scholarly journals Estimation of myocardial work – a new concept of non-invasive left ventricular systolic function assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
M.Yu. Kolesnyk

Assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a mandatory component of cardiovascular diseases diagnostics. In clinical practice, the main parameters are the ejection fraction and LV global longitudinal strain. Both parameters have a number of limitations, including dependence on afterload. This review describes a new technique for non-invasive assessment of global and segmental myocardial contractility based on the calculation of myocardial work by analyzing pressure-strain curves. The main advantage of the technique is the ability to take into account the afterload conditions by the traditional measurement of blood pressure on the brachial artery. The characteristics of the key parameters of the methodology (global work index, global constructive work, global effective and wasted work) as well as their normative values are presented. The stages of the analysis and the limitations of the method are described separately. The results of the main pilot studies of myocardial work parameters in various cardiovascular diseases are presented. Possibilities of the technique for characterizing LV segmental function in left bundle branch block, selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy with subsequent response assessment are presented. The diagnostic and prognostic value of the parameters of myocardial work in arterial hypertension, acute and chronic forms of ischemic heart disease, hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy, chronic heart failure are analyzed. The possibilities of the technique in assessing the effectiveness of therapy in patients with heart failure are described. Potential advantages of the parameters of myocardial work over other markers of LV systolic function, such as ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain, have been determined. The review is illustrated with clinical examples of the use of the technique for various cardiovascular diseases from our own practice.

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Devara ◽  
M Iftikhar ◽  
A Goda ◽  
L Shaik ◽  
R Katta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Certain factors such as left ventricular (LV) geometry and loading conditions affect the validity and reliability of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) as a true measure of LV contractility. LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) is less sensitive to these factors, and it has superior prognostic performance in patients with acquired heart disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical implications of using LVGLS (instead of LVEF) as the measure of LV systolic function in adults with Ebstein anomaly given the inherent abnormalities of LV geometry and preload in this population. Methods Retrospective cohort study of 673 adults with Ebstein anomaly (2003–2018). We hypothesized that LVGLS had a stronger correlation with heart failure indices and transplant-free survival compared to LVEF. Results Compared to LVEF, LVGLS had stronger correlations with cardiac index (r=0.46 vs r=0.21, p=0.007), glomerular filtration rate (r=0.57 vs r=0.19, p<0.001), and NT-proBNP (r=−0.64 vs r=−0.41, p=0.01). Of 673 patients, 514 (76%) had normal LV systolic function (LVGLSNormal-LVEFNormal), 87 (13%) had subclinical LV dysfunction (LVGLSLow-LVEFNormal) and 66 (10%) had overt LV dysfunction (LVGLSLow-LVEFLow). Compared to the overt LV dysfunction group, the subclinical LV dysfunction group had similar 10-year transplant-free survival (64% vs 63%, p=0.6), but were less likely to be on heart failure therapy (12% vs 82%, p<0.001). LVGLS (but not LVEF) was the independent predictor of transplant-free survival Conclusions LVGLS provided more robust risk stratification and prognostication than LVEF in patients with Ebstein anomaly, and patients with low LVGLS had reduced transplant-free survival regardless of LVEF. The use of LVGLS (rather than LVEF) as the measure of LV systolic function has important clinical implications with regards to initiation of medical and surgical therapies. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Author(s):  
Akshar Jaglan ◽  
Sarah Roemer ◽  
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno ◽  
Bijoy K Khandheria

