scholarly journals INFLUENCE OF MANAGERIAL ABILITY ON FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM NIGERIAN LISTED NON-FINANCIAL FIRMS

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 25-40
Author(s):  
Aderemi Olalere Adebayo

Users of accounting information crave of quality financial reporting, by emphasising on the quality of the auditors neglecting the attribute of the managers. This study investigates the influence of managerial abilities on financial reporting in Nigerian listed non-financial sectors. The time series research design was employed by selecting 40 non-financial institutions as sample size between 2010 and 2017. Secondary data obtained from the financial report were analysed using correlation and logistic regression. It was found that managerial ability has an inverse relationship on financial reporting quality, which is consistent with the agency theory. The finding implied that managers employ their ability to income smoothing for the benefit of the organisation rather than the interest of the shareholders.

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 886
Author(s):  
Taqiyah Dinda Insani ◽  
Noven Suprayogi

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences of Internet Financial Reporting Quality. This study was using quantitative approach with independent sample t test and mann whitney u test. The population of this study was official website of islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia. determination of the number of samples using (sampling jenuh), where all of the population is used as a sampel. Data that being used was secondary data. The data was collected from official website of the sentral banks in each country. The result of this study showed that there was significant differences of Internet Fianncial Reporting Quality between Indonesia and Malaysia. The difference is caused there are significant differences between the quality of content and timeliness components. Meanwhile, there is no differences between technology and user support components.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olumide A. Olowokure ◽  
Muhammad Tanko ◽  
Terzungwe Nyor

<p>The quality of financial report is very crucial as published financial reports remains, for the most part, the only means by which outside shareholders and investors keep themselves informed about the performance of the firm. In the present economic scenario, this concern for financial reporting quality becomes more acute as emerging market economies and more importantly mono economies like Nigeria face greater uncertainties as they combat the challenges of unprecedented fall in oil prices. In addition to this, the suspension of the CEO, Chairman and two other directors of Stambic IBTC bank by the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria for filling a misleading financial statement for 2013 and 2014 has also shown that the issue of financial reporting quality cannot be overemphasized. Using secondary data from the published reports of thirteen listed deposit money banks in Nigeria for over a period of ten years between 2005 and 2014, this paper seeks to find the determinants of financial reporting quality and reports the findings of the impact of structural characteristics like age, size and level of leverage on financial reporting quality. Using prio studies as a guide, we developed a model for loan loss provisions and generated the residuals, using these residuals know as abnormal loan loss provisions as the dependent variable for the multiple regression analysis, the study did not find any evidence of significant relationship between firm age, size, leverage and financial reporting quality.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Mousavi Shiri ◽  
Mahdi Salehi ◽  
Fatemeh Abbasi ◽  
Shayan Farhangdoust

PurposeIn the process of reporting accounting information, the auditor’s objective is to detect possible misstatements and errors in accounting information. Audit evidence aids auditors in providing reasonable assurance about the quality of financial reporting. Studying the quality of family firms’ financial reporting is of higher importance relative to non-family firms due to lower risk of accounting manipulation. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between family ownership structure and financial reporting quality from an auditing perspective.Design/methodology/approachTo analyze the research hypotheses, the authors use a sample data consisted of 221 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (including 52 family and 169 non-family firms) over a five-year span from 2011 to 2015.FindingsUsing multivariate regression analysis of panel data, our results indicate that audit risk in family firms is lower than their counterparts. Likewise, the findings are indicative of lower audit fees paid by family firms as compared to non-family ones. The authors also find that auditors put more effort in family firms and thus audit effort is more significant for these kinds of firms.Originality/valueThe study focuses on family ownership and financial reporting quality in a developing country like Iran and the results of the study may be beneficial to other developing nations, as Iran stock market possesses some unique features which are not normally prevailing in other equity markets, even in the Middle East.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 124-131
Author(s):  
Suci Wahyuliza

This research aims to test the influence of the quality of financial reporting accounting based and market based on the asimetri of information. The sample used the manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange from 2007 untill 2011. Using a Purposive sampling technique of Sampling and retrieved samples of as many as 41 companies.Hypothesis test results showed that the quality of financial reporting  based accounting is represented with three indicator are persistence and predictability has no effect on the asimetri of information whereas the effect on income smoothing indicator asimetri of information. Further market based financial reporting quality is represented by three indicators, namely the relevance of the value and timeliness of the Asimetri information has no effect while the indicator of conservatism has influence on the asimetri of information.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1759856
Author(s):  
Deborah Esi Gyanba Mbir ◽  
Otuo Serebour Agyemang ◽  
George Tackie ◽  
Mac Junior Abeka

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaad Mohammed Ali Wahhab ◽  
Abbas Murad Khnaitel Alzubadi Alzubadi ◽  
Ali Shakir Mahmood Haddad

