The role of radiosurgery in the management of WHO Grade II and III intracranial meningiomas

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. E16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale Ding ◽  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
John Hantzmon ◽  
Chun-Po Yen ◽  
Brian J. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Case Series ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Intracranial Meningiomas ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii

Object WHO Grade II and III intracranial meningiomas are uncommon, but they portend a significantly worse prognosis than their benign Grade I counterparts. The mainstay of current management is resection to obtain cytoreduction and histological tissue diagnosis. The timing and benefit of postoperative fractionated external beam radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery remain controversial. The authors review the stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes for Grade II and III meningiomas. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed to identify all radiosurgery series reporting the treatment outcomes for Grade II and III meningiomas. Case reports and case series involving fewer than 10 patients were excluded. Results From 1998 to 2013, 19 radiosurgery series were published in which 647 Grade II and III meningiomas were treated. Median tumor volumes were 2.2–14.6 cm3. The median margin doses were 14–21 Gy, although generally the margin doses for Grade II meningiomas were 16–20 Gy and the margin doses for Grade III meningiomas were 18–22 Gy. The median 5-year PFS was 59% for Grade II tumors and 13% for Grade III tumors, which may have been affected by patient age, prior radiation therapy, tumor volume, and radiosurgical dose and timing. The median complication rate following radiosurgery was 8%. Conclusions The current data for radiosurgery suggest that it has a role in the management of residual or recurrent Grade II and III meningiomas. However, better studies are needed to fully define this role. Due to the relatively low prevalence of these tumors, it is unlikely that prospective studies will be feasible. As such, well-designed retrospective analyses may improve our understanding of the effect of radiosurgery on tumor recurrence and patient survival and the incidence and impact of treatment-induced complications.

scholarly journals Single-fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Atypical Meningiomas (WHO grade II): Treatment Results Based on a 25-year Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Hasegawa ◽  
Kunal Vakharia ◽  
Link J Michael ◽  
Scott L Stafford ◽  
Paul D Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Atypical Meningiomas

Abstract PurposeTo clarify the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for atypical meningiomas (AM).MethodsA retrospective analysis of 68 patients with AM having SRS from 1995 until 2019. Nineteen patients (28%) had undergone prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (median dose, 54 Gy). The median follow-up period was 52 months.ResultsEighteen (26%), 17 (25%), and 33 (49%) patients received SRS as an upfront adjuvant (≤ 6 months), early salvage (7-18 months), or late salvage treatment (> 18 months), respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 52%, 35%, and 25%, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survivals (DSSs) were 85%, 78%, and 61%, respectively. Adverse radiation events (AREs) were observed in 12 patients (18%), with increased or new seizures being the most frequent complication (n=7). Prior EBRT was associated with reduced PFS (HR = 5.92, P <0.01), reduced DSS (HR = 5.84, P <0.01), and an increased risk of ARE (HR = 3.31, P = 0.04). Timing of SRS was correlated with reduced PFS for patients having early salvage treatment compared to upfront adjuvant (HR = 3.17, P = 0.01) or late salvage treatment (HR = 4.39, P <0.01). ConclusionPFS for patients with residual/recurrent AM remains poor despite SRS. Prior EBRT was associated with worse tumor control, higher tumor-related mortality, and an increased risk of ARE. Further study on the timing of SRS is needed to determine if upfront adjunctive SRS improves tumor control compared to salvage SRS.

Histopathological prognostic factors of recurrence following definitive therapy for atypical and malignant meningiomas

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 1123-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kim ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
William L. Hwang ◽  
Anat O. Stemmer-Rachamimov ◽  
William T. Curry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Bone Involvement ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Proliferation Index ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii

