Linguistic multi-attribute decision-making evaluation method for product innovation design scheme with demand preferences of customers

Author(s):  
Wen-Qing Liu ◽  
Jia-Wen Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Yun Jiang ◽  
Hui-Nan Hao
2012 ◽  
Vol 591-593 ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Peng Fei Tian ◽  
Shi Yan ◽  
Bi Ru Li

Selecting the favorable conceptual design scheme is the first step to make a new product development (NPD) successfully. To guarantee reliability and rationality of decision-making about multiple design schemes in conceptual design stage under the impact of uncertainties and qualitative information, we have employed KJ method to cluster the evaluation factors into 5 clusters such as emotion, ergonomics, aesthetics, core technology, and impact; and fuzzy mathematics method to deal with uncertainties and qualitative information effectively. The weights of evaluation factors were calculated by analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Fuzzy mathematics method is the comprehensive evaluation method and quantitative analysis which based on the “maximum membership degree evaluation”. All design schemes are ranked and selected according to the multiple evaluation score of parts with their weights. Finally, a case study for decision-making is presented to demonstrate the application of the evaluation method.


Author(s):  
Rongrong Yin ◽  
Xueliang Yin ◽  
Mengdi Cui ◽  
Yinghan Xu

Abstract Identifying important nodes is very crucial to design efficient communication networks or contain the spreading of information such as diseases and rumors. The problem is formulated as follows: given a network, which nodes are the more important? Most current studies did not incorporate the structure change as well as application features of a network. Aiming at the node importance evaluation in wireless sensor networks, a new method which ranks nodes according to their structural importance and performance impact is proposed. Namely, this method considers two aspects of the network, network structural characteristics and application requirements. This method integrates four indicators which reflect the node importance, namely, node degree, number of spanning trees, delay, and network energy consumption. Firstly, the changes in the four indicators are analyzed using the node deletion method. Then, the TOPSIS multi-attribute decision-making method is applied to merge these four evaluation indicators. On this basis, a more comprehensive evaluation method (MADME) for node importance is obtained. Theory study reveals MADME method saves computational time. And the simulation results show the superiority of the MADME method over various algorithms such as the N-Burt method, betweenness method, DEL-Node method, and IE-Matrix method. The accuracy of the evaluation can be improved, and the key nodes determined by the MADME method have a more obvious effect on the network performance. Our method can provide guidance on influential node identification in the network.


Author(s):  
Adam Borovička

Investment decision making is a complex process. Important decision concerns the (pre)selection of potential investment instruments to compose an investment portfolio. Conscientious selection involves the application of quantitative multi-criteria procedures. The typical element of uncertainty (i.e. unstable return or investor’s vague preferences about the criteria importance) must be considered. This combination of the typical characteristics of investment on the capital market can be addressed by means of fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods. These methods effectively quantify the vague elements by using fuzzy numbers. However, the applicability of a relevant method sufficiently depends on the actual investment decision making problem. This article focuses on open unit trusts because this market is recently becoming more popular in the Czech Republic. Unfortunately, under all the practical and theoretical specifics of this type of investment, there is no known evaluation method that can satisfactorily solved this problem. Therefore, the main aim of this article is to propose a novel fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method that works for all investment conditions. Its algorithm is inspired by some principles of the outranking methods. The evaluation of open unit trusts offered by the Česká spořitelna, clearly demonstrates all of the benefits of the proposed concept compared to the existing methods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 105223
Author(s):  
Jalil Heidary Dahooie ◽  
Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha ◽  
Shima Farazmehr ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ◽  
Jurgita Antucheviciene

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 7400
Author(s):  
Qinghua Liu ◽  
Jiadui Chen ◽  
Weixing Wang ◽  
Qing Qin

In concept design, effective decision making and management of schemes can shorten the design cycle and improve product quality. The decision maker (DM)’s confidence is one of the critical factors affecting the conceptual design evaluation. Although many studies use quantitative linguistic evaluation for design scheme decision-making, which improves product conceptual design decision-making efficiency and effectiveness, few studies consider the confidence level of a decision. A conceptual design evaluation method based on Z-numbers is proposed to solve this problem, considering the customer requirements and the DM’s confidence. Firstly, the evaluation criteria are determined by analyzing customer requirements; then, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the Z-numbers environment (Z-AHP) is used to determine the criteria weight; Finally, the fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method in the Z-numbers environment (Z-TOPSIS) is used to evaluate the design schemes to obtain the optimal scheme. The proposed method is applied to the selection of the design scheme of the waste containers in the kitchen. The results show that considering the DM’s self-confidence can achieve a more reasonable and practical evaluation of the conceptual design scheme, and it is easier to obtain the best scheme.


Informatica ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ◽  
Arturas Kaklauskas ◽  
Zenonas Turskis ◽  
Jolanta Tamošaitienė

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document