scholarly journals One-Year Experience Managing a Cancer Survivorship Clinic Using a Shared-Care Model for Gastric Cancer Survivors in Korea

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Eun Lee ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Hyejin Lee ◽  
Ki Young Son ◽  
Warrick Junsuk Kim ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Jo Rajotte ◽  
Leslie Heron ◽  
Karen Leslie Syrjala ◽  
Kevin Scott Baker

22 Background: Survivors of adult cancer face lifetime health risks that are dependent on their cancer, cancer treatment exposures, comorbid health conditions, and lifestyle behaviors. A shared care model, including planned and formal transition of the cancer survivor from the oncologist to the primary care physician needs to be established to ensure appropriate care. Methods: As a LIVESTRONG Survivorship Center of Excellence Network member, the Survivorship Program at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has established an outpatient clinic at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance to meet the clinical needs of cancer survivors. Before their survivorship-focused clinic appointment, adult cancer survivors are asked to complete a comprehensive survey that includes questions on health care utilization. Results: Between August 2013 to December 2014, 142 clinic patients completed the survey. They were 70.4% female, mean age 48 years (SD 16.3, range 22-83) and 21.1% breast cancer, 30.2% leukemia/lymphoma, and 17.6% reproductive cancer survivors. Patients were a mean of 7.8 years (SD 9.5, range 0-43) from their cancer diagnosis at the time of clinic appointment. 70.4% reported receiving oncology care and 87.3% primary care within the 12 months before their survivorship visit. Forty percent reported more than 12 clinic visits in the past year in which they saw a physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant compared with 6.5 clinic visits in the general population based on CDC, National Health Care Survey reference data. 41.5% had one or more visits to a hospital emergency or urgent care facility within the last year, compared with 39.4% in the CDC NHCS survey. Conclusions: Cancer survivors seen in a Survivorship Clinic utilize healthcare at a much higher rate than the general population. A shared-care model for cancer survivors, including a delineation of roles and specific points of communication, between the oncologist and the primary care physician may help address issues surrounding over-utilization. A cancer treatment summary and a survivorship care plan may be valuable tools to facilitate this shared care approach.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline J Loonen ◽  
Nicole MA Blijlevens ◽  
Judith Prins ◽  
Desiree JS Dona ◽  
Jaap Den Hartogh ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziza Shad ◽  
Scott N. Myers ◽  
Karen Hennessy

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy L. Bazzell ◽  
Amy Spurlock ◽  
Marilyn McBride

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. e22-e22
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Young ◽  
Rachel Goldfarb ◽  
Laurie Green ◽  
Kathleen Hollamby ◽  
Karen Weyman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background At our inner city hospital, we developed a shared care model between family health teams (FHTs), pediatricians and developmental pediatricians to care for children with mental health and developmental disorders. In phase one of our study, 84 FHT members participated in focus groups to inform the development of our clinic. Family physicians described their role as “referral agent”, “long term supporter” and “healthcare coordinator”. They expressed the desire to “learn” and “do more”, but noted barriers to providing care, including limited training, lack of service knowledge, limited communication, and cumbersome access to mental health and dual diagnosis services. Phase One was completed and accepted for publication. Phase Two describes the implementation of our clinic using a mixed methods approach and report preliminary findings. Objectives To evaluate the first two years of implementation of the developmental clinic housed within a family health team (FHT) an obtain feedback from members of the shared care model. Design/Methods Mixed methods were used including chart review of all patients referred to the clinic and semi structured interviews with primary care physicians, pediatricians and developmental pediatricians regarding their roles in managing children with developmental and mental health disorders, as well as use and impact of the developmental clinic. Results A total of 115 charts were reviewed between Feb 2016 and Jan 2018. Of all patients seen, 34% were female 64% male and 2% transgender. Ages ranged from 1-17 years. Eighty-one percent had an existing diagnosis and were referred for re-assessment while 43% received a new diagnosis: ASD (72%), ADHD (11%), GDD (11%), learning disorder (3%), Anxiety (1%), Other (1%). There was an 8% no show rate. Providers endorsed improved communication through use of a shared EMR for documentation and messaging, and improved service knowledge through availability of a pediatric service navigator who also used EMR to document service and funding applications. Longer term follow up, namely the roles and responsibilities of pediatrics vs. developmental pediatrics vs. primary care remained unclear. Conclusion Implementation of the shared care model for this population with primary care is feasible, and does address some stated barriers to care, including improved communication, increased service knowledge, and provision of reassessments. Further areas to develop include clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the different healthcare providers of children with mental health and developmental disorders, and determining what is needed for long-term follow up and transitional care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. S13
Author(s):  
A. Thumallapalli ◽  
Uzra Umme ◽  
A.R. Arun Kumar ◽  
M. Padma ◽  
L. Appaji ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Sumin Jeong ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Ji Eun Lee

121 Background: Gastrectomy is a risk factor for low bone mass. We aimed to investigate the relative risk for osteoporosis in gastric cancer survivorship compared to general population. Methods: Using Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES III-IV), 2008-2011, we identified the 8,156 individuals over 50 years old who have been tested the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Gastric cancer survivors (n = 103) who had a history of gastric cancer in questionnaire were defined as case. Control subjects were matched to case subjects by age (plus or minus 1 year) and sex with 1:5 ratio. Osteopenia ( -2.5 < T-score < -1.0 ) and osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5) were used to define the status of bone mass. We performed multinominal logistic regression to compare the risk for osteopenia and osteoporosis between case and control. Results: After adjusting for sex, age, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity and bone health related history (history of fracture or family history of osteoporosis), there was a significant high risk for osteopenia (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 2.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16–7.25) and osteoporosis (adjusted RR = 4.63; 95% CI 1.12–13.3) in gastric cancer survivor. The risk for osteoporosis was most prominent for femur total in gastric cancer survivors (adjusted RR = 16.3; 95% CI 3.35–82.6). In addition, the serum Vitamin D level was lower in gastric cancer survivors (20.3 ± 0.5 IU vs 17.5 ± 1.2 IU, p-value = 0.011). Conclusions: Gastric cancer survivors showed significantly high risk for osteoporosis. Our finding clinically implies the importance of managing osteoporosis in gastric cancer survivors.[Table: see text]


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P577-P577
Author(s):  
Mei Sian Chong ◽  
Colin Tan ◽  
Cindy Yeo ◽  
Kang Yih Low ◽  
Philomena Anthony ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document