scholarly journals Frequência cardíaca e volume de treinamento no High-Intensity Interval Resistance Training com diferentes intervalos entre estímulos

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 532-541
Author(s):  
Andressa Fidalgo ◽  
Rui Pilon ◽  
Lenifran Matos-Santos ◽  
Adriano Oliveira ◽  
Rodrigo Baladán ◽  
...  

Introdução: Dentre as variáveis de prescrição do High Intensity Interval Resistance Training (HIRT), destaca-se o intervalo entre estímulos. Uma interessante estratégia de intervalo entre estímulos que ainda não foi investigada na aplicação do HIRT diz respeito ao intervalo autosselecionado (AS). Objetivo: O estudo comparou as respostas da frequência cardíaca (FC) e do volume de treinamento em sessões de HIRT aplicadas com intervalos entre estímulos fixos e AS. Métodos: A amostra foi composta por 12 homens treinados, que foram submetidos a três sessões de HIRT, aplicadas em ordem randomizada, com diferentes intervalos entre estímulos (10 s, 30 s, e AS). Resultados: As respostas de FC não se diferenciaram mediante a aplicação dos diferentes intervalos (P > 0,05), o mesmo não ocorrendo com o volume de treinamento, que foi superior na sessão com intervalo AS (P < 0,05). Conclusão: As respostas de FC nas sessões de HIRT foram similares em todas as estratégias de intervalo entre estímulos investigadas. Devido à eficiência e praticidade, intervalos AS podem ser aplicados para controlar a intensidade do esforço em sessões de HIRT. Todavia, quando o objetivo da sessão recair em um maior volume de treinamento, intervalos de 30 s devem ser aplicados.

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (6) ◽  
pp. 1257-1265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Gentil ◽  
Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira ◽  
Suedi Gonçalves Cardoso Filho ◽  
Cauê Vazquez La Scala Teixeira ◽  
James Steele ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bryant R. Byrd ◽  
Jamie Keith ◽  
Shawn M. Keeling ◽  
Ryan M. Weatherwax ◽  
Paul B. Nolan ◽  
...  

This study sought to determine if personalized moderate-intensity continuous exercise training (MICT) combined with high-intensity interval training (HIIT) was more effective at improving comprehensive training responsiveness than MICT alone. Apparently healthy, but physically inactive men and women (n = 54) were randomized to a non-exercise control group or one of two 13-week exercise training groups: (1) a personalized MICT + HIIT aerobic and resistance training program based on the American Council on Exercise guidelines, or (2) a standardized MICT aerobic and resistance training program designed according to current American College of Sports Medicine guidelines. Mean changes in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and Metabolic (MetS) z-score in the personalized MICT + HIIT group were more favorable (p < 0.05) when compared to both the standardized MICT and control groups. Additionally, on the individual level, there were positive improvements in VO2max (Δ > 4.9%) and MetS z-score (Δ ≤ −0.48) in 100% (16/16) of participants in the personalized MICT + HIIT group. In the present study, a personalized exercise prescription combining MICT + HIIT in conjunction with resistance training elicited greater improvements in VO2max, MetS z-score reductions, and diminished inter-individual variation in VO2max and cardiometabolic training responses when compared to standardized MICT.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1317-1327 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tsitkanou ◽  
K. Spengos ◽  
A-N. Stasinaki ◽  
N. Zaras ◽  
G. Bogdanis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-219
Author(s):  
Seyedeh Fatemeh Tonkaboni ◽  
Neda Khaledi ◽  
Hossein Askari

Background: The most common causes of mortality in diabetic patients are cardiovascular disorders, one of the reasons being inflammatory factors. Given that physical activity can reduce inflammation, the present study was to investigate the effects of two types of Progressive Resistance Training (RT) and High Intensity Interval (HIIT) on the expression of TRAF6 gene and serum levels of TNF-α in male diabetic rats. Methods: In this experimental study, 72 male rats were divided into 6 groups of 12 diabetic rats (n=12), control (n=12), diabetic High Intensity Interval Training (n=12), High Intensity Interval Training(n=12), diabetic Progressive Resistance Training(n=12) and Progressive Resistance Training(n=12). Progressive Resistance Training was performed in a 6-weekly 3-session, climbing the vertical ladder, with 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% the body weight of the animals. After successful completion, 30 gr were added to the weights, to the extent that the rats cannot carry the ladder. High Intensity Interval Training were also performed at 6-weekly 3-session, with an intensity of 50 to 110% of the VO2max. 24 hours after the completion of the training, the functional test was taken and the animals were autopsy 48 hours after the test. Finally, the expression of TRAF6 gene was evaluated using Real Time PCR and serum TNF-α level by ELISA method. Results: TRAF6 levels increased significantly after the two Training in the diabetic group, which was higher in the HIIT group and serum TNF-α levels decreased significantly after both types of training, which was more prominent in the HIIT group. Conclusion: HIIT and RT can play an important role in reducing the inflammatory factor of TNF-α in diabetic patient that HIIT is more effective in this regard. Increasing the gene expression of the mediating agent TRAF6 can be induced in inflammatory pathways, which may require a reduction in exercise intensity or in anti-inflammatory routes indicating a positive effect of training on diabetes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 985-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Álvarez ◽  
Rodrigo Ramírez-Campillo ◽  
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez ◽  
Mikel Izquierdo

Our aim was to investigate the effects and prevalence of nonresponders (NR) to high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and resistance training (RT) in women with insulin resistance on cardiometabolic health parameters. Sedentary overweight/obese insulin-resistant women (age = 33.5 ± 6.5 yr; body mass index = 29.9 ± 3.7 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to a triweekly HIIT program (HIIT; n = 18) or resistance training (RT; n = 17). Anthropometry (body mass, fat mass, muscle mass, waist circumference, and skinfold thickness), cardiovascular (blood pressure), metabolic [fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)], as well as muscle strength, and endurance performance covariables were measured before and after 12 wk in both intervention groups. The interindividual variability to exercise training of the subjects was categorized as responders and NR using as cut points two times the typical error of measurement in mean outcomes. After intervention, significant reduction in waist circumference, skinfold thicknesses, fat mass, blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR ( P < 0.05) were identified to HIIT and RT group, respectively. Both HIIT and RT groups exhibited a significant decrease in the endurance performance, whereas only RT exhibited increased muscle strength. Significant differences in the NR prevalence between the HIIT and RT groups were identified for a decrease in fat mass (HIIT 33.3% vs. RT 70.5%; P = 0.028), muscle mass (HIIT 100% vs. RT 52.9%; P = 0.001), and tricipital skinfold (HIIT 5.5% vs. RT 29.4%; P < 0.041). For diastolic blood pressure, significant differences were observed in the NR prevalence between the HIIT and RT groups (55.5% vs. 94.1; P = 0.009). However, there were no differences in the NR prevalence between HIIT and RT for decreasing fasting glucose. Twelve weeks of HIIT and RT have similar effects and NR prevalence to improve glucose control variables; however, there is different NR prevalence in other anthropometric, cardiovascular, strength, and endurance performance measurements in insulin-resistant women. These findings were displayed with a similar time investment per week of 114 vs. 108 min, respectively, to HIIT and RT. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The effects and prevalence of nonresponders (NR) to improve glucose control variables have predominately been reported by endurance training. A uniqueness of the present study was to examine the NR prevalence in women with insulin resistance after high-intensity interval (HIIT) and resistance training (RT). This study demonstrates that 12 wk of HIIT and RT have similar effects and NR prevalence to improve glucose control variables. However, significantly different NR prevalence were observed in other anthropometric, cardiovascular, strength, and endurance performance measurements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document