scholarly journals Patients with Advanced Cancer during the COVID‐19 Pandemic in Ukraine

2022 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-03
Author(s):  
Hojouj Mohammad
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Patient Navigator ◽  
Resource Limited Settings ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Care Systems

COVID‐19 has overwhelmed the capacity of health care systems, limiting access to supportive and palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Telemedicine has emerged as a tool to provide care continuity to patients while limiting the risk of contagion. However, implementing telemedicine in resource‐limited settings is challenging. We report the results of a multidisciplinary patient‐navigator‐led telemedicine supportive care program in Dnipro City. One‐hundred sixty‐five telemedicine interventions were provided to 77 patients (median age 67, 47% female). A quarter of the patients had less than or equal to elementary school education, and 18% lived in a rural area. The most common interventions were psychological care (30%), pain and symptom control (27%), and nutritional counseling (10%). Half of the interventions were provided by video conferencing. The most common patient‐reported barrier was limited experience using communication technology. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of providing supportive and palliative care interventions using telemedicine in resource‐limited settings.

scholarly journals Using Telemedicine for Providing Supportive and Palliative Care Patients with Advanced Cancer during the COVID?19 Pandemic in Ukraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 01-03
Author(s):  
Hojouj Mohammad I M
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Patient Navigator ◽  
Resource Limited Settings ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Care Systems

COVID‐19 has overwhelmed the capacity of health care systems, limiting access to supportive and palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. Telemedicine has emerged as a tool to provide care continuity to patients while limiting the risk of contagion. However, implementing telemedicine in resource‐limited settings is challenging. We report the results of a multidisciplinary patient‐navigator‐led telemedicine supportive care program in Dnipro City. One‐hundred sixty‐five telemedicine interventions were provided to 50 patients (median age 67, 47% female). A quarter of the patients had less than or equal to elementary school education, and 18% lived in a rural area. The most common interventions were psychological care (30%), pain and symptom control (27%), and nutritional counseling (10%). Half of the interventions were provided by video conferencing. The most common patient‐reported barrier was limited experience using communication technology. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of providing supportive and palliative care interventions using telemedicine in resource‐limited settings.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of Symptom Screening With Targeted Early Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Camilla Zimmermann ◽  
Ashley Pope ◽  
Breffni Hannon ◽  
Monika K. Krzyzanowska ◽  
Gary Rodin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Symptom Screening ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Over Time

Background: Routine early palliative care (EPC) improves quality of life (QoL) for patients with advanced cancer, but it may not be necessary for all patients. We assessed the feasibility of Symptom screening with Targeted Early Palliative care (STEP) in a phase II trial. Methods: Patients with advanced cancer were recruited from medical oncology clinics. Symptoms were screened at each visit using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r); moderate to severe scores (screen-positive) triggered an email to a palliative care nurse, who called the patient and offered EPC. Patient-reported outcomes of QoL, depression, symptom control, and satisfaction with care were measured at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary aim was to determine feasibility, according to predefined criteria. Secondary aims were to assess whether STEP identified patients with worse patient-reported outcomes and whether screen-positive patients who accepted and received EPC had better outcomes over time than those who did not receive EPC. Results: In total, 116 patients were enrolled, of which 89 (77%) completed screening for ≥70% of visits. Of the 70 screen-positive patients, 39 (56%) received EPC during the 6-month study and 4 (6%) received EPC after the study end. Measure completion was 76% at 2 months, 68% at 4 months, and 63% at 6 months. Among screen-negative patients, QoL, depression, and symptom control were substantially better than for screen-positive patients at baseline (all P<.0001) and remained stable over time. Among screen-positive patients, mood and symptom control improved over time for those who accepted and received EPC and worsened for those who did not receive EPC (P<.01 for trend over time), with no difference in QoL or satisfaction with care. Conclusions: STEP is feasible in ambulatory patients with advanced cancer and distinguishes between patients who remain stable without EPC and those who benefit from targeted EPC. Acceptance of the triggered EPC visit should be encouraged. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04044040.

