Comparison between Intrathecal Nalbuphine and Bupivacaine versus Fentanyl and Bupivacaine For Postoperative Analgesia After Lower Abdominal Surgeries

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S F Ibrahim ◽  
R Y Ataallah ◽  
F A Abdelmalek ◽  
M M Hamisa
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Arterial Oxygen ◽  
Epidural Administration ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Abstract The use of opioids in intrathecal or epidural anesthesia has become popular to optimize postoperative analgesia. However, opioid-induced side effects, such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention and pruritus, limit their use. Several investigations have shown that intrathecal or epidural administration of opioids produces a dose dependent modulation of spinal nociceptive processing in animals and humans and is not associated with sedation. Aim of Study The purpose of this study was to assess the spinally mediated analgesic effects postoperativally of intrathecal Nalbuphine plus bupivacaine after lower abdominal surgeries in comparison to intrathecal bupivacaine plus fentanyl Patients & Methods : 60 patients came to Ain-shams Hospital for lower abdominal surgeries, They were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each) group F and group N. Group F : Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Patients received an intrathecal injection of 3 ml of 0.5% heavy (hyperbaric) bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (25 µg) fentanyl. Group N: Bupivacaine-Nalbuphin Patients received an intrathecal injection of 3 ml of 0.5% heavy (hyperbaric) bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (0.5 mg) Nalbuphine. All patients were assessed and monitored for: Hemodynamics: ECG for heart rate, and non-invasive arterial pressure, respiratory rate and arterial oxygen saturation, onset of sensory block, onset of motor block, duration of analgesia & 1st rescue analgesia, duration of motor block, adverse effects as: hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, pruritus, shivering, nausea and vomiting were recorded. Results & Conclusion Addition of a small dose of nalbuphine or fentanyl to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia moderately prolonged the time of postoperative analgesia the duration of postoperative analgesia is nearly the same in nalbuphine group & the fentanyl group. There is more rapid onset of motor block in fentanyl group than in nalbuphine group but with no difference in sensory or motor block regression. No respiratory depression or degree of sedation occurs in both groups. Hemodynamic stability & side effects incidence are the same in both groups

scholarly journals A comparative study of the effect of intrathecal tramadol and buprenorphine used as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infraumbilical surgeries

2019 ◽  
pp. 263-267
Author(s):  
Sana Siddiq ◽  
Naila Asad ◽  
Abaid -ur- Rehman ◽  
Maqsood Ali ◽  
Hafiz M Usman Khalid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B

Background & Objective: The augmentation of local anesthetics with various adjuvants to enhance the quality and efficacy of subarachnoid block is clinically in practice since long. Comparative studies on effects of adding intrathecal tramadol and buprenorphine has never been studied before. Both drygs are esily available in our country. So, we conducted this study to evaluate and compare the characteristics of subarachnoid blockade, duration of postoperative analgesia, dose of recue analgesic postoperatively, and adverse effects of intrathecal buprenorphine (50 μg) and intrathecal tramadol (30 mg) as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgeries Methodology: This prospective randomized, single blind controlled trial was carried out at Services Hospital Lahore, from January to July 2018. 110 American society of Anesthesiologist I - II male patients, 35 to 45 y of age undergoing subarachnoid block for infra-umbilical surgery were randomized into two groups. Group T (n = 55) patients received 10 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine and 30 mg of tramadol intrathecally, while group B (n = 55) received 10 mg 0.5% bupivacaine with 50 μg of buprenorphine. Sensory testing was done by pin prick method using 25G blunt needle and time taken to reach T10 level noted. Motor block was assessed using Modified Bromage Scale. The time taken to reach modified Bromage 3 was recorded. Side effects and postoperative analgesia noted for 24 h by VAS score every 20 min for first 2 h in PACU and then 4 hourly for 24 h in the ward. Patients with inadequate block were converted into general anesthesia and were excluded from the study. Time to first rescue analgesia, and total analgesic required in 24 h were compared in two groups.Results: Mean VAS scores were less in Group T as compared to Group B. Significant difference was seen among groups at 45 min (p = 0.04), 60 min (p = 0.02), 75 min (p = 0.03), 90 min (p = 0.01), 120 min (p = 0.00), 4h (p = 0.007), 8 h (p = 0.01), 12 h (p = 0.01), 16 h (p = 0.00). After 24 h no significant difference was seen in both groups. Mean onset time for sensory block was earlier in Group B (2.4 min) compared to Group T (2.7 min)(p = 0.001). Mean onset time for motor block was earlier in Group B (4.8 min)as compared to Group T (5.5 min)(p = 0.00). No significant difference was seen among groups in side effects (p > 0.05). Mean time for rescue analgesia in Group B was earlier (4.51 ± 2.8 h.) as compared to Group T (4.94 ± 4.1h). Total dose of analgesic given in 24 h was significantly less in group T. (p = 0.004) The mean dose given in Group B (1.24 ± 0.96 mg/kg) was greater than Group T (0.76 ± 0.71 mg/kg)Conclusion: We conclude that both tramadol and buprenorphine, prolong the duration of postop analgesia without adding any adverse effects, but duration with tramadol is longer; it significantly reduces VAS and the dose of analgesic requirement in 24 h postoperatively.IRB letter No. IRB/2018/427/SIMS Citation: Siddiq S, Asad N, Rehman AU, Ali M, Khalid HMU, Butt Z. A comparative study of the effect of intrathecal tramadol and buprenorphine used as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in infraumbilical surgeries. Anesth pain & intensiv care 2019;23(3):263-267

