scholarly journals Nuances of carotid artery stenting under flow arrest with dual-balloon guide catheter

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. V4
Author(s):  
Giovanni Vercelli ◽  
Thomas J. Sorenson ◽  
Enrico Giordan ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Leonardo Rangel-Castilla
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Atherosclerotic Lesion ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Protection Device ◽  
Perioperative Stroke ◽  
Guide Catheter ◽  
Proximal Protection ◽  
Event Rates

Cerebral protection device utilization during carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been demonstrated to decrease the risk of perioperative stroke. The ProximAl Protection with the MO.MA Device During CaRotid Stenting (ARMOUR) Trial had the lowest event rates of any independently adjudicated study. In this video of two cases of severe carotid artery stenosis, the authors present the nuances of the CAS procedure utilizing a dual-balloon guide catheter device (MO.MA). This device has the benefit of being in place before the lesion is crossed with any device, being able to arrest flow while the atherosclerotic lesion is crossed, and aiding in protection from distal emboli and stroke.The video can be found here: https://youtu.be/0o8DlC1n6_M.

Endovascular Advances for Extracranial Carotid Stenosis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S92-S101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge L. Eller ◽  
Travis M. Dumont ◽  
Grant C. Sorkin ◽  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Elad I. Levy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Endovascular Management ◽  
The Past

Abstract Carotid artery stenting has become a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in the management of carotid stenosis. Over the past 20 years, many trials have attempted to compare both treatment modalities and establish the indications for each one, depending on clinical and anatomic features presented by patients. Concurrently, carotid stenting techniques and devices have evolved and made endovascular management of carotid stenosis safe and effective. Among the most important innovations are devices for distal and proximal embolic protection and new stent designs. This paper reviews these advances in the endovascular management of carotid artery stenosis within the context of the historical background.

scholarly journals Achievable aspiration flow rates with large balloon guide catheters during carotid artery stenting

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilman Schubert ◽  
Leonardo Rivera-Rivera ◽  
Alejandro Roldan-Alzate ◽  
Daniel Consigny ◽  
Lorenz Leitner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Flow Reversal ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
External Carotid ◽  
4D Flow ◽  
Flow Rates ◽  
Guide Catheter

Abstract Background Emergency carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a frequent endovascular procedure, especially in combination with intracranial thrombectomy. Balloon guide catheters are frequently used in these procedures. Our aim was to determine if mechanical aspiration through the working lumen of a balloon occlusion catheter during the steps of a carotid stenting procedure achieve flow rates that may lead to internal carotid artery (ICA) flow reversal which consecutively may prevent distal embolism. Methods Aspiration experiments were conducted using a commercially available aspiration pump. Aspiration flow rates/min with 6 different types of carotid stents inserted into a balloon guide catheter were measured. Measurements were repeated three times with increasing pressure in the phantom. To determine if the achieved aspiration flow rates were similar to physiologic values, flow rates in the ICA and external carotid artery (ECA) in 10 healthy volunteers were measured using 4D-flow MRI. Results Aspiration flow rates ranged from 25 to 82 mL/min depending on the stent model. The pressure in the phantom had a significant influence on the aspiration volume. Mean blood flow volumes in volunteers were 210 mL/min in the ICA and 101 mL/min in the ECA. Conclusions Based on the results of this study, flow reversal in the ICA during common carotid artery occlusion is most likely achieved with the smallest diameter stent sheath and the stent model with the shortest outer stent sheath maximum diameter. This implies that embolic protection during emergency CAS through aspiration is most effective with these models.

scholarly journals Review: Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al: Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501, 2004

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Oren N. Gottfried ◽  
William T. Couldwell
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Protection Device ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
End Point ◽  
Percentage Points

Background Carotid endarterectomy is more effective than medical management in the prevention of stroke in patients with severe symptomatic or asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid-artery stenosis. Stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is a less invasive revascularization strategy than endarterectomy in carotid-artery disease. Methods We conducted a randomized trial comparing carotid-artery stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device to endarterectomy in 334 patients with coexisting conditions that potentially increased the risk posed by endarterectomy and who had either a symptomatic carotid-artery stenosis of at least 50 percent of the luminal diameter or an asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80 percent. The primary end point of the study was the cumulative incidence of a major cardiovascular event at 1 year—a composite of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days after the intervention or death or ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 1 year. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that the less invasive strategy, stenting, was not inferior to endarterectomy. Results The primary end point occurred in 20 patients randomly assigned to undergo carotid-artery stenting with an emboli-protection device (cumulative incidence, 12.2 percent) and in 32 patients randomly assigned to undergo endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 20.1 percent; absolute difference, −7.9 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, −16.4 to 0.7 percentage points; P=0.004 for noninferiority, and P=0.053 for superiority). At one year, carotid revascularization was repeated in fewer patients who had received stents than in those who had undergone endarterectomy (cumulative incidence, 0.6 percent vs. 4.3 percent; P=0.04). Conclusions Among patients with severe carotid-artery stenosis and coexisting conditions, carotid stenting with the use of an emboli-protection device is not inferior to carotid endarterectomy.

