scholarly journals Internet Based Infertility Information in Bahasa Indonesia Quality Survey

2018 ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Andon Hestiantoro ◽  
Intan Kusumaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Search Engine ◽  
Obstet Gynecol ◽  
Google Search ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia

Objective: To assess the quality of websites providing informationon infertility and its management in Bahasa.Methods: Differences between website types and affiliates wereassessed for the credibility, accuracy and ease of navigation usingpredefined criteria. We used Google search engine with the keyword"infertilitas" and we assessed 50 websites in Bahasa that relates withinfertility.Results: The content credibility for most of the sites has adequatescore with range of score 60 to 80 for 68% sites. Content accuracyfor most of the sites have scores more than 60, with 24% or 12sites with scores 60 to 80 and 44% or 22 sites have scores above80. The ease of navigation for most of the sites, 47 sites or 94%has scores more than 60.Conclusion: The quality of internet based infertility information inBahasa is adequate for category credibility, accuracy and ease ofnavigation.[Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 6-1: 28-33]Keywords: bahasa, infertility, information, internet, quality

A cross-sectional study on quality of diabetes information identified from the Internet (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchun Fan ◽  
Jean Craig ◽  
Na Zhao ◽  
Fujian Song
Keyword(s):  
Health Information ◽  
Search Engine ◽  
Search Engines ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Online Health Information ◽  
Online Information ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Content Coverage ◽  
Google Search

BACKGROUND Increasingly people seek health information from the Internet, in particular, health information on diseases that require intensive self-management, such as diabetes. However, the Internet is largely unregulated and the quality of online health information may not be credible. OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of online information on diabetes identified from the Internet. METHODS We used the single term “diabetes” or equivalent Chinese characters to search Google and Baidu respectively. The first 50 websites retrieved from each of the two search engines were screened for eligibility using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included websites were assessed on four domains: accessibility, content coverage, validity and readability. RESULTS We included 26 websites from Google search engine and 34 from Baidu search engine. There were significant differences in website provider (P<0.0001), but not in targeted population (P=0.832) and publication types (P=0.378), between the two search engines. The website accessibility was not statistically significantly different between the two search engines, although there were significant differences in items regarding website content coverage. There was no statistically significant difference in website validity between the Google and Baidu search engines (mean Discern score 3.3 vs 2.9, p=0.156). The results to appraise readability for English website showed that that Flesch Reading Ease scores ranged from 23.1 to 73.0 and the mean score of Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level ranged range from 5.7 to 19.6. CONCLUSIONS The content coverage of the health information for patients with diabetes in English search engine tended to be more comprehensive than that from Chinese search engine. There was a lack of websites provided by health organisations in China. The quality of online health information for people with diabetes needs to be improved to bridge the knowledge gap between website service and public demand.

scholarly journals Hubungan Self Care dengan Kualitas Hidup Pasien Kanker Serviks

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 776-787
Author(s):  
Dessy Listya Rissanti
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Search Engine ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Google Search

Menurut data Globocon 2018, kasus baru kanker serviks mencapai 32.469 jiwa dan angka kematian akibat kanker serviks mencapai 18.279 per tahun. Ini artinya, ada sekitar 50 perempuan Indonesia meninggal dunia akibat kanker serviks setiap harinya. Studi literatur ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan atau pengaruh selfcare terhadap kualitas hidup penderita kanker serviks. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan atau literature riview. Pencarian artikel dilakukan berdasarkan kata kunci dari ‘Self Care‘AND ‘Quality of Life’AND ‘Cervical Cancer Patients’, menggunakan mesin pencarian Pubmed, Google Search Engine (Scholar dan Repository) dan Researchgate. Dengan terbitan artikel tahun 2015 hingga 2020. Hasil pencarian didapatkan 11 artikel yang membahas topik mengenai self care dan kualitas hidup pada pasien kanker serviks. Artikel publikasi yang diterbitkan tahun 2015 hingga 2020. Setiap individu memiliki kualitas hidup yang berbeda tergantung dari masing-masing individu dalam menyikapi permasalahan yang terjadi dalam dirinya. Penggunaan strategi koping tertentu dapat memengaruhi hasrat mereka akan informasi tentang penyakit mereka, kemanjuran diri mereka, dan cara mereka menyesuaikan diri dengan penyakit serta perawatannya. Kualitas hidup pasien kanker serviks akan meningkat jika kita tahu faktor pendukung seseorang dalam melakukan perawatan baik dukungan keluarga, petugas kesehatan dan dukungan lingkunga sosialnya sehingga pasien tetap semangat dalam menjalankan hidupnya.