Palliative care referral practices and perceptions: The divide between metropolitan and non-metropolitan general practitioners

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire E. Johnson ◽  
Afaf Girgis ◽  
Christine L. Paul ◽  
David C. Currow
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Terminal Illness ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Psychosocial Needs ◽  
Consultative Service

AbstractObjective:Late or non-referral of patients to specialist palliative care (SPC) services may affect patients' and their carers' quality of care. General practitioners (GPs) are key professionals in linking people with SPC. The aim of this article is to assess GPs' perceptions and SPC referrals for their patients with advanced cancer and differences between metropolitan (M GPs) and non-metropolitan GPs (NM GPs).Method:Self-report survey mailed to a stratified random sample of 1,680 Australian GPs was used.Results:Thirty-one percent (469) of eligible GPs returned surveys. More M GPs than NM GPs reported referring >60% of their patients for SPC (p = 0.014); and that a more comprehensive range of SPC services was available. The most frequently reported referral prompts were: presence of terminal illness (M GPs, 71%, NM GPs, 66%, ns (not significant)); future need for symptom control (69% vs. 59%, ns) and uncontrolled physical symptoms (63% vs. 54%, ns). Reasons for not referring were: doctor's ability to manage symptoms (62% vs. 68%, ns) and the absence of symptoms (29% vs. 18%, p = 0.025). Higher referral was associated with: having a palliative care physician or consultative service available; agreeing that all patients with advanced cancer should be referred, and agreeing that with SPC, the needs of the family are better met.Significance of results:Referrals for SPC were primarily disease-related rather than for psychological and emotional concerns. Measures are needed to encourage referrals based upon psychosocial needs as well as for physical concerns, and to support GPs caring for people with advanced cancer in areas with fewer comprehensive SPC services.

scholarly journals A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing Virtual Learning Collaborative and Technical Assistance strategies to implement an early palliative care program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a study protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Zubkoff ◽  
Kathleen Doyle Lyons ◽  
J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom ◽  
Gregory Hagley ◽  
Maria Pisu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Background Virtual Learning Collaboratives (VLC), learning communities focused on a common purpose, are used frequently in healthcare settings to implement best practices. Yet, there is limited research testing the effectiveness of this approach compared to other implementation strategies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a VLC compared to Technical Assistance (TA) among community oncology practices implementing ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends), an evidence-based, early palliative care telehealth, psycho-educational intervention for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their caregivers. Methods Using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes Frameworks, this two-arm hybrid type-III cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare two implementation strategies, VLC versus TA, among the 48 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice clusters that have not historically provided palliative care to all patients with advanced cancer. Three cohorts of practice clusters will be randomized to the study arms. Each practice cluster will recruit 15–27 patients and a family caregiver to participate in ENABLE. The primary study outcome is ENABLE uptake (patient level), i.e., the proportion of eligible patients who complete the ENABLE program (receive a palliative care assessment and complete the six ENABLE sessions over 12 weeks). The secondary outcome is overall program implementation (practice cluster level), as measured by the General Organizational Index at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory aims assess patient and caregiver mood and quality of life outcomes at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. Practice cluster randomization will seek to keep the proportion of rural practices, practice sizes, and minority patients seen within each practice balanced across the two study arms. Discussion This study will advance the field of implementation science by evaluating VLC effectiveness, a commonly used but understudied, implementation strategy. The study will advance the field of palliative care by building the capacity and infrastructure to implement an early palliative care program in community oncology practices. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT04062552; Pre-results. Registered: August 20, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04062552?term=NCT04062552&draw=2&rank=1

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcomes Collected as Part of the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit in the Health Care Systems Research Network

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Tabano ◽  
Thomas Gill ◽  
Kathryn Anzuoni ◽  
Heather Allore ◽  
Ann Gruber-Baldini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Care Systems

scholarly journals 69 Exploring learners’ perspectives of a pediatric palliative care tele-mentoring and education program (project ECHO) in a resource-limited setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. e29-e29
Author(s):  
Emily Evans ◽  
Megan Doherty ◽  
Shokoufeh Modanloo ◽  
Jennifer Rowe ◽  
Dennis Newhook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
South Asia ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Pediatric Palliative Care ◽  
Learning Resources ◽  
Resource Limited Settings ◽  
Project Echo ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
One Year

