Pengaruh Struktur Dan Proses Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Di Indonesia

IJAcc ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-52
Author(s):  
Tri Cahyo Nugroho ◽  
Warseno Warseno ◽  
Isrial Isrial

The aims of the research is analyzing the influence of corporate governance structure and process on firm performance in Indonesia . The Indicators in this research is : institutional ownership, independent commissioner, board of directors size, board of directors meeting, board of commissioners meeting and audit committee meeting. Firm performance measured by TobinsQ value. This research uses multiplier regression analysis as statistic instrument. Population in this research is consumer goods manufacture listed on Bursa Efek Indonesia 2001-2015 obtain 85 samples base on determined criteria. The results of this research show that institutional ownership, independent commissioner and board of commissioners meeting has significant positive influence on firm performance, board of directors size and board of director meeting has significant negative influence on firm performance, while the audit committee meeting has no influence on firm performance

IJAcc ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-52
Author(s):  
Tri Cahyo Nugroho ◽  
Warseno Warseno ◽  
Isrial Isrial

The aims of the research is analyzing the influence of corporate governance structure and process on firm performance in Indonesia . The Indicators in this research is : institutional ownership, independent commissioner, board of directors size, board of directors meeting, board of commissioners meeting and audit committee meeting. Firm performance measured by TobinsQ value. This research uses multiplier regression analysis as statistic instrument. Population in this research is consumer goods manufacture listed on Bursa Efek Indonesia 2001-2015 obtain 85 samples base on determined criteria. The results of this research show that institutional ownership, independent commissioner and board of commissioners meeting has significant positive influence on firm performance, board of directors size and board of director meeting has significant negative influence on firm performance, while the audit committee meeting has no influence on firm performance


Author(s):  
Rina Mudjiyanti ◽  
Arini Hidayah ◽  
Erny Rachmawati

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of institutional ownership, board of directors, and audit committee, which are proxies of corporate governance structure, and firm size on firm performance. Company performance is measured using profitability. The sample of this study, companies listed in the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) from 2017 to 2018. The ROA data in this study ignores the positive and negative ROA values. Hypothesis testing using regression analysis found empirical evidence that institutional ownership and board of directors variables do not affect ROA. While the audit committee variable has a positive effect on ROA, the firm size variable negatively impacts ROA. Keywords                    : Institutional Ownership; Board Of Directors; Audit Committee; Company  Size; ProfitabilityCorrespondence to      : [email protected] Tujuan penelitian ini menguji pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, dewan direksi, dan komite audit yang merupakan proksi struktur corporate governance, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Kinerja perusahaan diukur menggunakan profitabilitas. Sampel penelitian ini, perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam Jakarta Islamic Indeks (JII) selama periode 2017 sampai 2018. Data ROA dalam penelitian ini mengabaikan nilai ROA positif dan negatif. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis regresi ditemukan bukti empiris bahwa variabel kepemilikan institusional dan dewan direksi tidak berpengaruh terhadap ROA. Sedangkan variabel komite audit berpengaruh positif terhadap ROA, dan variabel ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh negatif terhadap ROA.Kata kunci      : Kepemilikan Institusional; Dewan Direksi; Komite Audit; Ukuran Perusahaan; Profitabilitas


Author(s):  
Jun aidi ◽  
Nurd iono ◽  
Ahmad Rifai ◽  
Icuk Rangga Bawano

This study examines the effect of good corporate governance and sustainability report on company performance. Good corporate governance is dependent on the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the size of the audit committee, institutional ownership, management ownership. Sustainability report is facilitated by economic, environmental and social aspect as well as disclosure index. While Company performance is generated by Return on Assets (ROA). This research was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2014-2018. The purposive sampling technique was used. Hypothesis testing was done by linear regression analysis. The results of testing the first variable showed that institutional ownership affects ROA and has a negative relationship direction. While the size of the board of directors, the proportion of independent directors, the size of the audit committee, and management ownership have no effect on ROA. However, the result of the second variable showed that the disclosure of economic aspects affects ROA and has a positive relationship direction. While disclosure of environmental and social aspects does not affect ROA.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Sonu Goyal ◽  
Sanjay Dhamija

