scholarly journals On the issue of early parole from serving a sentence in the Kyrgyz Republic

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-181
Author(s):  
Kunduz Zhetigenova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Kyrgyz Republic ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Life Imprisonment ◽  
Full Compensation ◽  
The Law ◽  
First Time ◽  
State Body

The article is devoted to the grounds and conditions for parole from serving a criminal sentence. The article considers the legislative and law enforcement problems that arise when applying the rules governing the procedure for evaluating the behavior of a convicted person during the period of serving a sentence. On January 1, 2019, the new legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic of the criminal law block came into force, which significantly changed the procedure for parole from criminal punishment. At present, it is only possible in relation to persons sentenced to punishments related to isolation from society. In addition, the provision on parole application in relation to additional punishment is excluded from the criminal law. However, the new law eased the situation of a convict for damages compensation, extended the circle of persons entitled to apply for considering the case on parole (abolished in accordance with the rules of parole was possible only after full compensation of the material damage caused by the crime). The legislator also reduced the number of circumstances prohibiting the use of parole from serving a sentence, and showed humanity in relation to certain categories of convicts (the norm on the application of p from serving a sentence in relation to persons sentenced to life imprisonment). The issue of creating a specialized authorized state body that carries out the execution of criminal penalties that are not related to isolation from society, compulsory measures of criminal legal influence, supervision of persons released on parole from correctional institutions, with the performance of social and legal functions of the probation body, was resolved. However, despite all the positive changes, the study allowed the author to conclude that there are actual problems of legal regulation and practical application of the provisions on the conditions and grounds for parole. In particular, the law does not reflect who exactly should act as a person who compensates for damages. In practice, there are often cases when the convicted person did not work, and the damage was paid by relatives. At the same time, the court has no grounds for refusing to apply for parole. In such circumstances, it is doubtful that the goals of the convicted person’s correction have been achieved. In addition, currently the law stipulates the same rules for the application of parole for persons who have committed crimes for the first time, as well as for persons convicted for a set of crimes and a set of sentences.

Objectively-wrong behavior of condemned as a legal fact and features of its reflection in criminal executive legislation

2020 ◽  
pp. 71-82
Author(s):  
Егор Евгеньевич Новиков
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Good Reason ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Material Damage ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Illegal Behavior ◽  
Detention Centers ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Fact

В статье рассматривается объективно-противоправное поведение осужденных как юридический факт. Выделяются две группы объективно-противоправного поведения. К первой следует отнести объективно-противоправные деяния, которые содержатся в уголовно-исполнительном праве, но правоотношения, на которые они влияют, находятся за рамками предмета уголовно-исполнительного правового регулирования (например, невиновное причинение осужденным материального ущерба исправительному центру, ч. 2 ст. 60 УИК РФ). Ко второй группе данных юридических фактов можно отнести объективно-противоправные деяния, которые являются таковыми в связи с наличием уважительной причины, которая помешала осужденному выполнить требования, определенные законом. В статье выделяются признаки рассматриваемых юридических фактов. При написании статьи автор работы сформулировал правило, которое необходимо соблюдать при закреплении указанных юридических фактов в уголовно-исполнительном праве: «При закреплении в законе юридического факта, фиксирующего совершение участником уголовно-исполнительных правоотношений правонарушения, законодатель должен указать обстоятельство, когда деяние, нарушающее норму, будет являться объективно-противоправным». Ряд выводов, а также предложений, направленных на развитие уголовно-исполнительного законодательства, были подкреплены результатами опроса 24 начальников ИУ и СИЗО, 102 сотрудников УИИ. The article examines the objectively illegal behavior of convicts as legal facts. The author of the work distinguishes two groups of objectively illegal behavior. The first should include objectively wrongful acts, which are contained in the criminal-executive law, but the legal relations that they affect are outside the scope of the criminal-executive legal regulation (for example, the innocent infliction of material damage on a correctional center by a convict (part 2 of Art. 60.20 of the Criminal Executive Code of Russia)). The second group of these legal facts includes objectively wrongful acts, which are such in connection with the presence of a good reason that prevented the convict from fulfilling the requirements established by law. The article highlights the signs of the considered legal facts. When writing an article, the author of the work formulated the rule (conclusions) that must be observed when securing these legal facts in criminal law: «when a legal fact is fixed in the law that fixes a participant in criminal-executive legal relations committed an offense, the legislator must indicate the circumstance when an act that violates the norm may be objectively wrongful». A number of conclusions, as well as proposals aimed at the development of criminal executive law, were supported by the results of a survey of 24 heads of correctional institutions and pre-trial detention centers, 102 employees of criminal-executive inspections.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM DALAM RANGKA MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS LAGU RAKYAT “TILLO-TILLO DAN ALATIPANG”

