scholarly journals EKSEKUSI TERHADAP OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR.18/PUU-XVII/2019.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-145
Author(s):  
Darmiwati Darmiwati2021
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Oriented Research

Fiduciary is the transfer of ownership rights to an object on the basis of trust provided that the object whose ownership rights are transferred remains in the control of the owner of the object. In the implementation of fiduciary, the goods that are pledged remain in the power of the debtor. Fiduciary guarantees are security rights for movable objects, both tangible and intangible and immovable objects, especially buildings that cannot be encumbered with mortgage rights. The principle of the object of the fiduciary guarantee is the creditor's trust in the debtor. In the fiduciary guarantee law, if the debtor defaults, the object of the fiduciary guarantee will be handed over to the creditor for the purpose of fiduciary execution. The fiduciary guarantee law gives the creditor the right to carry out the execution of the fiduciary guarantee object, the existence of this power, the creditor can withdraw the fiduciary guarantee object by means of parate execution. However, with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 regarding the application for judicial review of Article 15 section (2) and section (3), which requires a breach of contract agreement between the creditor and the debtor and the debtor's willingness to submit the object of collateral, has eliminated the rights of creditors and eliminated the principle of material rights. Based on these problems, the question in the research is how to execute the object of fiduciary security after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 and what is the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The legal research method in this paper is normative juridical which is reform oriented research. The conclusion in this study should be in the fiduciary guarantee certificate including the completeness of the default clause, to strengthen the evidence that the debtor has committed a breach of contract. If the debtor (fiduciary giver), after being agreed by the parties, is deemed to be in breach of contract (default), the execution of the object of the fiduciary guarantee can be carried out independently.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN ASAS ERGA OMNES DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 30/PUU-XVI/2018 DIKAITKAN DENGAN ASAS NEGATIVE LEGISLATOR

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 800
Author(s):  
Muchamad Lutfi Hakim ◽  
Rasji .
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Political Party ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research

The problem began because there was an Application to Judicial Review Article 182 Letter l specifically in the phrase "other work" Law Number 7 of 2017. The applicant requested the Constitutional Court to interpret the phrase "other work". The request was finally granted by the Constitutional Court which interpreted the phrase "other work" in Article 182 letter l of the Act to also serve as a Political Party Functionary. For the Decision, there are Parties who disagree, finally the KPU Regulation Number 26 Year 2018 which accommodates the MK Decision so that candidates for DPD members resign from Political Parties to the Administrative Court and MA. The problem is that the Decision of the Administrative Court and Supreme Court is different from the Constitutional Court Decision, both decisions allow political party functionaries to register as candidates for the DPD. In solving these problems the author uses the Normative Legal Research Method, the author's conclusion is that the principle of the Erga Omnes and the principle of the Negative legislator attached to the Constitutional Court Decision is not effective. While the author's suggestion is that there is a need for a revision of the Constitutional Court Law by adding sanctions to institutions or communities that do not follow the MK Decision.

scholarly journals The Position of Constitutional Complaint in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Agsel Awanisa ◽  
Yusdianto Yusdianto ◽  
Siti Khoiriah
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Case Number

The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutional complaint mechanism based on comparisons in other countries, practices, and adaptation of constitutional complaints under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Many cases with constitutional complaint substance have been submitted to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia even though they don’t have this authority. This research uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a case approach. This research indicates that the constitutional complaint mechanism in Germany, South Korea, and South Africa has been well implemented. In practice, cases with constitutional complaint substance are filed to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia by changing the form by using the legal means of a judicial review, such as case number 16/PUU-VI/ 2008, case number 140/PUU-XIII/2015 and case number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Due to the consideration of the structure, substance, and culture of law, adaptation of constitutional complaint within the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia needs to be carried out by amending Law Number 24 of 2003 jo. Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court.

scholarly journals DISKURSUS SOSIOLOGI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2021 ◽  
pp. 236-246
Author(s):  
Dwi Sakti Muhamad Huda ◽  
Dodi Alaska Ahmad Syaiful ◽  
Desi Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sociological Discourse ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Broad Scale

