for lateral plate fixation. Such fixation can reduce the probability of extensor tendon adhesion. Nevertheless, our results indicated that when lateral plate fixation is used for fixating a metacarpal shaft fracture in a clinical setting, whether the mechanical strength offered by such fixation would be strong enough to support bone union remains questionable.

Surgical Treatment for Nonunion of Femoral Shaft Fractures

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 364
Author(s):  
Jae Ik Shim ◽  
Taik Seon Kim ◽  
Sung Jong Lee ◽  
Suk Ha Lee ◽  
Young Bae Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Femoral Shaft ◽  
Femoral Shaft Fractures ◽  
Shaft Fractures

Intramedullary screw fixation for metacarpal shaft fractures: a biomechanical human cadaver study

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-600
Author(s):  
Raffael Labèr ◽  
David Jann ◽  
Pascal Behm ◽  
Stephen J. Ferguson ◽  
Florian S. Frueh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Cadaver Study ◽  
Human Cadaver ◽  
Active Motion ◽  
Shaft Fractures ◽  
Metacarpal Shaft ◽  
Lower Load ◽  
Strength And Stiffness ◽  
Increasing Cyclic Loading ◽  
Intramedullary Screw

Intramedullary cannulated compression screws have been introduced for the fixation of unstable metacarpal fractures. In the present study, this technique was compared with dorsal compression plating to evaluate its biomechanical performance in stabilizing metacarpal shaft fractures. In a first set of experiments, the biomechanical characteristics of the screws were analysed in an artificial bone model. In subsequent experiments, midshaft osteotomies were performed in human cadaver metacarpals, followed by plating or intramedullary screw osteosynthesis. The metacarpals were tested to failure in cantilever bending, following a stepwise increasing cyclic loading protocol. We found a significantly lower load at failure and a significantly lower number of cycles to failure in the intramedullary screw group, but both methods offered sufficient stability under these loads. With reference to published loads on the metacarpals during use of the hand, we conclude that intramedullary osteosynthesis yields sufficient strength and stiffness for early active motion. A difference in its fixation stability is noted compared with plate fixation, which may not be clinically relevant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document