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yovan Iristian
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Collective Property ◽  
The Law ◽  
First Time ◽  
Protection Period

ABSTRACTThe policy to determine the copyright holder on the song unknown its creator according to the Copyright Acts in Indonesia is performed by the State, in which the State holds that copyright consistently based on article 11 paragraph (3) of the Acts Number 19 of 2002 about copyright. The copyright is held by the State and to be the collective property. The protection period is without period of time or unlimited, in which the state is holding the copyright consistently. In Indonesia, the period of time for copyright protection generally is along the life of its creator plus 50 years or 50 years after for the first time it notified or published. This case conducted recalled the developments in trade, industry, and investment fields already such rapid, until need the protection increase for the Creator and Owner of the Related Right by keep pay attention to the vast society interest. The efforts reached for the law enforcement to the infringement to copyright on the song whose creator is unknown is by performing law enforcement based on the Acts Number 19 of 2002 about the copyright in Indonesia. In Chapter XII it is arranged that, the law enforcement on copyright is performed by the copyright holder in the civil law, but there is also the criminal law side.Key Words: Creator, Song Copyright

Legal Devices, Law Enforcement, Facilities and Infrastructure

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Lasmi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Litigation ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law And Justice

Abstract The importance of law enforcement agencies or the judiciary that can help enforce the law to resolve the problems its faces. Therefore, the main task of the court is to maintain the law, both in the form of criminal law and civil law. In the case of civil procedural law, it is a legal regulation that regulates how a person processes civil litigation in front of a court session and how the court processes in accepting, examining, adjudicating and deciding cases and how the process of implementation is in order to maintain the existence of material civil law. Generally, in the enforcement of law and justice, there are several elements, namely: elements of law enforcement, elements of justice seekers, elements of legal instruments (legal / regulatory material), and elements of infrastructure all of which become an integrated unit. The four elements have the same opportunity to be a support and obstacle in the implementation of law enforcement and justice in the field of Shari'ah economy

scholarly journals ON THE ISSUE OF THE BLANKET METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING CRIMINAL LAW PROHIBITIONS (BASED ON PROVISIONS OF SECTION VII OF THE SPECIAL PART OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE)

Legal Ukraine ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 20-27
Author(s):  
Dmytro Kamensky
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Economic Crime ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Special Part ◽  
Regulatory Law ◽  
The Law

The article examines the blanket method for describing dispositions of criminal law prohibitions, in particular, the norms of Section VII of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It has been established that when using blanket dispositions, the content of a criminal act is determined both by the law on criminal liability and by the norms of other branches of law; at the same time, such dispositions do not replace criminal law provisions, while performing in such cases auxiliary, clarifying function. It is determined that the blanket way of describing economic articles of criminal legislation is due to the special meaning of a criminal prohibition, which protects the economy as a regulator of relations by non-criminal legal acts. In the norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine on economic crimes considered in the article, the domestic legislator pragmatically concretized the semantic links between the norm of the criminal and special regulatory law, which should be taken positively. It was established that in this way, firstly, the limits of the volume of unlawful behavior are clearly established, beyond which the representatives of law enforcement practice are strictly prohibited from going out during the criminal-legal assessment of the deed. At the same time, here, to a certain extent, the work of the law enforcement officer is facilitated, since normative acts of a non-criminal direction have been concretized, which should be relied upon in the investigation and further judicial proceedings. Secondly, such a normatively specific approach to the construction of criminal law prohibitions obviously contributes to the unification and simplification of approaches to socially dangerous acts in the economic sphere. It shows that the state does not need numerous laws and regulations, which are textually, chronologically and legally distorted. It has been established defined that the reform of the object and system of norms on crimes against the order of economic activity should have as its main task the careful development of specific criminal law norms in order to create the cross-sectoral mechanism of legal regulation. Key words: blanket disposition, economic crime, legal act, disposition, regulatory law.

