scholarly journals Management Practices and Reported Antimicrobial Usage on Conventional and Organic Dairy Farms

2004 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Zwald ◽  
P.L. Ruegg ◽  
J.B. Kaneene ◽  
L.D. Warnick ◽  
S.J. Wells ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritha M Langford ◽  
Kenneth MD Rutherford ◽  
Mhairi C Jack ◽  
Lorna Sherwood ◽  
Alistair B Lawrence ◽  
...  

There have been increases in the number of organic dairy farms in the UK in recent years. However, there is little information on the impact of organic regulations on cow welfare. As part of a larger study, we aimed to investigate differences between organic and non-organic farms in management practices and winter housing quality. Forty organic and 40 non-organic farms throughout the UK were visited. Organic and non-organic farms were paired for housing type, and as far as possible for herd size, genetic merit and location. A detailed questionnaire covering key aspects of dairy management was carried out with each farmer. On a subset of twenty pairs, an assessment of the quality of the winter housing for both lactating and dry cows was undertaken, covering the parlour, bedding, loafing and feeding areas. Management practices and building conditions varied greatly within farm types and there was considerable overlap between organic and non-organic farms. Milk yield, level and composition of concentrate feed, management of heifers and calving, and use of ‘alternative treatments’ to prevent and treat mastitis differed between organic and non-organic farms. In all other respects there were no differences between farm types. Building dimensions per cow did not differ, even though organic recommendations advise greater space per cow than recommended for non-organic farms. The similarity between organic and non-organic farms in most respects indicates that cow housing and health, based on both the described management regimes and the farmers' perceptions of disease incidence, on organic dairy farms is neither compromised by the regulations, nor considerably better than on non-organic farms.


2012 ◽  
Vol 145 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ivemeyer ◽  
G. Smolders ◽  
J. Brinkmann ◽  
E. Gratzer ◽  
B. Hansen ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 159 (20) ◽  
pp. 680-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. O'Mahony ◽  
A. M. Healy ◽  
K. J. O'Farrell ◽  
M. L. Doherty

2022 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 869-882
Author(s):  
Gabriel Michelutti do Nascimento ◽  
◽  
Marita Vedovelli Cardozo ◽  
Mylena Karoline Valmorbida ◽  
Natália Pereira ◽  
...  

Bovine mastitis is one of the main causes of economic damage in dairy farms. Therefore, the control and prevention of microorganisms involved in this disease, mainly Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus agalactiae, are essential. One of the most important steps for the prevention of the disease is the use of antiseptic products before and after the milking process to avoid bacteria from infecting the udder of the animal. Currently, the most used antiseptic product in dairy farms is iodine-based, and organic dairy farms, which follow several strict regulations, including the use of natural products whenever possible, are often forced to adopt non-natural antiseptic products, such as iodine-based ones, because of the lack of natural alternatives. Propolis, a natural substance produced by honeybees, has been extensively studied for its various properties, one of which is antimicrobial activity. Therefore, a new natural antiseptic product containing 1% propolis in 10% hydroalcoholic solution for the pre-dipping, and 10% glycerol solution added with 0.2% citronella oil for the post-dipping was analyzed for its capacity to reduce bacteria in vivo in order to prevent bovine mastitis, allowing its use on organic dairy farms. A total of 128 samples were analyzed in terms of bacterial growth for Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus spp. using the spreadplate technique. The reduction in the bacterial concentration after the application of the products was compared between two antiseptic solutions, an iodine-based solution as the control and a propolis-based one as the natural alternative. The results obtained show a similar efficiency for both products in terms of total bacterial reduction, indicating considerable antimicrobial activity against bacteria most commonly associated with bovine mastitis. Molecular analysis was carried out for the identification of Streptococcus agalactiae; the PCR results were negative for the presence of S. agalactiae in all samples, indicating that the animals most likely did not have any form of the disease. The efficiency of the natural antiseptic was satisfactory, indicating an important find facilitating organic milk production worldwide, showcasing a natural antiseptic solution with efficient antimicrobial activity.


2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seongbeom Cho ◽  
Charles P. Fossler ◽  
Francisco Diez-Gonzalez ◽  
Scott J. Wells ◽  
Craig W. Hedberg ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang-Seok Ki ◽  
Hyun-Joo Lim ◽  
Dong-Hyun Lim ◽  
Seong-Min Park ◽  
Tae-il Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document