Evaluation of the correlation between the Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index, Back Pain Functional Scale and other back pain disability scales in Turkish patients with low back pain

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Ahmet Karadağ ◽  
Muhammet Canbaş
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Functional Scale ◽  
Pain Disability Index ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Important Health ◽  
Disability Questionnaire ◽  
Turkish Patients

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is an important health problem that may cause functional loss. Several back pain disability scales have been developed in different languages. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluates the correlation between the Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index (ILBPDI) the Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS) and other back pain disability scales in patients with mechanical low back pain. METHODS: Included in the study were 105 patients who presented to our outpatient clinics and who were diagnosed with mechanical low back pain. The ILBPDI, BPFS, Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS) and Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (ODI) were administered to all participants, and Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded. RESULTS: A strongly negative correlation was identified between ILBPDI and BPFS (p< 0.05), and a strongly positive correlation was noted between ILBPDI and QBPDS, ODI and VAS. CONCLUSION: A strong correlation exists between ILBPDI and BPFS, and a further strong correlation between ILBPDI ODI and QBPDS. These questionnaires can be used interchangeably to evaluate disability associated with chronic mechanical low back pain.

scholarly journals Comparison among different therapeutic techniques to treat low back pain: a monitored randomized study

Ozone Therapy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Luca Morelli ◽  
Simona Carla Bramani ◽  
Marco Cantaluppi ◽  
Mara Pauletto ◽  
Alessandro Scuotto
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Functional Limitation ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Ozone Therapy ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Treatment Data ◽  
Disability Questionnaire

Idiopathic low back pain can be considered as a chronic condition, characterized by recurrent episodes of pain and functional limitation. The aim of this study is to compare two therapeutic methods to treat this chronic disease: the oxygen-ozone therapy and the diathermy through Tear<sup>®</sup> therapy. Two groups of 10 patients each who suffered from postural idiopathic low back pain due to different pathologies have been recruited. All selected patients have been evaluated through spinometry and have been given the <em>Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire</em> to fill in at the beginning of the treatments and at the end of them with a three-month follow-up. The first group underwent a diathermy treatment through Tecar<sup>®</sup> therapy, whilst the second group received an oxygen-ozone therapy treatment through a paravertebral lumbar infiltration; both treatments have been associated with a standard physiokinesitherapy treatment. Data collected through Formetric spinometry show an improvement in both groups, but in the second group (treated with oxygen-ozone therapy+physiokinesitherapy), the improvement is greater (from 6% to 57%) against the first group (from 20% to 38%). In conclusion, the study has cor roborated the validity of both treatments leading to improvement of symptomatology, but while one treatment leads to some relapses after a few months, the second one has a greater healing effect, which preserves over time.

scholarly journals Are stabilisation exercises different to other treatments in improving physical activity or reducing disability for people with persistent low back pain? A systematic literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Sara Gardiner ◽  
Helena Daniell ◽  
Benjamin Smith ◽  
Rachel Chester
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Fear Avoidance ◽  
Functional Scale ◽  
Disability Questionnaire ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background/Aims Stabilisation exercises are commonly prescribed for people with persistent low back pain. However, for some patients, it has been hypothesised that stabilisation exercises could draw attention to protecting the core, promote hypervigilance and inhibit volitional movement. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and reported adverse events, in particular fear avoidance, of stabilisation exercises compared with placebo or other treatments offered by physiotherapists on the outcome of disability and activity at 12- and 24-months' follow-up. Methods The following electronic databases were searched: Embase, Medline, AMED, CINAHL, from inception to June 2019. Only randomised controlled trails were included. Study selection, data extraction and appraisal of quality criteria using PEDro, were undertaken by two independent assessors. Results Seven studies (n=1820) were eligible. Of six studies that reported adverse effects in the group receiving stabilisation exercises, four reported none and two reported mild exacerbation of pain locally or elsewhere. Fear avoidance was not investigated in any of the studies. Across the studies, 12 analyses were reported and included seven different comparator groups and three outcome measures: Oswestry Disability Index (n=1), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (n=5), Patient Specific Functional Scale (n=4). Two studies included a 24-month follow up in addition to a 12-month follow up. Of the 12 studies, nine reported no significant differences between the effectiveness of stabilisation exercises and comparator groups. Stabilisation exercises were more effective than comparator groups for the following three analyses: compared to manual therapy or education at 12 but not 24 months for the Oswestry Disability Index (15.71, 95% confidence interval 19.3–10.01); compared to placebo for the Patient Specific Functional Scale (1.5, 95% confidence interval 0.7–2.2) but not the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; and compared to high load lifting for the Patient Specific Functional Scale (1.8 95% confidence interval 2.8–0.7). Conclusions Stabilisation exercises are safe and equally effective to other treatments, and possibly superior for some outcomes at some time points. No or only mild adverse effects were reported. However, none of the studies measured fear avoidance as an outcome and we recommend this be included in future randomised controlled trials measuring the effectiveness of stabilisation exercises.

