scholarly journals CDKs family -a glimpse into the past and present: from cell cycle control to current biological functions

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Muzna Shah ◽  
Muhammad Fazal Hussain Qureshi ◽  
Danish Mohammad ◽  
Mahira Lakhani ◽  
Tabinda Urooj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cell Renewal ◽  
Catalytic Subunits ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Stem Cell Renewal ◽  
Cyclin Protein ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are the catalytic subunits or protein kinases characterized by separate subunit “cyclin” that are essential for their enzymatic activity. CDKs play important roles in the control of cell cycle progression, cell division, neuronal function, epigenetic regulation, metabolism, stem cell renewal and transcription. However, they can accomplish some of these tasks independently, without binding with cyclin protein or kinase activity. Thus, so far, twenty different CDKs and cyclins have been reported in mammalian cells. The evolutionary expansion of the CDK family in mammals led to the division of CDKs into three cell-cycle-related subfamilies (Cdk1, Cdk4 and Cdk5) and five transcriptional subfamilies (Cdk7, Cdk8, Cdk9, Cdk11 and Cdk20). In this review, we summarizes that how CDKs are traditionally involve their latest revelations, their functional diversity beyond cell cycle regulation and their impact on development of disease in mammals.  

Calcium and cell cycle control

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Whitaker ◽  
R. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sea Urchin ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Sea Urchins ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Control Point ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Free Calcium ◽  
Cycle Regulation

The cell division cycle of the early sea urchin embryo is basic. Nonetheless, it has control points in common with the yeast and mammalian cell cycles, at START, mitosis ENTRY and mitosis EXIT. Progression through each control point in sea urchins is triggered by transient increases in intracellular free calcium. The Cai transients control cell cycle progression by translational and post-translational regulation of the cell cycle control proteins pp34 and cyclin. The START Cai transient leads to phosphorylation of pp34 and cyclin synthesis. The mitosis ENTRY Cai transient triggers cyclin phosphorylation. The motosis EXIT transient causes destruction of phosphorylated cyclin. We compare cell cycle regulation by calcium in sea urchin embryos to cell cycle regulation in other eggs and oocytes and in mammalian cells.

Integrins and cell proliferation

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (14) ◽  
pp. 2553-2560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Alexander Schwartz ◽  
Richard K. Assoian
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Integrated Control ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Erk Pathway ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases

Cell cycle progression in mammalian cells is strictly regulated by both integrin-mediated adhesion to the extracellular matrix and by binding of growth factors to their receptors. This regulation is mediated by G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which are downstream of signaling pathways under the integrated control of both integrins and growth factor receptors. Recent advances demonstrate a surprisingly diverse array of integrin-dependent signals that are channeled into the regulation of the G1 phase CDKs. Regulation of cyclin D1 by the ERK pathway may provide a paradigm for understanding how cell adhesion can determine cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Ubiquitin signaling in cell cycle control and tumorigenesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabin Dang ◽  
Li Nie ◽  
Wenyi Wei
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligases ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Precise Control ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Abstract Cell cycle progression is a tightly regulated process by which DNA replicates and cell reproduces. The major driving force underlying cell cycle progression is the sequential activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), which is achieved in part by the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of their cyclin partners and kinase inhibitors (CKIs). In eukaryotic cells, two families of E3 ubiquitin ligases, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and Skp1-Cul1-F-box protein complex, are responsible for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of many of these CDK regulators, ensuring cell cycle progresses in a timely and precisely regulated manner. In the past couple of decades, accumulating evidence have demonstrated that the dysregulated cell cycle transition caused by inefficient proteolytic control leads to uncontrolled cell proliferation and finally results in tumorigenesis. Based upon this notion, targeting the E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in cell cycle regulation is expected to provide novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment. Thus, a better understanding of the diversity and complexity of ubiquitin signaling in cell cycle regulation will shed new light on the precise control of the cell cycle progression and guide anticancer drug development.

scholarly journals Cell cycle regulation in Aspergillus by two protein kinases

1996 ◽  
Vol 317 (3) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. OSMANI ◽  
Xiang S. YE
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Kinases ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
Mitotic Regulation

Great progress has recently been made in our understanding of the regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle, and the central role of cyclin-dependent kinases is now clear. In Aspergillus nidulans it has been established that a second class of cell-cycle-regulated protein kinases, typified by NIMA (encoded by the nimA gene), is also required for cell cycle progression into mitosis. Indeed, both p34cdc2/cyclin B and NIMA have to be correctly activated before mitosis can be initiated in this species, and p34cdc2/cyclin B plays a role in the mitosis-specific activation of NIMA. In addition, both kinases have to be proteolytically destroyed before mitosis can be completed. NIMA-related kinases may also regulate the cell cycle in other eukaryotes, as expression of NIMA can promote mitotic events in yeast, frog or human cells. Moreover, dominant-negative versions of NIMA can adversely affect the progression of human cells into mitosis, as they do in A. nidulans. The ability of NIMA to influence mitotic regulation in human and frog cells strongly suggests the existence of a NIMA pathway of mitotic regulation in higher eukaryotes. A growing number of NIMA-related kinases have been isolated from organisms ranging from fungi to humans, and some of these kinases are also cell-cycle-regulated. How NIMA-related kinases and cyclin-dependent kinases act in concert to promote cell cycle transitions is just beginning to be understood. This understanding is the key to a full knowledge of cell cycle regulation.