scholarly journals Criminalization of drunk driving: problems of legislative practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
K. Popov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Drunk Driving ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Parliamentary Committee ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Legislative Activity ◽  
External Consistency ◽  
The Law

The article highlights the Ukrainian experience of criminalization of drunk driving as a result of amendments to criminal and administrative legislation in 2018–2021. The importance of systematization and validity in making changes to administrative and criminal law is noted. Attention is drawn to the need for careful observance of the rules of legal technique in legislative activity, given that the use of administrative and criminal law is associated with the most significant restrictions on human rights and freedoms. It is noted that there are violations of the rules of legal technique, allowed in the relevant laws in terms of the provisions on criminalization and decriminalization of drunk driving: violations of the homogeneity of legal regulation (Law № 720-IX regulated an issue that was not the subject of its regulation); internal consistency (Law № 720-IX on amendments “in connection with the adoption of Law № 2617-VIII” amended the Law itself № 2617-VIII); external consistency (provisions of Law № 720-IX contradict the provisions of Article 2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses and Article 3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine); linguistic (in paragraph 117 of the Law № 720-IX there is a morphological error); procedural (violated the requirements of Articles 90, 92 of the Regulations). Attention is drawn to the content of the conclusions and the legal significance of the explanations of the Parliamentary Committee on Law Enforcement, adopted on the criminalization of drunk driving. It is noted that the relevant committee violated the regulatory procedures and provisions of the legislation on parliamentary committees. The consequences of the relevant technical and legal violations (legislative uncertainty) are highlighted and ways to eliminate these problems are suggested.

Law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on tax disputes

2021 ◽  
pp. 550-563
Author(s):  
Alexandr V. Izmalkov ◽  
Alexander A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Pavel A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Ella Y. Kuzmenko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Effect Relationship ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Qualitative Characteristics ◽  
State Body

We analyze the law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on taxes and fees, since the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is a rather controversial regulatory legal act. Tax disputes arise both at the initiative of tax authorities and at the initiative of taxpayers. Purpose: to determine the main directions of law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes. We use general scientific and specially legal methods as research methods. The focus is on the method of analysis. In the course of the research, we analyze the con-sideration of cases by judicial authorities on tax disputes, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics. We conclude that the emergence of disagree-ments between taxpayers and the state body when resolving the issue of the legality of their actions (inaction), as well as the legality of a non-normative legal act is the main reason for the formation of law enforcement practice in tax disputes. During the passage of all stages of the application of the law, it is also necessary to establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the actions of the taxpayer and the resulting consequences. The main points of this process go through several stages. We define the main directions of the law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY I N THE LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK OF THE MECHANISM OF LEGAL REGULATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 101-114
Author(s):  
И.А. Кузьмин
Keyword(s):  
Theoretical Model ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
The Law ◽  
Problematic Situations