Subject area The case “Corporate Governance Failure at Ricoh India: Rebuilding Lost Trust” discusses the series of events post disclosure of falsification of the accounts and violation of accounting principles, leading to a loss of INR 11.23bn for the company, eroding over 75 per cent of its market cap (Financial Express, 2016). The case provides an opportunity for students to understand the key components of corporate governance structure and consequences of poor corporate governance. The case highlights the responsibility of the board of directors, audit committee and external auditors and discusses the changes required in the corporate governance structure necessary to ensure that such incidents do not take place. The case also delves into the classic dilemma of degree of control that needs to be exercised by the parent over its subsidiaries and freedom of independence given to the subsidiary board, which is a constant challenge all multinationals face. Such a dilemma often leads to the challenge of creating appropriate corporate governance structures for numerous subsidiaries. Study level/applicability The case is intended for MBA courses on corporate governance, business ethics and also for the strategic management courses in the context of multinational corporations. The case can be used to develop an understanding of the essential of corporate governance with special focus on the role of the board of directors, audit committee and external auditors. The case highlights the consequences and cost of poor corporate governance. The case can also be used for highlighting governance challenges in the parent subsidiary relationship for multinational corporations. The case can be used for executive training purposes on corporate governance and leadership with special focus on business ethics. Case overview This case presents the challenges faced by the newly appointed Chairman Noboru Akahane of Ricoh India. In July 2016, Ricoh India, the Indian arm of Japanese firm Ricoh, admitted that the company’s accounts had been falsified and accounting principles violated, leading to a loss of INR 11.23 bn for the financial year 2016. The minority shareholders were agitating against the board of directors of Ricoh India and were also holding the parent company responsible for not safeguarding their interest. Over a period of 18 months, Ricoh India had been in the eye of a storm that involved delayed reporting of financials, auditor red flags regarding accounting irregularities, a forensic audit, suspension of top officials and a police complaint lodged by Ricoh India against its own officials. Akahane needed to ensure continuity of Ricoh India’s business and also act quickly and decisively to manage the crisis and ensure that these incidents did not recur in the future. Expected learning outcomes The case provides an opportunity for students to understand the key components of corporate governance structure and consequences of poor corporate governance. More specifically, the case addresses the following objectives: provide an overview of corporate governance structure; highlight the role of board of directors, audit committee and external auditors; appreciate the rationale behind mandatory auditor rotation; appreciate the consequences of poor corporate structure; explore the interrelationship between sustainability reporting and transparency in financial disclosures of a corporation; understand management and governance of subsidiaries by multinational companies; and understand the response to a crisis situation. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Please contact your library to gain login details or email [email protected] to request teaching notes. Subject code CSS 11: Strategy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-149
Author(s):  
Ina Mutmainah

This study aims to determine the effect of good corporate governance on CSR disclosure which is moderated by earning management. This study uses secondary data from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2014-2018 periods. The purposive sampling method was selected for data collection, then the data was analyzed by using the absolute difference of moderation test. The results of this study indicate that good corporate governance which consists of institutional ownership, and independent commissioners have no significant effect on CSR disclosure, while audit committees have a positive effect on CSR disclosure. Thoreover, this study earnings management strengthen the positive influence of the institutional ownership on CSR disclosure, and strengthen the negative influence of the audit committee on CSR disclosure. However, earning management fails to find moderation role of independent commissioners on CSR disclosure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Jova Yolanda ◽  
Dian Efriyenti

Earnings management practice is the decision to choose a particular accounting method that can achieve the goal of increasing reported profits or reducing investment losses. Misappropriation of financial statements by management can affect the amount of reported income. This study aims to determine whether ownership structure and good corporate governance have a significant influence on earnings management. The study was conducted on pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in a row for the 2016-2020 period. The sample technique used is purposive sampling, so as many as 7 samples of companies are used. The data testing method uses multiple linear analysis. The results of the data test show that partially institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on earnings management, independent commissioners, the audit committee, and the board of directors has a negative but not significant effect on earnings management. Simultaneously the results state that institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and the board of directors have an effect but not significantly on earnings management.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Wan Adibah Binti Wan Ismail

