scholarly journals DISKURSUS SOSIOLOGI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010

2021 ◽  
pp. 236-246
Author(s):  
Dwi Sakti Muhamad Huda ◽  
Dodi Alaska Ahmad Syaiful ◽  
Desi Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Reason ◽  
Kinship System ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sociological Discourse ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Broad Scale

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 annulled the provisions of Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law because it contradicts the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and does not have binding legal force. The legal reason behind the rechtfinding is to emphasize that children born outside of marriage have the right to legal protection. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 on one of the judges' judicial duties. This study uses a socio-legal approach with data collection techniques for study documents of literature materials. Based on the results of the analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010, it does not contradict and intersect with the sociological discourse in accordance with the argumentum a contrario method. Then have coherence between the parental or bilateral kinship system with the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46 / PUU-VIII / 2010 in its application in Indonesia. This condition demands the intellectuality of Judges who are required to think on a broad scale and consider other disciplines in their legal findings.

scholarly journals Outer Children Marriages Status After Constitutional Court Decision No: 46/PUU-VII/2010

Rechtsidee ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Budi Purwaningsih
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Illegitimate Children ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No.46/PUU-VIII / 2010 dated 17 February 2012, granted the judicial review of Article 43 (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage by deciding that the article should read "Children who are born outside of marriage just had a civil relationship with her mother and her mother's family as well as with men as a father who can be proved based on science and technology and / or evidence, has blood ties according to law, including a civil relationship with his father's family". This Indonesian Constitutional Court's decision bring Juridical consequence that illegitimate children not only have a legal relationship with her mother, but also has a legal relationship with the father (biological) and his father's family, as long as it is proven with science and technology. The Constitutional Court's decision is a starting point in the legal protection of illegitimate children, namely the "right alignment" between the illegitimate child with the legitimate son. Illegitimate children have the rights to demand their civil rights toward their father (biological) as the same rights obtained by the legitimate son. How To Cite: Purwaningsih, S. (2016). Outer Children Marriages Status After Constitutional Court Decision No: 46/PUU-VII/2010. Rechtsidee, 1(1), 119-130. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v1i1.99

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 11-017/PUU-I/2003 TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK DIPILIH

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Ketut Ngastawa
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Body ◽  
State System ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Right

Paper that had the title: "Juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the Legal Protection for the Rights to be Eelected." This explores two issues: 1) how the legal protection of the settings selected in the state system of Indonesia ; 2) what are juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected. To solve both problems, this paper uses normative legal research methods. Approach being used is the statute approach, case approach, and a conceptual approach. Further legal materials collected were identified and analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. Legal protection for the right to be elected in the state system of Indonesia can be traced from the 1945 opening, the articles in the body of the 1945 Constitution, Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D (1) and paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (3) 1945 Second Amendment, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1998, Article 43 of Law Number 39 of 1999, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 25 of the International Covenant  on Civil and Political Rights. Discussion of the juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected have been included: a) only on the juridical implications of representative institutions no longer marked with specified requirements as stipulated in Article 60 letter g of Law Number 12 Year 2003 in Law Number 10 Year 2008; b) juridical implications of the political field for the right to be elected is the absence of any discriminatory treatment in legislative product formed by the House of Representatives and the President as well as products of other legislation forward.

