scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINEHEAVY (0.5%) WITH BUPIVACAINE HEAVY (0.5%) PLUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumar Shailesh ◽  
Jitendra Prasad Singh ◽  
Arjun Prasad ◽  
Veena Horo
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Group D

Introduction: Several adjuncts like adrenaline, opioids and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists are being used with local anaesthetics intrathecally for prolongation of intra-operative and post-operative analgesia and to reduce the side-effects of high doses of local anaesthetics. Aim: The present study was done to evaluate the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic effects, post-operative analgesia and adverse effects of Dexmedetomidine given intrathecally with hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine. Materials and methods: Sixty inpatients of ASA class I and II scheduled for various lower abdominal surgeries under Sub-Arachnoid Block were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each namely C (Control), D(Dexmedetomidine) . All received 12.5mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml Normal Saline in Group C (Control),10µg Dexmedetomidine (diluted in preservative free Normal saline of 0.5ml) in Group D(Dexmedetomidine) . The onset time to reach peak sensory and motor level, the regression time for sensory and motor block, hemodynamic changes and side-effects were noted. Results: The duration of sensory and motor block, rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in Dexmedetomidine group when compared to that of Control group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 10 µg seems to be a better neuraxial adjuvant to hyperbaric Bupivacaine. Keywords: Bupivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; intrathecal.

scholarly journals Comparison of effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing surgery for fracture femur and tibia

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. 3833
Author(s):  
G. Praveen Chandra ◽  
Sampathi Shiva Krishna ◽  
Pooja Singh
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Wound Infiltration ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Fracture Femur ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group D

Background: Spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine is administered routinely for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. The ensuing nerve block is sufficient to ensure patient’s wellbeing, while motor block facilitates the surgeon’s work. Post-operative pain relief can be achieved by various methods namely systemic opioid and non-opioid peripheral nerve blocks and local wound infiltration, each with their own merits and demerits. the present study was undertaken to compare the effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing surgery for fracture femur and tibia.Methods: 80 patients between 20-60 years, undergoing elective surgery for closed fracture shaft of femur and tibia with ASA physical status of 1 and 2 were included in the study. All the subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two groups (Group C and Group D) by a computer-generated randomization chart. Group C received 2.5ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 50mcg clonidine and group D received 2.5ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 5mcg dexmedetomidine.Results: 30 of the 40 patients in group C were of ASA I and 10 were ASA II, while in group D, 25 were ASA I and 15 were ASA II. A significant difference was found in the onset time for sensory and motor block, receding time for sensory and motor block and the need of the first rescue analgesia between the two groups, showing that Dexmedetomidine was more potent than clonidine.Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine is a potent, highly selective and specific α2-adrenoreceptor agonist that has both sedative and analgesic effects and is also a valuable adjuvant when regional anaesthesia is incorporated.

scholarly journals A comparative study of the effect of intrathecal tramadol and buprenorphine used as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infraumbilical surgeries

2019 ◽  
pp. 263-267
Author(s):  
Sana Siddiq ◽  
Naila Asad ◽  
Abaid -ur- Rehman ◽  
Maqsood Ali ◽  
Hafiz M Usman Khalid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B

