Threshold-based vestibular adaptation to cross-coupled canal stimulation

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-181
Author(s):  
Carol C. Cheung ◽  
Heiko Hecht ◽  
Thomas Jarchow ◽  
Laurence R. Young
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Motion Sickness ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Rotation Rates ◽  
Vestibular Adaptation ◽  
Carry Over

Prior experiments have demonstrated that people are able to adapt to cross-coupled accelerations associated with head movements while spinning at high rotation rates (e.g., 23 rpm or 138°/s). However, while adapting, subjects commonly experience serious side effects, such as motion sickness, non-compensatory eye movements, and strong and potentially disorienting illusory body tilt or tumbling sensations. In the present study, we investigated the feasibility of adaptation using a threshold-based method, which ensured that the illusory tilt sensations remained imperceptible or just barely noticeable. This was achieved by incrementally increasing the angular velocity of the horizontal centrifuge while supine subjects made repeated consistent yaw head turns. Incremental adaptation phases started at centrifugation speeds of 3 rpm. Centrifuge speed was slowly increased in steps of 1.5 rpm until a light illusory tilt was experienced. At the end of the incremental procedure, subjects were able to make head turns while rotating 14 rpm without experiencing illusory tilt. Moreover, motion sickness symptoms could be avoided and a limited carry over of the adaptive state to stronger stimulation at 23 rpm was found. The results are compared to prior studies which adapted subjects to super-threshold stimuli.

Sensorimotor aspects of high-speed artificial gravity: III. Sensorimotor adaptation

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Paul DiZio ◽  
James R. Lackner
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Coriolis Force ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Motor Adaptation ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Artificial Gravity ◽  
Slow Rotation ◽  
Movement Trajectory ◽  
Rotation Rates

As a countermeasure to the debilitating physiological effects of weightlessness, astronauts could live continuously in an artificial gravity environment created by slow rotation of an entire spacecraft or be exposed to brief daily "doses" in a short radius centrifuge housed within a non-rotating spacecraft. A potential drawback to both approaches is that head movements made during rotation may be disorienting and nauseogenic. These side effects are more severe at higher rotation rates, especially upon first exposure. Head movements during rotation generate aberrant vestibular stimulation and Coriolis force perturbations of the head-neck motor system. This article reviews our progress toward distinguishing vestibular and motor factors in side effects of rotation, and presents new data concerning the rates of rotation up to which adaptation is possible. We have studied subjects pointing to targets during constant velocity rotation, because these movements generate Coriolis motor perturbations of the arm but do not involve unusual vestibular stimulation. Initially, reaching paths and endpoints are deviated in the direction of the transient lateral Coriolis forces generated. With practice, subjects soon move in straighter paths and land on target once more. If sight of the arm is permitted, adaptation is more rapid than in darkness. Initial arm movement trajectory and endpoint deviations are proportional to Coriolis force magnitude over a range of rotation speeds from 5 to 20 rpm, and there is rapid, complete motor adaptation at all speeds. These new results indicate that motor adaptation to high rotation rates is possible. Coriolis force perturbations of head movements also occur in a rotating environment but adaptation gradually develops over the course of many head movements.

Velocity storage: its multiple roles

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (3) ◽  
pp. 1206-1215 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Lackner ◽  
Paul DiZio
Keyword(s):  
Angular Velocity ◽  
Motion Sickness ◽  
Semicircular Canal ◽  
Neural Circuits ◽  
Parabolic Flight ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Velocity Storage ◽  
Dynamic Balancing

Our research described in this article was motivated by the puzzling finding of the Skylab M131 experiments: head movements made while rotating that are nauseogenic and disorienting on Earth are innocuous in a weightless, 0- g environment. We describe a series of parabolic flight experiments that directly addressed this puzzle and discovered the gravity-dependent responses to semicircular canal stimulation, consistent with the principles of velocity storage. We describe a line of research that started in a different direction, investigating dynamic balancing, but ended up pointing to the gravity dependence of angular velocity-to-position integration of semicircular canal signals. Together, these lines of research and the theoretical framework of velocity storage provide an answer to at least part of the M131 puzzle. We also describe recently discovered neural circuits by which active, dynamic vestibular, multisensory, and motor signals are interpreted as either appropriate for action and orientation or as conflicts evoking motion sickness and disorientation.

