The effects of new or worsened postoperative neurological deficits on survival of patients with glioblastoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Rahman ◽  
Joseph Abbatematteo ◽  
Edward K. De Leo ◽  
Paul S. Kubilis ◽  
Sasha Vaziri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Postoperative Neurological Deficit ◽  
Neurological Morbidity ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEAn increased extent of resection (EOR) has been shown to improve overall survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) but has the potential for causing a new postoperative neurological deficit. To investigate the impact of surgical neurological morbidity on survival, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data from patients with GBM to quantify the impact of a new neurological deficit on the survival benefit achieved with an increased EOR.METHODSThe data from all GBM patients who underwent resection at the University of Florida from 2010 to 2015 with postoperative imaging within 72 hours of surgery were included in the study. Retrospective analysis was performed on clinical outcomes and tumor volumes determined on postoperative and follow-up imaging examinations.RESULTSOverall, 115 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Tumor volume at the time of presentation was a median of 59 cm3 (enhanced on T1-weighted MRI scans). The mean EOR (± SD) was 94.2% ± 8.7% (range 59.9%–100%). Almost 30% of patients had a new postoperative neurological deficit, including motor weakness, sensory deficits, language difficulty, visual deficits, confusion, and ataxia. The neurological deficits had resolved in 41% of these patients on subsequent follow-up examinations. The median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI 10.9–15.2 months). Using a multipredictor Cox model, the authors observed that increased EOR was associated with improved survival except for patients with smaller tumor volumes (≤ 15 cm3). A residual volume of 2.5 cm3 or less predicted a favorable overall survival. Developing a postoperative neurological deficit significantly affected survival (9.2 months compared with 14.7 months, p = 0.02), even if the neurological deficit had resolved by the first follow-up. However, there was a trend of improved survival among patients with resolution of a neurological deficit by the first follow-up compared with patients with a permanent neurological deficit. Any survival benefit from achieving a 95% EOR was abrogated by the development of a new neurological deficit postoperatively.CONCLUSIONSDeveloping a new neurological deficit after resection of GBM is associated with a decrease in overall survival. A careful balance between EOR and neurological compromise needs to be taken into account to reduce the likelihood of neurological morbidity from surgery.

An extent of resection threshold for recurrent glioblastoma and its risk for neurological morbidity

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 846-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Oppenlander ◽  
Andrew B. Wolf ◽  
Laura A. Snyder ◽  
Robert Bina ◽  
Jeffrey R. Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Neurological Morbidity

Object Despite improvements in the medical and surgical management of patients with glioblastoma, tumor recurrence remains inevitable. For recurrent glioblastoma, however, the clinical value of a second resection remains uncertain. Specifically, what proportion of contrast-enhancing recurrent glioblastoma tissue must be removed to improve overall survival and what is the neurological cost of incremental resection beyond this threshold? Methods The authors identified 170 consecutive patients with recurrent supratentorial glioblastomas treated at the Barrow Neurological Institute from 2001 to 2011. All patients previously had a de novo glioblastoma and following their initial resection received standard temozolomide and fractionated radiotherapy. Results The mean clinical follow-up was 22.6 months and no patient was lost to follow-up. At the time of recurrence, the median preoperative tumor volume was 26.1 cm3. Following re-resection, median postoperative tumor volume was 3.1 cm3, equating to an 87.4% extent of resection (EOR). The median overall survival was 19.0 months, with a median progression-free survival following re-resection of 5.2 months. Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, the variables of age, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score, and EOR were predictive of survival following repeat resection (p = 0.0001). Interestingly, a significant survival advantage was noted with as little as 80% EOR. Recursive partitioning analysis validated these findings and provided additional risk stratification at the highest levels of EOR. Overall, at 7 days after surgery, a deterioration in the NIH stroke scale score by 1 point or more was observed in 39.1% of patients with EOR ≥ 80% as compared with 16.7% for those with EOR < 80% (p = 0.0049). This disparity in neurological morbidity, however, did not endure beyond 30 days postoperatively (p = 0.1279). Conclusions For recurrent glioblastomas, an improvement in overall survival can be attained beyond an 80% EOR. This survival benefit must be balanced against the risk of neurological morbidity, which does increase with more aggressive cytoreduction, but only in the early postoperative period. Interestingly, this putative EOR threshold closely approximates that reported for newly diagnosed glioblastomas, suggesting that for a subset of patients, the survival benefit of microsurgical resection does not diminish despite biological progression.

