scholarly journals Stereotactic radiation treatment for benign meningiomas

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. E5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew E. H. Elia ◽  
Helen A. Shih ◽  
Jay S. Loeffler
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Optic Chiasm ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Stereotactic Radiation ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Toxicity Equivalent

✓Meningiomas are the second most common primary tumor of the brain. Gross-total resection remains the preferred treatment if achievable with minimal morbidity. For incompletely resected or inoperable benign meningiomas, 3D conformal external-beam radiation therapy can provide durable local tumor control in 90 to 95% of cases. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) are highly conformal techniques, using steep dose gradients and stereotactic patient immobilization. Stereotactic radiosurgery has been used as an alternative or adjuvant therapy to surgery for meningiomas in locations, such as the skull base, where operative manipulation may be particularly difficult. Stereotactic radiotherapy is useful for larger meningiomas (> 3–3.5 cm) and those closely approximating critical structures, such as the optic chiasm and brainstem. Although SRS has longer follow-up than SRT, both techniques have excellent 5-year tumor control rates of greater than 90% for benign meningiomas. Stereotactic radiotherapy has toxicity equivalent to that of radiosurgery, despite its biased use for larger meningiomas with more complicated volumes. Reported rates of imaging-documented regression are higher for radiosurgery, but neurological recovery is relatively good with both techniques. Stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated SRT are complementary techniques appropriate for different clinical scenarios.

scholarly journals Single-fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Atypical Meningiomas (WHO grade II): Treatment Results Based on a 25-year Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Hasegawa ◽  
Kunal Vakharia ◽  
Link J Michael ◽  
Scott L Stafford ◽  
Paul D Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Atypical Meningiomas

Abstract PurposeTo clarify the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for atypical meningiomas (AM).MethodsA retrospective analysis of 68 patients with AM having SRS from 1995 until 2019. Nineteen patients (28%) had undergone prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (median dose, 54 Gy). The median follow-up period was 52 months.ResultsEighteen (26%), 17 (25%), and 33 (49%) patients received SRS as an upfront adjuvant (≤ 6 months), early salvage (7-18 months), or late salvage treatment (> 18 months), respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 52%, 35%, and 25%, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survivals (DSSs) were 85%, 78%, and 61%, respectively. Adverse radiation events (AREs) were observed in 12 patients (18%), with increased or new seizures being the most frequent complication (n=7). Prior EBRT was associated with reduced PFS (HR = 5.92, P <0.01), reduced DSS (HR = 5.84, P <0.01), and an increased risk of ARE (HR = 3.31, P = 0.04). Timing of SRS was correlated with reduced PFS for patients having early salvage treatment compared to upfront adjuvant (HR = 3.17, P = 0.01) or late salvage treatment (HR = 4.39, P <0.01). ConclusionPFS for patients with residual/recurrent AM remains poor despite SRS. Prior EBRT was associated with worse tumor control, higher tumor-related mortality, and an increased risk of ARE. Further study on the timing of SRS is needed to determine if upfront adjunctive SRS improves tumor control compared to salvage SRS.

Stereotactic radiosurgery providing long-term tumor control of cavernous sinus meningiomas

2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Y. K. Lee ◽  
Ajay Niranjan ◽  
James McInerney ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
John C. Flickinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Cavernous Sinus ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Tumor Control Rate ◽  
Fine Print

Object. To evaluate long-term outcomes of patients who have undergone stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus meningiomas, the authors retrospectively reviewed their 14-year experience with these cases. Methods. One hundred seventy-six patients harbored meningiomas centered within the cavernous sinus. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up review, leaving 159 analyzable patients, in whom 164 procedures were performed. Seventy-six patients (48%) underwent adjuvant radiosurgery after one or more attempts at surgical resection. Eighty-three patients (52%) underwent primary radiosurgery. Two patients (1%) had previously received fractionated external-beam radiation therapy. Four patients (2%) harbored histologically verified atypical or malignant meningiomas. Conformal multiple isocenter gamma knife surgery was performed. The median dose applied to the tumor margin was 13 Gy. Neurological status improved in 46 patients (29%), remained stable in 99 (62%), and eventually worsened in 14 (9%). Adverse effects of radiation occurred after 11 procedures (6.7%). Tumor volumes decreased in 54 patients (34%), remained stable in 96 (60%), and increased in nine (6%). The actuarial tumor control rate for patients with typical meningiomas was 93.1 ± 3.3% at both 5 and 10 years. For the 83 patients who underwent radiosurgery as their sole treatment, the actuarial tumor control rate at 5 years was 96.9 ± 3%. Conclusions. Stereotactic radiosurgery provided safe and effective management of cavernous sinus meningiomas. We believe it is the preferred management strategy for tumors of suitable volume (average tumor diameter ≤ 3 cm or volume ≤ 15 cm3).