scholarly journals Getting Bulk Data Through Google: An empirical study

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
Shama Rani ◽  
Jaiteg Singh
Keyword(s):  
Search Engine ◽  
Web Search ◽  
Matching Function ◽  
Quality Of Information ◽  
Web Documents ◽  
Page Rank ◽  
Efficient Storage ◽  
Bulk Data ◽  
Google Search

To store the information in a database is one of the major tasks. The efficient storage of data is important for future use. Information retrieval is a method of gathering information related to input queries from the various sources or stored databases. To retrieve the information, a search engine plays an important role. A web search engine creates an index to match queries. The quality of information is improved with the help of search engine. For retrieving the information, a search engine comprises some modules such as query processor, a searching and matching function, document processor and page rank capability. This paper focuses on the retrieval of web documents against input queries and stores them in to database. A Google search API can be used to fetch the results. It analyses the data by processing through these modules and downloads the content available in different formats.

Between Web search engines and artificial intelligence: what side is shown in laboratory tests?

Diagnosis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Negrini ◽  
Andrea Padoan ◽  
Mario Plebani
Keyword(s):  
Search Engine ◽  
Web Search ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Web Content ◽  
Web Searches ◽  
Web Contents ◽  
Publishing Groups ◽  
Google Search ◽  
Over Time

AbstractBackgroundThe number of websites providing laboratory test information is increasing fast, although the accuracy of reported resources is sometimes questionable. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of online retrievable information by Google Search engine.MethodsConsidering urinalysis, cholesterol and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as keywords, the Google Search engine was queried. Using Google Trends, users’ search trends (interest over time) were evaluated in a 5-year period. The first three or 10 retrieved hits were analysed in blind by two reviewers and classified according to the type of owner or publisher and for the quality of the reported Web content.ResultsThe interest over time constantly increased for all the three considered tests. Most of the Web content owners were editorial and/or publishing groups (mean percentage 35.5% and 30.0% for the first three and 10 hits, respectively). Public and health agencies and scientific societies are less represented. Among the first three and 10 hits, cited sources were found to vary from 26.0% to 46.7% of Web page results, whilst for cholesterol, 60% of the retrieved Web contents reported only authors’ signatures.ConclusionsOur findings confirm those obtained in other studies in the literature, demonstrating that online Web searches can lead patients to inadequately written or reviewed health information.

scholarly journals Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Urolithiasis on the Google Search Engine

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwayne T. S. Chang ◽  
Robert Abouassaly ◽  
Nathan Lawrentschuk
Keyword(s):  
Health Information ◽  
Search Engine ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Quality Information ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Educational Sources ◽  
Google Search

Purpose. To compare the quality of health information on the Internet for keywords related to urolithiasis, to assess for difference in information quality across four main Western languages, and to compare the source of sponsorship in these websites. Methods. Health On the Net (HON) Foundation principles were utilised to determine quality information. Fifteen keywords related to urolithiasis were searched on the Google search engine. The first 150 websites were assessed against the HON principles and the source of sponsorship determined. Results. A total of 8986 websites were analysed. A proportion of HON-accredited websites for individual search terms range between 2.5% and 12.0%. The first 50 websites were more likely to be HON-positive compared to websites 51–100 and 101–150. French websites searched were more likely to be HON-positive whereas German websites were less likely to be HON-positive than English websites. There was no statistically significant difference between the rate of HON-positive English and Spanish websites. The three main website sponsors were from government/educational sources (40.2%), followed by commercial (29.9%) and physician/surgeon sources (18.6%). Conclusions. Health information on most urolithiasis websites was not validated. Nearly one-third of websites in this study have commercial sponsorship. Doctors should recognise the need for more reliable health websites for their patients.

