Meta Analysis of Single Subject Research on Sensory Integration Intervention for Evidence Based Practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-226
Author(s):  
Yonghwa Kown ◽  
Youngok Lee ◽  
Sukjeong Rhie
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Integration ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Single Subject Research

scholarly journals Team functioning and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. McGuier ◽  
David J. Kolko ◽  
Mary Lou Klem ◽  
Jamie Feldman ◽  
Grace Kinkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Human Service ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Services Implementation ◽  
Team Functioning

Abstract Background Healthcare and human services increasingly rely on teams of individuals to deliver services. Implementation of evidence-based practices and other innovations in these settings requires teams to work together to change processes and behaviors. Accordingly, team functioning may be a key determinant of implementation outcomes. This systematic review will identify and summarize empirical research examining associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes in healthcare and human service settings. Methods We will conduct a comprehensive search of bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC) for articles published from January 2000 or later. We will include peer-reviewed empirical articles and conference abstracts using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. We will include experimental or observational studies that report on the implementation of an innovation in a healthcare or human service setting and examine associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes of interest are acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles/abstracts, review full-text articles, and extract data from included articles. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess methodological quality/bias and conduct a narrative synthesis without meta-analysis. Discussion Understanding how team functioning influences implementation outcomes will contribute to our understanding of team-level barriers and facilitators of change. The results of this systematic review will inform efforts to implement evidence-based practices in team-based service settings. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020220168

A Meta-analysis of Single-Subject Research Designs on Smart Education for Students with Disabilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-50
Author(s):  
Dongil Kim ◽  
Younghee Cho ◽  
Eunjung Cho ◽  
Jungeun Lim
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Single Subject Research ◽  
Research Designs ◽  
Smart Education

Introduction

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Charles Auerbach
Keyword(s):  
Software Package ◽  
Current Trend ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Building Research ◽  
Single Subject Research ◽  
Software Packages ◽  
Important Position

Single-subject research has historically had an important position in the areas of research and practice evaluation. With the current trend toward evidence-based practice, the emphasis in this chapter is on the demand for and reliance on this practice-based, evidence-building research design to increase in the future. SSD for R is a software package available to help researchers and practitioners analyze single-subject research data. This chapter describes the historical, current, and future uses of single-subject research and the contributions of these designs to both visual and statistical analysis. A brief review of software packages to handle this type of analysis is included in this chapter. Finally, an overview of the functionality of SSD for R is provided.

Evaluating Behavioral Skills Training as an Evidence-Based Practice When Training Parents to Intervene with Their Children

2020 ◽  
pp. 014544552092399 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Schaefer ◽  
Natalie R. Andzik
Keyword(s):  
Design Research ◽  
Behavioral Skills Training ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Single Subject ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Single Subject Design ◽  
Behavioral Skills ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Behavior Skills ◽  
What Works Clearinghouse

The authors of this systematic review identified 20 individual single-subject studies examining the efficacy of Behavior Skills Training (BST) implemented with parents. Findings indicate that researchers have used BST to successfully train parents to implement a range of evidence-based practices (EBP) with their own children. Parents of children with autism or intellectual disability made up the large majority of participants in these studies. Applying the methodological quality standards set by What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), the authors detail the evidence from 67 individual cases provided by single-subject design research. Practitioners looking to train parents of children with disabilities to implement EBPs can be confident that BST is an effective training practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document