Sound Production Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: An Examination of Dosage in Relation to Probe Performance

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Julie L. Wambaugh ◽  
Lydia Kallhoff ◽  
Christina Nessler
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Sound Production ◽  
Apraxia Of Speech ◽  
Practice Schedule ◽  
Practice Schedules ◽  
Baseline Performance ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Number Of Treatment ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This study was designed to examine the association of dosage and effects of Sound Production Treatment (SPT) for acquired apraxia of speech. Method Treatment logs and probe data from 20 speakers with apraxia of speech and aphasia were submitted to a retrospective analysis. The number of treatment sessions and teaching episodes was examined relative to (a) change in articulation accuracy above baseline performance, (b) mastery of production, and (c) maintenance. The impact of practice schedule (SPT-Blocked vs. SPT-Random) was also examined. Results The average number of treatment sessions conducted prior to change was 5.4 for SPT-Blocked and 3.9 for SPT-Random. The mean number of teaching episodes preceding change was 334 for SPT-Blocked and 179 for SPT-Random. Mastery occurred within an average of 13.7 sessions (1,252 teaching episodes) and 12.4 sessions (1,082 teaching episodes) for SPT-Blocked and SPT-Random, respectively. Comparisons of dosage metric values across practice schedules did not reveal substantial differences. Significant negative correlations were found between follow-up probe performance and the dosage metrics. Conclusions Only a few treatment sessions were needed to achieve initial positive changes in articulation, with mastery occurring within 12–14 sessions for the majority of participants. Earlier occurrence of change or mastery was associated with better follow-up performance. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12592190

scholarly journals Inter-relationships between Gender, Frailty and 10-Year Survival in Older Italian Adults: an observational longitudinal study

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Graziamaria Corbi ◽  
Francesco Cacciatore ◽  
Klara Komici ◽  
Giuseppe Rengo ◽  
Dino Franco Vitale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Fractional Polynomial ◽  
The Impact

AbstractAim of the present study was to assess the impact of gender on the relationship between long-term mortality and clinical frailty. In an observational, longitudinal study on 10-year mortality, we examined 1284 subjects. The Frailty Staging System was used to assess frailty. The Cox model was employed to assess variables independently associated with survival using a backward stepwise algorithm. To investigate the possible interactions between gender and the selected variables, an extension of the multivariable fractional polynomial algorithm was adopted. Women were more likely to be older, have a higher disability, present with more comorbidities, consume more drugs, be frail and have a higher rate of survival at the follow-up than were men. At the Cox multivariate analysis only age (HR 2.26), female gender (HR 0.43), and number of drugs (HR 1.57) were significant and independent factors associated with all-cause mortality. In the survival analyses, only frailty (vs no frailty) showed significant interaction with gender (p < 0.001, HR = 1.92). While the presence of frailty reduced the survival rate in women, no effect was observed in men. Importantly, frail women showed higher survival rates than did both frail and no frail men. The main finding of the present study is that gender shapes up the association between frailty and long-term survival rates.

