scholarly journals DIKOTOMI PIDANA MATI SEBAGAI HAK ASASI MANUSIA DI INDONESIA MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF DAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-33
Author(s):  
Muhammad Afif
Keyword(s):  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Difference

Eksekusi hukuman mati dalam hukum positif Indonesia dilakukan dengan cara hukuman mati, yang berarti bahwa eksekusi hukuman mati tidak dilakukan di depan orang banyak atau tidak dipublikasikan. Dalam hukum pidana Islam, dieksekusi dengan cara dipenggal, dilempar dengan batu (Rajam) dan dieksekusi di depan umum, artinya eksekusi hukuman mati disaksikan oleh publik. Jenis penelitian merupakan penelitian normative.Pokok bahasan dari artikel ini adalah bagaimana eksekusi hukuman mati memberikan efek jera bagi masyarakat? karena salah satu tujuan hukuman mati adalah memberikan efek jera kepada seseorang / masyarakat agar tidak melakukan kejahatan. Tidak ada perbedaan antara eksekusi hukuman mati dilihat dalam hukum positif Indonesia dan hukum Islam, pada dasarnya kedua tindak pidana tersebut sama-sama memberikan efek jera berupa ketakutan kepada publik untuk melakukan kejahatan atau tindakan yang melanggar hukum. Perbedaan antara hukum positif Indonesia dan hukum Islam, hanya dalam hal prosedur eksekusi. Abstract The execution of the death penalty in Indonesian positive law is carried out by means of a death shot, meaning that the execution of the death penalty is not carried out in front of a crowd or unpublished. In Islamic criminal law, the execution is executed by beheaded, thrown with stone (Rajam) and the execution is executed in front of the public, meaning that the execution of capital punishment is witnessed by the public. this type of research is normative research. The subject matter of this article is how the execution of capital punishment theoretically gives more deterrent effect to society? because one of the objectives of criminalizing, especially capital punishment is to give deterrent effect to a person / society in order not to commit a crime / crime. The execution of the death penalty between two criminal sides namely the positive crime of Indonesia and Islamic crime, basically the two criminal act equally give a deterrent effect in the form of fear to the public to commit a crime or a crime that violates the law. It's just possible to see the difference between positive criminal Indonesia and Islamic crime in terms of the procedure of execution execution.  

8. Patent Protection and Exploitation

2019 ◽  
pp. 178-198
Author(s):  
Justine Pila ◽  
Paul L.C. Torremans
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
European Patent ◽  
Central Importance ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Patent Grant

Once a European patent has been granted the nature and scope of the protection it confers must be determined. In considering such protection this chapter focuses on four issues of central importance to that end. The first is the effects of a patent, namely, the territories in and term for which it is valid. The second is the object of protection, namely, the subject matter that the public is excluded from using during the term of its protection. The third is the nature of protection, namely, the uses of the subject matter from which the public is excluded. And the fourth is the limitations to protection, namely, the uses of an invention that the law permits notwithstanding its protection by patent grant.

scholarly journals SEX TANPA NIKAH: Dilema Hukum Positif dan Moralitas Bangsa

AKADEMIKA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achmad Fageh
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Front Door ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Local Cultures

Abstract: Efforts to bring together the synergity of positive legal products and the value of morality of the nation as the wisdom of local cultures to-Indonesiaan needs the seriousness of various parties. Specifically, the provisions of the law governing adultery that truly reflect the aspirations and values that live in the community and are moral mirroring, are indispensable to the attention of many other aspects that Need to also note. While awaiting its realization, the author considers it to be no longer the time when all parties excuse that the freedom and privacy of a person in the sex field is ' closed ' to the law, so that the criminal law stops at the front door of the room. Therefore, maintaining the notion of adultery according to the PENAL code (which is now in force), is the same by validating the sofsion of the values of goodness that live in society. Do we have to be flashed and want to keep that detrimental ' privacy '? Do we still have to ' endure ' by skipping.The formulation of TP fornication in the RUU KUHP has a wider scope than arranged in the KUHP. This is reflected in article 417 and article 419 RUU KUHP, which arranges about the deed of intercourse with a person who is not a husband or his or his/her "collect Kebo" act. Controversy appear as the Delik fornication arranged in both of the article is a complaints delics (still equal to the Delik fornication in article 284 KUHP). The fornication act is not changed to a common delics that can be reported by anyone who knows the deeds. From the subject side, the right to complain has been expanded in a RUU KUHP, which can be complained by a husband, wife, parent, or child.Keywords: Free sec, positive law, national morality