Effectiveness of Intrathecal Administration of Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine for Elective Cesarean Section

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Mohamed Bahaa Eldin Mostafa Abdel Rahman ◽  
Khaled Mohammed Maghawry ◽  
Raham Hasan Mostafa ◽  
Ahmed Wagih Ezzat
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia is the most popular procedure in the field of anesthesiology. Subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean section, being simple to perform and economical with rapid onset. Lower incidence of failed block, less drug doses, minimal neonatal depression and decreased incidence of aspiration pneumonitis are added advantages of spinal anesthesia. Objectives The study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine when used with intrathecal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section as the primary objective and compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative pruritus and shivering as the secondary objectives. Methods and material After Approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University and after obtaining a written informed consent. Fifty adult females underwent elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, their ages ranged between 18-45 years old and classified as ASA I and II were enrolled in the study at obstetrics and gynecology Ain Shams university hospital over 4 months. The patients were randomly divided using computer generated randomization into two groups 25patients in each (n = 25), Group A received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg); Group B received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg) Results The main significant findings in this study was that fentanyl has a more rapid onset of motor block (5.63±0.25 minute in fentanyl group versus 5.88±0.19 minute in nalbuphine group), while nalbuphine produces less perioperative side effects as: shivering (7 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), pruritis (6 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), nausea and vomiting (5 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group). Regarding perioperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative analgesia, they were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusions We concluded that either intrathecal nalbuphine (0.8 mg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine or intrathecal fentanyl (25 µg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine improves intraoperative analgesia and prolongs early postoperative analgesia in cesarean section with significantly lower incidence of side effects as shivering, pruritis, nausea and vomiting in Nalbuphine.

Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia with Bupivacaine and Fentanyl on Hospital Wards 

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 688-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spencer S. Liu ◽  
Hugh W. Allen ◽  
Gayle L. Olsson
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Management Service ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Epidural Catheters ◽  
Hospital Wards

Background The efficacy and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative analgesia on hospital wards was studied. Methods Postoperative analgesia was provided for 1,030 patients with PCEA using 0.05% bupivacaine and fentanyl, 4 microg/ml, in a standardized manner. Patients were seen at least twice a day by the staff of the anesthesia pain management service. Prospectively gathered data included verbal pain scores at rest and activity (0-10); consumption of bupivacaine and fentanyl; and incidences of pruritus, nausea, sedation, hypotension, motor block, and respiratory depression. Descriptive statistics were used. Risk factors for side effects were determined using logistic regression. Results The study included 552 women and 477 men who underwent a median (mode) of 3 (2) days of PCEA. Their mean age was 59 +/- 16 yr and their mean weight was 76 +/- 19 kg. There were 454 abdominal, 165 gynecologic, 126 urologic, 108 vascular, 90 thoracic, 83 orthopedic, and 4 plastic surgical procedures. Median (mode) pain scores were 1 (0) at rest and 4 (5) with activity on postoperative day 1. Incidences of side effects were 16.7% (pruritus), 14.8% (nausea), 13.2% (sedation), 6.8% (hypotension), 2% (motor block), and 0.3% (respiratory depression). Reasons for termination of PCEA were elective (82%), displaced epidural catheter (12%), anticoagulation (3%), infection (1%), side effects (1%), inadequate analgesia (1%), and other (<1%). Risk factors for side effects were female sex, patient weight <73 kg, patient age <58 yr, bupivacaine and fentanyl consumption >9 ml/h, use of analgesic adjuncts, and lumbar placement of epidural catheters. Conclusion Patient-controlled epidural analgesia provides effective and safe postoperative analgesia on hospital wards.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTRATHECAL BUPIVACAINEHEAVY (0.5%) WITH BUPIVACAINE HEAVY (0.5%) PLUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL SURGERIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumar Shailesh ◽  
Jitendra Prasad Singh ◽  
Arjun Prasad ◽  
Veena Horo
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Group D