Background & Objective: The augmentation of local anesthetics with various adjuvants to enhance the quality and efficacy of subarachnoid block is clinically in practice since long. Comparative studies on effects of adding intrathecal tramadol and buprenorphine has never been studied before. Both drygs are esily available in our country. So, we conducted this study to evaluate and compare the characteristics of subarachnoid blockade, duration of postoperative analgesia, dose of recue analgesic postoperatively, and adverse effects of intrathecal buprenorphine (50 μg) and intrathecal tramadol (30 mg) as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries Methodology: This prospective randomized, single blind controlled trial was carried out at Services Hospital Lahore, from January to July 2018. 110 American society of Anesthesiologist I - II male patients, 35 to 45 y of age undergoing subarachnoid block for infra-umbilical surgery were randomized into two groups. Group T (n = 55) patients received 10 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 30 mg of tramadol intrathecally, while group B (n = 55) received 10 mg 0.5% bupivacaine with 50 μg of buprenorphine. Sensory testing was done by pin prick method using 25G blunt needle and time taken to reach T10 level noted. Motor block was assessed using Modified Bromage Scale. The time taken to reach modified Bromage 3 was recorded. Side effects and postoperative analgesia noted for 24 h by VAS score every 20 min for first 2 h in PACU and then 4 hourly for 24 h in the ward. Patients with inadequate block were converted into general anesthesia and were excluded from the study. Time to first rescue analgesia, and total analgesic required in 24 h were compared in two groups.Results: Mean VAS scores were less in Group T as compared to Group B. Significant difference was seen among groups at 45 min (p = 0.04), 60 min (p = 0.02), 75 min (p = 0.03), 90 min (p = 0.01), 120 min (p = 0.00), 4h (p = 0.007), 8 h (p = 0.01), 12 h (p = 0.01), 16 h (p = 0.00). After 24 h no significant difference was seen in both groups. Mean onset time for sensory block was earlier in Group B (2.4 min) compared to Group T (2.7 min)(p = 0.001). Mean onset time for motor block was earlier in Group B (4.8 min)as compared to Group T (5.5 min)(p = 0.00). No significant difference was seen among groups in side effects (p > 0.05). Mean time for rescue analgesia in Group B was earlier (4.51 ± 2.8 h.) as compared to Group T (4.94 ± 4.1h). Total dose of analgesic given in 24 h was significantly less in group T. (p = 0.004) The mean dose given in Group B (1.24 ± 0.96 mg/kg) was greater than Group T (0.76 ± 0.71 mg/kg)Conclusion: We conclude that both tramadol and buprenorphine, prolong the duration of postop analgesia without adding any adverse effects, but duration with tramadol is longer; it significantly reduces VAS and the dose of analgesic requirement in 24 h postoperatively.IRB letter No. IRB/2018/427/SIMS Citation: Siddiq S, Asad N, Rehman AU, Ali M, Khalid HMU, Butt Z. A comparative study of the effect of intrathecal tramadol and buprenorphine used as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infraumbilical surgeries. Anesth pain & intensiv care 2019;23(3):263-267

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRATHECAL FENTANYL WITH HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE TO IMPROVE PERIOPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENT UNDERGOING ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

2021 ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Rahul Wagh ◽  
Swapnil Sangale ◽  
Nagesh Jambure
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Various methods exist for treating post-operative pain which includes systemic narcotics, NSAIDS, patient-controlled analgesia, regional anaesthesia techniques, epidural local anaesthetic – narcotic mixtures, cryoanalgesia, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, psychological methods. Various opioides intrathecally and epidurally have been tried for post-operative analgesia. These include - morphine, pethidine, pentazocine, methadone, tramadol, Fentanyl, sufentanyl. In present study, we tried to find out analgesic effectiveness of intrathecal Fentanyl for post-operative analgesia, combined with 0.5 % Bupivacaine and side effects if any, in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries. Materials and Methods: After approval from the local ethics committee and with written informed consent from patient, a randomized controlled prospective study is carried out in the medical college and hospital.100 patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)classification I & II, aged between 18-60 years, posted for elective lower limb surgeries, were randomly allocated for the study. Group-I: 50 patients received intrathecal 3 ml of 0.5 % hyperbaric Bupivacaine only. Group-II : 50 patients received intrathecal 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Fentanyl 25 mcg.The patients studied across the group did not vary much with respect to age,height, weight and sex distribution. Results: The onset of sensory blockade was faster by 1.27 min in Group-BF. The perioperative and postoperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable in both the groups. The sensory analgesia in Group II was significantly prolonged by 159 mins, thus increasing the duration of analgesia. The time of first request of analgesics by the patients in group-II is prolonged compared to group-I thus prolonging the duration of analgesia. Analgesic requirement is also reduced in study group in early post-operative period. The onset of motor block was faster when Fentanyl was added to intrathecal Bupivacaine and it was 1.1 min earlier in study group. The duration of motor block to Bromage III was prolonged by almost 22 min in study group as compare to control group. Visual analogue scores were significantly lower in group-II compared to group-I after two hours of surgery thus reducing the frequency of supplemental postoperative analgesics. Conclusion: With the present study we can summarize that intrathecal Fentanyl potentiates the action of Bupivacaine thereby bringing about better quality and longer duration of analgesia, intense motor block, no hemodynamic disturbance and better postoperative outcome with/ minimum side effects.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Magnesium versus Dexmedetomidine as Additives to Local Anesthetic Mixture Using Single Injection Percutaneous Peribulbar Anesthesia in Vitreoretinal Surgeries

