scholarly journals The Problematics of the Implementation of the Dominus Litis

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 2986-2993
Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusni
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Slow Process ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Case Files ◽  
Eligibility Standards

Public prosecutors have the authority to control criminal cases, examine the results of investigators' examinations, or filter case files regarding the completeness of requirements and eligibility standards to be delegated to court. This principle is called dominus litis. Etymologically dominus (Latin), which means owner, litis means case or lawsuit. In this context, the public prosecutor as dominus litis is the owner of a criminal case submitted to the court for trial. The problem of applying the dominus litis principle from the perspective of the prosecutor's office raises many problems, which can hinder a simple, fast, and low cost judicial process. The back and forth of criminal case files between public prosecutors and investigators is not a strange thing in this context, the slow process of criminal justice is protracted, tiring, and even unclear, and creates injustice for justice seekers, and so on.

scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Proses Peradilan Dan Pemenuhan Hak Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak ( Menurut UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 )

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-40
Author(s):  
Muhammad Surya Adi Wibowo
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
The Public ◽  
Knowledge Of God ◽  
Criminal Justice Systems ◽  
Legal Adviser ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Judicial Proceedings

  The purpose of this study is to find how the judicial proceedings for violations of the proven to have committed a criminal justice and criminal justice be face to face with the process , and what of sanctions and the protection laws will be provided to hak-hak children according to statute number 11 years 2012 about the criminal justice systems . By using the method of juridical normative , hence writers can conclude: 1 .The judicial process given to children is: trial should be done behind closed doors and decisions are openly to the public , investigators , the public prosecutor , the judge and legal adviser in conducting its function as law enforcement officials by not using dress uniform or bertoga; single presided over by a magistrate a trial, The judge spirit keeps the matter hidden blast of judgment and by the son was of a judge that are specially emphasised in the program of a justice of the woman who man having knowledge of god on the issue on psychiatric; the implementation of the son of due to go on trial the match will be held on the day there is a special levy; in the process of the trial the children must be accompanied by central on the part of parents .Was not allowed to be was covered by the reporters before those who surrender decisions which are carried out by the prosecutor and judges , have to being read the report a social worker who had been given authority and a court of law to scrutinize the conduct and the condition of residents such a child . 2. Protection laws against children s rights had received the very criminal according to a system and criminal justice , as for him who is the son of in the hour of the detention and placed in an institution the deployment of the son of while ( LPKS ) and institutions for the special building the son of ( LPKA ) , the kid for cancer and asked to undergo an incident in which she prior to taking over leadership of nought of the fulfilment of rudimentary living in the treatment of health and human services by the officers , have been able to take education and training as well as coaching and provide assistance , and in conjunction with adequate in accordance with the regulations statute .

scholarly journals PENGUATAN KEWENANGAN PENUNTUT UMUM MELALUI PENGESAMPINGAN PERKARA PIDANA DENGAN ALASAN TERTENTU

LITIGASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 291-313
Author(s):  
RUDI PRADISETIA SUDIRDJA
Keyword(s):  
Due Process ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Due Process Of Law ◽  
Justice Process

The implementation of the principle of opportunity is realized through the authority to overrule criminal cases. In Indonesia, this authority only becomes the authority of the Attorney General, and is limited to reasons of public interest. The public prosecutor is not equipped with the authority to set aside the case for certain reasons, such as the quality of crime is low, the suspect is too old / young, the health condition of the suspect, payment of compensation, and so forth. This article intends to question the practice of law enforcement that occurs due to the limited authority given by the law to public prosecutors and the prospect of regulating the authority of public prosecutors in setting aside criminal cases for certain reasons. Limited authority creates a judicial process that is not in line with the principleof due process of law. Small cases remain tried in court. In addition, the limited authority, raises the paradigm that the current criminal policy tends to prioritize the means of punishment to tackle crime. As a result, the occurrence is overcrowded in correctional institutions. Ius Constituendum has accommodated the authority to set aside cases for certain reasons. The regulation is expected to bring changes to create a criminal justice process in accordance with the principle of due process of law. Public prosecutors are expected to be more tolerant in determining attitudes, to prosecute or not sue someone based on human values and justice. The regulation is intended so that the public prosecutor can really be the controller of handling criminal cases as mandated by the universal principle of dominus litis

scholarly journals Analisis Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Al-Mizan ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-248
Author(s):  
Arhjayati Rahim ◽  
Madinah Mokobombang
Keyword(s):  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Proof System ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right ◽  
Research Show

Evidence in criminal cases is generally borne by the public prosecutor. This is different from the criminal case of corruption, in addition to being proven by the public prosecutor, the defendant also has the right to prove that he did not commit a criminal act of corruption. This study aims to determine the arrangement of the shifting burden of proof system in cases of corruption and the application of the shifting burden of proof system in cases of corruption in Decision Number: 22/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Gto. This type of research is a literature analyzed with a normative juridical approach. The results of the research show that the Decision Number: 22/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Gto, seen from the evidence that in terms of the application of reverse evidence, the defendant exercised his right to carry out shifting burden of proof. However, the defendant did not prove that the property he had obtained was not the result of a criminal act of corruption, even though it was his obligation to prove this, so that the right to shifting burden of proof evidence was not fully utilized by the defendant.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP CALON ADVOKAT YANG SEDANG MAGANG PADA KANTOR HUKUM BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG ADVOKAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1104-1124
Author(s):  
Martin Luter Ndaparoka
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legal Consequences