Introduction: Several adjuncts like adrenaline, opioids and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists are being used with local anaesthetics intrathecally for prolongation of intra-operative and post-operative analgesia and to reduce the side-effects of high doses of local anaesthetics. Aim: The present study was done to evaluate the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic effects, post-operative analgesia and adverse effects of Dexmedetomidine given intrathecally with hyperbaric 0.5% Bupivacaine. Materials and methods: Sixty inpatients of ASA class I and II scheduled for various lower abdominal surgeries under Sub-Arachnoid Block were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each namely C (Control), D(Dexmedetomidine) . All received 12.5mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml Normal Saline in Group C (Control),10µg Dexmedetomidine (diluted in preservative free Normal saline of 0.5ml) in Group D(Dexmedetomidine) . The onset time to reach peak sensory and motor level, the regression time for sensory and motor block, hemodynamic changes and side-effects were noted. Results: The duration of sensory and motor block, rescue analgesia was significantly prolonged in Dexmedetomidine group when compared to that of Control group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 10 µg seems to be a better neuraxial adjuvant to hyperbaric Bupivacaine. Keywords: Bupivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; intrathecal.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS VERSUS INTRATHECAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON CHARACTERISTICS OF HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN LOWER LIMB SURGERY

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
Laxman K Senapati ◽  
Priyadarsini Samanta
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Lower Limb Surgery

Objectives: Dexmedetomidine was shown to prolong the duration of spinal anesthesia and enhance post-operative analgesia. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of intravenous (IV) versus intrathecal (IT) administration of dexmedetomidine on bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb surgery.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted during the year 2014–15. 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II aged 18–60 years scheduled for lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were assigned randomly to two groups: (1) IT group (IT group) (n=30) patients received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 5 μg of dexmedetomidine intrathecally (100 μg/1 ml ampoule drawn in 40 IU/ml insulin syringe making 5 μg=2 IU=0.05 ml) and (2) IV group (IV group) (n=30) received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.05 ml of normal saline intrathecally followed 5 min later by IV dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg by infusion pump over 10 min as a single dose.Results: The IT group had a statistically significantly earlier sensory onset to T10 and shorter time from injection to highest sensory level (p<0.001). The regression times of two dermatomes, regression time to S1 dermatome and time to reach Bromage 3 motor block were significantly less in the IT group, whereas regression time to Bromage 0 was prolonged (p<0.001). The IT group showed a significantly longer time to the use of rescue analgesia and less analgesic consumption in first 24 h than the IV group (p<0.001). Furthermore, the intensity of pain was significantly less in the IT group as compared to IV group (p<0.001). Compared with IV group, the IT group had low sedation score, fewer overall side effects, which was statistically not significant (p>0.05).Conclusion: In bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for limb surgeries, dexmedetomidine, when administered intrathecally, has greater augmentation to sensory and motor block, more hemodynamic stability, better analgesic properties, and fewer overall side effects compared to the IV route of administration.

scholarly journals Comparison of Fascia Iliaca Block with Intravenous Paracetamol, as Postoperative Analgesic Method for Femur Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Praveen kumar Shekhrajka ◽  
Dhaval kumar C Patel
Keyword(s):  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Group I ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Fascia Iliaca Block ◽  
Total Burden

Background: Postoperative pain is extremely unpleasant which causes severe discomfort to the patient as well as it increases the anxiety, hospital stay so overall total burden. Objectives: Comparison of efficacy between fascia iliaca block with intravenous paracetamol, as postoperative analgesic method after femur surgery. Simultaneously requirement of other analgesics in the first 24 hours.Subjects and Methods:Prospective longitudinal study conducted in patients belonging to age group of 18 to 65 years posted for femur surgeries. All patients were received Intrathecal injection of 3.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and divided into two groups. After completion of surgery Group I received the Fascia Iliaca block with thirty ml of 0.25% of injection bupivacaine and Group II received injection Paracetamol one gram intravenously. Duration of analgesia, time from block / iv PCM to 1st rescue analgesia, number of patients as well as total doses of required rescue analgesics in 1st 24 hours were observed postoperatively.Results:From One hour onwards at all the time interval, mean pain scores was less in FIB group as compared to PCM group(p<0.001). In FIB group 15 (42%) patients had more than 24 hours and 11(32%) patients had 12-24 hours of analgesia, where as in PCM Group not a single patient had more than 12 hours of analgesia. In FIB group only 20 (57%) patients required rescue analgesic as compared to 35 (100%) patients in PCM group.Conclusion:In FIB insertion point is away from femoral vessels and can be provided without nerve stimulator. Post-operative it is extremely crucial to provide analgesia specially initial 24 hours. FIB can provide prolong duration of analgesia, so helps in early mobilization and early rehabilitation as well as it also reduces opioid requirements. Thus, Fascia iliaca block is an effective, easy and affordable method for postoperative analgesia and can be used safely as a part of multimodal approach to pain relief after femur surgery.