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 annulled the provisions of Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law because it contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and does not have binding legal force. The legal reason behind the rechtfinding is to emphasize that children born outside of marriage have the right to legal protection. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 on one of the judges' judicial duties. This study uses a socio-legal approach with data collection techniques for study documents of literature materials. Based on the results of the analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, it does not contradict and intersect with the sociological discourse in accordance with the argumentum a contrario method. Then have coherence between the parental or bilateral kinship system with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 in its application in Indonesia. This condition demands the intellectuality of Judges who are required to think on a broad scale and consider other disciplines in their legal findings.

scholarly journals Position of Tax Debt and Labour Right: Legal Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sonya Liani Ramadayanti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
Tax Law ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Labour Law ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Right

This study aims to explain the position of tax debt and labour right in bankruptcy. The legal research method used in this research using normative research, the legal rules and legal principles used related to bankruptcy law, tax law and labour law will be a reference in describing the problem of the position of tax debt and labour right in bankruptcy cases. The Taxation Law gives a special treatment and higher position on which the tax debt is first to be paid by the debtor and followed by the right borne by the separatist creditor. On the other hand, Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Employment also regulates that the labour of the wages and other rights of the labour and positioned the labour as preferred creditor on which the privilege is given by the law. However, there are no statements in the Employment Law that stated the position of labour as a preferred creditor is higher than separatist creditor in the matter of bankrupt as what the Taxation Kaw expressed creditor is higher than the separatist creditor within the matter of tax payment. That distinction seems positioned the preferred creditor status of labour is lower than the position of separatist creditor on the matter of right fulfillment in bankruptcy. It is certainty that the statement which stated that the collection of tax debts have the right to preceded than other debts does not fit in this matter. Eventually, there is a decision of Constitutional Court Number 67/PUU-XI/2013 that provides a change within the position labour’s right on the matter of bankruptcy.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI HUKUM TIDAK DILAKSANAKANNYA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PERKARA PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1089
Author(s):  
Andre Suryadinata ◽  
Toendjoeng Herning Sitaboeana
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Rules Of Procedure

The Constitutional Court is one of the branches of judicial power that has authority to adjudicate at the first and last level whose decision is final to test the law against the Constitution as regulated in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. The final nature of  decision of the constitutional court is binding on the entire community since it was said in the Open Plenary Session. Therefore, decision of constitutional court that invalidates the validity of a law must be followed up by legislators in the cumulative list open to the national legislation program. But in practice there are 2 (two) decisions that have not been followed up, namely Constitutional Court Decision Number 31 / PUU-XI / 2013 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 30 / PUU-XVI / 2018. Based on this description, it will be examined regarding the legal implications of not implementing the Constitutional Court Decision in case of judicial review? The author examines the problem using the method of normative legal research with the statutory approach. From the results of this study, it was found that the non-follow-up of the two decisions had violated the principle of rule of law in concept of the rule of law, and caused the loss of the decision-making power, and was a form of neglect of principle of legal awareness. So it is necessary to make changes in stages of the Constitutional Court Law and the House of Representatives' Regulations on Rules of Procedure.

scholarly journals Pemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Bagi Warga Negara Asing

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Rokilah Rokilah ◽  
Mia Mukaromah
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Foreign Nationals ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Basic Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights

This writing aims to find out how land ownership rights for Foreign Citizens as regulated in the Agrarian Basic Law (UPPA) Number 5 of 1960, in the UPPA regulate the prohibition on land ownership for Foreign Citizens. This is to reduce the existence of ownership rights to land for foreigners. Because in addition to keeping the land of Indonesian citizens not controlled by the foreigners also helping Indonesian citizens to be able to use their land to support their lives. Prohibition of land ownership rights for foreign nationals as stipulated in Article 21 of the BAL there are also exceptions to the prohibition, foreigners can use the right to use to build buildings or open a business. The method used is the empirical normative legal research method, namely the incorporation of normative legal provisions (laws) with empirical elements (legal events in society/social elements).