The subject matter of the study of the effect of the law on the judge's decision to ignore the litis contestatio in the criminal acts of corruption, with the problem of how the legal position of the indictment in the judicial process against a criminal act of corruption and what the legal consequences if the judge's decision on a crime occurred ignore litis contestatio. Approach of concepts and case approach, the following conclusions are obtained: Legal Status The indictment in a criminal case of corruption which is one of the most fundamental principles in the criminal process is the necessity of making an indictment and the judge may only decide on the basis of the facts, less or more. The indictment is viewed as litis contestation. The indictment is the basis for the judge in examining and adjudicating a criminal case and the Judge's Decision on a case involving STA in a criminal act of corruption in Judge Consideration based solely on facts in the hearing does not comply with the provisions of article 182 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, If the provisions of the articles charged by the Public Prosecutor are not legally and convincingly proven, the Judge shall award the decision or the vrijspraak as determined in Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and if not in accordance with Article 197 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code then the verdict will be null and void.

scholarly journals ANAK NAKAL: DIVERSI DAN DILEMA PENERAPANNYA

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Eva Achjani Zulfa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Management Policy ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Discourse Management

AbstrakHandling problems through brat children and children who have problems with the law have occurred again when some kids sticking a gamble being arrested at near Soekarno Hatta Airport areas then processed into the judicial process. Diversion is a form of change the process by which a program can only take place on hold pre-adjudication in the criminal justice system. Forms of transfer or diversion of this case are indeed associated with the authority possessed discretion of law enforcement officers. Giddiness has appeared in the process of implementation of diversion by law enforcement officials, the search for forms of application of the criminal case handlingchild has become a growing discourse management. Policy taken toward the institution of criminal diversion not only becomes demand for law enforcement officers, but also must be institutionalized through plain legal mechanisms. It becomes author's concern to create more certain procedures to brighten solve on deviant children in this way

scholarly journals Optimizing The Role of Immigration Civil Servant Investigator in Treating Criminal Actions of People Smuggling

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-45
Author(s):  
Doniar Andre Vernanda ◽  
Tony Mirwanto
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Servant ◽  
Immigration Law ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Case Files ◽  
National Police

Immigration law enforcement is carried out by civil servant investigators (PPNS) of Immigration by the mandate of Law No. 6 of 2011 on immigration. Immigration civil servant investigators have the authority to carry out the investigation process to hand over case files for subsequent prosecution in court by the public prosecutor. The results and discussion of this research are: (i) People smuggling is a crime where people illegally enter humans without legal and valid immigration travel documents aimed at personal or group gain by entering a country without going through an examination. immigration at the immigration checkpoint (TPI). Criminal sanctions related to human smuggling are regulated in article 120 of the Immigration Law with a maximum threat of 15 years and a fine of Rp. 1,500,000,000.00. (ii) According to the Immigration Law, pro Justitia law enforcement in immigration crimes is carried out by immigration civil servant investigators who have the duties and functions of carrying out investigations & investigations, coordinating with the National Police and other law enforcement agencies as well as carrying out other matters which are ordered by immigration Law

scholarly journals Analysis of the Implementation of Criminal and Administrative Offenses in the Perspective of Immigration Law Number 6 of 2011 (Case Study Djoko Soegiarto Tjandra)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
Bima Yosua A Tarigan ◽  
Faridh Al Wajidi ◽  
K Karina
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Immigration Law ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Administrative Action ◽  
Administrative Sanction

Criminal action is an act that violates the rules and punishable by crime, while the immigration administrative action is an administrative sanction given to foreigners outside the judicial process. One of the cases that have been in the public spotlight is the criminal case of Cessie Bank Balicorruption and bribery related to the deletion of the wanted list (DPO) by Djoko Tjandra. This study uses a qualitative empirical normative legal approach with data collection in the form of library materials which include statutory regulations, books, papers, and other sources. The formulation of the problem discussed in this study is how the application of criminal acts and Immigration Administrative Measures (TAK) in Law Number 6 Of 2011 concerning Immigration which is charged against Djoko Tjandra. The purpose of this research is to find out the criminal acts and administrative immigration actions given to Djoko Tjandra who was an Indonesian fugitive for many years. Based on the data analysis carried out, it was concluded that criminal and administrative actions ensnared Djoko Tjandra and the elements who helped him in accordance with the applicable rules, namely as the provisions written in the Criminal Code, Law Number 20 Of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime, and Law Number 6 Of 2011 concerning Immigration.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Anak Yang Terjerat Perkara Pidana Melalui Diversi (Studi Di Polrestabes Medan)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
Akalafikta Jaya ◽  
Triono Eddy ◽  
Alpi Sahari
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Criminal Convictions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
The Law