scholarly journals Core Control Principles of the Eukaryotic Cell Cycle

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souradeep Basu ◽  
Paul Nurse ◽  
Andrew Jones
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Substrate Specificities ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Do So

Abstract Cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) lie at the heart of eukaryotic cell cycle control, with different Cyclin-CDK complexes initiating DNA replication (S-CDKs) and mitosis (M-CDKs). However, the principles on which Cyclin-CDKs organise the temporal order of cell cycle events are contentious. The currently most widely accepted model, is that the S-CDKs and M-CDKs are functionally specialised, with significant different substrate specificities to execute different cell cycle events. A second model is that S-CDKs and M-CDKs are redundant with each other, with both acting as sources of overall cellular CDK activity. Here we reconcile these two views of core cell cycle control. Using a multiplexed phosphoproteomics assay of in vivo S-CDK and M-CDK activities in fission yeast, we show that S-CDK and M-CDK substrate specificities are very similar, showing that S-CDKs are not completely specialised for S-phase alone. Normally S-CDK cannot undergo mitosis, but is able to do so when Protein Phosphatase 1 (PP1) is removed from the centrosome, allowing several mitotic substrates to be better phosphorylated by S-CDK in vivo. Thus, an increase in S-CDK activity in vivo is sufficient to allow S-CDK to carry out M-CDK function. Therefore, we unite the two opposing views of cell cycle control, showing that the core cell cycle engine which temporally orders cell cycle progression is largely based upon a quantitative increase of CDK activity through the cell cycle, combined with minor qualitative differences in catalytic specialisation of S-CDKs and M-CDKs.

scholarly journals Cell-cycle control of cell polarity in yeast

2018 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle D. Moran ◽  
Hui Kang ◽  
Ana V. Araujo ◽  
Trevin R. Zyla ◽  
Koji Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Positive Feedback Loop ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Rho Family

In many cells, morphogenetic events are coordinated with the cell cycle by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). For example, many mammalian cells display extended morphologies during interphase but round up into more spherical shapes during mitosis (high CDK activity) and constrict a furrow during cytokinesis (low CDK activity). In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, bud formation reproducibly initiates near the G1/S transition and requires activation of CDKs at a point called “start” in G1. Previous work suggested that CDKs acted by controlling the ability of cells to polarize Cdc42, a conserved Rho-family GTPase that regulates cell polarity and the actin cytoskeleton in many systems. However, we report that yeast daughter cells can polarize Cdc42 before CDK activation at start. This polarization operates via a positive feedback loop mediated by the Cdc42 effector Ste20. We further identify a major and novel locus of CDK action downstream of Cdc42 polarization, affecting the ability of several other Cdc42 effectors to localize to the polarity site.

Dolichol delays G1-arrest for one cell cycle in human fibroblasts subjected to depletion of serum or mevalonate

1992 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 1065-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Larsson ◽  
J. Wejde
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Video Recording ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Serum Factors

It is well-established that some product(s) or metabolite(s) of mevalonate is (are) critical for growth of mammalian cells. In the search for this (these) compound(s) it seems meaningful to distinguish between compounds needed for cell cycle progression in proliferating cells and compounds needed for growth activation of arrested cells. By using time-lapse video recording we have studied the possible regulatory role of cholesterol, dolichol and mevalonate in the cell cycle of human diploid fibroblasts (HDF). HDF, which are serum-dependent, were rapidly growth-arrested in the first part of G1 upon removal of serum factors. They also responded to mevinolin (an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor) by a similar G1-block, indicating that a mevalonate-derived product is involved in the G1-located cell cycle control of HDF. Interestingly, dolichol counteracted the G1-block caused by both types of treatment. Hence, the early G1-cells could traverse the remainder of the cell cycle and divide despite depletion of serum or mevalonate. We also demonstrated that addition of dolichol resulted in a significant decrease in the rate of protein degradation. This protein stabilizing effect may constitute the mechanism by which dolichol delays the G1-arrest of HDF.

scholarly journals Cell cycle control by Xenopus p28Kix1, a developmentally regulated inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases.