scholarly journals Carotid stenting in Nepal: Our experience with two cases of carotid stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Pravesh Rajbhandari ◽  
Saujanya Rajbhandari ◽  
Anish Neupane ◽  
Tariq Martin ◽  
Basant Pant
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cervical Vertebra ◽  
Carotid Stenting ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Less Invasive Approach ◽  
Distal Filter

Carotid artery stenosis is one of the important risk factors for stroke. Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are the available treatment options for managing carotid artery stenosis patients. The technology shift towards carotid artery stenting is promising due to its less invasive approach. Carotid artery stenting has become an alternative for surgically high-risk patients and high carotid lesions (lesions located at or above the second cervical vertebra). Here, we present two cases with carotid artery stenosis who were successfully treated with open-cell type carotid stent with distal filter embolic protection device.

scholarly journals Effect of Carotid Artery Stenting on Cognitive Function in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis: Preliminary Results

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Turk ◽  
I. Chaudry ◽  
V.M. Haughton ◽  
B.P. Hermann ◽  
H.A. Rowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Preliminary Results

Abstract P540: Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting Without Embolic Protection: A Single Centre Experience

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Hawkes ◽  
Aviraj Deshmukh ◽  
Brian van Adel
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Atheromatous Plaque ◽  
Stroke Rate ◽  
Protection Device ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Stent Occlusion ◽  
Embolic Protection Device ◽  
Embolic Protection

Introduction: One of the most feared complications of carotid revascularization, including carotid artery stenting (CAS), is peri-procedural ischemic stroke. Several studies suggest that the use of a distal embolic protection device (EPD), as well as over-sized pre- and post-stenting balloon angioplasty, may increase the risk of dislodgement of atheromatous plaque in patients undergoing CAS. The CREST trial, that mandated the use of an EPD, had a peri-procedural ischemic stroke rate of 4.1%. We hypothesize that our technique of stenting without the use of an EPD and sub-maximal angioplasty will have a low risk of peri-procedural complications. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive cases of ICA stenting without use of an embolic protection device between January 2012 and June 2020 at a Canadian stroke centre. Data was extracted from the patient electronic medical record and Picture Archives and Communications Systems (PACS). Both symptomatic and asymptomatic CAS cases were included. Results: A total of 220 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 70 years (range 39-93 years), and 83 patients (38%) were female. The vast majority of patients were symptomatic (216 patients [98%]). A large portion of patients had a contralateral ICA occlusion or near occlusion (56 patients [25%]). In the majority of cases, a Precise Cordis RX carotid stent (Cordis) was placed. There were four patients with peri-procedural ischemic strokes (1.8%), with two occurring 8-30 days after stenting. There was one case of acute stent occlusion associated with an ischemic stroke. Two patients (less than 1%) had hyperperfusion syndrome after CAS. Median length of stay following the procedure was one day. Conclusions: In this single centre series, the peri-procedural risks of CAS without using an EPD are low. The ischemic stroke rate is less than 2%, lower than what has been reported in large randomized controlled trials using embolic protection.

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Advances in Vascular Surgery for Carotid Artery Disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Hu ◽  
◽  
Andy Sohn ◽  
Justin George ◽  
Rajesh Malik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Vascular Surgery ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenosis ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Carotid Artery Disease ◽  
Artery Stenosis ◽  
Cerebrovascular Accidents ◽  
Artery Disease

Carotid artery atherosclerotic disease impacts over 2 million Americans annually. Since the advent of the carotid endarterectomy by Debakey in 1953, the surgical management of carotid artery stenosis has prevented cerebrovascular accidents. The technology utilized to manage carotid artery stenosis continued to evolve with the utilization of carotid artery stenting in 1989 and more recently transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR). This review discusses the modern management of carotid artery stenosis with an emphasis on transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and reversal of flow for reversal of flow for embolic protection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document