The Logical Function of ‘That’, or Truth, Propositions and Sentences

Philosophy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-96
Author(s):  
Jonathan Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Logical Function ◽  
Theories Of Truth ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Law Of Excluded Middle ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Excluded Middle

(i) It is propositions, not sentences, that are true or false. It is true ‘Dogs bark’ does not make sense. It is true that dogs bark does. (ii) and (iii) Davidson wrong about ‘that’. (iv) The difference between ‘implies’ and ‘if ... then ...’. (v), (vi), (vii) and (viii) Russell, not Quine, right about the subject matter of logic. (ix) The objectual and substitutional interpretations of quantifiers compatible. (x), (xi), (xii), (xiii), (xiv), (xv) and (xvi) Implications for well-known theories of truth; truth correspondence. (xvii), (xviii) and (xix) and (xx) Implications for the principle of bivalence, the law of excluded middle, and the principle of non-contradiction. (xxi) Recapitulation. (xxii) ‘That’ and entailment. (xxiii) Propositions not entities, subsistent or otherwise.

Privacy Rights and Satellite Broadcasts

1993 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-414
Author(s):  
Jonathan Gillis
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Practical Problem ◽  
Privacy Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
News Broadcasts ◽  
Tv News ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Private Individual

The subject matter of this article is, at bottom, a practical problem. It accepts that people have a right to privacy and that this right should find proper protection in the law. It asks, simply, whether such protection is at all feasible given the particular technology of broadcast by satellite.For the purposes of investigating this problem several issues must be addressed. First is the nature of the violation of privacy involved. Our concern here is principally with TV news broadcasts. We begin from the point where the debate over “what is in the public interest versus what the public is interested in” has ended; there will be general consensus that the content of a certain broadcast represents a violation of an individual's privacy and one about which the law should do something. An example might be the filming in the public domain of a private individual caught in the shock of personal grief or tragedy. In such a case we would need to investigate the nature of the injury involved in any subsequent broadcast of these sounds and images, and to ask what dimension, if any, is added to this injury by their simultaneous broadcast across the globe.

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE, THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto . .
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense. Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.<br /><br />Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights.

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY EXECUTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense.    Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.    </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights</em></strong><strong><em>.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>

scholarly journals Batas Waktu Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-30
Author(s):  
Leo Arwansyah ◽  
Andi Najemi ◽  
Aga Anum Prayudi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The purpose of this article is to find out how the aspects of legal certainty and justice in the implementation of the death penalty in Indonesia and how the concept of the deadline for the execution of capital punishment that is legal and just. By using the normative juridical method, this article shows that the aspects of certainty and justice regarding the time limit for the implementation of the death penalty are still not regulated in positive law, the practice of capital punishment often raises problems related to the time limit for execution, aspects of legal certainty and justice for death convicts have not. guaranteed, so that it is necessary to renew the laws and regulations related to the implementation of the death penalty both in material criminal law, formal criminal law, and criminal law enforcement. Abstrak Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana aspek kepastian hukum dan keadilan dalam pelaksanaan pidana mati di Indonesia serta bagaimana konsep batas waktu pelaksanaan pidana mati yang berkepastian hukum dan berkeadilan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, artikel ini menunjukkan aspek kepastian dan keadilan mengenai pengaturan batas waktu pelaksanaan pidana mati masih belum terdapat pengaturannya di dalam hukum positif, praktik  pidana mati kerap menimbulkan persoalan terkait batas waktu pelaksanaan eksekusi, aspek kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi terpidana mati belum terjamin, sehingga perlu pembaharuan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan terkait pelaksanaan pidana mati baik dalam hukum pidana materiil, hukum pidana formal, maupun hukum pelaksanaan pidana.

