scholarly journals Ovicidal and repellent effects of some spice powders against the Callosobruchus chinensis L. and C. maculatus (F.)

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59
Author(s):  
Shah HA Mahdi
Keyword(s):  
Black Pepper ◽  
Red Pepper ◽  
Callosobruchus Chinensis ◽  
Black Gram ◽  
Ovicidal Activity ◽  
Black Cumin ◽  
Pulse Beetle ◽  
Green Cardamom ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Large Cardamom

The ovicidal and repellent effects of 11 spice powders against the pulse beetle Callosobruchus chinensis L. and C. maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on stored chickpea and black gram, respectively was investigated. The spice powders of black cumin, black pepper, cinnamon, clove, coriander, cumin, green cardamom, large cardamom, nutmeg, red pepper and Trigonella were used throughout the experiment. The data were recorded on oviposition after 30, 60 and 100 days and repellent activity after 1 to 5 hours of treatment doses of 25 and 37.5 mg/g spice powders, which were applied with chickpea and black gram seed on C. chinensis L. and C. maculatus (F.), respectively. Minimum number of oviposition was observed in black pepper, clove and cinnamon treated pulses, while maximum number was recorded in control treatments. The ovicidal activity of the spice powders was in the order of black pepper > clove > cinnamon > nutmeg > black cumin > cumin > green cardamom > red pepper > coriander > large cardamom > Trigonella> as control for C. chinensis L. and black pepper> clove> cinnamon> nutmeg> black cumin> cumin> green cardamom> red pepper> coriander> Trigonella> large cardamom> as control for C. maculatus (F.). Black peeper, clove, cinnamon and nutmeg showed repellant activity against adult C. chinensis L., and black peeper, clove and cinnamon showed repellant activity against adult C. maculatus (F.) while the others spices did not show any repellency.Bangladesh J. Zool. 44(1): 51-59, 2016

scholarly journals Bio efficacy of Eruca sativa oil against Callosobruchus chinensis on chickpea

2020 ◽  
pp. 193-199
Keyword(s):  
Choice Experiment ◽  
Residual Effect ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Callosobruchus Chinensis ◽  
Eruca Sativa ◽  
Synthetic Chemicals ◽  
Pulse Beetle ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
To Come ◽  
Mammalian Toxicity

Pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. responsible for destroying qualitative and quantitative losses to most stored grains. Once the damage done by the beetle, the grains lose their nutritional and germination capacity and become unfit for either consumption. Seed treatment still mainly relies on heavy synthetic chemicals which cause residual effect and threaten public health. However, the natural plant products containing insecticidal activity have recently displayed a great scope as they tend to come up with low mammalian toxicity, less effect on environmental and broad public adoption. Therefore, an experiment was conducted with variable doses of Eruca sativa L. seed oil (0.5 ml, 1 ml, and 1.5 ml) against C. chinensis. The data were recorded for corrected mortality, repellent effects, and seed protectant at different intervals (24, 48, 72 hrs and 1 week). We found the higher corrected mortality (32.65%) at 1.5ml after 24 hrs. Later, the mortality percentage decreased at different intervals but remained higher at maximum dose of E. sativa. However, the overall highest mortality of C. chinensis was 50.00% at 1.5 ml and the lowest 41.00% at 0.5 ml. Meanwhile, the index showed repellent effect with R.I value <1 in all treatments at different intervals. The seed protectant data showed that the minimum number of 1.66±0.33 eggs laid on treated seeds at 1.5 ml and 8.00±1.15 eggs on untreated seeds in choice experiment. In total, maximum number of 17.33±4.93 eggs laid at 0.5 ml in choice experiment and minimum 4.83±1.51 eggs at 1.5 ml. However, in no choice experiment, the maximum number of 51.00±4.58 eggs on control treatment and minimum 0.33±0.33 eggs on 1.5 ml were laid by pulse beetle. The most effective dose of 1.5ml caused maximum mortality, repellent and seed protectant.

scholarly journals Insecticidal effect of some spices on Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) in black gram seeds

1970 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 47-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shah Hussain Ahmad Mahdi ◽  
Md Khaladur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Callosobruchus Maculatus ◽  
Nigella Sativa ◽  
Curcuma Longa ◽  
Black Pepper ◽  
Piper Nigrum ◽  
Syzygium Aromaticum ◽  
Black Gram ◽  
Black Cumin ◽  
Insecticidal Effect ◽  
Extent Of Damage

The experiment was conducted to investigate the insecticidal potency of some spices eg. clove (Syzygium aromaticum), black pepper (Piper nigrum), ceylon cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), black cardamom (Amomum subulatum), nutmeg (Myristica fragnans), black cumin (Nigella sativa), turmeric (Curcuma longa), red pepper (Capsicum frutescens), cumin (Cuminum cyminum), green cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) and bay leaf (Cinnamomum tamala), against the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) on stored black gram (Phaseolus bengalensis L.). Data were recorded on days to 100% mortality; number of adults emerged and weight loss (%) of black gram. All the spices were effective as protectants of black gram seeds. However, clove and black pepper were most effective. Key words: Callosobruchus maculatus, stored black gram, mortality, adult emerge, extent of damage. doi:10.3329/ujzru.v27i0.1953 Univ. j. zool. Rajshahi Univ. Vol. 27, 2008 pp. 47-50