scholarly journals BATASAN TERHADAP IMUNITAS ADVOKAT YANG DIPERLUAS BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 26/PUU-XI/2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-48
Author(s):  
Oey Valentino Winata ◽  
Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Keyword(s):  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Professional Code ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The basis for granting immunity to advocates is in Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003, that advocates cannot be prosecuted both civil and criminal in carrying out their professional duties in good faith in the interests of the Client's defense in court proceedings. The immunity obtained by advocates is not only within the scope of the court, but also protects it outside the court. The immunity has been expanded based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 26 / PUU-XI / 2013. The granting of immunity to such advocates is considered as an act that violates the provisions of Article 28 D of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantee protection and fair legal certainty and equal treatment before the law. However, the right to immunity from lawsuits (immunity) to advocates does not conflict with Article 28D of the 1945 Constitution if given with limitations to advocates who are one of law enforcers in Indonesia, these restrictions apply both outside and in court proceedings. The limitation is in the form of a professional code of ethics and legislation, as well as good faith. Any action that goes beyond or beyond these three limits cannot be protected by immunity, so that if one of the three limits is exceeded, advocates can be legally processed and sentenced based on applicable regulations.Dasar pemberian imunitas kepada advokat ada pada Pasal 16 UU No. 18 Tahun 2003, bahwa advokat tidak dapat dituntut baik secara perdata maupun pidana dalam menjalankan tugas profesinya dengan iktikad baik untuk kepentingan pembelaan Klien dalam sidang pengadilan. Imunitas yang didapatkan advokat ternyata tidak hanya dalam lingkup pengadilan, tetapi juga melindunginya diluar pengadilan. Imunitas tersebut telah diperluas berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XI/2013. Pemberian imunitas kepada advokat tersebut dianggap sebagai suatu perbuatan yang melanggar ketentuan Pasal 28D Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, bahwa setiap orang berhak atas pengakuan, jaminan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum yang adil serta perlakuan yang sama dihadapan hukum. Tetapi hak atas kekebalan dari tuntutan hukum (imunitas) kepada advokat tersebut menjadi tidak bertentangan dengan Pasal 28D UUD 1945 apabila diberikan dengan batasan-batasan kepada advokat yang merupakan salah satu penegak hukum di Indonesia, batasan tersebut berlaku baik di luar maupun di dalam sidang pengadilan. Batasan tersebut berupa kode etik profesi dan peraturan perundang-undangan, serta iktikad baik. Setiap tindakan yang melampaui atau diluar ketiga batasan tersebut, tidak bisa dilindungi oleh imunitas, sehingga atas dilampauinya salah satu dari ketiga batasan tersebut maka advokat dapat diproses secara hukum dan dijatuhi hukuman berdasarkan peraturan yang berlaku.

scholarly journals TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT (TUPE) DALAM PERJANJIAN OUTSOURCING

Media Iuris ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
Muhammad Johar Fathoni
Keyword(s):  
Service Provider ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Employment Service ◽  
Labor Agreement ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Transfer of Undertaking Protection of Employment Based on Constitutional Court Decision Number 27/PUU-IX/2011, there are two models that must be fulfilled in outsourcing agreement, that is First, by requiring for agreement between worker and company conducting work outsourcing does not take the form of a certain time labor agreement (PKWT), but is in the form of an indefinite time agreement (PKWTT). The consequences of termination of contract for the Employment Service Provider who laid off his employees for the law, the employer shall be entitled to grant the right to his employees in accordance with the Manpower Act, Kepmenaker No. Kep. 150/Men/2000 on the Settlement of Termination of Employment and Stipulation of Severance, Money of Work and Indemnification. Then the government also stipulates the Decree of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia no. Kep. 76/Men/2001 on Amendment to several articles of Minister of Manpower Decree no. Kep. 150 / Men / 2000 on the Settlement of Termination of Employment and Stipulation of Severance, Money of Work and Indemnification at the Company.

scholarly journals Konsekuensi Yuridis Berlakunya Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 295
Author(s):  
Si Ngurah Ardhya ◽  
I Putu Windu Mertha Sujana
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Way Of Life ◽  
Civil Registration ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Justifiable Reason ◽  
Husband And Wife

Philosophically PMK (Constitutional Court Decision) Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 based on way of life, awareness, and legal ideals such as the mystical atmosphere and Indonesian Nation according Pancasila and The Constitutional of The Republic of Indonesia Article 28E Paragraph (2). Sociologically, based on legal needs society regarding the leniency when the marriage agreement was made that is the phenomenon of a husband and wife for some reason feels they needed to make a marriage agreement after the wedding day was held. Juridically, the issuance of PMK Nr. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 is not solely on the basis of unconstitutionality, but also on a conflict of norms between Article 29 Paragraph (1) of Act Nr.  Year 1974 with general provisions of the ageement in Book III Code of Civil Law. Referring to PMK No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 which was strengthened by Act Nr. 2 Year 2014, Notary has the right to ratified the marriage agreement into an authentic deed so that there is no justifiable reason for the Department of Population and Civil Registration and Office of Religious Affairs rejects the authentic nature of the deed which is validated bay notary. 