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-100
Author(s):  
Aktham Shoukry ◽  
Amr Sobhy Abd el Kawy
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Vitreoretinal Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peribulbar Block ◽  
Ocular Pressure ◽  
Peribulbar Anesthesia ◽  
Group D

Background: Peribulbar block for vitreoretinal surgery is rather associated with delayed onset of globe anesthesia, akinesia and short duration of analgesia. Objective: To compare the effect of addition of Magnesium sulphate vs dexmedetomidine to standard local anesthetics mixtures on the time of onset of Globe Anesthesia, Akinesia & analgesia duration. Patients and Methods: Ninety patients of both sexes, aged 25- 75 years, ASA I-III scheduled for vitreoretinal surgery. They were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups each received peribulbar block a mixture of Levo- bupivacaine 0.5% (3 ml) + lidocaine 2% (3 ml) +120 IU hyaluronidase + Control group (C): 0.5 ml of Normal saline. Group (M): 50 mg of Magnesium sulphate in 0.5 ml normal saline. Group (D): 50 μic of dexmedetomidine in 0.5 ml normal saline. The duration of sensory, motor block, Sedation level, Intra-ocular Pressure (IOP) and surgeon satisfaction were assessed. Results: The onset of globe anesthesia and akinesia was significantly shorter in M group in comparison with D and C Groups, with a significant increase in the duration of globe analgesia and akinesia in the D Group when compared to both M & C groups. Groups D and M showed a statistically significant decrease in the IOP at 5 min and 10 min when compared to the baseline measurement of the same groups & to C Group, no complications or adverse effects related to the drug or technique were recorded. Conclusion: Magnesium sulphate as a local anesthetic adjuvant in peribulbar block is safe and comparable to dexmedetomidine regarding the sensory and motor block duration with better cost-effectiveness and availability.

scholarly journals Randomized clinical study comparing safety and efficacy of adjuvant intrathecal clonidine versus normal saline along with bupivacaine anaesthesia in lower limb surgery patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 2804
Author(s):  
Brijesh Kumar ◽  
Kiran Shetty ◽  
Vijaya Kiran Shetty ◽  
Suresha K. R.
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Background: Various adjuvants have been used in intrathecal anesthesia to avoid intraoperative visceral and somatic pain and prolong postoperative analgesia. Clonidine, partially selective α2-agonist, is being evaluated as a neuraxial adjuvant with intrathecal bupivacaine. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare safety and efficacy of intrathecal clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine with control normal saline.Methods: American Society of Anesthesiologist grade 1 and 2 patients (60 patients) were randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each for lower limb surgeries. Study group injected with intrathecal 3ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine heavy (15mg) + 1µg/kg of clonidine and control group injected with 3ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine heavy (15mg) + equivalent dose of normal saline. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, and the incidence of side effects in both groups were observed and compared.Results: Time for 2 segment regressions in study group was 186.17±25.92 minutes compared to control was 103.20±19.15 minutes (p value<0.001). Total duration of analgesia in control was 226.50±35.69 minutes and in the study group was 465.67±100.37 minutes (p value<0.001). The average duration of motor block in control group was 181.17±26.12 minutes compared to study group was 217.80±41.51 minutes (p value<0.001). The small dose of intrathecal clonidine is not significantly associated with systemic side effects such as bradycardia and hypotension.Conclusions: Clonidine added to bupivacaine for intrathecal anesthesia effectively increases the duration of sensory block, duration of motor block and duration of analgesia and does not produce any significant hemodynamic changes. No significant side effects are associated with it.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF INTRATHECAL BUPRENORPHINE VERSUS CLONIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagdish Kumar ◽  
Satya Narayan Seervi
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Introduction: Present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of intrathecal clonidine or buprenorphine with bupivacaine in lower abdominal surgeries. Methods:90 ASA I and II patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into three groups(n=30). Group A received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 1ml normal saline, GroupB received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 60 mcg buprenorphine(1:5 dilution) and Group C received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 30mcg clonidine(1:5 dilution) respectively (Total volume 4ml). Onset time and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, hemodynamics, VAS score, sedation score and side effect were compared. Results: The duration of analgesia was significantly longest in  GroupC (354.50±38.48min), followed by Group B (277.10±25.47min) and Group A(131.50±20.15min) (p<0.001) Conclusion: On comparing the two drugs, Clonidine appears to be superior in terms of postoperative analgesia. Keywords: Clonidine, Buprenorphine, Intrathecal