Abstract Aims Myocardial work (MW) is a novel parameter that can be used in a clinical setting to assess left ventricular (LV) pressures and deformation. We sought to distinguish patterns of global MW index in hypertensive vs. non-hypertensive patients and to look at differences between categories of hypertension. Methods and results Sixty-five hypertensive patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years; 30 male) and 15 controls (mean age 38 ± 12 years; 7 male) underwent transthoracic echocardiography at rest. Hypertensive patients were subdivided into Stage 1 (n = 32) and Stage 2 (n = 33) hypertension based on 2017 American College of Cardiology guidelines. Exclusion criteria were suboptimal image quality for myocardial deformation analysis, reduced ejection fraction, valvular heart disease, intracardiac shunt, and arrhythmia. Global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency were estimated from LV pressure–strain loops utilizing proprietary software from speckle-tracking echocardiography. LV systolic and diastolic pressures were estimated using non-invasive brachial artery cuff pressure. Global longitudinal strain and LV ejection fraction were preserved between the groups with no statistically significant difference, whereas there was a statically significant difference between the control and two hypertension groups in GWI (P = 0.01), GCW (P < 0.001), and GWW (P < 0.001). Conclusion Non-invasive MW analysis allows better understanding of LV response under conditions of increased afterload. MW is an advanced assessment of LV systolic function in hypertension patients, giving a closer look at the relationship between LV pressure and contractility in settings of increased load dependency than LV ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1153
Author(s):  
Alessandra Scatteia ◽  
Angelo Silverio ◽  
Roberto Padalino ◽  
Francesco De Stefano ◽  
Raffaella America ◽  
...  

The left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is the preferred parameter applied for the non-invasive evaluation of LV systolic function in clinical practice. It has a well-recognized and extensive role in the clinical management of numerous cardiac conditions. Many imaging modalities are currently available for the non-invasive assessment of LVEF. The aim of this review is to describe their relative advantages and disadvantages, proposing a hierarchical application of the different imaging tests available for LVEF evaluation based on the level of accuracy/reproducibility clinically required.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Sakaguchi ◽  
A Yamada ◽  
M Hoshino ◽  
K Takada ◽  
N Hoshino ◽  
...  

Abstract Purposes We examined how changes in left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) were associated with prognosis in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after congestive heart failure (HF) admission. Methods We studied 123 consecutive patients (age 70 ± 15 years, 55% male) who had been hospitalized due to congestive HF with preserved LVEF (> 50%). The exclusion criteria were atrial fibrillation and inadequate echo image quality for strain analyses. The patients underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography and measurement of plasma NT-ProBNP levels on the same day at the time of hospital admission as well as in the stable condition after discharge. Differences in GLS, LVEF and NT-ProBNP (delta GLS, LVEF and NT-ProBNP ; 2nd – 1st measurements) were calculated. The study end points were all-cause mortality and cardiac events. Results Mean periods of echo performance after hospitalization were 2 ±1days (1st echo) and 240 ± 289 days (2nd echo), respectively. During the follow-up (974 ± 626 days), 12 patients died and 25 patients were hospitalized because of HF worsening. In multivariate analysis, delta GLS and follow-up GLS were prognostic factors, whereas baseline and follow-up LVEF, NT-ProBNP, changes in LVEF and NT-ProBNP could not predict cardiac events. Delta GLS (p = 0.002) turned out to be the best independent prognosticator. Receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that -0.6% of delta GLS was the optimal cut-off value to predict cardiac events and mortality (sensitivity 76%, specificity 67%, AUC 0.75). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with delta GLS more than -0.6% experienced significantly less cardiac events during the follow-up period (p < 0.0001, log-rank). Conclusion A change in LV GLS after congestive HF admission was a predictor of the prognosis in patients with preserved LVEF. It would be useful to check the changes in GLS in those with preserved LVEF after discharge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Sahiti ◽  
C Morbach ◽  
C Henneges ◽  
M Hanke ◽  
R Ludwig ◽  
...  

Abstract OnBehalf AHF Registry Background & Aim A novel echocardiographic method to non-invasively determine left ventricular (LV) myocardial work (MyW) based on speckle-tracking derived longitudinal strain and blood pressure has recently been validated against invasive reference measurements. MyW is considered less load-dependent than LV ejection fraction (EF) and LV longitudinal strain. We investigated MyW indices in patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF <40%; HFrEF) and patients with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%, HFpEF) admitted for acutely decompensated heart failure (AHF). Methods The AHF registry is a monocentric prospective follow-up study that comprehensively phenotypes consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF. Echocardiography was performed on the day of admission. MyW assessment was performed off-line using EchoPAC (GE, version 202). Here we present MyW indices and performed two-sided t-tests to analyze differences in numerical baseline covariates. Results We analyzed the echocardiograms of 94 AHF patients (72 ± 10 years; 36% female). 46 patients (49%) had an LVEF <40%, while 48 patients (51%) presented with LVEF ≥50%. HFrEF patients were younger, less often female, and hat lower blood pressure (table). Consistent with lower LVEF, HFrEF patients had less negative global longitudinal strain and lower global constructive work, when compared to HFpEF patients. Since HFrEF patients also had higher global wasted work, this yielded a lower myocardial work efficiency compared to HFpEF patients (table). Conclusions This analysis in patients with AHF exhibited marked differences in MyW indices according to subgroups with HFrEF and HFpEF, thus adding information to the classical measures of LV function. Future research has to determine whether constructive and/or wasted MyW are valuable diagnostic or therapeutic targets in patients with AHF. Abstract P803 Figure.