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Shou ◽  
W G Dunphy
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin E ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Cdk Inhibitors ◽  
Egg Extracts

We have isolated Xenopus p28Kix1, a member of the p21CIP1/p27KIP1/p57KIP2 family of cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitors. Members of this family negatively regulate cell cycle progression in mammalian cells by inhibiting the activities of Cdks. p28 shows significant sequence homology with p21, p27, and p57 in its N-terminal region, where the Cdk inhibition domain is known to reside. In contrast, the C-terminal domain of p28 is distinct from that of p21, p27, and p57. In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, p28 was found to be associated with Cdk2, cyclin E, and cyclin A, but not the Cdc2/cyclin B complex in Xenopus egg extracts. Xenopus p28 associates with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen, but with a substantially lower affinity than human p21. In kinase assays with recombinant Cdks, p28 inhibits pre-activated Cdk2/cyclin E and Cdk2/cyclin A, but not Cdc2/cyclin B. However, at high concentrations, p28 does prevent the activation of Cdc2/cyclin B by the Cdk-activating kinase. Consistent with the role of p28 as a Cdk inhibitor, recombinant p28 elicits an inhibition of both DNA replication and mitosis upon addition to egg extracts, indicating that it can regulate multiple cell cycle transitions. The level of p28 protein shows a dramatic developmental profile: it is low in Xenopus oocytes, eggs, and embryos up to stage 11, but increases approximately 100-fold between stages 12 and 13, and remains high thereafter. The induction of p28 expression temporally coincides with late gastrulation. Thus, although p28 may play only a limited role during the early embryonic cleavages, it may function later in development to establish a somatic type of cell cycle. Taken together, our results indicate that Xenopus p28 is a new member of the p21/p27/p57 class of Cdk inhibitors, and that it may play a role in developmental processes.

scholarly journals The Involvement of Two cdc2-related Kinases (CRKs) inTrypanosoma bruceiCell Cycle Regulation and the Distinctive Stage-specific Phenotypes Caused by CRK3 Depletion

2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (19) ◽  
pp. 20519-20528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Tu ◽  
Ching C. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Eukaryotic Cell ◽  
Small Population ◽  
Bloodstream Form ◽  
Phenotypic Change ◽  
Procyclic Form ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Cyclin-dependent protein kinases are among the key regulators of eukaryotic cell cycle progression. Potential functions of the five cdc2-related kinases (CRK) inTrypanosoma bruceiwere analyzed using the RNA interference (RNAi) technique. In both the procyclic and bloodstream forms ofT. brucei, CRK1 is apparently involved in controlling the G1/S transition, whereas CRK3 plays an important role in catalyzing cells across the G2/M junction. A knockdown of CRK1 caused accumulation of cells in the G1phase without apparent phenotypic change, whereas depletion of CRK3 enriched cells of both forms in the G2/M phase. However, two distinctive phenotypes were observed between the CRK3-deficient procyclic and bloodstream forms. The procyclic form has a majority of the cells containing a single enlarged nucleus plus one kinetoplast. There is also an enhanced population of anucleated cells, each containing a single kinetoplast known as the zoids (0N1K). The CRK3-depleted bloodstream form has an increased number of one nucleus-two kinetoplast cells (1N2K) and a small population containing aggregated multiple nuclei and multiple kinetoplasts. Apparently, these two forms have different mechanisms in cell cycle regulation. Although the procyclic form can be driven into cytokinesis and cell division by kinetoplast segregation without a completed mitosis, the bloodstream form cannot enter cytokinesis under the same condition. Instead, it keeps going through another G1phase and enters a new S phase resulting in an aggregate of multiple nuclei and multiple kinetoplasts in an undivided cell. The different leakiness in cell cycle regulation between two stage-specific forms of an organism provides an interesting and useful model for further understanding the evolution of cell cycle control among the eukaryotes.

scholarly journals Limits and constraints on mechanisms of cell-cycle regulation imposed by cell sizehomeostasis measurements

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Willis ◽  
Henrik Jönsson ◽  
Kerwyn Casey Huang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Size ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Constant Size ◽  
Cycle Regulation ◽  
High Throughput Imaging ◽  
Insight Into

SummaryHigh-throughput imaging has led to an explosion of observations regarding cell-size homeostasis across the kingdoms of life. Among bacteria, “adder” behavior in which a constant size appears to be added during each cell cycle is ubiquitous, while various eukaryotes show other size-homeostasis behaviors. Since interactions between cell-cycle progression and growth ultimately determine size-homeostasis behaviors, we developed a general model of cell proliferation to: 1) discover how the requirement of cell-size homeostasis limits mechanisms of cell-cycle control; 2) predict how features of cell-cycle control translate into size-homeostasis measurements. Our analyses revealed plausible cell-cycle control scenarios that nevertheless fail to regulate cell size, conditions that generate apparent adder behavior without underlying adder mechanisms, cell-cycle features that play unintuitive roles in causing deviations from adder, and distinguishing predictions for extended size-homeostasis statistics according to the underlying control mechanism. The model thus provides holistic insight into the mechanistic implications of cell-size homeostasis measurements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document