Sensorimotor aspects of high-speed artificial gravity: I. Sensory conflict in vestibular adaptation

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 271-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika L. Brown ◽  
Heiko Hecht ◽  
Laurence R. Young
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Motor Coordination ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Sensory Conflict ◽  
Rotation Rates ◽  
Coriolis Effects ◽  
Gain Adaptation ◽  
Intersensory Conflict ◽  
Vertical Nystagmus

Short-radius centrifugation offers a promising and affordable countermeasure to the adverse effects of prolonged weightlessness. However, head movements made in a fast rotating environment elicit Coriolis effects, which seriously compromise sensory and motor processes. We found that participants can adapt to these Coriolis effects when exposed intermittently to high rotation rates and, at the same time, can maintain their perceptual-motor coordination in stationary environments. In this paper, we explore the role of inter-sensory conflict in this adaptation process. Different measures (vertical nystagmus, illusory body tilt, motion sickness) react differently to visual-vestibular conflict and adapt differently. In particular, proprioceptive-vestibular conflict sufficed to adapt subjective parameters and the time constant of nystagmus decay, while retinal slip was required for VOR gain adaptation. A simple correlation between the strength of intersensory conflict and the efficacy of adaptation fails to explain the data. Implications of these findings, which differ from existing data for low rotation rates, are discussed.

scholarly journals Neural Basis of Visually Guided Head Movements Studied With fMRI

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 2516-2527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Petit ◽  
Michael S. Beauchamp
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Posterior Part ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Oculomotor Control ◽  
Imaging Studies ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Temporoparietal Junction

We used event-related fMRI to measure brain activity while subjects performed saccadic eye, head, and gaze movements to visually presented targets. Two distinct patterns of response were observed. One set of areas was equally active during eye, head, and gaze movements and consisted of the superior and inferior subdivisions of the frontal eye fields, the supplementary eye field, the intraparietal sulcus, the precuneus, area MT in the lateral occipital sulcus and subcortically in basal ganglia, thalamus, and the superior colliculus. These areas have been previously observed in functional imaging studies of human eye movements, suggesting that a common set of brain areas subserves both oculomotor and head movement control in humans, consistent with data from single-unit recording and microstimulation studies in nonhuman primates that have described overlapping eye- and head-movement representations in oculomotor control areas. A second set of areas was active during head and gaze movements but not during eye movements. This set of areas included the posterior part of the planum temporale and the cortex at the temporoparietal junction, known as the parieto-insular vestibular cortex (PIVC). Activity in PIVC has been observed during imaging studies of invasive vestibular stimulation, and we confirm its role in processing the vestibular cues accompanying natural head movements. Our findings demonstrate that fMRI can be used to study the neural basis of head movements and show that areas that control eye movements also control head movements. In addition, we provide the first evidence for brain activity associated with vestibular input produced by natural head movements as opposed to invasive caloric or galvanic vestibular stimulation.

“Torso Rotation”' experiments. 4: the role of vision and the cervico-ocular reflex in compensation for a deficient VOR

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-101
Author(s):  
L.J.G. Bouyer ◽  
D.G.D. Watt
Keyword(s):  
Motion Sickness ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Repeated Exposure ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Calibration Data ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Gaze Stability ◽  
Velocity Gain

Acute, reversible changes in human vestibular function can be produced by exposure to “Torso Rotation” (TR), a method involving the overuse of certain types of simple, self-generated movements. A single session results in multiple, short-lasting aftereffects, including perceptual illusions, VOR gain reduction,gaze and postural instability, and motion sickness. With repeated exposure, motion sickness susceptibility disappears and gaze stability improves. VOR gain continues to be reduced, however. Therefore, another gaze stabilizing system must come into play. Are visual and/or neck inputs involved in this functional compensation? Six subjects participated in this 7-day experiment. Eye and head movements were measured during 2 tests: 1) voluntary “head only” shaking between 0.3 and 3.0 Hz (lights off) and 2) voluntary “head and torso” shaking, moving the upper body en bloc (neck immobilized). Measurements were obtained before and repeatedly after TR. Velocity gain (eye velocity/head velocity) was determined for each of these tests. Each day, mean velocity gain during “head only” shaking in the dark (averaged over 1.0 to 2.0 Hz) dropped significantly after TR ( P < 0.01), with no long-term improvement ( P > 0.9). Similar results, although more noisy, were obtained for “head and torso” shaking. As a control, EOG calibration data confirmed that gaze stability in the light did improve over the 7 days of testing. This experiment demonstrates that the reduction in gaze instability following repeated exposure to TR results from an increased use of vision. It excludes the VOR, the COR, and predictive mechanisms (including efference copy) as contributors. In addition, in the 20 minutes following TR completion, gaze stability recovered less than during previous VOR testing in the dark. These results are compatible with the motion that exposure to TR leads to a change in sensorimotor strategy involving a de-emphasis of vestibular inputs.

scholarly journals The vestibular-related frontal cortex and its role in smooth-pursuit eye movements and vestibular-pursuit interactions

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junko Fukushima ◽  
Teppei Akao ◽  
Sergei Kurkin ◽  
Chris R.S. Kaneko ◽  
Kikuro Fukushima
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Frontal Cortex ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Target Motion ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Image Motion ◽  
Target Velocity ◽  
Eye Velocity ◽  
Pursuit Neurons