scholarly journals Extent of resection in glioblastoma: a 10-year local survival analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv19-iv19
Author(s):  
Theodore Hirst ◽  
Patrick McAleavey ◽  
Tom Flannery
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Partial Resection ◽  
Gross Total Resection ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Local Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims The impact on extent of resection (EOR) in glioblastoma has been well documented. It is clear that gross-total resection (GTR) confers best overall survival (OS), however the minimum EOR required to confer a survival benefit over biopsy is debated. Recent studies favour partial resection (PR) over biopsy for IDH-wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated tumours. We describe our experiences locally with these principles in mind. Method Retrospective evaluation of a single surgeon cohort. All patients over 18 years old, undergoing a surgical treatment for histologically confirmed GBM in the stated period were included. We collected information on demographics, tumour volume, EOR, complications, adjuvant therapies, molecular profile, and OS. We used log rank tests and Cox Proportional Hazards Models to identify factors associated with OS. Results The patient and tumour characteristics of our cohort were similar to those documented in the literature. The mean age was 56.6 years. 72 patients underwent biopsy and 202 had debulking surgery. Median OS was 11 months. Of those debulked, gross-total resection was achieved in 41 patients (20%); associated median OS was 29 months. Patients receiving partial resection (defined as EOR &lt;80%) had no clear survival benefit over patients undergoing biopsy (median OS 6 vs 5 months) but had a higher rate of post-op neurological deficit (3% vs 12%). Tumour molecular profile appeared to influence survival outcome in a manner comparable to worldwide experience. Conclusion In our experience, partial resection is not a justifiable surgical aim in the typical glioblastoma cohort. The limited benefit that it may confer over biopsy appears to be outweighed by the risk of neurological deficit that affects quality and probably quantity of life. This finding applies to our glioblastoma population in general as well as those specifically with an MGM-unmethylated tumour.

scholarly journals Long-term follow-up of children with neuroblastoma receiving radiotherapy to metastatic lesions within the German Neuroblastoma Trials NB97 and NB 2004

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Jazmati ◽  
Sarina Butzer ◽  
Barbara Hero ◽  
Jerome Doyen ◽  
Dalia Ahmad Khalil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Secondary Malignancy ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid malignancy during childhood. Despite a multimodal treatment approach, the prognosis of patients with metastatic NB is not satisfactory. Although radiotherapy (RT) has become an integral part of treatment of the primary tumor, the role of RT in osteomedullary lesions is not well defined. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of RT for metastatic sites in children with high-risk NB. Methods All patients with stage 4 NB from the prospective, multicenter NB trials NB97 and NB2004 who received RT to metastatic sites during frontline treatment were included in this retrospective analysis. Results A total of 18 children were irradiated with a median dose of 36 Gray (Gy; range 20–45 Gy) to one or more (range 1–3) osteomedullary metastases with or without concomitant RT to the primary tumor site. The median follow-up time was 149 months (range 55–220) in survivors. At 5 years, local relapse-free survival (LRFS) at irradiated metastatic sites and metastases-free survival (MFS) at distant, non-irradiated site rates were 51.4 and 39.9%, respectively. The estimated overall survival (OS) rate at 5 years was 49.4%. No high-grade acute or late toxicity and no secondary malignancy was reported. Conclusion RT to metastases is feasible for patients with stage 4 NB. However, an impact of RT to residual metastatic sites on outcome was not found. Studies with larger cohorts or prospective trials would be desirable in order to elucidate the role of RT for metastases.

scholarly journals Palliative Embolisation of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Presenting with Progressive Neurological Deficit

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Al-Yamany ◽  
K. G. terBrugge ◽  
R. Willinsky ◽  
W. Montanera ◽  
M. Tymianski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neurological Deficit ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Progressive Neurological Deficit ◽  
Permanent Morbidity ◽  
Brain Avms

Large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) located in eloquent areas of the brain are generally considered incurable because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with their treatment. When these patients develop a progressive neurological deficit they in time often become severely disabled. This report presents the results of palliative embolisation in this subgroup of patients. Analysis of our data-base of 714 patients with known brain AVMs revealed 17 patients who presented with progressive neurological deficit and who underwent palliative embolisation as the therapeutic modality of choice for management of their AVM. One patient was excluded due to lack of follow-up and two were excluded because they later received radiation therapy. Following embolisation 43% had improvement of their neurological deficit, 50% stabilized and 7% continued to deteriorate and these clinical results persisted for an average of more than 2 years follow-up. Transient neurological morbidity associated with embolisation treatment was 7% and there was no permanent morbidity and no mortality. Palliative embolisation of brain AVMs presenting with progressive neurological deficits arrested deterioration in more than 90% of patients and was associated with low morbidity and no mortality.