В статье приводятся промежуточные результаты исследования вопросов реализации юридической ответственности. Сформулированы подходы к пониманию механизма правового регулирования и его содержания. Установлены закономерности взаимодействий между правовыми средствами в процессе реализации юридической ответственности. Предложена общетеоретическая модель реализации юридической ответственности в правоохранительном блоке механизма правового регулирования. Проанализированы проблемные ситуации, при которых нарушаются принципы юридической ответственности и разрушаются системные связи между правовыми средствами. Annotation: The article presents the interim results of research on the realization of legal liability. Approaches to understanding the mechanism of legal regulation and its content are formulated. The patterns of interactions between legal remedies in the process of realization legal liability have been established. A general theoretical model of the realization of legal liability in the law enforcement block of the mechanism of legal regulation is proposed. The author analyzed problematic situations in which the principles of legal liability are violated, and the cases in which the systemic connections between legal remedies are destroyed.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL DELINQUENCY – CYBERSTALKING: CHARACTERISTICS OF OBJECT AND OBJECTIVE SIDE

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (83) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Uldis Ķinis
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Written Text ◽  
Legitimate Interest ◽  
International Regulations ◽  
Actus Reus ◽  
The Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
First Time

On January 2018 significant amendments to the Criminal Law and the Law On the Procedure for Application of the Criminal Law came into force in Latvia. These changes not only in the first time introduce the criminal responsibility for the emotional violence, but also determine the procedure for assessing emotional disparity, equating the effects to telepathic injuries.In the article, the author reviews a modality of crime “persecution” - cyber-persecution. Although the legislator in the annotation of the law provides that the article also shall be applicable to acts committed in cyberspace, at the same time, the author indicates some problems that may arise due to the narrow interpretation of the law by the law enforcement. The purpose of the article is to study the object (protected legitimate interest) and the objective side (actus reus) of the offense - cyber-stalking. For purposes of research, several methods have been used. The method of comparative analysis, for examination and comparison of external and international regulations. Methods of legal interpretation used to disclose the differences between the understanding of the written text of the definition of the crime and what ought to be understood in the meaning of the norm. Finally, the author presents the conclusions and proposals on the application of the norm.

scholarly journals The History of the Development of the French Laws on Criminal Liability of Legal Entities

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 46-56
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Fedorov ◽  
◽  
Mikhail V. Krichevtsev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Economic Crime ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Entities

The article reviews the history of development of French laws on criminal liability of legal entities. The authors note that the institution of criminal liability of legal entities (collective criminal liability) dates back to the ancient times and has been forming in the French territory for a long time. Initially, it was established in the acts on collective liability residents of certain territories, in particular, in the laws of the Salian Franks. This institution was inherited from the Franks by the law of the medieval France, and got transferred from the medieval period to the French criminal law of the modern period. The article reviews the laws of King Louis XIV as an example of establishment of collective criminal liability: the Criminal Ordinance of 1670 and the Ordinances on Combating Vagrancy and Goods Smuggling of 1706 and 1711. For the first time ever, one can study the Russian translation of the collective criminal liability provisions of the said laws. The authors state that although the legal traditions of collective liability establishment were interrupted by the transformations caused by the French Revolution of 1789 to 1794, criminal liability of legal entities remained in Article 428 of the French Penal Code of 1810 as a remnant of the past and was abolished only as late as in 1957. The publication draws attention to the fact that the criminal law codification process was not finished in France, and some laws stipulating criminal liability of legal entities were in effect in addition to the French Penal Code of 1810: the Law on the Separation of Church and State of December 9, 1905; the Law of January 14, 1933; the Law on Maritime Trade of July 19, 1934; the Ordinance on Criminal Prosecution of the Press Institutions Cooperating with Enemies during World War II of May 5, 1945. The authors describe the role of the Nuremberg Trials and the documents of the Council of Europe in the establishment of the French laws on criminal liability of legal entities, in particular, Resolution (77) 28 On the Contribution of Criminal Law to the Protection of the Environment, Recommendation No. R (81) 12 On Economic Crime, the Recommendation No. R (82) 15 On the Role of Criminal Law in Consumer Protection and Recommendation No. (88) 18 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning Liability of Enterprises Having Legal Personality for Offences Committed in the Exercise of Their Activities. The authors conclude that the introduction of the institution of criminal liability of legal entities is based on objective conditions and that research of the history of establishment of the laws on collective liability is of great importance for understanding of the modern legal regulation of the issues of criminal liability of legal entities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document