Open Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e001088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Londono-Hoyos ◽  
Patrick Segers ◽  
Zeba Hashmath ◽  
Garrett Oldland ◽  
Maheshwara Reddy Koppula ◽  
...  

ObjectiveNon-invasive assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic function is important to better understand physiological abnormalities in heart failure (HF). The spatiotemporal pattern of LV blood flow velocities during systole and diastole can be used to estimate intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs). We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of an MRI-based method to calculate systolic and diastolic IVPDs in subjects without heart failure (No-HF), and with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).MethodsWe studied 159 subjects without HF, 47 subjects with HFrEF and 32 subjects with HFpEF. Diastolic and systolic intraventricular flow was measured using two-dimensional in-plane phase-contrast MRI. The Euler equation was solved to compute IVPDs in diastole (mitral base to apex) and systole (apex to LV outflow tract).ResultsSubjects with HFpEF demonstrated a higher magnitude of the early diastolic reversal of IVPDs (−1.30 mm Hg) compared with the No-HF group (−0.78 mm Hg) and the HFrEF group (−0.75 mm Hg; analysis of variance p=0.01). These differences persisted after adjustment for clinical variables, Doppler-echocardiographic parameters of diastolic filling and measures of LV structure (No-HF=−0.72; HFrEF=−0.87; HFpEF=−1.52 mm Hg; p=0.006). No significant differences in systolic IVPDs were found in adjusted models. IVPD parameters demonstrated only weak correlations with standard Doppler-echocardiographic parameters.ConclusionsOur findings suggest distinct patterns of systolic and diastolic IVPDs in HFpEF and HFrEF, implying differences in the nature of diastolic dysfunction between the HF subtypes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Md Noornabi Khondokar ◽  
Khurshed Ahmed ◽  
Mohammad Ashraf Hossain ◽  
Rakibulh Rashed ◽  
Mohamed Mausool Siraj ◽  
...  

Background:Chronic heart failure (CHF) is the most common and prognostically unfavorable outcome of many diseases of the cardiovascular system. Clinical trials have demonstrated mortality and morbidity benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure. These studies have used either eplerenone or spironolactone as the MRA. Eplerenone is a selective aldosterone antagonist expected to have a lower incidence of hormonal side effects than spironolactone. The present study is designed to compare these two drugs in chronic heart failure patients as no head to head trial between these two drugs is found regarding improvement of systolic function, tolerability and safety. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of eplerenone and spironolactone on LV systolic function in patients with chronic heart failure in a single center. Methods:It was a randomized clinical trial single blind study. A total of 224 cases of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and NYHA class III or IV were selected by random sampling, from July 2017 to June 2018. Each patient was randomly allocated into either of the two arms, and was continued receiving treatment with either spironolactone (Arm-I) or eplerenone(Arm-II). Each patient was evaluated clinically, biochemically and echocardiographically at the beginning of treatment (baseline) at 1 month and at the end of 6th month. Echocardiography was performed to find out change in left ventricular systolic function. Result: After 6 months of treatment, ejection fraction was found higher in the eplerenonearm (40.3 ± 6.5 versus 38.3 ± 4.6%; P < 0.05). Ejection fraction (EF) changes were 6.2% in eplerenone group and 4.1% in spironolactonearm. A significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (21.9±2.5 in group I versus 14.9±5.7 in group II; P < 0.05) and left ventricular systolic diameter (48.7±4.0 in arm I versus 45.2±4.9 in arm II; P<0.05) occurred after 6 months of treatment. But no significant differences were observed in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (187.8±37.4 versus 184.5±33.9; P=0.101) and left ventricular diastolic diameter (60.1±4.5 versus 61.0±4.9; P=0.0818) between arms. Assessment of blood pressure six months after treatment shows, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were improved in both arms but difference between two arms were statistically non-significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, the improvement in systolic function was more in eplerenone arm, which also had fewer adverse side effects when compared to spironolactone arm. So, it can be concluded that eplerenone can be advised in patient with chronic heart failure in addition to other drugs that are used to treat heart failure. University Heart Journal Vol. 16, No. 2, Jul 2020; 65-70