Abstract Introduction/Background More than 98% of children who need palliative care live in low- or middle-income countries where access to palliative care is extremely limited. A lack of palliative care education for health care providers has been identified as a significant barrier to improving access to palliative care. Project ECHO (Extension of Community Healthcare Outcomes) is an online tele-mentoring educational platform developed to improve access to specialist care in these underserved areas. From 2018 to 2019, we piloted a one-year Project ECHO program which provided pediatric palliative care training for healthcare professionals mainly within India and surrounding South Asian countries. Objectives The objective of this study was to explore the learning experiences of participants in a Project ECHO on pediatric palliative care in South Asia and explore considerations to improve ECHO to cater to the unique learning needs and challenges for healthcare professionals in resource-limited settings. Design/Methods We implemented a one-year Project ECHO targeting healthcare providers in South Asia, which consisted of 24 bi-weekly 90-minute sessions. Learners who attended at least 20% (5 sessions) were invited to participate in focus groups. Focus groups were designed to explore participants’ experiences and the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the program. Recordings of the focus group sessions were transcribed, coded and independently verified. The codes were then arranged into overarching themes. Results Seventeen individuals from India and Bangladesh participated in four focus groups at the end of ECHO PPC. Following coding and analysis, two major themes and seven sub-themes were identified. The themes included: (1) Benefits of participation in ECHO PPC (creation of a community of practice; opportunity to exchange cultures, ideas and experiences; supportive role of the facilitator and peers; increased relevant knowledge and skills; and access to additional learning resources) and (2) Barriers to participation (difficulties with time and practice schedule management; and language and sociocultural factors). Conclusion Healthcare professionals in resource-limited settings benefit from project ECHO through the creation of a supportive, online learning community of peers where ideas, experiences and learning resources can be shared. Addressing barriers to participation may enhance the learning experience of project ECHO in the future.

scholarly journals Upside down solutions: palliative care and COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Knights ◽  
Felicity Knights ◽  
Iain Lawrie
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Relief Of Suffering ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Effective Use

The current COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented and requires innovation beyond existing approaches to contribute to global health and well-being. This is essential to support the care of people at the end of their lives or who are critically ill from COVID-19 or other life-limiting illnesses. Palliative care (PC) is centred on effective symptom control, promotion of quality of life, complex decision-making, and holistic care of physical, psychological, social and spiritual health. It is ideally placed to both provide and contribute to care for patients, families, communities and colleagues during the pandemic. Where recovery is uncertain, emphasis should be on care and relief of suffering, as well as survival. Where healthcare resources and facilities come under intense pressure, lessons can be learnt from models of care in other settings around the world. This article explores how the field can contribute by ensuring that PC principles and practices are woven into everyday healthcare practice. We explore alternative ways of providing care under such pressure and discuss three areas of learning from resource-limited settings: (1) integration of palliative medicine into everyday practice, (2) simplification of biomedical management plus multidisciplinary teamwork and (3) effective use of volunteers.

Predictive value of the patient reported outcome “living with cancer” instrument on overall survival in advanced cancer patients: A tool for guiding timing of palliative care consultations.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10025-10025
Author(s):  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Dhakshila Paramanathan ◽  
Srikesh Arunajadai ◽  
Victoria DeVincenzo ◽  
Ruth Pe Benito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Living With Cancer

10025 Background: The Living with Cancer (LWC) patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument evaluates distress from the point of view of the advanced cancer pt. The 7-item Likert survey measures 4 personhood domains (performance status, pain, burden [financial and family], depression) with scores ranging 0-112. In a pilot study of 433 cancer pts at a single center a score of >28 was associated with an increased likelihood of physician’s (blinded) opinion of need for end-of-life care discussions ( J Palliative Med 2016). Methods: The LWC instrument is a statistically validated PRO (ASCO Palliative Care Symposium 2016). LWC was administered to 1024 cancer pts receiving non-curative therapy at 7 centers (Regional Cancer Care Associates, NJ) from Sept 2015 - Oct 2016. LWC surveys were linked to the Cota database, which extracts and enriches data from EHRs. Date of survey was used as the start point in time-to-event analysis. Results: 290 (28%) pts expired during the study (median f/u 9.9 months). 267 (26%) pts exceeded the threshold score of 28 defined in the pilot set (28 was also independently this study’s optimal cut point). Pts with an LWC score >28 had inferior 6 and 12 mo overall survival (69% and 54%) vs pts with scores <29 (88% and 73%) (log rank p<0.001). A Cox model demonstrated that LWC score and cancer type were significant (LWC: p<0.001, cancer types (compared to B): GI p<0.001, GU: p=0.013, T: p<0.001, M: p=0.334) A one point score increase in LWC resulted in a 1.8% increase in expected hazard. Among solid tumor pts with LWC >28, 20% died within the next 3 mo and 35% died within the next 6 mo, indicating appropriate timing for hospice and palliative care consults, respectively. Conclusions: Pt responses to the LWC instrument predict survival among advanced cancer pts and may be useful in guiding timing of palliative care consultations. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document