OBJECTIVEPatients with atypical and malignant (WHO Grade II and III) meningiomas have a worse prognosis than patients with benign (WHO Grade I) meningiomas. However, there is limited understanding of the pathological risk factors that affect long-term tumor control following combined treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. Here, the authors identify clinical and histopathological risk factors for the progression and/or recurrence (P/R) of high-grade meningiomas based on the largest series of patients with atypical and malignant meningiomas, as defined by the 2007 WHO classification.METHODSPatients diagnosed with WHO Grade II and III meningiomas between 2007 and 2014 per the WHO 2007 criteria and treated with both surgery and external beam radiation therapy were retrospectively reviewed for clinical and histopathological factors at the time of diagnosis and assessed for P/R outcomes at the last available follow-up.RESULTSA total of 76 patients met the inclusion criteria (66 Grade II meningiomas, 10 Grade III meningiomas). Median follow-up from the time of pathological diagnosis was 52.6 months. Three factors were found to predict P/R: Grade III histology, brain and/or bone invasion, and a Ki-67 proliferation rate at or above 3%. The crude P/R rate was 80% for patients with Grade III histology, 40% for those with brain and/or bone involvement (regardless of WHO tumor grade), and 20% for those with a proliferative index ≥ 3% (regardless of WHO tumor grade). The median proliferation index was significantly different between patients in whom treatment failed and those in whom it did not fail (11% and 1%, respectively).CONCLUSIONSIn patients with atypical or malignant meningiomas, the presence of Grade III histology, brain and/or bone involvement, and a high mitotic index significantly predicted an increased risk of treatment failure despite combination therapy. These patients can be stratified into risk groups predicting P/R. Patients with high-risk features may benefit from more treatment and counseling than is typically offered currently.

scholarly journals Case-Based Review: meningioma

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon E. Fogh ◽  
Derek R. Johnson ◽  
Fred G. Barker ◽  
Priscilla K. Brastianos ◽  
Jennifer L. Clarke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Additional Chemotherapy ◽  
Proven Efficacy ◽  
Tremendous Amount ◽  
Primary Intracranial Tumor

AbstractMeningioma is by far the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults. Treatment of meningioma is complex due to a tremendous amount of variability in tumor behavior. Many patients are incidentally found to have tumors that will remain asymptomatic throughout their lives. It is important to identify these patients so that they can be spared from potentially morbid interventions. On the other end of the spectrum, high-grade meningiomas can behave very aggressively. When treatment is necessary, surgical resection is the cornerstone of meningioma therapy. Studies spanning decades have demonstrated that extent of resection correlates with prognosis. Radiation therapy, either in the form of external beam radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery, represents another important therapeutic tool that can be used in place of or as a supplement to surgery. There are no chemotherapeutic agents of proven efficacy against meningioma, and chemotherapy treatment is generally reserved for patients who have exhausted surgical and radiotherapy options. Ongoing and future studies will help to answer unresolved questions such as the optimum use of radiation in resected WHO grade II meningiomas and the efficacy of additional chemotherapy agents.

scholarly journals Glioblastoma multiforme as a secondary malignancy following stereotactic radiosurgery of a meningioma: case report

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason J. Labuschagne ◽  
Dinoshan Chetty
Keyword(s):  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Secondary Malignancy ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Who Grade Ii Meningioma

The documentation and exact incidence of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)–induced neoplasia is not well understood, with most literature restricted to single case reports and single-center retrospective reviews. The authors present a rare case of radiosurgery-induced glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) following radiosurgical treatment of a meningioma. A 74-year-old patient with a sporadic meningioma underwent radiosurgery following surgical removal of a WHO grade II meningioma. Eighteen months later she presented with seizures, and MRI revealed an intraaxial tumor, which was resected and proven to be a glioblastoma. As far as the authors are aware, this case represents the third case of GBM following SRS for a meningioma. This report serves to increase the awareness of this possible complication following SRS. The possibility of this rare complication should be explained to patients when obtaining their consent for radiosurgery.

scholarly journals RADT-40. TRENDS IN THE USE OF RADIATION FOR MENINGIOMA ACROSS THE UNITED STATES

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii190-ii190
Author(s):  
Hirsch Matani ◽  
Stephen Abel ◽  
Linda Xu ◽  
Alexander Yu ◽  
Tulika Ranjan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
The United States ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Treatment Facility ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Who Grade

Abstract BACKGROUND Meningiomas are tumors originating from arachnoid cap cells on the surface of the brain or spinal cord. Treatment differs by grade but can consist of surgery, radiation therapy or both. We utilized the national cancer database (NCDB) to compare trends in the use stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the management of meningioma. METHODS We queried the NCDB from 2004-15 for meningioma patients (Grade 1-3) treated with radiation therapy, either SRS or EBRT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of each treatment and to generate a propensity score. Propensity adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and multivariable cox hazards ratios were used to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS We identified 5406 patients with meningioma meeting above criteria. Median follow up was 43 months. 45%, 44%, and 11% were Grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Predictors for SRS were distance from treatment facility and histology. Predictors of EBRT were tumor size and WHO grade 2 or 3 disease. Tumor size, treatment year, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with improved survival. Five and ten year survival rates were 89.2% vs. 72.6% (p &lt; 0.0001) and 80.3% vs. 61.4% (p = 0.29) for SRS and EBRT respectively. After propensity matching 226 pairs were generated. For SRS, 5 year survival was not significantly improved at 88.2% (p = 0.056) CONCLUSIONS In the present analysis, predictors of SRS utilization in management of meningioma include distance from treatment facility and histology whereas conventional EBRT utilization was associated with tumor size and grade 2 or 3 disease. Despite a possible survival benefit with SRS, inherent selection bias may confound interpretation of the apparent survival benefit reflected in our study.