Effect of chemical seed protectants on quality parameters of red gram seed against. pulse beetle Callosobruchus chinensis L under ambient storage

ENTOMON ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
Manish Kumar Yadav ◽  
R.B. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Ambient Condition ◽  
Callosobruchus Chinensis ◽  
Emamectin Benzoate ◽  
Ambient Storage ◽  
Pulse Beetle ◽  
Vigour Index

Among the insecticides tested as seed protectants against Callosobruchus chinensis under ambient condition for a period of nine months revealed that all seed protectants were significantly effective. Maximum germination was observed (86.67%) when seed treated with novaluron 10 EC @0.05ml/kg followed by emamectin benzoate 5 SG@40mg/kg (85.67 per cent). The vigour index was maximum in emamectin benzoate (1913.87) followed by novaluron.

Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium in black pepper and red pepper by gamma irradiation

2014 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 125-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-Jae Song ◽  
Hye-Jung Sung ◽  
Sung-Youn Kim ◽  
Kwang-Pyo Kim ◽  
Sangryeol Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Salmonella Typhimurium ◽  
Gamma Irradiation ◽  
Black Pepper ◽  
Red Pepper ◽  
Escherichia Coli O157

scholarly journals Potential  of Cold Plasma to Control Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Chickpea Cultivars during Four Year Storage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Pathan ◽  
R. Deshmukh ◽  
U. Annapure
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Treatment ◽  
Cold Plasma ◽  
Storage Period ◽  
Food Preservation ◽  
Callosobruchus Chinensis ◽  
Storage Study ◽  
Spoilage Bacteria ◽  
Pulse Beetle ◽  
Synthetic Pesticides ◽  
Chickpea Cultivars

Abstract Cold plasma has proven itself as a promising method of food preservation by controlling food spoilage bacteria at very low temperatures. It is showing potential for insect control. Synthetic pesticides are mostly used to control Callosobruchus chinensis to which it has developed resistance. The prospective potential of cold plasma treatment to control pulse beetle infestation of chickpea in the storage for about 4 years of plasma treatment was studied. The four chickpea cultivars were treated with cold plasma at different power 40, 50, and 60 W each for 10, 15, 20 min. Plasma treated and untreated chickpeas were stored in an airtight ziplock pouch. At regular intervals, the grains were observed for infestation. It was found most effective in controlling the pulse beetle infestation of treated chickpea samples. While plasma untreated chickpeas were attacked and damaged mostly by pulse beetle within the first quarter of the storage study. To avoid the problems created by the use of pesticides cold plasma treatment is found to be the best alternative in the protection of chickpea invasion by pulse beetle during a longer storage period. The findings in the present research may be used for the preparation of legumes which may also soak and cook faster like quick-cooking legumes and preserved for years without invasion of pulse beetle.

Screening and selection of accessions in the genus Pisum L. for resistance to pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)

Euphytica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 215 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Azime Esen ◽  
Hatice Sari ◽  
Fedai Erler ◽  
Alper Adak ◽  
Duygu Sari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Callosobruchus Chinensis ◽  
Pulse Beetle ◽  
Selection Of

scholarly journals The Direct Toxicity Effect of Some Indigenous Plant Extracts Against Pulse Beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis)

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-67
Author(s):  
MT Ahmed ◽  
M Begum ◽  
MW Zaman
Keyword(s):  
Plant Extracts ◽  
Leaf Extract ◽  
Callosobruchus Chinensis ◽  
Indigenous Plants ◽  
Plant Parts ◽  
Toxicity Effect ◽  
Randomized Design ◽  
Pulse Beetle ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Direct Toxicity

Experiments were conducted in the laboratory of the Division of Entomology, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh to evaluate the efficacy of four indigenous plants parts such as leaves of raintree (Albizia saman), riot lata (Mikania micrantha), pithraj (Aphanamixis polystachya) and seeds of mahogani (Swietenia macrophylla) with methanol extracts at the rates of 10.0, 7.5, 5.0 and 2.5% for their direct toxicity against the pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). The experiments were set up following Completely Randomized Design (CRD). The results showed that extracts of all the plant parts had very close efficacy in relation to direct toxicity effect and grain protection values. Pithraj leaf extract showed the highest mortality (96.66%) action and raintree leaf extract showed the lowest (80.33%) with 10% extract at 5 DAT. The effectiveness of all the plant extracts were found to increase with the increase of doses and decreased proportionatelly with the increase of timeDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v7i2.22206 J. Environ. Sci. & Natural Resources, 7(2): 65-67 2014

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document