Comparison between Intrathecal Nalbuphine and Bupivacaine versus Fentanyl and Bupivacaine For Postoperative Analgesia After Lower Abdominal Surgeries

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S F Ibrahim ◽  
R Y Ataallah ◽  
F A Abdelmalek ◽  
M M Hamisa
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Epidural Administration ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Abstract The use of opioids in intrathecal or epidural anesthesia has become popular to optimize postoperative analgesia. However, opioid-induced side effects, such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention and pruritus, limit their use. Several investigations have shown that intrathecal or epidural administration of opioids produces a dose dependent modulation of spinal nociceptive processing in animals and humans and is not associated with sedation. Aim of Study The purpose of this study was to assess the spinally mediated analgesic effects postoperativally of intrathecal Nalbuphine plus bupivacaine after lower abdominal surgeries in comparison to intrathecal bupivacaine plus fentanyl Patients & Methods : 60 patients came to Ain-shams Hospital for lower abdominal surgeries, They were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each) group F and group N. Group F : Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Patients received an intrathecal injection of 3 ml of 0.5% heavy (hyperbaric) bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (25 µg) fentanyl. Group N: Bupivacaine-Nalbuphin Patients received an intrathecal injection of 3 ml of 0.5% heavy (hyperbaric) bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (0.5 mg) Nalbuphine. All patients were assessed and monitored for: Hemodynamics: ECG for heart rate, and non-invasive arterial pressure, respiratory rate and arterial oxygen saturation, onset of sensory block, onset of motor block, duration of analgesia & 1st rescue analgesia, duration of motor block, adverse effects as: hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, pruritus, shivering, nausea and vomiting were recorded. Results & Conclusion Addition of a small dose of nalbuphine or fentanyl to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia moderately prolonged the time of postoperative analgesia the duration of postoperative analgesia is nearly the same in nalbuphine group & the fentanyl group. There is more rapid onset of motor block in fentanyl group than in nalbuphine group but with no difference in sensory or motor block regression. No respiratory depression or degree of sedation occurs in both groups. Hemodynamic stability & side effects incidence are the same in both groups