Maintenance Thalidomide May Improve Progression Free but Not Overall Survival; Results from the Myeloma IX Maintenance Randomisation

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 656-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth J Morgan ◽  
Graham H Jackson ◽  
Faith E Davies ◽  
Mark T Drayson ◽  
Roger G Owen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Cell Clone ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The role of maintenance therapy for the long term control of the plasma cell clone in patients induced into response with either intensive or conventional treatment is an important outstanding question. We addressed this in the MRC Myeloma IX study which incorporates intensive and non-intensive pathways selected according to PS and age. In the intensive pathway patients were randomised to either CTD or CVAD induction, followed by High Dose Melphalan (HDM) before being randomised to either thalidomide or no maintenance. In the non-intensive pathway patients were randomised to either MP or attenuated CTD prior to the maintenance randomisation. For patients randomised to thalidomide it was initiated at d100 following HDM or at the end of induction in the non-intensive arm with the aim of delivering 100mg daily until relapse. A dose reduction algorithm for side effects was used. Between the years of 2003–8, 820 patients were entered into the maintenance randomisation, median age 64 (intensive 59, non-intensive 73), median follow-up 32 months. Prognostic features were evenly distributed between the arms. FISH and cytogenetics were done using standard methods. Response was assessed by IWG criteria. For overall survival (OS) there was a non-significant trend in favour of the no maintenance arm, which enables us, by calculating confidence limits on the hazard ratio, to make the assertion that no maintenance could be up to 7% worse than thalidomide at 5 years (p=.005). Further analysis showed that there was no significant difference in OS in either the intensive or the non-intensive arm. The duration of time on thalidomide maintenance appeared to make no difference to OS. There was a non-significant improvement in progression free survival (PFS) across the maintenance randomisation as a whole and in the intensive pathway a significant benefit of maintenance was seen in the patients achieving less than a VGPR post initial induction therapy prior to HDM, (hazard ratio 1.9, p=.007). This PFS difference did not translate into a survival benefit because the survival after progression in the PR patients receiving maintenance thalidomide was poor (p=.002). In addition we looked at the time spent off thalidomide, the recovery time, (the time between stopping thalidomide and progression) as a possible predictor of survival after progression. Treated as a continuous variable in the Cox model this showed a trend for longer survival after relapse in those with longer recovery time (p=.056). In the non-intensive pathway a similar but less pronounced effect of thalidomide maintenance on PFS was seen. These results are consistent with a consolidation rather than a maintenance effect for thalidomide in this setting. The impact of maintenance in different cytogenetic subgroups was also determined [17p-, 13q-, 14q abnormalities including t(4;14), t(14;16), t(6;14), t(14;20) and t(11;14)]. For the 17p- group, the difference in OS between no thalidomide and thalidomide is large (HR = 4.55, p=.02) with the thalidomide patients faring worse, although this is based on only 30 patients. For the non 17p- group there is no difference in PFS (HR = 1.24, p=.37), in the 17p- group, however, the PFS is worse. In addition, of the 22, 17p- patients receiving CTD or CTDa as initial therapy, the 10 who received no thalidomide maintenance are all still alive, whereas 9/12 of those who went on to receive thalidomide maintenance have died. It seems that thalidomide given at induction and again in maintenance, may be particularly detrimental in 17p- patients. Although thalidomide maintenance may improve PFS, there is no demonstrable benefit on OS. It is important to identify 17p- in order to exclude these patients from receiving thalidomide maintenance.

ASXL1 Mutations in AML: Molecular Biomarker for Secondary AML?