In order to see clearly when a target is moving slowly, primates with high acuity foveae use smooth-pursuit and vergence eye movements. The former rotates both eyes in the same direction to track target motion in frontal planes, while the latter rotates left and right eyes in opposite directions to track target motion in depth. Together, these two systems pursue targets precisely and maintain their images on the foveae of both eyes. During head movements, both systems must interact with the vestibular system to minimize slip of the retinal images. The primate frontal cortex contains two pursuit-related areas; the caudal part of the frontal eye fields (FEF) and supplementary eye fields (SEF). Evoked potential studies have demonstrated vestibular projections to both areas and pursuit neurons in both areas respond to vestibular stimulation. The majority of FEF pursuit neurons code parameters of pursuit such as pursuit and vergence eye velocity, gaze velocity, and retinal image motion for target velocity in frontal and depth planes. Moreover, vestibular inputs contribute to the predictive pursuit responses of FEF neurons. In contrast, the majority of SEF pursuit neurons do not code pursuit metrics and many SEF neurons are reported to be active in more complex tasks. These results suggest that FEF- and SEF-pursuit neurons are involved in different aspects of vestibular-pursuit interactions and that eye velocity coding of SEF pursuit neurons is specialized for the task condition.

scholarly journals Dynamics of gaze control during prey capture in freely moving mice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angie M. Michaiel ◽  
Elliott T.T. Abe ◽  
Cristopher M. Niell
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Prey Capture ◽  
Active Vision ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Visual Scene ◽  
Specific Point ◽  
Binocular Field ◽  
Freely Moving

ABSTRACTMany studies of visual processing are conducted in unnatural conditions, such as head- and gaze-fixation. As this radically limits natural exploration of the visual environment, there is much less known about how animals actively use their sensory systems to acquire visual information in natural, goal-directed contexts. Recently, prey capture has emerged as an ethologically relevant behavior that mice perform without training, and that engages vision for accurate orienting and pursuit. However, it is unclear how mice target their gaze during such natural behaviors, particularly since, in contrast to many predatory species, mice have a narrow binocular field and lack foveate vision that would entail fixing their gaze on a specific point in the visual field. Here we measured head and bilateral eye movements in freely moving mice performing prey capture. We find that the majority of eye movements are compensatory for head movements, thereby acting to stabilize the visual scene. During head turns, however, these periods of stabilization are interspersed with non-compensatory saccades that abruptly shift gaze position. Analysis of eye movements relative to the cricket position shows that the saccades do not preferentially select a specific point in the visual scene. Rather, orienting movements are driven by the head, with the eyes following in coordination to sequentially stabilize and recenter the gaze. These findings help relate eye movements in the mouse to other species, and provide a foundation for studying active vision during ethological behaviors in the mouse.

Eye-Head Movement Coordination: Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Suppression with Head-Fixed Target Fixation1

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-170
Author(s):  
Jean-Louis Vercher ◽  
Gabriel M. Gauthier
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Mental Arithmetic ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Total Darkness ◽  
Fixed Target ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Optokinetic Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

To maintain clear vision, the images on the retina must remain reasonably stable. Head movements are generally dealt with successfully by counter-rotation of the eyes induced by the combined actions of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and the optokinetic reflex. A problem of importance relates to the value of the so-called intrinsic gain of the VOR (VORG) in man, and how this gain is modulated to provide appropriate eye movements. We have studied these problems in two situations: 1. fixation of a stationary object of the visual space while the head moves; 2. fixation of an object moving with the head. These two situations were compared to a basic condition in which no visual target was allowed in order to induce “pure” VOR. Eye movements were recorded in seated subjects during stationary sinusoidal and transient rotations around the vertical axis. Subjects were in total darkness (DARK condition) and involved in mental arithmetic. Alternatively, they were provided with a small foveal target, either fixed with respect to earth (earth-fixed target: EFT condition), or moving with them (chair-fixed-target: CFT condition). The stationary rotation experiment was used as baseline for the ensuing experiment and yielded control data in agreement with the literature. In all 3 visual conditions, typical responses to transient rotations were rigorously identical during the first 200 ms. They showed, sequentially, a 16-ms delay of the eye behind the head and a rapid increase in eye velocity during 75 to 80 ms, after which the average VORG was 0.9 ± 0.15. During the following 50 to 100 ms, the gain remained around 0.9 in all three conditions. Beyond 200 ms, the VORG remained around 0.9 in DARK and increased slowly towards 1 or decreased towards zero in the EFT and CFT conditions, respectively. The time-course of the later events suggests that visual tracking mechanisms came into play to reduce retinal slip through smooth pursuit, and position error through saccades. Our data also show that in total darkness VORG is set to 0.9 in man. Lower values reported in the literature essentially reflect predictive properties of the vestibulo-ocular mechanism, particularly evident when the input signal is a sinewave.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document