scholarly journals PERDEBATAN HUKUMAN MATI DI INDONESIA: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Islam dengan Hukum Pidana Indonesia

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hatta
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
The Public

<p>Abstrak: Secara tegas, hukum pidana Islam dan Indonesia mengatur tentang hukuman mati. Tetapi, di Indonesia eksistensi hukuman mati masih menjadi perdebatan. Ada pendapat bahwa hukuman mati bertentangan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dan ada juga menilai hukuman mati dimaksudkan untuk melindungi kepentingan umum. Untuk mengkaji pertentangan pandangan tersebut, perlu dilakukan analisis secara kritis dengan mengunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Disimpulkan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan hukuman mati, baik hukum pidana Islam maupun Indonesia mem- berlakukan secara hati-hati dan dengan batasan yang telah ditentukan oleh undang- undang. Dengan batasan-batasan inilah diharapakan dapat mengimbangi pandangan antara yang mendukung dan menolak hukuman mati di Indonesia. Hukuman mati dalam hukum pidana Islam untuk melindungi agama, jiwa, harta, akal, dan keturunan yang merupakan karunia Allah SWT. yang harus dilindungi, di mana pelanggarnya pantas dihukum mati.</p><p><br />Abstract: The Debate of Capital Punishment in Indonesia: A Comparative Study between Islamic and Indonesian Criminal Law. Strictly speaking, the Islamic and Indonesian criminal law provide for capital punishment. However, the existence of the death penalty in Indonesia is still debatable. It is assumed that the death penalty is against human rights, but others consider it as to protect the public interest. In order to discuss the contravening views, this paper is an attempt to critically analyzed the issu by using a normative juridical approach. It is concluded in its implementation of capital punishment both the in Islamic and Indonesian criminal law is carefully applied and with the limits prescribed by law. Such restrictions are expected to balance the views between the pro and against capital punishment in Indonesia. The death penalty in Islamic criminal law is to protect religion, life, property, intellect and descendant. The five basic human rights is given by the Almighty God that should be protected, the violator of which is liable for capital punishment.</p><p><br />Kata Kunci: hukuman mati, hukum pidana, Islam</p>

scholarly journals The Shadow of the Gallows: The Death Penalty and the British Labour Government, 1945–51

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Symbolic Form ◽  
Labour Government ◽  
British Labour ◽  
English Law ◽  
The Law

The punishment prescribed by English law for murder in the first half of the twentieth century was death. A judge had to pronounce this sentence upon a person convicted of murder, except in two special classes of cases: persons under eighteen years of age at the time of the offense and pregnant women. He had no discretion to impose any less severe sentence. While retribution survived only in a symbolic form elsewhere in the criminal law, capital punishment, as Oxford criminologist Max Grunhut maintained, was a “powerful relic of retaliation in kind.” The law still reflected the ancient concept that every murderer forfeits his life becauce he has taken another's life: “He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death.”

scholarly journals KEBERADAAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
The Right

Capital punishment is the heaviest crime and difficult to apply in a country of law considering the death penalty is one of the acts of human rights violations, but to make someone discourage of committing a crime there needs to be rules or penalties that can provide a deterrent effect and provide security for the community from all form of crime. The purpose of writing is directed to find out the regulation of the Death Penalty in the Criminal Law Code which is stipulated in several articles in the Criminal Code and the existence of capital punishment in the legal system in Indonesia in terms of human rights perspective, which of course would be contrary to human rights, especially the right to life, however capital punishment is also needed as an effort to prevent the occurrence of crimes, especially those classified as serious

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document