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2343-2343
Author(s):  
Jingmei Hsu ◽  
Anita J. Kumar ◽  
Martin P. Carroll ◽  
Noelle V. Frey ◽  
Nirav N. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Additional sex combs like transcription factor 1 (ASXL1) is a member of the polycomb group protein. ASXL1 mutation has been implicated in myeloid malignancy transformation. It is hypothesized that mutated ASXL1 leads to the loss of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) mediated gene repression and subsequent transforming events. Recent studies identify ASXL1 mutation as a poor prognostic marker in patients (pts) with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who present with intermediate–risk cytogenetic lesions (Patel, NEJM 2012; Schnittger, Leukemia2013). To study the impact of ASXL1 mutations in an unselected AML population, we analyzed clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with untreated AML who express ASXL1 mutation at presentation. Methods: Using next generation sequencing, 254 adult patients with AML seen at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania were analyzed for mutations, including ASXL1, using a 33-gene hematologic malignancy panel. Clinical characteristics were obtained from retrospective chart review. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis. Living patients were censored at date last seen. Results: ASXL1 mutations were detected in 36/254 (14%) AML pts. There were 29 known pathologic mutations, 1 benign, 1 probable pathologic, and 9 variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS). In 6/36 (16.7%) pts, ASXL1 was the sole mutation identified. Of the 30 pts with additional mutations (Figure 1), 6/30 (20%) pts harbored 2 independent ASXL1 mutations. When the 27 patients with pathologic ASCL mutations were analyzed for co-mutations, TET2 (13/27, 48%) was the most frequent ASXL1 co-mutation. FLT3 (0/27, 0%) and NPM1 (1/27, 3.7%) were notable for their absence. Median age of pts at diagnosis was 69 years (range 23-80). Prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) was noted in 9/36 (25%) and 11/36 (30.6%) pts, respectively. Four pts (11.1%) had received chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for a prior non-myeloid neoplasm. Karyotype was normal in 18/36 (50%) pts, and 7 additional pts had intermediate cytogenetic lesions. There were 7 pts (19.4%) with unfavorable cytogenetics (complex karyotype (3 pts), 7q- (3 pts), and 5q- (1 pt)). Four pts (11.1%) had a favorable karyotype, with t(8;21) in 3 pts and t(15;17) in 1 pt. At presentation, median white blood cell count (WBC) was 6.4x103/uL (1.0 x -103). In pts whose AML transformed from prior MPN, median WBC was 50 X103/uL (3.3-140). Standard induction chemotherapy with an anthracycline and cytarabine was given to 17/36 (47%) pts. An additional 3/36 (8.3%) pts underwent induction therapy with clofarabine. Complete remission (CR) was documented in 14/20 (70%) evaluable pts. Of the remaining pts, 11 received a hypomethylating agent, and 5 received other therapies. Thirty-day treatment mortality for all 36 pts and for 27 pts with known ASXL1 pathologic mutation was 13.4% and 18.5% respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimate showed a median overall survival of 349 days (median follow up of 107 days (range 15-1570)). For the 27 pts with a pathologic ASXL1 mutation, the OS was 276 days (Figure 2, median follow up of 145 days (range 18-1570)). Conclusion: ASXL1 mutations in de novo AML with intermediate-risk cytogenetics is associated with poor clinical outcome in cooperative group trials. Strikingly we demonstrate in a single institution, retrospective analysis that 66.7% of pts who present with ASXL1 mutations in the setting of previously untreated AML had documented MDS, MPN and/or prior chemotherapy/radiation. Further studies are necessary to evaluate if ASXL1 mutation has independent prognostic significance in AML or if it is primarily a marker for secondary leukemia. Figure 1: ASXL1 and co-mutations Figure 1:. ASXL1 and co-mutations Figure 2: Overall survival for AML patients with ASXL1 pathologic mutation Figure 2:. Overall survival for AML patients with ASXL1 pathologic mutation Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document