scholarly journals Solid organ transplantation and pregnancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-338
Author(s):  
M.A. Lysenko ◽  
◽  
P.V. Kozlov ◽  
V.M. Grabovskiy ◽  
I.Yu. Kokaya ◽  
...  

This paper highlights the management of pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period after solid organ transplantation. First, statistical data on the prevalence and pattern of organ transplantation are addressed. The most relevant issues of pregnancy management in organ transplant recipients include identifying optimal criteria of transplant function monitoring, assessment of pregnancy and medication effects on the fetus, and pregnancy complication development. Next, the authors review major pharmacological classes of immunosuppressive therapy, pregnancy risks, complications, and outcomes associated with these medications, relevant pregnancy planning and management issues, and delivery in liver and kidney transplant recipients. Finally, the effect of breastfeeding (in the context of regular immunosuppressive therapy) on the postnatal period is discussed. Current data demonstrate that favorable pregnancy outcome after organ transplantation is most likely at least one year after transplantation in case of stable organ functioning, careful monitoring of recipient and transplant, adequate immunosuppressive therapy, diagnostic monitoring of fetus throughout pregnancy, and timely delivery. KEYWORDS: pregnancy, transplantation, liver, kidney, immunosuppressive therapy, complications, breastfeeding. FOR CITATION: Lysenko M.A., Kozlov P.V., Grabovskiy V.M. et al. Solid organ transplantation and pregnancy. Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health. 2021;4(4):333–338 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2618-8430-2021-4-4-333-338.

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3497-3506
Author(s):  
Raymund R. Razonable

Cytomegalovirus is the classic opportunistic infection after solid organ transplantation. This review will discuss updates and future directions in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention, but they should not be mutually exclusive and each strategy should be considered depending on a specific situation. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is emphasized as a major factor that should pave the way for an individualized approach to prevention. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management, and strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are enumerated. There is increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, and their potential role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts is discussed.


Author(s):  
Eurides Lopes ◽  
Jennifer Husson

End-organ disease has become a major cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients due to increased life expectancy, increasing the demand for organ transplantation in these patients. The care of HIV-infected transplant recipients warrants a multidisciplinary team approach, including the transplant team, pharmacists, infectious disease specialists, nurses, and patients and their families. The immunosuppression of HIV-infected recipients post-transplant does not appear to further advance HIV disease. The post-transplant risk for HIV-infected recipients of opportunistic infections does not appear to be increased by immunosuppression. However, the overall rate of infections is high, and it is even higher in hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected transplant recipients. HIV/HCV co-infected recipients have worse outcomes compared to both liver and kidney HIV-infected recipients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S87-S87
Author(s):  
Hsin-Yun Sun ◽  
Aristine Cheng ◽  
Cheng-Maw Ho ◽  
Rey-Heng Hu ◽  
Nai-Kuan Chou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with liver cirrhosis have an increased risk for cryptococcosis. However, it is unknown whether they remain at a higher risk for cryptococcosis after liver transplantation. Methods Patients undergoing solid organ transplantation at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan were included for analysis. Cryptococcosis was defined based on criteria proposed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group. Only Nystatin oral suspension but no systemic anti-fungal agents was prescribed routinely post-transplant. Results From 2001 to 2016, in total, 1576 patients underwent solid organ transplantation, including 756 kidney, 411 liver, 336 heart, 61 lung, and 12 multi-organ transplantation. Cryptococcosis developed in 20 patients (1.3%), including cryptococcemia in 9, pulmonary/urine in 6, meningitis in 3, and surgical site infection in 2. Its incidence was 3.2% (13/411) in liver, 1.5% (5/336) in heart, and 0.3% (2/756) in kidney transplant recipients. Compared with 1165 non-liver transplant recipients, 441 liver transplant recipients had a significant higher incidence of cryptococcosis (3.1% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.01) and developed the disease with a shorter median duration after transplantation (75 vs. 213 days). Cryptococcosis with very-early onset (<30 days after transplantation) developed in 38.5% (5/13) of liver transplant recipients with cryptococcosis, but only 14.3% (1/7) in non-liver transplant recipients. Six patients (30%) died after a median follow-up duration of 399 days, and only two deaths were related to cryptococcosis. Conclusion Our findings showed that liver transplant recipients still had a higher risk for cryptococcosis, and the disease developed earlier after transplantation than non-liver transplant recipients. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-241
Author(s):  
Paul Huiras ◽  
Steven Gabardi