scholarly journals Using the Google™ Search Engine for Health Information: Is There a Problem? Case Study: Supplements for Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah C Cai ◽  
Leanne E King ◽  
Johanna T Dwyer
Keyword(s):  
Health Information ◽  
Search Engine ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Nutrition Information ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Search Results ◽  
Health And Nutrition ◽  
Quality Rating

ABSTRACT We assessed the quality of online health and nutrition information using a Google™ search on “supplements for cancer”. Search results were scored using the Health Information Quality Index (HIQI), a quality-rating tool consisting of 12 objective criteria related to website domain, lack of commercial aspects, and authoritative nature of the health and nutrition information provided. Possible scores ranged from 0 (lowest) to 12 (“perfect” or highest quality). After eliminating irrelevant results, the remaining 160 search results had median and mean scores of 8. One-quarter of the results were of high quality (score of 10–12). There was no correlation between high-quality scores and early appearance in the sequence of search results, where results are presumably more visible. Also, 496 advertisements, over twice the number of search results, appeared. We conclude that the Google™ search engine may have shortcomings when used to obtain information on dietary supplements and cancer.

scholarly journals The Observatory of the Américas as a network in environmental and worker health in the Americas

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo Siqueira ◽  
Fernando Carvalho
Keyword(s):  
Search Engine ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Worker Health ◽  
Google Search

This article reviews the scope of several Observatories found by a search in the Internet through the Google search engine. After examining these observatories, it describes the aims and initial accomplishments of the Observatory of the Americas as a network of professionals and activists from different countries in the Americas. The article concludes with a discussion of the pattern identified among these observatories: they may be clearinghouses or networks, or both.

scholarly journals Perilaku Pencarian Informasi Generasi milenial untuk Memenuhi Kebutuhan Informasi Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Yuni Rahmah ◽  
Elva Rahmah
Keyword(s):  
Search Engine ◽  
Information Search ◽  
Information Seeking ◽  
Millennial Generation ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Information Source ◽  
The Internet ◽  
State University ◽  
Google Search ◽  
Source Of Information

AbstractIn this paper the language about Millennial Generation Information Search Behavior To Meet Information Needs. This study aims to describe the information seeking behavior of the millennial generation to meet the information needs of this study at the Padang State University. Data were collected through observation and distribution of questionnaires with students of the Indonesian and Regional Languages and Literature Department at Padang State University. Analyzing the data, concluded the following matters. (1). Starting - consists of activities that initiate information seeking activities. In general (100%) determine the topic especially before conducting an information search, in general (90%) conduct information search after discussion or consultation with lecturers, in general (95.23%) know the information needs when attending lectures, (88.4 %) know the information needs specifically, and in general (88%) do information when they are aware of and know the need for information. (2). Chaining - activities following a series of citations, citations or forms of reconciliation between documents with each other. In general (92.8 uses a bibliography to search information, generally (90.4%) use the author's name from the core reference to look for other references in conducting information searches, and in general (92.9%) use subjects from core reference to look for other references (3) Browsing - merawak, looking for, but rather directed, in areas that are considered to have the potential for the information needed.In general (73%) libraries can always meet information needs, in general In general (95.2%) look for information on the internet if the information you are looking for is not found in the printed source of information, (92.8%) generally directly looking for information on the internet if the information you need is not found in the printed source of information, at generally (45.22%) query identification (keywords). (4). Differentiating - sorting, using the features in the information source as a basic reference for checking quality or information content. in general (88%) the internet is the main source of information, in general (92.84%) The source of information printed is still very much needed in fulfilling information needs. (5). Monitoring - monitoring progress by focusing on selected sources. In general (88.09%) looked for the latest information through the internet by searching for the latest articles, in general (78.56%) needed to find the latest information to enrich the reference sources. (6). Extracting - systematically digging in one source to retrieve information that is considered important. In general (90.47 when you need information you often search the search engine (google, yahoo), in general (88.09 often uses a journal database to get information, in general (78.56%) after getting information on the internet , you directly copy the information, in general (76.19%) use the "Google" search engine because it is more relevant than other search engines.Keywords: behavior, millennial generation and information.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document