scholarly journals Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Brain Malignancies: Indications and Outcomes in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Cifarelli ◽  
Geraldine M. Jacobson
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Metastatic Brain Tumors ◽  
Beam Radiation

Despite the continued controversy over defining an optimal delivery mechanism, the critical role of adjuvant radiation in the management of surgically resected primary and metastatic brain tumors remains one of the universally accepted standards in neuro-oncology. Local disease control still ranks as a significant predictor of survival in both high-grade glioma and treated intracranial metastases with radiation treatment being essential in maximizing tumor control. As with the emergence and eventual acceptance of cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) following an era dominated by traditional radiotherapy, evidence to support the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in brain tumors requiring surgical intervention continues to accumulate. While the clinical trial strategies in treating glioblastoma with IORT involve delivery of a boost of cavitary radiation prior to the planned standard external beam radiation, the use of IORT in metastatic disease offers the potential for dose escalation to the level needed for definitive adjuvant radiation, eliminating the need for additional episodes of care while providing local control equal or superior to that achieved with SRS in a single fraction. In this review, we explore the contemporary clinical data on IORT in the treatment of brain tumors along with a discussion of the unique dosimetric and radiobiological factors inherent in IORT that could account for favorable outcome data beyond those seen in other techniques.

scholarly journals Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using two static ports of tomotherapy for breast cancer after conservative surgery: dosimetric comparison with other treatment methods and 3-year clinical results

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiko Nagai ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto ◽  
Masanori Yoshida ◽  
Koji Inoda ◽  
Yuzo Kikuchi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Radiation Dermatitis ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Dose Volume

Abstract This study investigated the differences in dose–volume parameters for the breast and normal tissues during TomoDirectTM (TD) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), TD-3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and 3DCRT plans, all using two beams, and analyzed treatment outcomes of two-beam TD-IMRT for breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. Between August 2011 and January 2015, 152 patients were treated using two-beam TD-IMRT with 50 Gy/25 fractions. Among them, 20 patients with left-sided breast cancer were randomly chosen, and two-beam TD-IMRT, TD-3DCRT and 3DCRT plans were created for each patient. The homogeneity and conformity indices and various dose–volume parameters for the planning target volume and OARs were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3 years. Toxicities were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. TD-IMRT and TD-3DCRT showed better whole-breast coverage than 3DCRT (P &lt; 0.001). Most of the mean values of dosimetric endpoints for OARs were better in TD-IMRT than in TD-3DCRT and 3DCRT. Overall survival rates were 97.7% and local control rates were 99.1% at 3 years. Regional control and distant metastasis control rates at 3 years were 98.6% and 96.8%, respectively. Twenty-four of the 152 patients had Grade 2 or higher acute radiation dermatitis. Four patients (4/146 = 2.7%) had Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis. There were no late adverse events of Grade 2 or higher. Two-beam TD-IMRT appeared to yield better dose distribution for whole-breast external-beam radiation therapy than TD-3DCRT and two-beam 3DCRT. The treatment appeared to provide low skin toxicity and acceptable tumor control.

Age and Radiation Response in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1288-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred G. Barker ◽  
Susan M. Chang ◽  
David A. Larson ◽  
Penny K. Sneed ◽  
William M. Wara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale Score ◽  
Performance Scale

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Advanced age is a strong predictor of shorter survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GM), especially for those who receive multimodality treatment. Radiographically assessed tumor response to external beam radiation therapy is an important prognostic factor in GM. We hypothesized that older GM patients might have more radioresistant tumors. METHODS We studied radiographically assessed response to external beam radiation treatment (five-level scale) in relation to age and other prognostic factors in a cohort of 301 GM patients treated on two prospective clinical protocols. A total of 223 patients (74%) were assessable for radiographically assessed radiation response. A proportional odds ordinal regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Younger age (P = 0.006), higher Karnofsky Performance Scale score before radiotherapy (P = 0.027), and more extensive surgical resection (P = 0.028) predicted better radiation response in univariate analyses. Results were similar when clinical criteria were used to classify an additional 61 patients without radiographically assessed radiation response (stable versus progressive disease). In multivariate analyses, age and extent of resection were significant independent predictors of radiation response (P &lt; 0.05); Karnofsky Performance Scale score was of borderline significance (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION Older GM patients are less likely to have good responses to postoperative external beam radiation therapy. Karnofsky Performance Scale score before radiation treatment and extent of surgical resection are additional predictors of radiographically assessed radiation response in GM.

scholarly journals Prevention and correction of radiation dermatitis with basic skin care: doctor and patient consensus

2021 ◽  
pp. 167-172
Author(s):  
D. A. Khlanta ◽  
D. S. Romanov
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Radiation Dermatitis ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Post Radiation