Postoperative analgesia after radical prostatectomy with high-dose intrathecal morphine and intravenous naloxone: A retrospective review

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 331-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Rebel, MD ◽  
Paul Sloan, MD ◽  
Michael Andrykowski, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Intrathecal Morphine ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
High Dose ◽  
The Mean

Background and methods: Intrathecal opioids (ITOs) have been used for decades to control postoperative pain. Intrathecal opioid dosing is limited, however, by opioid-related side effects, most importantly respiratory depression. To overcome these limitations, we combined intrathecal morphine with a continuous intravenous (IV) postoperative naloxone infusion to control opioid-related side effects. The purpose of this study is to document the efficacy and safety of high-dose intrathecal morphine combined with postoperative naloxone infusion to provide postoperative analgesia after major surgery. After IRB approval, a retrospective chart analysis was performed on 35 patients who had a radical prostatectomy from 2004 to 2006. All patients received a single injection of ITOs before anesthesia, a typical general anesthestic, followed by naloxone infusion at 5 μg/kg/h started 1 hour post-ITOs and continued for 22 hours postoperatively. The following information was collected: patient age, height, weight, anesthesia technique/time, and dose of ITOs given. Postoperative pain relief was assessed for 48 hours using the Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain (0, no pain; 10, worst pain), perioperative opioid use, NSAID consumption, and ability of patient to ambulate. The safety of this novel treatment was assessed with opioid-related side effects and vital signs. All data are reported as mean (SD).Results: Mean ITOs given were morphine 1.3 (0.3) mg combined with fentanyl 56 (9) μg. The intrathecal morphine dose ranged from 0.8 to 1.7 mg. The mean worst pain VAS in the first 12 hours postoperatively was only 1.0 (1.7). The first NSAID dose was given 6.6 (3.1) hours post-ITOs. The first opioid on the floor was given an average of 22.6 (14.5) hours post-ITOs. A mean of only 5.7 (12.3) morphine equivalents were required on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). On POD 2, the mean worst pain VAS was only 2.6 (2.2) with only 5.7 (6.2) morphine equivalents needed to provide pain relief. On POD 1, 25 patients required no additional opioids for their entire hospital stay. Overall, 11 of 35 patients did not require any additional postoperative opioids. Thirtyfour patients (97 percent) were able to ambulate in the first 12 hours postoperatively. No opioid-induced respiratory depression was observed. Opioid-related side effects (pruritus, nausea) were infrequent and minor.Conclusions: High-dose ITOs combined with postoperative IV naloxone infusion provided excellent analgesia for radical prostate surgery. IV naloxone infusion appeared to control opioid side effects without diminishing the analgesia. No serious adverse effects were noted.

scholarly journals The Effects of 2 μG and 4 μG Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Combination with Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine on Spinal Anesthesia and its Postoperative Analgesic Characteristics

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulkadir Yektaş ◽  
Enver Belli
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Analgesic Effects ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
First Pain ◽  
Different Doses ◽  
Group 1

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative analgesic characteristics and side effects of two different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine in combination with hyperbaric bupivacaine, and to evaluate the effects of these combinations on spinal anesthesia.METHODS: After obtaining approval from the local ethics committee, 60 male patients who were undergoing inguinal surgery and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I were included in the study. The present study was conducted in 2003 in a military hospital with a capacity of 100 beds. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups of 20 patients: group 1, 0.5 mL saline added to 3 mL (15 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine; and groups 2 and 3, 2 μg dexme-detomidine and 4 μg dexmedetomidine added to 3 mL (15 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively. Medications were administered by intrathecal injection in a total volume of 3.5 mL. The postoperative analgesic characteristics, effects on spinal anesthesia and side effects were recorded.RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups. The mean (± SD) time to onset of pain was 220.75±112.7 min in group 1, 371.5±223.5 min in group 2 and 1042.50±366.78 min in group 3. Time to first pain sensation in group 3 was significantly longer than that in groups 1 and 2 (P<0.001).CONCLUSION: Two different doses of dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenoceptor agonist with analgesic effects, resulted in an increased duration of analgesia and efficacy, decreased postoperative analgesic use and was associated with no notable adverse effects.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of Adding Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesia

2015 ◽  
Vol 18;1 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 71-77
Author(s):  
Aloka Samantaray
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Saline Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Midazolam Group ◽  
Effective Analgesia

Background: Dexmedetomidine and midazolam both modulate spinal analgesia by different mechanisms, and yet, no human studies are available to compare them for postoperative analgesia after neuraxial administration. Objectives: We investigated the addition of dexmedetomidine or midazolam to intrathecal bupivacaine on the duration of effective analgesia and clinical safety profile. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Setting: University teaching hospital. Methods: The study cohort included a consecutive and prospective series of patients, referred for endourological procedures. The patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups (20 patients each) to receive intrathecally 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in combination with 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine group), 1 mg of midazolam (midazolam group) or 0.5 mL of 0.9% saline (control group). The groups were compared to the regression time of sensory block, duration of effective analgesia (defined as the time interval between administration of intrathecal drug to the time of first analgesic request or a numeric rating scale ≥ 4.0), sedation score, and side effects in the first 24 hours. Statistics: One way-ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis test, and Chi-square test (χ2), significance level: P < 0.05. Results: The duration of effective analgesia (time to first analgesic request) was significantly prolonged in the dexmedetomidine group (286 ± 64 minutes, P < 0.01) when compared with midazolam group (236.9 ± 64.9 minutes) and the control group (212.7 ± 70.2 minutes). Pairwise comparisons among the 3 groups with Bonferroni adjustment revealed that patients from the dexmedetomidine group were more sedated in comparison to the midazolam and control groups at the end of the first 15 minutes after intrathecal injection [χ2 (2) = 7.157, P = 0.028], with a mean rank sedation score of 35.58 for dexmedetomidine, 25.00 for midazolam, and 30.93 for control. No significant differences in the side effects were observed during the study period. Midazolam did not lengthen the time of the two segment sensory regression or the time to first request analgesia. Limitation: The study cannot be extrapolated to muscle cutting surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Conclusions: The addition of dexmedetomidine (5 mcg) to 3 mL of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) significantly prolongs the duration of effective analgesia in comparison to 1 mg midazolam or placebo (0.9% normal saline) with a comparable incidences of side effects. Key words: Dexmedetomidine, midazolam, intrathecal, spinal anaesthesia, subarachnoid block, postoperative pain Pain Physician 20

scholarly journals Comparison of clonidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in unilateral spinal anaesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 521
Author(s):  
Pradnya B. Khadse ◽  
Swati S. Chhatrapati ◽  
Trupti S. Kamble
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Haemodynamic Instability ◽  
Postoperative Changes

Background: Various adjuvants to local anaesthetics are added to improve the quality of subarachnoid block in unilateral anaesthesia during lower limb surgeries. The present study was conducted with the aim to evaluate the efficacy of combination of clonidine-bupivacaine and fentanyl-bupivacaine.Methods: This randomized study was conducted on 60 patients at tertiary care center (Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai) for 2 years. They were divided into 2 groups consisting of 30 in each. Group BC receives Inj. bupivacaine 0.5% (hyperbaric) 7.5 mg (1.5 ml) with inj. clonidine 15 µg (0.1 ml) intrathecally and Group BF receives Inj. bupivacaine 0.5% (hyperbaric) 7.5 mg (1.5 ml) with inj. fentanyl 15 µg (0.3 ml) intrathecally. The time of onset and duration and level of sensory and motor block, time to complete sensory and motor block recovery and duration of spinal anaesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics and side effects if any were noted.Results: The time of onset and duration of sensory and motor block was lesser in group BF compared to BC but the difference was statistically not significant (p>0.05). Duration of analgesia was also higher in group BF. Intraoperative and postoperative changes in hemodynamic parameters, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate were comparable, and no significant changes are observed, and all are with in normal range (p<0.05). Pruritus was noticed in group BF (10%). None of the patient in both groups show any side effects such as respiratory depression and nausea, vomiting.Conclusions: We conclude that addition of fentanyl and clonidine to hyperbaric bupivacaine produces almost similar effect in unilateral spinal anaesthesia for lower limb surgery without prolonged motor blockade, haemodynamic instability, respiratory depression and nausea and vomiting with good sedation and postoperative analgesia. Although the incidence of pruritus is more with fentanyl, it is not distressing for patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document