Adenocarcinoma Developing at the Level of a Chronic Perianal Fistula by Cell Implantation from a Proximal Rectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138
Author(s):  
Lucian Sorin ANDREI ◽  
◽  
Adriana ANDREI ◽  
Radu Sorin POPISTEANU ◽  
Gabriel BECHEANU ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S012-S012
Author(s):  
M D Wewer ◽  
M Zhao ◽  
A Nordholm-Carstensen ◽  
J B Seidelin ◽  
J Burisch

Abstract Background Perianal Crohn’s disease (pCD) has a major negative impact on patients’ quality of life and is complex to treat. Despite its putative high frequency and burden for patients, only a few studies have investigated the incidence, disease course and associated cancer-risk in a population-based setting. The aim was to assess the incidence and course of pCD in adult patients with CD within a 19-year period. Specifically, describing changes in medical and surgical management as well as rates of cancer. Methods The cohort comprised all individuals >18 years diagnosed with CD in Denmark between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2015. Patients were identified in the National Patient Registry. Chi-square test, Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used. Results A total of 1,697/9,739 (17%) patients with CD were found to have pCD. Perianal fistulas were the most common manifestation accounting for 943 (56%) cases. The onset of pCD before CD diagnosis occurred in 32%. The overall incidence of pCD was 20/1,000 patient-years. The incidence of pCD remained stable over time. More patients with pCD were treated with immunomodulators (70%) and biologics (35%) than those without pCD (51%, p < 0.001 and 15%, p < 0.001, respectively). Defunctioning stoma was performed in 157/943 (17%) of perianal fistula patients. Stoma formation in relation to resection was performed in 112/943 (12%) of perianal fistula patients. Patients with pCD were found to have a significantly increased risk of undergoing major abdominal surgery compared with patients without pCD (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.40 to 1.65, p < 0.001). The incidence rate ratios of anal and rectal cancer in pCD patients were 12.46 (95% CI: 5.07 to 30.59, p < 0.001) and 2.41 (95% CI: 1.31 to 4.42, p = 0.003) respectively, when compared with non-IBD matched controls. The incidence rate ratio of anal and rectal cancer in pCD patients was 2.36 (95% CI: 0.86 to 6.50, p = 0.09) and 1.35 (95% CI: 0.68 to 2.68, p = 0.38) respectively, when compared with CD patients without pCD. Conclusion In this nationwide study, 17% of the CD patients developed pCD. The continuing high incidence of pCD suggests a limited disease-modifying effect of biologics. Patients with pCD were at increased risk of undergoing major surgery compared with non-pCD patients. The risk of rectal or anal cancer was increased in patients with pCD compared with non-IBD matched controls. These findings encourage surveillance of rectal and anal cancer.


1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1508-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genc Basha ◽  
Nadine Ectors ◽  
Freddy Penninckx ◽  
Ludo Filez ◽  
Karel Geboes

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 256-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Link ◽  
Staib ◽  
Kornmann ◽  
Formentini ◽  
Schatz ◽  
...  

The possibilities and results of multimodal treatment in rectal cancer were reviewed with respect to the results of surgical treatment only. Based on the results of 4 studies, reducing local relapse rates and increasing long term survival rates significantly, postoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) + chemotherapy (CT) should remain the recommended standard for R0 resected UICC II and III rectal cancers. The addition of RT to adjuvant CT reduces local relapses without significant impact on survival (NSABP R-02). Vice versa, the addition of CT to RT or an improved CT in the RCT-concept prolongs survival. Preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) reduced local relapse rates in 9 studies, and extended survival in one study that evaluated all eligible patients. Preoperative RT reduced local relapse rates in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME) but did not extend survival. The preoperative RCT + CT downstages resectable and nonresectable tumors and induces a higher sphincter preservation rate. Phase III data justifying its routine use in all UICC II + III stages are not yet available. This treatment may be routinely applied in nonresectable primary tumors or local relapses. Preoperative RCT (or RT) may evolve as standard, if the patient selection is improved and postoperative morbidity and long term toxicity reduced. Intraoperative RT could be added to this concept or be used together with preoperative/postoperative RT at the same indications. Postoperative adjuvant RT reduced local relapses significantly in a single trial, and no impact on survival time is reported. Since postoperative RT is inferior to preoperative RT, this treatment cannot be recommended, if RT is chosen as a single treatment modality in adjunction to surgery. The results of local tumor excisions may be improved with pre- or postoperative RCT + CT. In the future, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer might be more effective, if individualized according to prognostic factors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (04) ◽  
pp. 162-164
Author(s):  
Frank Lichert

Diers J et al. Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectum resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany. BJS Open 2020; doi:10.1002/bjs5.50254


Endoscopy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (S 03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Xiaoyin ◽  
Guo Xuegang ◽  
Wang Xin ◽  
Du Jianjun ◽  
Zhao Qingchuan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document