External beam radiation therapy is widely used by doctors around the world as one of the most common form of cancer treatment. The radiotherapy can help reduce the treatment aggression as compared with the surgical intervention in a large number of clinical situations, which ensures that the patient's quality of life will be decreased to a lesser extent in the after-treatment period. However, like the vast majority of anticancer treatments, the radiation therapy has a number of side effects, which are classified into acute radiation reactions and post-radiation injuries. Among them is radiation dermatitis, which is one of the most common adverse reactions to the radiotherapy. This complication manifests as erythema, as well as hyperpigmentation, dry and itchy skin, hair loss. In addition to the obvious negative impact on the patient's quality of life, some of the above factors can result in the development of a secondary skin infection. As one of the most frequent post-radiation complications, radiation dermatitis places radiotherapists before a challenge to reduce the incidence rates of this side effect, as well as to decrease the intensity of its clinical manifestations if it occurs. This challenge suggests the search for targeted drugs aimed to prevent and treat clinical symptoms. To date, dermatocosmetic products that are used to relieve skin manifestations of radiation treatment complications is an alternate option of the effective solution to the problem of radiation dermatitis. In the described clinical case, we assess the experience of using some of the dermatocosmetic products in a patient with a florid form of radiation dermatitis. 

scholarly journals An update in the management of spinal metastases

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 795-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei F. Joaquim ◽  
Ann Powers ◽  
Ilya Laufer ◽  
Mark H. Bilsky
Keyword(s):  
New Technologies ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Mechanical Instability ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Neurologic Function

The best clinical treatment for spinal metastases requires an integrated approach with input from an interdisciplinary cancer team. The principle goals of treatment are maintenance or improvement in neurologic function and ambulation, spinal stability, durable tumor control, and pain relief. The past decade has witnessed an explosion of new technologies that have impacted our ability to reach these goals, such as separation surgery and minimally invasive spinal procedures. The biggest advance, however, has been the evolution of stereotactic radiosurgery that has demonstrated durable tumor control both when delivered as definitive therapy and as a postoperative adjuvant even for tumors considered markedly resistant to conventional external beam radiation. In this paper, we perform an update on the management of spinal metastases demonstrating the integration of these new technologies into a decision framework NOMS that assesses four basic aspects of a patient’s spine disease: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical Instability and Systemic disease.

scholarly journals Rapid and complete radiological resolution of an intradural cervical cord lung cancer metastasis treated with spinal stereotactic radiosurgery: case report

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. E10 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Emily Bennett ◽  
Camille Berriochoa ◽  
Ghaith Habboub ◽  
Scott Brigeman ◽  
Samuel T. Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Cord Compression ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Cervical Cord ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Lung Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Intradural Extramedullary ◽  
Cancer Lesion

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a treatment option for patients with spinal metastatic disease. Although SRS has been shown to be successful in a multitude of extradural metastatic tumors causing cord compression, very few cases of intradural treatment have been reported. The authors present a rare case of an intradural extramedullary metastatic small cell lung cancer lesion to the cervical spine resulting in cord compression in an area that had also been extensively pretreated with conventional external-beam radiation therapy. The patient underwent successful SRS to this metastatic site, with rapid and complete resolution of his lesion.

Correlations of UICC tumor stage and tumor regression on T2-weighted MRI sequences during definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162094002
Author(s):  
Florian Arend ◽  
Markus Oechsner ◽  
Clara B. Weidenbächer ◽  
Stephanie E. Combs ◽  
Kai J. Borm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Tumor Stages ◽  
Mri Sequences

Background: The purpose of this study is to detect a correlation between the preradiation tumor staging and the relative volumetric regression of the primary tumor through external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Methods: Clinical data of 32 patients with a mean age of 60±12 years treated with primary radiation therapy (RT) of cervical carcinoma were analyzed. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stages were T1 = 4 patients, T2 = 15 patients, T3 = 8 patients, T4 = 5 patients; N1 = 26 patients, N0 = 6 patients; and M0 = 25 patients, M1 = 7 patients. All patients received pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before RT as well as during RT. The cervical primary tumor was delineated as gross tumor volume (ptGTV) in T2-weighted MRI sequences. We compared ptGTV reduction by stage, lymph node status, metastatic status, and grading. Results: Mean ptGTV reduction during RT was 61.4±28.9%. T1 tumors shrank by 88.2±13.4%, T2 by 67.6±28.7%, T3 by 50.8±23.6%, and T4 by 38.7±27.2%. The difference in tumor shrinkage was statistically significant between the lower T stages and the higher T stages ( p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the mean ptGTV before treatment in the group with lymph node metastases (LNM) (54.1±47.7 cm3) as compared to the group without LNM (76.6±52.2 cm3). Nonetheless, ptGTV shrank significantly differently: by 68.9±25.7% (N1 patients) and by 29.0±17.7% (N0 patients). No significant differences in ptGTV shrinkage were observed in M0 versus M1 and G2 versus G3 tumors. Conclusion: There is a correlation between mean ptGTV reduction during EBRT and tumor stages. Tumors with higher T stages shrank less under radiation treatment, and the ptGTV of N1 patients responded better than that of N0 patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document