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amil M Shah ◽  
Brian Claggett ◽  
Nancy K Sweitzer ◽  
Sanjiv J Shah ◽  
Inder S Anand ◽  
...  

Introduction: Left ventricular (LV) systolic function by strain imaging is impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but its prognostic relevance is not known. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that worse longitudinal strain (LS) is independently associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: LS was assessed by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in a blinded core laboratory at baseline in 447 patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥45%) enrolled in the Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial and was related to the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death, HF hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest, and its components. Results: At a median follow-up of 2.6 (IQR 1.5-3.9) years, 115 patients experienced the primary outcome. Impaired LS, defined as an absolute LS < 15.8%, was present in 53% of patients and was associated with the composite outcome (adjusted HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.26-3.66; p=0.005), CV death alone (adjusted HR 3.20, 95% CI 1.44-7.12; p=0.004), and HF hospitalization alone (adjusted HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.16-4.28; p=0.016) after adjusting for age, gender, race, randomization strata (prior HF hospitalization vs elevated B-type natriuretic peptide level), region of enrollment (Americas vs Russia or Georgia), randomized treatment assignment, history of atrial fibrillation, heart rate, New York Heart Association class, history of stroke, creatinine, hematocrit, LVEF, mass, end-systolic volume index, and E/E’ ratio. These findings were similar in the subgroup of 354 patients with LVEF ≥55%. Conclusions: Among HFpEF patients enrolled in TOPCAT, impaired LV systolic function, measured by LS, is predictive of adverse CV outcomes independent of clinical and conventional echocardiographic predictors. Impaired LS represents a novel imaging biomarker to identify HFpEF patients at particularly high risk for CV morbidity and mortality.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Negareh Mousavi ◽  
Timothy Tan ◽  
Mohammad Ali ◽  
Elkan F. Halpern ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether baseline echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) size and function predict the development of symptomatic heart failure or cardiac death (major adverse cardiac events, MACE) in patients treated with anthracyclines who have a pre-chemotherapy left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the low normal range (between 50-59%). Background: Anthracycline-induced symptomatic heart failure and impaired LVEF are late and often irreversible manifestations of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. The value of echocardiographic parameters of myocardial size and function before chemotherapy to identify patients at high-risk for development of symptomatic heart failure in patients with low normal LVEF was studied. Methods: Patients with a LVEF between 50 and 59% before anthracyclines were selected. In these patients, LV volumes, LVEF and peak longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured. Individuals were followed for MACE and all-cause mortality over a median of 659 days (range; 3-3704 days). Results: Of 2234 patients undergoing echocardiography for pre-anthracycline assessment, 158 (7%) had a resting ejection fraction of 50-59%. Their average LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) was 101±22ml, LVEF was 54 ±3% and global longitudinal strain (GLS) was -17.7±2.6%. Twelve patients experienced a MACE (congestive heart failure) at a median of 173 days (range; 15-530). Age, diabetes, previous coronary artery disease, LVEDV, LVESV and GLS were all-predictive of MACE (P= 0.015, 0.0043 and 0.0065 for LVEDV, LVESV, and GLS respectively). LVEDV and GLS remained predictive of MACE when adjusted for age. Age and GLS were also predictive of overall mortality (p<0.0001 and 0.0105 respectively). Conclusions: In patients treated with anthracyclines with an LVEF of 50-59%, both baseline EDV and GLS predict the occurrence of MACE. These parameters may help target patients who could bene[[Unable to Display Character: &#64257;]]t from closer cardiac surveillance and earlier initiation of cardioprotective medical therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document