P14.36 Characterising Meningiomas in young patients under 40

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii45-ii46
Author(s):  
M Attia ◽  
Y Mirkin ◽  
R Hershkovitch ◽  
Z R Cohen ◽  
Z Zibly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract BACKGROUND Meningiomas are the most common primary CNS tumor in adults, with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years and a female to male ratio of 2–3:1 (except in grade II, III meningiomas). Younger patients usually have a genetic background or history of prior radiation exposure. Based on population-level studies, approximately 80–85% of meningiomas are WHO grade I (benign), 15–18% grade II (atypical), and 1–3% grade III (anaplastic). This case series describes a single center experience of the presentation and pathology of meningiomas in patients under the age of 40. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the Sheba Medical Center Neurosurgery and radiotherapy databases containing patients who were operated on for meningioma between the years 2011–2020. Patients under 40 were selected and information from digital medical records was gathered on these patients, including pathology reports, surgical reports, clinical and radiological data, and the use of radiotherapy or medical treatments. RESULTS Of 600 patients in the database, 49 patients under 40 (8.3%) were identified and 54 tumors were reviewed (five patients were operated on for multiple meningiomas). 31 patients were female (63%); 2 were under 20 years old, 15 were age 20–29 and 32 were age 30–39 at first presentation. Seven patients had received prior radiation therapy for a childhood malignancy. 28 meningiomas were histology confirmed grade I (52%), 22 were grade II (41%), 2 were grade III (4%), and 2 (4%) were grade undetermined. 22 tumors were located in the skull base (41%) and 32 (59%) in the brain convexity. Of the skull base tumors, 16 were grade I, 5 were grade II, and one was grade III. Of the convexity tumors, 12 were grade I, 16 were grade II, and 2 were grade III. Median follow-up was 35 months, and longest follow-up time was 98 months. Six patients were treated with additional radiotherapy after surgery. CONCLUSION Our experience with meningioma patients under 40 revealed a different grade segregation than the older population, with younger patients showing a higher incidence of grade II tumors. These tumors are generally more aggressive, and require careful resection and consideration for post-surgical radiotherapy. Further validation with population based databases is required.

scholarly journals The use of spine stereotactic radiosurgery for oligometastatic disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Ho ◽  
Chad Tang ◽  
Brian J. Deegan ◽  
Pamela K. Allen ◽  
Eric Jonasch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Oligometastatic Disease ◽  
Local Progression

OBJECTIVE The authors investigated the outcomes following spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) for patients with oligometastatic disease of the spine. METHODS The study was a secondary analysis of 38 of 209 patients enrolled in 2 separate institutional Phase I/II prospective protocols and treated with SSRS between 2002 and 2011. Of these 38 patients, 33 (87%) were treated for a solitary spine metastasis, with no other history of metastatic disease. SSRS was prescribed to 24 Gy in 1 fraction (8%), 18 Gy in 1 fraction (18%), 16 Gy in 1 fraction (11%), 27 Gy in 3 fractions (53%), 30 Gy in 5 fractions (8%), or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (3%). Seventeen patients (45%) received prior conventional external beam radiation therapy. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) was 75.7 months, and the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 84% and 60%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients who had prior spine surgery and a better Karnofsky Performance Scale score had an improved OS (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05–0.52, p < 0.01, and HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13%–0.84%, p = 0.02, respectively), and those who had undergone prior radiation therapy had a worse OS (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2%–10%, p = 0.02). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 85%, 82%, and 78%, respectively. The median time to systemic therapy modification was 41 months. Two patients (5%) experienced late Grade 3–4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Patients with oligometastatic disease of the spine treated with SSRS can experience long-term survival and a long time before needing a modification in systemic therapy. In addition, SSRS leads to excellent local control and minimal late toxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document