scholarly journals Comparison between Morphine and Hyaluronidase Added to Local Anesthetic in Sonar Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block; Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 155-165
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. E. Elmaghraby ◽  
Amany F. Omara ◽  
Rabab M. Mohammed ◽  
Ashraf E. Alzeftawy
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Morphine Group ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Huge volumes of local anaesthetics used in conventional blocks may be associated with complications. Hyaluronidase is an enzyme that hydrolyses hyaluronic acid in the tissue. It has been shown to aid the spread of local anaesthetics (LA) through tissue. The aim of this study was to compare between the addition of morphine or hyaluronidase to local anaesthetic in sonar guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block regarding the onset and duration of the block, postoperative analgesia and the total analgesic requirements in the first 24 hours. Patient and methods: Seventy-five patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I & II, aged 18-60 years, scheduled to acute or elective elbow, forearm or hand surgery under sonar guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block at Tanta University Hospital were randomly allocated into three equal groups; Group I (Control group) received 20 ml containing 9 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 9 ml lidocaine 2% plus 2 ml normal saline, group II (Morphine group) received 20 ml containing 9 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 9 ml lidocaine 2% plus 5 mg morphine in 2 ml normal saline and group III (Hyaluronidase group) received 20 ml containing 9 ml bupivacaine 0.5% and 9 ml lidocaine 2% plus 1500 units of hyaluronidase in 2 ml normal saline. The onset of sensory and motor block, duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative VAS, time to first rescue analgesia, total morphine consumption and possible side effects were recorded. Results: Onset of the sensory block and motor block was significantly shorter in the hyaluronidase group than control group and morphine group. Duration of the sensory block and motor block was significantly prolonged in morphine group than hyaluronidase group & control group. VAS started to increase at 6 hours in the control group, at 10 hours in morphine group and at 8 hours in hyaluronidase group. Time to first rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in morphine group than control group and hyaluronidase group. Total analgesic consumption of morphine was significantly lower in morphine group than control group and hyaluronidase group. Conclusion: Morphine was superior to hyaluronidase as regarding to improving the post-operative pain. The incidence of complications was nil and self-limited in the three groups.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF INTRATHECAL BUPRENORPHINE VERSUS CLONIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO 0.5% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Choudhary ◽  
Abhimanyu Singh
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intrathecal Clonidine

Introduction: Present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of intrathecal clonidine or buprenorphine with bupivacaine in lower abdominal surgeries. Methods: 90 ASA I and II patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into three groups(n=30). Group A received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 1ml normal saline, GroupB received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 60 mcg buprenorphine(1:5 dilution) and Group C received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 30mcg clonidine (1:5 dilution) respectively (Total volume 4ml). Onset time and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, hemodynamics, VAS score, sedation score and side effect were compared. Results: The duration of analgesia was significantly longest in GroupC (354.50±38.48min), followed by Group B (277.10±25.47min) and Group A(131.50±20.15min) (p<0.001) Conclusion: Clonidine (30mcg) and buprenorphine (60mcg) when used as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally produces significantly longer duration and better quality of postoperative analgesia than bupivacaine alone. Keywords: clonidine, buprenorphine, intrathecal, postoperative analgesia.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRATHECAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN LOWER LIMB SURGERY

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
Laxman K Senapati ◽  
Priyadarsini Samanta
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Lower Limb Surgery

Objectives: Dexmedetomidine was shown to prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia and enhance post-operative analgesia. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of intravenous (IV) versus intrathecal (IT) administration of dexmedetomidine on bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgery.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted during the year 2014–15. 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II aged 18–60 years scheduled for lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were assigned randomly to two groups: (1) IT group (IT group) (n=30) patients received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 μg of dexmedetomidine intrathecally (100 μg/1 ml ampoule drawn in 40 IU/ml insulin syringe making 5 μg=2 IU=0.05 ml) and (2) IV group (IV group) (n=30) received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.05 ml of normal saline intrathecally followed 5 min later by IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg by infusion pump over 10 min as a single dose.Results: The IT group had a statistically significantly earlier sensory onset to T10 and shorter time from injection to highest sensory level (p<0.001). The regression times of two dermatomes, regression time to S1 dermatome and time to reach Bromage 3 motor block were significantly less in the IT group, whereas regression time to Bromage 0 was prolonged (p<0.001). The IT group showed a significantly longer time to the use of rescue analgesia and less analgesic consumption in first 24 h than the IV group (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intensity of pain was significantly less in the IT group as compared to IV group (p<0.001). Compared with IV group, the IT group had low sedation score, fewer overall side effects, which was statistically not significant (p>0.05).Conclusion: In bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for limb surgeries, dexmedetomidine, when administered intrathecally, has greater augmentation to sensory and motor block, more hemodynamic stability, better analgesic properties, and fewer overall side effects compared to the IV route of administration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document