In the past, the punishment of children was the same as the punishment of adults. This causes the psychological condition of children ranging from investigation, investigation and trial to be disturbed because it is often intimidated by law enforcement agencies. Under these conditions, Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System was born. One of the reforms in the Child Criminal Justice System Law requires the settlement of a child criminal case by diversion. Based on the results of research that the conception of criminal offenses against children in conflict with the law in Indonesia is different from criminal convictions to adults. Children are given the lightest possible punishment and half of the criminal convictions of adult criminal offenses. That criminal liability for children who are ensnared in a criminal case according to the Law on the Criminal Justice System for Children is still carried out but with different legal sanctions from adults. Criminal imprisonment against children is an ultimumremedium effort, meaning that criminal imprisonment against children is the last legal remedy after there are no other legal remedies that benefit the child. That the concept of enforcement of criminal law against children caught in criminal cases through diversion is in fact not all have applied it. Some criminal cases involving children as the culprit, in court proceedings there are still judges who impose prison sentences on children who are dealing with the law.

“Visible” and “Invisible” Victims in the Criminal Justice System

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Armando Saponaro
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Common Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Law System ◽  
The Public ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Victim Impact Statement

This chapter outlines the “conflict” and “peace-keeping” victim-oriented justice paradigms. The latter empowers the victims of crime, putting them at the center of an encounter and using interindividual mediation or collective circles to address conflict resolution. Two models are critically discussed in the conflict victim-oriented justice paradigm. The European continental “visible victim” model structures the role of the victim as a full-fledged processual party together with the public prosecutor and offender. In this model, the victim has the same rights and powers of the defendant. The “invisible victim” common law model views the victim as a trial witness, participating, for example, through a victim impact statement (in the United States) or victim personal statement (in the United Kingdom) at the sentencing stage. The visible victim conflict paradigm model enhances a victim's role and involvement in the criminal justice system, offering a solution to existing controversial and critical common law system issues.

scholarly journals AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS (VRIJSPRAAK) BAGI WARGA NEGARA ASING (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Nyoman Sri Candra Purnami
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
District Court ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Immigration ◽  
Legal Consequences

The high flow of globalization and the easiness of obtaining visas for foreign citizens can increase the income of a country engaged in tourism. This phenomenon does not always have a positive impact for the country of Indonesia because many foreigners were found residing in the territory of Indonesia without having a valid and legal immigration stay permit. Many of these foreign citizens were convicted legal cases in Indonesia, it is therefore necessary to study the legal consequences of the free judgment for the foreign citizens. This study was conducted to examine the legal basis for the imposition of free judgment against foreign citizens and the implementation of the Denpasar District Court Decision Number 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS on the free judgment against a foreign citizen. This study is an empirical juridical study that examines the legal consequences caused after the abolition of free judgment on foreigner (Case study of Denpasar District Court No. 748/ Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN DPS). Based on the result of this study, was found that according to Law Number 8 Year 1981 regarding Criminal Procedure Law and law of the republic of Indonesia Number 6 Year 2011 on Immigration, foreigners who live in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia who do not have a valid and legal immigration stay permit can be given immigration administrative action in the form of detention. Whereas foreign citizens who are secured and still hold immigration stay permit until the completion of the judicial process and  given free judgment, the foreigners may remain in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia until the validity period of their stay permit expires. Meanwhile, for foreign citizens who have been subjected to free judgment and still hold immigration permit, the Public Prosecutor may request the Immigration Civil Service Investigator to perform the act of detention to those foreign citizens. Tingginya arus globalisasi dan kemudahan memperoleh visa bagi warga negara asing dapat meningkatkan pendapatan suatu negara yang bergerak dalam bidang kepariwisataan. Fenomena ini tidak selalu berdampak positif bagi negara Indonesia karena banyak ditemukan orang asing yang berada di wilayah Indonesia tidak memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian yang sah dan masih berlaku. Banyak  diantara warga negara asing tersebut tersandung kasus hukum di Negara Indonesia, sehingga perlu dikaji akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan atas Putusan Bebas bagi warga negara asing tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji dasar hukum penjatuhan putusan bebas terhadap warga negara asing dan pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS atas putusan bebas terhadap seorang warganegara asing. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris yang mengkaji akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan setelah dijatuhkannya Putusan Bebas terhadap orang asing (Studi kasus terhadap Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 748/Pid.Sus/2016/PN DPS). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 Tentang Keimigrasian, orang asing yang tinggal di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia yang tidak memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian yang sah dan berlaku dapat dilakukan Tindakan Administratif Keimigrasian berupa pendetensian.  Sedangkan warga negara asing yang saat diamankan dan hingga proses peradilan selesai masih memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian dan dijatuhi putusan bebas, maka orang asing tersebut dapat tetap tinggal di wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia hingga masa berlaku izin tinggalnya habis. Sementara bagi orang warga negara asing yang telah dijatuhi putusan bebas dan masih memiliki izin tinggal keimigrasian namun oleh Penuntut Umum dilakukan upaya hukum kasasi, Penuntut Umum dapat meminta kepada Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil Keimigrasian untuk melakukan tindakan pendetensian atas warga negara asing tersebut.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document