The aim of this review article is to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of everolimus. Primary literature was obtained via MEDLINE. Studies and abstracts evaluating everolimus in solid organ transplantation were considered for evaluation. English-language studies and abstracts only were selected for inclusion. Everolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor that prevents growth factor-induced cell proliferation, is effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. This agent is also useful in reducing cyclosporine-related nephrotoxicity. Everolimus directly inhibits vascular remodelling and intimal thickening, which are often associated with chronic rejection. Clinical trials have shown that everolimus is generally safe. The most commonly reported adverse events were haematologic effects and hyperlipidaemia. Everolimus is the second proliferation signal inhibitor to be proven effective in preventing acute rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. However, its exact role in the transplant immunosuppressive armamentarium is still unknown.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Paul Huiras ◽  
Steven Gabardi

The aim of this review article is to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of everolimus. Primary literature was obtained via MEDLINE. Studies and abstracts evaluating everolimus in solid organ transplantation were considered for evaluation. English-language studies and abstracts only were selected for inclusion. Everolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor that prevents growth factor-induced cell proliferation, is effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. This agent is also useful in reducing cyclosporine-related nephrotoxicity. Everolimus directly inhibits vascular remodelling and intimal thickening, which are often associated with chronic rejection. Clinical trials have shown that everolimus is generally safe. The most commonly reported adverse events were haematologic effects and hyperlipidaemia. Everolimus is the second proliferation signal inhibitor to be proven effective in preventing acute rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. However, its exact role in the transplant immunosuppressive armamentarium is still unknown.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e043731
Author(s):  
Adnan Sharif ◽  
Javeria Peracha ◽  
David Winter ◽  
Raoul Reulen ◽  
Mike Hawkins

IntroductionSolid organ transplant patients are counselled regarding increased risk of cancer (principally due to their need for lifelong immunosuppression) and it ranks as one of their biggest self-reported worries. Post-transplantation cancer is common, associated with increased healthcare costs and emerging as a leading cause of post-transplant mortality. However, epidemiology of cancer post-transplantation remains poorly understood, with limitations including translating data from different countries and national data being siloed across different registries and/or data warehouses.Methods and analysisStudy methodology for Epidemiology of Cancer after Solid Organ Transplantation involves record linkage between the UK Transplant Registry (from NHS Blood and Transplant), Hospital Episode Statistics (for secondary care episodes from NHS Digital), National Cancer Registry (from cancer registration data hosted by Public Health England) and the National Death Registry (from NHS Digital). Deterministic record linkage will be conducted by NHS Digital, with a fully anonymised linked dataset available for analysis by the research team. The study cohort will consist of up to 85 410 solid organ transplant recipients,who underwent a solid organ transplant in England between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2015, with up-to-date outcome data.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Confidentiality Advisory Group (reference: 16/CAG/0121), Research Ethics Committee (reference: 15/YH/0320) and Institutional Review Board (reference: RRK5471). The results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences, and manuscripts with results will be submitted for publication in high-impact peer-reviewed journals. The information produced will also be used to develop national evidence-based clinical guidelines to inform risk stratification to enable risk-based clinical follow-up.Trial registration numberNCT02991105.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Mohamed Morsy ◽  
Mohammad Ayaz Hossain ◽  
Atul Bagul

Background: Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) has been established in the field of solid organ transplantation for both liver and kidney allografts. The ability to perfuse organs at body temperature enables viability assessment as well as optimisation prior to implantation. Discussion: A recent in vitro report of the use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) in the use of a normothermic lung perfusion circuit has raised the possibility of their use in solid organ transplantation. The aim of this short review is to outline the potential uses of bone marrow derived MSCs for their use in renal allograft ex vivo NMP. An overview is provided of current literature of NMP as well as theorised uses for MSCs.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2019
Author(s):  
Anum Abbas ◽  
Andrea J. Zimmer ◽  
Diana Florescu

Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for infections due to chronic immunosuppression. Diarrhea is a commonly encountered problem post transplantation, with infectious causes of diarrhea being a frequent complication. Viral infections/enteritides in solid organ transplant recipients often result from frequently encountered pathogens in this population such as cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, and norovirus. However, several emerging viral pathogens are increasingly being recognized as more sensitive diagnostic techniques become available. Treatment is often limited to supportive care and reduction in immunosuppression, though antiviral therapies mayplay a role in the treatment in certain diseases. Viral enteritis is an important entity that contributes to morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document