scholarly journals VALUE AND APPLICABILITY OF LARGE ADMINISTRATIVE HEALTHCARE DATABASES IN PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS OUTCOMES RESEARCH

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taavy Miller ◽  
Shane Wurdeman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Health Economics ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Outcomes Research ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Healthcare Data ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making

The goal of health economics and outcomes research is to improve healthcare decision making. In the absence of high-value clinical data, the availability and quality of administrative healthcare data could be vital in the generation of evidence for orthotics and prosthetics services. The purpose of this article is to provide a stronger understanding of administrative healthcare data analysis, an area that has been scarcely examined within prosthetics and orthotics despite the wealth of information available within such data. Examples of common datasets in this arena currently available are provided, as well as an overview of the limitations and advantages of studies utilizing such datasets. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/35958/28315 How To Cite: Miller TA, Wurdeman S. Value and applicability of large administrative healthcare databases in prosthetics and orthotics outcomes research. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2021; Volume 4, Issue 2, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.35958 Corresponding Author: Taavy A Miller, PhD, CPODepartment of Clinical and Scientific Affairs, Hanger Clinic, Austin, Texas, USA.E-Mail: [email protected] ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-6124

scholarly journals Analysis of the Status and Trends of Chinese Clinical Practice Guideline Development Between 2010 and 2020: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Zhang ◽  
Si-yu Yan ◽  
Yun-yun Wang ◽  
Qiao Huang ◽  
Xiang-ying Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Status And Trends ◽  
The Status

Objective: This study aimed to systematically review the status and trends of Chinese clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) during the time period 2010–2020 and explore their methodological characteristics. Then, based on the strengths and weaknesses in development, offer several recommendations for the quality improvement which will serve as a reference for the users and developers of CPG.Introduction: With the development of evidence-based medicine (EBM), the CPGs play an increasingly important role in healthcare decision-making both in China and worldwide.Inclusion criteria: The CPGs that have been used to help the health professionals in the healthcare decision-making were included.Methodology: The China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang databases were searched from 2010 to 2020 for the studies describing the general and methodological characteristics of Chinese CPGs. Comparisons of the methodological characteristics between the groups were conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The M-K test was adopted to identify the monotonically increasing or decreasing trends of methodological characteristics over the timespan.Results: A total of 2,654 CPGs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The quantity and quality of the guidelines developed in China have improved over the time span. From 2010 to 2020,the guidelines had differing characteristics and covered a wide range of subjects. In total, 2,318(87.34%) guidelines focused on Western Medicine. Eight (0.30%) had been developed for patient versions of guidelines, 10(0.38%) were tentative guidelines, and 16(0.60%) were rapid advice guidelines. Medical specialty societies (including their branches) (71.1%) were the main guideline makers. The most addressed diseases were neoplasms (14.43%). The target population is mainly adults (84.97%). The methodological quality of consensus-based (CB)-CPGs was obviously lower than evidence-based (EB)-CPGs. Except for the item, “recommendations were based on evidence of systematic reviews,” there were statistical differences in all other methodological items between the EB-CPGS and CB-CPGS (P < 0.01). Higher methodological quality has been observed in EB-CPGs. All the data relating to the methodological characteristics indicated that higher methodological quality was present in the guidelines using GRADE (P < 0.01).Conclusion: The quantity and quality of the guidelines developed in China have improved between 2010 and 2020. CB-CPGs have also paid attention to the methodology quality, but obviously, this is lower than that in the EB-CPGs.

scholarly journals IDENTIFICATION OF MULTI-STAKEHOLDER VALUE IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Moons ◽  
Liliane Pintelon ◽  
Pieterjan Jorissen ◽  
Dirk De Ridder ◽  
Wouter Everaerts
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Multi Stakeholder