The main objective of the current study is to examine audit fee, financial reporting quality, going concern, and earning management as antecedents to the audit quality of non-financial firms listed in Iraq stock Exchange. In addition to that the study has also examined the moderating role of accounting fairness in the relationship between audit fee, financial reporting quality, going concern, earning management and audit quality of non-financial firms listed in Iraq stock Exchange. The data of 60 firms listed on Iraqi stock exchange over the period of 4 years from 2017-2021 is taken from the audited accounts. The study basically employs panel data analytical tools in achieving the set goals of the research. The choice of panel data approach is informed by a number of methodological advantages it offers. Results indicates that that as interest in the agency theory grows, the importance of fairness as a principle will grow, and that it is expected that the value of this concept would grow as a means of resolving conflict and exploiting interests that arise between the many stakeholders in the firm. on the concept of fairness, agreeing that the interests of particular parties should not trump fairness, which he referred to as clarity. The results of the study have provided support to the hypothesis of the study. The findings of the study will be helpful for policymakers, and researchers on the issues related to accounting fairness ,audit fee, financial reporting quality, going concern, earning management and audit quality of non-financial firms listed in Iraq stock Exchange.


Author(s):  
Joohyun Lim ◽  
Jaehong Lee ◽  
jinho Chang

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the association between financial reporting quality in target companies and acquisition profitability in a sample of 280 acquisitions in South Korea between 2002 and 2011. Design/methodology/approach – Using the accruals quality measure developed by McNichols (2002) as a proxy for financial reporting quality, it was found that high-quality financial reporting in target companies is associated with more profitable acquisitions for the acquirer, as measured by the acquirer’s announcement returns. Findings – It was found that high-quality financial reporting in target companies is associated with more profitable acquisitions for the acquirer, as measured by the acquirer’s announcement returns. This finding suggests that higher-quality accounting information leads to better decision-making during acquisitions. It was also found that the importance of financial reporting quality increases when information about the target company is scarce. In addition, it was found that the financial reporting quality of target companies is less important when the agency costs of the acquirer are high. Practical implications – This analysis also complements several recent papers that examine target firm accounting information and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) returns (Shalev and Martin, 2009; McNichols and Stubben, 2012). By expanding this analysis, the authors help to provide a more complete understanding of how target firm’s accounting quality relates to the valuation of the target company and future expected synergies in M&A deal practice. Originality/value – This study is one of a growing body of literature on the relations between financial reporting quality and investment decisions (Bens and Monahan, 2004; Biddle and Hilary, 2006; Hope and Thomas, 2008; McNichols and Stubben, 2008; Biddle et al., 2009; Francis and Martin, 2010). These results extend and generalize the results of prior studies, in that data pertinent to acquisition profitability of M&As in South Korea are used.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khamis H. Al-Yahyaee ◽  
Ahmed Al-Hadi

We examine whether the voluntary formation of a Risk Committee (RC) compromises the effectiveness of other monitoring duties carried out by the board members. We argue that adding more monitoring committees increases the board’s internal busyness, which reduces the effectiveness of monitoring by the Audit Committee (AC). Using a sample of financial firms over the period 2007 to 2011 from the Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC), we find that voluntarily adopting a risk committee impairs the effectiveness of the audit committee, which in turn reduces financial reporting quality. Our findings suggest that multiple layers of monitoring capacity viz-a-viz the existence of both an audit and risk committee may weaken the quality of monitoring provided by the audit committee.


Author(s):  
Mayadunnege Senaka Anuruddha ◽  

There is a growing concern over the public financial management practices including financial reporting of governments. People's concern over more productive public resource utilization has flourished. Not only that, transparency, accountability, and openness of public money utilizations have become more common. Financial reporting is a key leading instrument that is able to prove both ideas. The requirement stimulates governments to concern about the quality of financial reporting in the public sector. The government of Sri Lanka has already taken several steps to strengthen their public financial reporting while there are still being criticisms by critical interest parties. The situation creates a drought over the effectiveness and the direction of the initiatives. Based on the public financial reporting environment in Sri Lanka, the research investigates the determining factors of Public Financial Reporting Quality (PFRQ). Scholars acknowledge the influence of the Accounting Information System (AIS) and Internal Control (IC) to determine the PFRQ in different organizational environments. A questionnaire survey seeking opinions on these two areas was distributed to a sample of Accountants working in the central government ministries and departments in Sri Lanka. The results reveal the strong contribution of AIS and IC to enhance the PFRQ. The results further acknowledge the findings of previous scholars over the positive influence of AIS and IC to determine the FRQ. These findings contribute to the literature by analyzing the determinants of financial reporting quality in the public sector. Finally, it is recommending to the government of Sri Lanka to take steps to strengthen their public financial reporting in a correct and more influential direction.


Author(s):  
Putri Septiani Dwi Hayati ◽  
Noven Suprayogi

The purpose of this study was to Determine the differences of Internet Financial Reporting Quality. This study was using quantitative approach with one-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test. The population of this study was official website of islamic banks in Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Sudan. The Data was collected from the central bank's official website in each country and the official website of islmaic banks in each country. That the data being used was secondary data. The result of this study showes that there was significant differences of Internet Financial Reporting Quality between Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Sudan. The difference is the caused there are significant differences between the quality of content, timeliness, user support components. Meanwhile, there is no differences between technology components


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document