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 14/PUU-XI/2013

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-80
Author(s):  
Liberthin Palullungan ◽  
Trifonia Sartin Ribo
Keyword(s):  
Political Parties ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Party System ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Presidential System ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Impact

Indonesia is a country that implements a presidential system and a multi-party system jointly. The implementation of general elections has been regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The presidential threshold is a concept used in proposing candidates for President and Vice President. Proposals are made by political parties or joining political parties by general election participants. This article analyzes the application of the presidential threshold after the Constitutional Court decision Number 114 / PUU-XI / 2013. The purpose of this writing is to determine the application of the Presidensitial threshold after the Constitutional Court decision Number 14 / PUU-XI / 013, and to determine the impact of the Constitutional Court decision number 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 on political parties. The research method used is qualitative and conceptual normative research methods. Based on this article, it is known that the application of the presidential threshold in which political parties must obtain seats 20% of the number of seats in the DPR or 25% of the valid votes nationally in the previous DPR elections, so that making new or small parties will not be able to nominate the President and Vice President themselves, but parties can form a coalition.

scholarly journals Constitutional principles and their impact on the establishing of constitutional order and rule of law in Kosovo

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1079-1096
Author(s):  
Nur Çeku ◽  
Haxhi Xhemajli
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Minority Groups ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Constitutional Order ◽  
The Republic ◽  
European Standards ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Considered as a progressive document based on the models of the Western constitutions, the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo has established the legal basis for a functional statethat respects rights and fundamental freedoms while guaranteeing the rule of law. In its provisions, the Constitution has laid down basic principles which serve as the foundation for Kosovo’s constitutional order. In this regard, these constitutional principles have been further enshrined in the provisions of laws that emanate from the Constitution, and also have been established in the institutional mechanisms for its appropriate application. In addition, what played a prominent role in defining these principles was the impact of the Constitutional Court’s case-law. Case-law has reaffirmed in many instances the tremendous importance of constitutional principles in enhancing the rule of law, protecting the rights of minority groups and other members of Kosovo’s society, and the right to freedom of belief and secularism by implementing the most modern European standards in human protection. Hence, this paper analyzess the impact that constitutional principles have had on defining the structure of the state, guaranteeing the rule of law, protection of human rights and establishing Kosovo as a multi-ethnic society. Likewise, it examines the case-law of Kosovo’s Constitutional Court by providing some of the most prominent cases.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK AKIBAT PERCERAIAN ORANG TUA

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Putu Sauca Arimbawa Tusan
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Research Type

Legal protection is the right of every citizen including the right for children. All citizens are equal before the law and government and shall abide by the law and the government without any exception. The state should make laws as commander in safeguarding the implementation of national and state life. Every child has the right to live, grow and develop and are entitled to protection and violence and discrimination. Divorce cases in particular Denpasar Bali every year showed an increase. It is necessary to get the attention of the parties concerned, because of the impact of divorce experienced by children can be felt directly by the children themselves. Children become victims direct result of his parents' divorce. The judiciary has an important role to ensure the rights of children through a court decision. Judges who hear cases of divorce may consider in its decision to regulate the rights of children whose parents did divorce. This research with the normative methods research type, which aims to provide a clear picture of the setting and the role of judges in providing legal protection for child victims of divorce. Perlindungan hukum merupakan hak bagi setiap warga negara termasuk juga hak bagi anak. Segala warga negara bersamaan kedudukannya di dalam hukum dan pemerintahan dan wajib menjunjung hukum dan pemerintahan itu dengan tidak ada kecualinya. Negara harus menjadikan hukum sebagai panglima dalam mengawal penyelenggaraan kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Setiap anak berhak atas kelangsungan hidup, tumbuh dan berkembang serta berhak atas perlindungan dan kekerasan dan diskriminasi. Kasus perceraian di Bali khususnya kota Denpasar setiap tahunnya memperlihatkan adanya peningkatan. Hal ini perlu mendapatkan perhatian oleh pihak terkait, karena dampak perceraian yang dialami anak dapat dirasakan langsung oleh anak itu sendiri. Anak menjadi korban langsung akibat perceraian orang tuanya. Lembaga peradilan mempunyai peranan penting untuk menjamin hak-hak anak lewat putusan pengadilan. Hakim yang memeriksa perkara perceraian misalnya dapat mempertimbangkan dalam putusan nya untuk mengatur tentang hak-hak anak yang orang tuanya melakukan perceraian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, yang bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran yang jelas tentang pengaturan dan peranan hakim dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi anak korban akibat perceraian.

scholarly journals HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA (DPR RI) TERHADAP KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK)

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-202
Author(s):  
Dasep Muhammad Firdaus
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Institutional Authority ◽  
Balance Principle ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