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Wewenang Kantor Pertanahan Dalam Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi di Kecamatan Kuta Baro Kabupaten Aceh Besar)

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-163
Author(s):  
Fery Irwanda
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Pasal 3 PP 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah menyebutkan pendaftaran tanah bertujuan untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang hak atas suatu bidang tanah. Terbitnya  sertifikat Hak Milik atas tanah Jailani Yusuf cs yang merupakan objek sengketa, telah diputus berdasarkan Putusan Kasasi No.633 K/Pdt/2006. Permohonan pendaftaran hak yang diajukan oleh Abdullah Ibrahim dan Cut Ben Ibrahim ke Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Aceh Besar tanpa memberitahukan adanya Putusan Kasasi, sehingga melahirkan sertifikat yang subjek hukumnya tidak sesuai dengan Putusan Kasasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan, mengetahui pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah yang melahirkan Sertifikat hak atas tanah yang subjek hukumnya tidak sesuai dengan Putusan Kasasi dan tanggung jawab Kantor Pertanahan atas  penerbitan sertifikat untuk atas pihak yang tidak berhak berdasarkan putusan pengadilan. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan meneliti keberlakuan hukum itu dalam kenyataan atau dalam masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dalam pelaksanaan Pendaftaran tanah yang melahirkan Sertifikat No.11, 12 dan 21, 22, 23/2015 terdapat cacat hukum administratif yang disebabkan kesalahan subyek dan/atau obyek hak, karena di atas tanah yang diterbitkan sertifikat telah ada Putusan Kasasi. Akibatnya pihak yang mendaftarkan tanah bertanggung jawab secara hukum dan Kantor Pertanahan bertanggung jawab secara administratif.Article 3 of the Government Regulation Number 24, 1997 on Land Registration states that a land registration aiming to provide law certainty and law protection on land right holder over the land. The issuance on of the land certificate of Jailani Yusuf et.al is a dispute object; it has been decided based on Judicial Review Number 633 K/Pdt/2006. The application on the right registration that is proposed by Abdullah Ibrahim and Cut Ben Ibrahim to Land Authority Office of Aceh Besar without providing the review, hence it results in certificate issuance that the law subject is not based on the decision. This research aims to know the implementation of land registration in the making process of certificate that its legal subject is not based on the court decision, responsibility of land office of the change of certificate issuance for party that is no having right based on the court decision. This is juridical empirical research by exploring the law application into society. The research shows that in the implementation of land registration in making process of Certificates Numbers: 11, 12 and 21, 22, 23/2015 has administrative law lack caused by subject fault and/or object of right, as on the land certificate issued has been reviewed by the Supreme Court. The impact on parties registering their land is legally responsible and the Land Authority Office is administrative legally responsible.

scholarly journals Status Hukum Tanah Hak Milik bagi Ahli Waris yang Pindah Kewarganegaraan Menjadi Warga Negara Asing

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Agnes Geraldine Olga Supriyana ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Land Ownership ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Mixed Marriages ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights

Indonesian citizens who have transferred citizenship due to mixed marriages with other citizens who obtain property rights due to inheritance should be obliged to relinquish this right within one year. If it is not released then the right is lost because the law and the land fall to the state. However, in reality some of these property rights have not been released. This research is formulated to determine the status of land ownership rights that are not released by heirs who become foreign nationals and to find out the legal efforts taken by heirs who have transferred citizenship to become foreign citizens in releasing their ownership rights over land acquired due to inheritance. The research method used in this research is normative legal research method. The results showed that the status of land ownership rights that were not released by heirs who became foreign citizens was lost due to the law. This occurs after a period of one year, and the land becomes State land. Then, the legal effort made by the heirs in releasing ownership rights over the land obtained due to inheritance is to apply for more Indonesian citizenship or to remain a foreign citizen residing in Indonesia, so after one year they can obtain use rights or transfer of property rights. It can be done through buying and selling.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 14/PUU-XI/2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-80
Author(s):  
Liberthin Palullungan ◽  
Trifonia Sartin Ribo
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Party System ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Presidential System ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Impact