<p>This study investigates whether family ownership and control, and corporate governance are associated with earnings quality, and whether family influence in firms weakens the association between corporate governance and earnings quality. This study uses a panel sample of 527 publicly traded firms over the period 2003-2008 from the Malaysia Stock Exchange (Bursa Malaysia). Identifying family firms as firms in which family members hold a significant portion of shares and possess control over the board of directors, this study finds that family firms have significantly higher earnings quality. The results remain unchanged, even after using alternative measures of earnings quality and family influence. This study also finds that the earnings quality of firms in Malaysia is positively associated with the size and independence of the audit committee and negatively associated with the size of the board of directors. However, these relationships exist only for nonfamily firms. These results on the corporate governance variables suggest that the effectiveness of corporate governance could be mediated by family influence. Using multivariate regressions that include interaction variables for corporate governance and family firms, the study finds that the relationship between corporate governance and earnings quality is mediated by family ownership and control. The result is consistent with the argument that the monitoring role of corporate governance reduces when there is substantial control by family owners in a firm. Overall, this study concludes that family ownership and control drives higher quality earnings for firms regardless of their corporate governance structure.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Della Ayu Rizki ◽  
Eni Wuryani

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of implementing good corporate governance on financial performance in banking companies. Proxies for good corporate governance are the board of directors, the independent board of commissioners, the audit committee, external audit quality, and institutional ownership. Measurement of banking financial performance uses Return on Assets (ROA). The sample used is 26 samples of banking sector companies listed on the IDX during 2014-2018. The analysis technique uses multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the board of directors and institutional ownership have an influence on financial performance, while the independent board of commissioners, audit committee, and external audit quality have no influence on financial performance. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance;Financial Performance;Banking Sector.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Wan Adibah Binti Wan Ismail

<p>This study investigates whether family ownership and control, and corporate governance are associated with earnings quality, and whether family influence in firms weakens the association between corporate governance and earnings quality. This study uses a panel sample of 527 publicly traded firms over the period 2003-2008 from the Malaysia Stock Exchange (Bursa Malaysia). Identifying family firms as firms in which family members hold a significant portion of shares and possess control over the board of directors, this study finds that family firms have significantly higher earnings quality. The results remain unchanged, even after using alternative measures of earnings quality and family influence. This study also finds that the earnings quality of firms in Malaysia is positively associated with the size and independence of the audit committee and negatively associated with the size of the board of directors. However, these relationships exist only for nonfamily firms. These results on the corporate governance variables suggest that the effectiveness of corporate governance could be mediated by family influence. Using multivariate regressions that include interaction variables for corporate governance and family firms, the study finds that the relationship between corporate governance and earnings quality is mediated by family ownership and control. The result is consistent with the argument that the monitoring role of corporate governance reduces when there is substantial control by family owners in a firm. Overall, this study concludes that family ownership and control drives higher quality earnings for firms regardless of their corporate governance structure.</p>


AKUNTABEL ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 157
Author(s):  
Inosensius Istiantoro ◽  
Ardi Paminto ◽  
Herry Ramadhani

The influence of Corporate Governance Structure  on Integrity Corporate Financial Statements of the LQ45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2009-2014. (Under the guidance of Dr. H. Ardi Paminto, MS and Herry Ramadhani, SE., MM). The purpose of research is to analyze the influence of Corporate Governance Structure on Integrity Corporate Financial Statements of the LQ45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2009-2014. The data used in this study is 18 companies using criteria through purposive sampling method. Analysis of the data used in this study is the classical assumption test and multiple linear regression SPSS 19.0. The results of this study indicate that the institutional ownership has a negative and significant influence on integrity corporate financial statements, Managerial Ownership is positive but no significant effect on integrity corporate financial statements, Audit Committee is positive and has a significane effect on integrity corporate financial statements, Independent Commissioner is negative and no significant effect on integrity corporate financial statements.Keywords:  Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Audit Committee and Independent Commissioner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document