The recent trend is towards value-based healthcare, which is characterized by the relationship between quality of care and the associated costs. However, value in healthcare is a largely unmeasured and misunderstood concept. In particular, a definition of multi-stakeholder value in healthcare decision-making is missing. In this case study, we review the radical prostatectomy procedure because previous studies have shown discrepancies between what the patient’s value most and what the experts think the patient’s value most. The objective of this research is to address this gap by identifying a multi-stakeholder definition of value which will improve healthcare decision-making. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, more specifically the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), are applied to prioritize the quality of care indicators according to the following six pillars of quality: safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient-centeredness and equity. In addition, the average cost of a radical prostatectomy is estimated. A distinction is made between three treatment stages in order to calculate the overall quality score by assigning weights to criteria in each treatment stage. According to the AHP weights, the pillars of effective, patient-centered and equitable care contribute the most to value creation. Finally, some of the challenges of MCDM studies are addressed, such as conflicting preferences between stakeholder groups. In conclusion, this case study stresses the need to adapt operational research methods and knowledge to be applied in value-based healthcare. The AHP is a suitable approach to address the needs of healthcare decision-makers, to set priorities, and to identify value improvement opportunities while considering all of the stakeholders involved in the full care cycle.  

scholarly journals Perceptions of Quality of Communication in Family Interactions in Neurocritical Care

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Stewart ◽  
Kyle Hobbs ◽  
Kristopher Dixon ◽  
Roberto Navarrete ◽  
Jannat Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Neurocritical Care ◽  
Family Engagement ◽  
Family Interactions ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Assess Quality ◽  
Strongly Agree

Objective: To investigate concordance in perceptions of communication among participants in family discussions and assess the importance of different domains of communication in a neurocritical care unit. Methods: Prospective observational study conducted in a neurocritical care unit. Our study involved family discussions regarding plan of care for patients admitted to the unit. All participants completed a survey. The first 4 questions rated understanding of the discussion and general satisfaction; the remaining questions were open-ended to assess quality of communication by the physician leading the discussion. Responses were scored and compared among participants using a Likert scale. A difference of < 1 in scores among participants was rated as concordance, while > 2 was designated as discordance. All open-ended responses were classified into six domains. Results: We observed 35 family discussions. Questions 1-3 yielded 99 cross-comparisons per question (total of 297 compared responses). Most responses were either “Strongly Agree” or “Agree”; with “Neutral” or “Disagree” responses being more prevalent in Question 2. Overall concordance of responses between participants was 88%. Education was the most frequently cited domain of communication in response to open-ended questions. Among family and neutral observers, empathy was frequently listed, while providers more often listed family engagement. Conclusion: Overall, satisfaction was high among providers, families, and the observer regarding quality of communication during family discussions in the unit. Perceptual differences emerged over whether this communication impacted healthcare decision-making during that encounter.

scholarly journals Nursing Home Staff’s Perceptions of Healthcare Decision Making for Unbefriended Residents

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 384-384
Author(s):  
Hyejin Kim ◽  
Molly Perkins ◽  
Thaddeus Pope ◽  
Patricia Comer ◽  
Mi-Kyung Song
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Geographic Area ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Facility Level

Abstract ‘Unbefriended’ adults are those who lack decision-making capacity and have no surrogates or advance care plans. Little data exist on nursing homes (NHs)’ healthcare decision-making practices for unbefriended residents. This study aimed to describe NH staff’s perceptions of healthcare decision making on behalf of unbefriended residents. Sixty-six staff including administrators, physicians, nurses, and social workers from three NHs in one geographic area of Georgia, USA participated in a 31-item survey. Their responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis. Of 66 participants, eleven had been involved in healthcare decision-making for unbefriended residents. The most common decision was do-not-resuscitate orders. Decisions primarily were made by relying on the resident’s primary care physician and/or discussing within a facility interdisciplinary team. Key considerations in the decision-making process included “evidence that the resident would not have wanted further treatment” and the perception that “further treatment would not be in the resident’s best interest”. Compared with decision making for residents with surrogates, participants perceived decision making for unbefriended residents to be equally-more difficult. Key barriers to making decisions included uncertainty regarding what the resident would have wanted in the given situation and concerns regarding the ethically and legally right course of action. Facilitators (reported by 52 participants) included some information/knowledge about the resident, an understanding regarding decision-making-related law/policy, and facility-level support. The findings highlight the complexity and difficulty of healthcare decision making for unbefriended residents and suggest more discussions among all key stakeholders to develop practical strategies to support decision-making practices in NHs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document