scholarly journals A Scientific Study of the Unidentified Flying Objects in accordance with Anti-Gravity

Author(s):  
Deep Bhattacharjee ◽  
Aruna Harikant ◽  
Sanjeevan Singha Roy

<p>Electrohydrodynamics, semi-quantum kinetics, anti-gravity, electro-gravitics, gravito-electrics, all these are classified as the ‘black’ area of theoretical and experimental physics because, these theories tend to explain the amazing science behind the alien means of propulsion, thereby giving answers to many questions like, how they travel such long distances? Do they need any kind of fuel? If so, then why are they not seen to be massive like the rockets with 80-90% fuel capacities? Do they travel in perpetual motion? Is the fact really true that they can harness energy from the nature? Then, do they travel at a speed faster than that of light? These, along with many facts are still unexplainable to modern day physics, its not unexplainable but rather its covert and classified, government does not want to disclose the science behind UFOs that they have gathered through reverse engineering of ‘crashed alien crafts’ and through the covert research of many scientists who were engaged in black R&D operations. This paper will answer the researches and physics behind those unexplained phenomena’s because, once explained they tend to shake the pillars of modern physics.</p>

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
DONG-WON KIM

ABSTRACT Yoshio Nishina is often honored as ““a father of modern physics in Japan.”” By performing multiple roles as a competent researcher, a formidable teacher, and a shrewd organizer, he not only made a great contribution to the emergence of a research network that produced two Nobel prize winners in physics but also raised the level of Japanese physics overall. Among Nishina's many contributions to the Japanese physics community, the construction and operation of two cyclotrons during the 1930s and 1940s were the most celebrated. In this paper I try to answer the following questions: why did Nishina start the construction of two cyclotron in the mid-1930s?; how did he secure the necessary financial support?; what were the original objectives of the machines, and how were they were actually used?; what difficulties did he meet and overcome in the construction and running of the cyclotrons?; how significant was the Berkeley connection in contributing to the construction and operation of the cyclotrons?; why did Nishina skip the construction of the medium size cyclotron (30––40 inches) and move directly from a small (26-inch) to a large one (60-inch)?; and how much did the cyclotron project influence the future path of Japanese physics? I argue that Nishina's two cyclotrons, especially the larger one, should be considered as successful examples of reverse engineering, a hallmark of Japanese technology in the interwar period.


Author(s):  
Graeme Gooday ◽  
Daniel Jon Mitchell

This article discusses the reasons for rethinking ‘classical physics’, building upon Richard Staley’s historical enquiry into the origins of the distinction between ‘classical’ and ‘modern physics’. In particular, it challenges Staley’s thesis that ‘classical’ and ‘modern physics’ were invented simultaneously by Max Planck at the Solvay conference in 1911, arguing instead that the emergence of these notions took place separately over a period that reached as late as the 1930s. The article first considers how the identification of the ether as a key feature of classical physics has drawn historians’ attention towards its changing metaphysical fortunes during the nineteenth century. It then describes the connections between physics and industry that are obscured by the theoretical bias of any dichotomy between ‘classical’ and ‘modern physics’. Finally, it highlights continuity in the field of French experimental physics by focusing on three comparative case studies dealing with electrocapillarity, electromagnetic waves, and X-rays.


Author(s):  
Frank Wilczek

Modern physics suggests several exotic ways in which things could go terribly wrong on a very large scale. Most, but not all, are highly speculative, unlikely, or remote. Rare catastrophes might well have decisive influences on the evolution of life in the universe. So also might slow but inexorable changes in the cosmic environment in the future. Only a twisted mind will find joy in contemplating exotic ways to shower doom on the world as we know it. Putting aside that hedonistic motivation, there are several good reasons for physicists to investigate doomsday scenarios that include the following: Looking before leaping: Experimental physics often aims to produce extreme conditions that do not occur naturally on Earth (or perhaps elsewhere in the universe). Modern high-energy accelerators are one example; nuclear weapons labs are another. With new conditions come new possibilities, including – perhaps – the possibility of large-scale catstrophe. Also, new technologies enabled by advances in physics and kindred engineering disciplines might trigger social or ecological instabilities. The wisdom of ‘Look before you leap’ is one important motivation for considering worst-case scenarios. Preparing to prepare: Other drastic changes and challenges must be anticipated, even if we forego daring leaps. Such changes and challenges include exhaustion of energy supplies, possible asteroid or cometary impacts, orbital evolution and precessional instability of Earth, evolution of the Sun, and – in the very long run – some form of ‘heat death of the universe’. Many of these are long-term problems, but tough ones that, if neglected, will only loom larger. So we should prepare, or at least prepare to prepare, well in advance of crises. Wondering: Catastrophes might leave a mark on cosmic evolution, in both the physical and (exo)biological senses. Certainly, recent work has established a major role for catastrophes in sculpting terrestrial evolution (see http://www.answers.com/topic/timeline-of-evolution). So to understand the universe, we must take into account their possible occurrence. In particular, serious consideration of Fermi’s question ‘Where are they?’, or logical pursuit of anthropic reasoning, cannot be separated from thinking about how things could go drastically wrong. This will be a very unbalanced essay.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 161-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo D. Sontag

This paper discusses a theoretical method for the “reverse engineering” of networks based solely on steady-state (and quasi-steady-state) data.


1979 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 947-947
Author(s):  
RICHARD A. KASSCHAU

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1431-1443
Author(s):  
K. Král ◽  
Z. Khás

2002 ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
Liudmyla O. Fylypovych

Sociology of religion in the West is a field of knowledge with at least 100 years of history. As a science and as a discipline, the sociology of religion has been developing in most Western universities since the late nineteenth century, having established traditions, forming well-known schools, areas related to the names of famous scholars. The total number of researchers of religion abroad has never been counted, but there are more than a thousand different centers, universities, colleges where religion is taught and studied. If we assume that each of them has an average of 10 religious scholars, theologians, then the army of scholars of religion is amazing. Most of them are united in representative associations of researchers of religion, which have a clear sociological color. Among them are the most famous International Society for the Sociology of Religion (ISSR) and the Society for Scientific Study of Religion (SSSR).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document