Indonesia is a country that implements a presidential system and a multi-party system jointly. The implementation of general elections has been regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The presidential threshold is a concept used in proposing candidates for President and Vice President. Proposals are made by political parties or joining political parties by general election participants. This article analyzes the application of the presidential threshold after the Constitutional Court decision Number 114 / PUU-XI / 2013. The purpose of this writing is to determine the application of the Presidensitial threshold after the Constitutional Court decision Number 14 / PUU-XI / 013, and to determine the impact of the Constitutional Court decision number 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 on political parties. The research method used is qualitative and conceptual normative research methods. Based on this article, it is known that the application of the presidential threshold in which political parties must obtain seats 20% of the number of seats in the DPR or 25% of the valid votes nationally in the previous DPR elections, so that making new or small parties will not be able to nominate the President and Vice President themselves, but parties can form a coalition.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN YANG BEROBJEK JAMINAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jazau Elvi Hasani ◽  
Fitri Agustina Trianingsih ◽  
Nadiya Ayu Rizky Saraswati
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Force

Abstract A fiduciary guarantee is a law product that is applied to protect creditors in particular. When the debtor defaults, the creditor can request compensation from the debtor through execution of a fiduciary guarantee. The Constitutional Court (MK) issued Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 related to the application for judicial review of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees Article 15 paragraph 2 and Article 15 paragraph 3 of the 1945 Republic of Indonesia Constitution. The Constitutional Court granted the petitioners part of the petition, stating Article 15 paragraph (2), Article 15 paragraph (3), and Elucidation of Article 15 paragraph (2) of Law Number 42 the Year 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security contradicts the 1945 Constitution and has no legal force binding. Application related to the implementation of Article 15 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Law No. 42/1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee which subsequently reads following Article 15 paragraph (2) "Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate as referred to in paragraph (1) has the same executorial power as a court decision that has obtained permanent legal force" and Article 15 paragraph (3) that "If the debtor fails to promise the Fiduciary Recipient has the right to sell the object that is the object of the Fiduciary Guarantee on his authority". Based on the above, the author considers it necessary to discuss what is the background of the petitioner in submitting an application to the Constitutional Court, the Court's argument in deciding the case, and the implications of the decision on the implementation of the agreement with a fiduciary guarantee before and after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019.Keywords: constitutional court decision; guarantee; implicationAbstrak Jaminan fidusia adalah produk konvensional yang memberi perlindungan hukum kepada kreditur. Ketika debitur wanprestasi, kreditur meminta ganti rugi dengan eksekusi jaminan fidusia. Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) mengeluarkan Putusan No 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terkait permohonan pengujian materi Undang-Undang No 42/1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia terhadap Konstitusi atau Undang-undang Dasar Negara RI 1945. Melalui putusan tersebut Mahkamah Konstitusi mengabulkan permohononan pemohon sebagian, dengan menyatakan bahwa Pasal 15 ayat (2), Pasal 15 ayat (3), dan Penjelasan Pasal 15 ayat 2 UU Nomor 42/1999 Jaminan Fidusia telah bertentangan dengan UUDNRI 1945 sehingga tidak berkekuatan hukum mengikat. Permohonan terkait keberlakuan UU No 42/1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia yang Pasal 15 ayat 2 berbunyi bahwa Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia memiliki kekuatan eksekutorial yang sama dengan putusan pengadilan berkekuatan hukum tetap dan Pasal 15 ayat (3) yang menyatakan bahwa bila debitur cidera janji, Penerima Fidusia berhak menjual Benda objek Jaminan Fidusia. Atas dasar diatas penulis menilai perlu untuk membahas apa latar belakang pemohon dalam mengajukan permohonan kepada Mahkamah Konstitusi, argumentasi Mahkamah dalam memutus perkara tersebut, dan implikasi putusan tersebut terhadap pelaksanaan perjanjian yang berobjek jaminan fidusia sebelum dan sesudah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 .Kata kunci: jaminan fidusia; implikasi; putusan mahkamah konstitusi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document