AbstractIndonesia as a constitutional and democratic state has three governmental branches which are executive, legislative and judicial power; and executed on the check and balance principle. One of the check and balance principles implementation can be seen in the House of Representatives of Indonesia (DPR)’s Parliamentary Scrutiny function which is mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), the right of inquiry to investigate all forms of implementation of laws and government policies that are allegedly contrary to the legislation. Recently the rights had been applied to evaluate KPK (corruption eradication commission) as an independent institution and free from any authority. Substantially the inquiry right was applied to evaluate KPK regarding the following aspects: institutional, authority, human resources, and expenditure budgets. Through legal tracing on related laws and regulations, that were descriptively analyzed regarding the DPR's inquiry right implementation towards KPK; it was found the DPR's inquiry rights to the KPK is constitutionally regulated in Article 20A of the UUD 1945, Law Number 17 of 2014 Article 79 paragraph (1), (2) and (3) and Constitutional Court Decision Case No. 36 and 37 / PUU-XV / 2017. Based on those regulations, DPR has rights to ask for KPK’s accountability upon their duties and authority and KPK is obliged to respect and implement DPR recommendations produced from the inquiry rights.Keywords:People’s Representative Council, Rights of Inquiry, Corruption Eradication Commission AbstrakIndonesia sebagai negara demokrasi kontitusional terdiri dari cabang kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif berdasar prinsip check and balance. Wujud prinsip tersebut ada dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia terlihat pada fungsi pengawasan DPR RI yang diamanatkan oleh UUD NRI Tahun 1945, antara lain melalui hak angket untuk menyelidiki segala bentuk pelaksanaan UU maupun kebijakan pemerintah yang diduga bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Salah satunya adalah hak angket yang ditujukan terhadap KPK sebagai lembaga bersifat independen dan bebas dari kekuasaan manapun. Secara subtantif pelaksanaan hak dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi KPK dari sisi kelembagan, kewenangan, sumber daya manusia hingga anggaran belanja. Melalui penelusuran peraturan perundang-undangan yang dianalisis secara deskriptif atas hak angket DPR terhadap KPK; ditemukan bahwa landasan hukum hak angket DPR terhadap KPK secara konstitusional diatur di dalam Pasal 20A UUD NKRI Tahun 1945, Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 Pasal 79 ayat (1), (2) dan (3) dan Putusan MK No. Perkara 36 dan 37/PUU-XV/2017 . Atas dasar ketentuan tersebut, DPR berhak meminta pertanggungjawaban pelaksanaan tugas dan kewenangan KPK dan KPK sebagai lembaga penegak hukum harus menghormati dan melaksanakan rekomendasi yang telah dihasilkan pansus angket dan.Kata Kunci:DPR, Hak Angket, KPK

scholarly journals EKSEKUSI TERHADAP OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR.18/PUU-XVII/2019.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-145
Author(s):  
Darmiwati Darmiwati2021
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Oriented Research

Fiduciary is the transfer of ownership rights to an object on the basis of trust provided that the object whose ownership rights are transferred remains in the control of the owner of the object. In the implementation of fiduciary, the goods that are pledged remain in the power of the debtor. Fiduciary guarantees are security rights for movable objects, both tangible and intangible and immovable objects, especially buildings that cannot be encumbered with mortgage rights. The principle of the object of the fiduciary guarantee is the creditor's trust in the debtor. In the fiduciary guarantee law, if the debtor defaults, the object of the fiduciary guarantee will be handed over to the creditor for the purpose of fiduciary execution. The fiduciary guarantee law gives the creditor the right to carry out the execution of the fiduciary guarantee object, the existence of this power, the creditor can withdraw the fiduciary guarantee object by means of parate execution. However, with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 regarding the application for judicial review of Article 15 section (2) and section (3), which requires a breach of contract agreement between the creditor and the debtor and the debtor's willingness to submit the object of collateral, has eliminated the rights of creditors and eliminated the principle of material rights. Based on these problems, the question in the research is how to execute the object of fiduciary security after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 and what is the impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The legal research method in this paper is normative juridical which is reform oriented research. The conclusion in this study should be in the fiduciary guarantee certificate including the completeness of the default clause, to strengthen the evidence that the debtor has committed a breach of contract. If the debtor (fiduciary giver), after being agreed by the parties, is deemed to be in breach of contract (default), the execution of the object of the fiduciary guarantee can be carried out independently.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document