Family History and Severity of Disability Associated with Chronic Low Back Pain

1985 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 813-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Alec Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Family History ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pain Disability Index ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Severity Of Disability ◽  
Chronic Pain Conditions

76 patients with chronic low back pain were asked to complete the Pain Disability Index and a family history pain checklist. A significant positive relationship was found between severity of chronic pain disability and the number of chronic pain conditions in the patients' families of origin and genesis. These findings support the position that pain disability is learned from family members, but controlled research is needed before dismissing the possible role of genetic and other factors.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of kinesiotherapy in chronic non-specific low back pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Vladimir A. Parfenov ◽  
Irina A. Lamkova
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Patient Group ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Emotional State ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Disability Questionnaire

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of physical therapy (kinesiotherapy or KT) for chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) in managing pain, improving functional and emotional state, and overall physical activity. Materials and methods. The study included 71 patients (17 men and 54 women) aged 1875 years (mean age 55.09 13.0 years) with CNSLBP, of whom 34 patients received standard KT and 37 patients received enhanced KT. Patients were asked to complete the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) at baseline, after 7 days and 90 days. Results. In patients who received treatment, we observed a reduction in pain intensity as measured by the NPRS, from a score of 8 at baseline (68) to 3 (24) points after 7 days and down to 2 (04) after 3 months (p 0.0001). Depression severity decreased from 7 (59) points to 5 (37) after 7 days (p = 0.002) and 4 (36) points after 90 days (p = 0.002). Anxiety decreased from 7 (510) to 6 (48) after 7 days (p = 0.0003) and 5 (37) points after 90 days (p = 0.0003). The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire score decreased from 46% (3457.77) to 28% (1235.55) after 7 days (p 0.0001), and then to 11.11% (4.4426) after 90 days (p 0.0001). Physical activity as measured by the IPAQ-SF increased from 11 (716) to 16 (1319) points after 7 days (p = 0.001) and to 23 (1526) points after 90 days (p = 0.0002). The patient group receiving enhanced KT had a more significant reduction in pain as measured by the NPRS after 7 days and 3 months (p = 0.02 and p = 0.055, respectively), depression as measured by the HADS (p 0.05), and disability as measured by the Oswestry Questionnaire (p = 0.015), accompanied by an increase in physical activity as measured by the IPAQ-SF after 90 days (p = 0.0002), as compared to the patient group receiving standard KT. Conclusion. KT not only reduces pain but also improves the functional and emotional state, and increases physical activity in patients with CNSLBP. Enhancing KT by using a personalized approach and educational programmes improves long-term treatment outcomes.

scholarly journals Development and structural validity of a Nigerian culture- and environment-friendly low back pain outcome measure: Ibadan Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Bolanle A. Nottidge ◽  
Adesola C. Odole ◽  
Nse A. Odunaiya ◽  
Matthew O. Akpa ◽  
Olufunmilayo I. Fawole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Structural Validity ◽  
Environment Friendly ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Pain Outcome ◽  
Disability Questionnaire

Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire--Arabic Version

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamad S. Al Amer ◽  
Fahad Alanazi ◽  
Mohamed ELdesoky ◽  
Ayman Honin
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Disability Questionnaire

Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire

1980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy C. T. Fairbank ◽  
Judith Couper ◽  
Jean B. Davies ◽  
John P. O'Brien
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Disability Questionnaire

Frequency of Work-related Low Back Pain and Disability Among Automobile Mechanics in Lahore

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
Sameed Liaqat ◽  
Muhammad Jawad ◽  
Wardah Rauf ◽  
Mehak Hamna Zahra Gilani
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Disability Questionnaire ◽  
Number Of Individuals ◽  
Ergonomic Risk Factors

Automobile mechanic work is an extensive and physically hard job. Consequently, the automobile workers suffer from ergonomic risk factors including Low Back Pain (LBP) as a major.Objective: To find out the prevalence of Low Back pain (LBP) and disability among automobile mechanics in Lahore.Methodology:The study was cross-sectional and included 180 automechanics of Lahore. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OLBPDQ) was used to measure the disability caused by pain. Pain was measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data was collected from 180 auto mechanics from auto repair shops of Lahore.Results:Out of 180 individuals, 125 subjects reported LBP with average age of 30±5.3 years. 87 individuals (69.6%) were minimally disabled and 31 individuals (24.8%) experienced moderate disability, whereas only 7 individuals (5.6%) experienced severedisability in activities of daily living (ADLs).Conclusions:LBP is highly frequent among automobile mechanics. Majority of the individuals suffering from LBP had minimal disability. The rate of moderate disability was also noticeable but number of individuals with severe disability was very low. Overall, LBP disturbed the quality of life.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document